12:52:10 RRSAgent has joined #dwbp 12:52:10 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/07/01-dwbp-irc 12:52:12 RRSAgent, make logs 351 12:52:12 Zakim has joined #dwbp 12:52:14 Zakim, this will be DWBP 12:52:14 ok, trackbot 12:52:15 Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 12:52:15 Date: 01 July 2016 12:52:42 rrsagent, generate minutes 12:52:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/07/01-dwbp-minutes.html deirdrelee 12:57:35 riccardoAlbertoni has joined #DWBP 13:01:05 yaso has joined #dwbp 13:01:09 EricKauz has joined #dwbp 13:01:28 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160701 13:01:45 BernadetteLoscio has joined #dwbp 13:03:52 hi All! 13:04:23 Hi riccardoAlbertoni 13:05:35 antoine has joined #dwbp 13:06:54 present+ antoine 13:07:20 present+ EricKauz 13:07:27 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160701 13:07:28 present+ BernadetteLoscio 13:07:31 present+ deirdrelee 13:07:42 present+ riccardoAlbertoni 13:07:47 Scribe: antoine 13:07:53 chair: deirdrelee 13:08:12 +q 13:08:17 rrsagent, please draft minutes 13:08:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/07/01-dwbp-minutes.html antoine 13:08:39 zakim? 13:08:48 zakim, are you here? 13:08:48 I don't understand your question, antoine. 13:10:16 rrsagent, make logs public 13:10:35 RRSAgent, generate minutes 13:10:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/07/01-dwbp-minutes.html deirdrelee 13:10:54 Present+ yaso 13:11:16 Topic: BP voting 13:11:19 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Jun/0102.html 13:11:33 deirdrelee: 18 votes in favour of moving to cR 13:11:43 s/cR/CR 13:11:56 ... we need to make sure open issues and comments are addressed 13:12:05 Caroline_ has joined #DWBP 13:12:05 ... BernadetteLoscio do you agree with this? 13:12:26 ... can you confirm that all comments received have been answered and everyone is happy with answers 13:12:32 ... ? 13:12:42 BernadetteLoscio: commenters answered that they are happy 13:13:15 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Status_of_comments_about_the_last_call_working_draft 13:13:22 I am sorry to send regrets because I am in another meeting 13:13:50 BernadetteLoscio: all answers are accessible from the table 13:14:19 deirdrelee: so you're happy that everything has been addressed 13:14:23 BernadetteLoscio: yes 13:14:29 :) 13:14:30 congrats! 13:14:38 deirdrelee: I'm happy to announce that the BP has been published as CR! 13:14:48 laufer has joined #dwbp 13:14:53 BernadetteLoscio: great teamwork, thx everybody! 13:14:55 O/ 13:15:10 deirdrelee: Next step is director's meeting 13:15:18 ... has anyone been in such a meeting before? 13:15:26 all: no 13:15:39 ACTION: phil to set up director's meeting 13:15:40 Created ACTION-287 - Set up director's meeting [on Phil Archer - due 2016-07-08]. 13:15:54 q+ 13:15:55 present+ laufer 13:16:06 deirdrelee: next is implementations 13:16:24 ... the end of the group is end of July 13:16:38 ... we may have to ask for an extension 13:16:52 ack riccardoAlbertoni 13:16:55 ack BernadetteLoscio 13:17:18 BernadetteLoscio: we'd like to talk with phil and hadley before the meeting with the directors 13:17:28 ... to make sure that we are prepared for it 13:17:44 deirdrelee: sure, you can arrange this by email 13:18:21 hi all 13:18:27 deirdrelee: for implementations we have on month before we close according tot he charter 13:18:36 s/tot he/to the 13:18:53 BernadetteLoscio: for some BP it will be easy to get implementations in one month 13:19:07 ... considering that we can use existing datasets and portals 13:19:19 ... or we can make new ones (portals, not datasets) 13:19:33 ... For other BP it maight be more difficult 13:20:10 ... if we don't have external implementers we can do it ourselves 13:20:30 http://w3c.br/form-dwbp/# 13:20:30 deirdrelee: the implementation form is ready to go 13:20:48 BernadetteLoscio: it's alsmot done, newton needs to make few adjustements still. 13:20:59 ... I have one question 13:21:15 ... for example BP1 has two tests [reads the two tests] 13:21:29 ... if an evidence pass one test but not the other 13:21:31 q+ 13:21:33 ... is it a FAIL? 13:21:50 ... or can we say sthg like 'partly implemented' 13:21:59 deirdrelee: let's keep simple 13:22:24 ack deirdrelee 13:22:29 ... we have already 25 BP if we have more detail it would take long 13:22:31 q+ 13:22:33 q+ 13:22:36 s/25/35 13:23:09 ack antoine 13:23:25 antoine: is there some implementation reports that have partly passed? 13:23:37 q+ 13:23:41 +1 13:23:47 ... i wouldn't be surprised that there is 13:23:47 q- 13:23:54 q+ 13:23:57 ack BernadetteLoscio 13:24:10 antoine: isn't there a 'partly pass' option in some existing reports? 13:24:37 BernadetteLoscio: we could make an option with one checkbox for every test 13:24:48 ... if two checkboxes are checked then it's full implemnetation