16:32:53 RRSAgent has joined #aria 16:32:53 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/07/14-aria-irc 16:32:53 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Jul/0090.html 16:32:55 RRSAgent, make logs world 16:32:55 Zakim has joined #aria 16:32:57 Zakim, this will be 16:32:57 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 16:32:58 Meeting: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference 16:32:58 Date: 14 July 2016 16:33:04 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 16:33:08 present+ Janina 16:33:09 chair: Rich 16:34:00 RRSAgent, make log public 16:34:25 Present+ Leonie 16:34:27 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Jul/0090.html 16:34:27 present+ Michiel_Bijl 16:34:30 present+ fesch 16:34:33 Present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 16:34:38 present+ MichaelC 16:34:53 scribe: fesch 16:35:13 TOPIC: Survey 16:35:23 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/83726/2016-07-07_roledescription_CfC/results 16:35:45 s/Survey/Survey on CFC resutlss/ 16:36:11 clown has joined #aria 16:36:28 jamesn has joined #aria 16:36:35 rs: goes over survey responses 16:36:59 on role-descripition yes 4 no 1 concur 8 abstain 1 16:37:01 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/83726/2016-07-07_roledescription_CfC/results 16:37:31 rs: second survey yes 3 no 5 concur 6 16:37:51 first survey - predominately yes - 1 no 16:38:23 rs: based on the survey I think we should go with the first 16:38:48 jn: one no has an explanation... 16:39:17 jn: by shutting down ways - you will force developers to do more and more hacks 16:39:59 jaeun has joined #aria 16:40:05 jn: prefer not shutting down the less bad hacks... preferred the static role - 16:40:16 present+ Joseph_Scheuhammer 16:40:25 present+ jaeunJemmaku 16:40:36 rs: looking at conversations on the list... should we have an a 16:40:42 ARIA 1.2? 16:40:50 q+ 16:41:22 rs" I don't want to do a 1.2 ... and prefer to move on 16:41:38 rs: folks have been waiting for us to finish this up 16:41:55 mc: we could do a 1.2 if needed 16:41:58 ack me 16:42:08 q+ To say that I'm fine with a 1.2, as long as the people who want the 1.2 drive it all. 16:42:28 mc: we only have a couple of folks to do 1.2 and some not... it takes 6 months minimum 16:42:53 mc: if we know that we want to do a 1.2, then should we consider doing in 1.1? 16:42:53 present+ jongund 16:42:57 rs: no 16:43:14 rs: we are holding up ARIA in HTML... 16:43:31 mk: there is nothing left that is burning the house down 16:44:17 rs: the support for this type of functionality is all over the map... the group in general does not feel that strongly for this in 1.1 16:44:44 cs: can put in in the first working draft in ARIA 2... 16:45:07 mk: purpose is to learn and we learned 16:45:24 bgaraventa1979 has joined #aria 16:45:30 q- 16:45:37 lw: we did that in webapps... can take a snapshot if stuff is stable 16:45:45 present+ Bryan_Garaventa 16:46:28 rs: the two James find this feature is important... 16:46:59 mc: implement early means it can be changed... 16:47:09 rs: lets get ARIA 1.1 done 16:47:23 rs: looks like the group has gone with option 1 16:47:51 rs: we should start an ARIA 2 editors draft sooner... 16:48:02 cs: github can manage any updates... 16:48:41 cs: we could password in a draft... 16:49:34 rs: I don't care about password role - group has addressed technical issues - hopefully the security group will come up with something better 16:49:48 rs: Do we agree the group agrees on option 1? 16:50:43 rs: Joanie pull in the branch for option 1 16:51:15 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2092option3/aria/aria.html#aria-roledescription 16:51:20 s/option 1/option 3/ 16:51:25 mck has joined #aria 16:51:57 rs: we are picking option 1 in survey (option 3 branch) 16:52:17 rs: we are moving to pseudo last call 16:52:27 rs: how long for comments 16:52:34 mc: one month 16:53:18 mc: we normally do messaging to - WAI IG, twitter, mailing lists... 16:53:28 mc: this is a wide review draft 16:54:53 action: mking3 Create strongly wored guidance in the authoring practices for aria-roledescription 16:54:54 Created ACTION-2100 - Create strongly wored guidance in the authoring practices for aria-roledescription [on Matthew King - due 2016-07-21]. 16:55:03 action-2100? 16:55:03 action-2100 -- Matthew King to Create strongly wored guidance in the authoring practices for aria-roledescription -- due 2016-07-21 -- OPEN 16:55:03 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2100 16:56:02 TOPIC: Posting on public aria admin list 16:56:35 rs: list is for weighing in on a CfC, we have turned it into technical decisions 16:56:46 rs: we can't do that, too much chatter 16:57:16 rs: if you have technical decisions about CfCs do that on public aria 16:57:38 rs: that makes it visible to folks 16:57:50 mc: other folks can read it, but not post 16:58:03 mc: want to keep noise down on admin list 16:58:14 TOPIC: SVG A11Y pubs 16:58:35 rs: we would like to make these 3 docs pushed to publication - working drafts 16:58:42 rs: any objections? 16:59:37 RESOLUTION: Publish First Working Draft Graphics Module AAM, Heartbeat of Graphics Module and SVG AAM 16:59:58 mc: may be ready by end of the month 17:00:07 TOPIC: TPAC 17:00:12 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2016/registrants#ARIA 17:01:10 Note that URI may not be visible to everyone here 17:01:10 rs: will be setting up meetings, COGA wants 2 hours... asked Janinia will split it up with APA, will meet with TAG for ARIA 2.0 17:01:41 https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2016 17:01:53 rs: did anyone add to the wiki? If you have stuff you want covered at TPAC put on wiki 17:01:55 cyns has joined #aria 17:02:09 rs: need to set up interlocks with other groups... 17:02:45 https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/project 17:02:58 TOPIC: ARIA project plan 17:03:34 rs: we need to look at plans, I don't know if we will make August for ARA I.1 17:04:03 mc: TPAC will interfere with September, what about October? 17:04:21 rs: Jospeh still has an action item list 17:04:33 https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/products/23 17:04:40 issues/actions for core-aam ^ 17:04:44 cs: building the test cases and harnesses will take a couple of months 17:05:13 cs: could get testing done by end of September 17:05:34 rs: need to make sure folks have implemented it 17:05:54 mc: can try for Feb for CR and April for recommendation 17:06:14 mc: several others will be on the same timeline, Core AAM... 17:06:37 rs: what about dPub? Can you do that in edge? 17:06:47 cs: we haven't talked about it. 17:06:50 LJWatson has joined #aria 17:07:06 rs: we probably will see it in webkit and firefox 17:07:18 rs: may not get edge 17:07:37 rs: only roles, no properties... 17:08:16 mc: lists docs on same timeline... 17:08:29 rs: has edge looked at SVG at all? 17:08:40 cs: SVG AAM - no 17:09:54 rs: I don't know what will happen with SVG working group, they lost 2 chairs... 17:10:12 rs: I think we can get webkit, chrome and maybe firefox 17:10:31 rs: February may be OK 17:11:59 fe: we can get the tests translated we have the perl scirpt, just need the final form 17:12:14 rs: lets shoot for November for CR for SVG AAM 17:13:01 rs: May for PR, June for REC 17:13:32 rs: may be later for Graphics AAM, only has 3 roles 17:13:55 rs: we can have a very short CR periiod 17:14:17 rs: I would enter Graphics AAM a little later than SVG AAM 17:14:27 LJWatson has joined #aria 17:14:47 -> https://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Roadmap SVG Roadmap (out of date?) 17:14:58 mc: In theory they should have entered CR in Feb 2016... can't predict based on what they have... 17:15:26 mc: want to make sure the group knows about the times 17:16:19 https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/project 17:17:02 SVG 2 will have a last call WD / first call CR in the next month. Will probably be revised a few times once implementers start actually working on it. There are a few changes that will filter down to SVG AAM, but that should be soon. 17:20:27 lw: does the timeline assume problems? 17:20:43 mc: includes some slack for getting implementations 17:21:20 cs: filling out test infrastructure will take some time 17:22:43 cs: we had a discussion on writing the test cases 17:23:21 cs: we talked about all the pieces that need to be done... one thing is get the other APIs.... 17:23:35 cs: shane will integrate reporting infrastructure 17:23:58 -> https://www.w3.org/2016/07/13-aria-test-minutes.html Minutes ARIA Test 13 July 2016 17:24:06 cs: I will propose on documenting stuff in JSON and a dev will work on parsing 17:24:29 cs: then we will ask others to get testcases... 17:25:02 rs: don't want to repeat ARIA 1.0 want lots of folks to help 17:25:22 q+ 17:25:36 q+ to ask if you have established a regular meeting time 17:25:40 jg: shane wants to demonstrate how the current test platform could work with for WTT 17:26:00 cs: some of that already works 17:26:29 jg: we we build a testcase - in a JSON format 17:27:39 fe: we have a perl script for handling the SVG tests 17:27:53 s/WTT/WPT/ 17:28:16 jg: In the next month we will have a clear idea of how it will work 17:28:30 ack me 17:28:30 MichaelC, you wanted to ask if you have established a regular meeting time 17:28:42 rrsaggent, make minutes 17:28:51 rrsagent, make minutes 17:28:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/07/14-aria-minutes.html fesch 17:29:17 cs: Jon did we decide to meet in 2 weeks? 17:29:30 jg: yes 17:30:10 -> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-test/ ARIA Test list 17:30:30 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 17:31:11 rrsagent, make minutes 17:31:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/07/14-aria-minutes.html fesch 17:31:59 Are all calls now one hour? 18:05:46 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 18:33:03 clown has joined #aria 19:33:17 Zakim has left #aria 19:55:21 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 19:55:23 Rich has joined #aria 20:05:34 Rich has joined #aria 20:56:13 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 20:59:18 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 21:03:04 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 21:07:40 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 22:35:04 Josh_Soref_ has joined #aria 22:35:27 JonathanNeal_ has joined #aria 22:35:29 MichielBijl has joined #aria 22:36:52 janina has joined #aria 22:38:54 dcooney has joined #aria 23:57:09 chaals has joined #aria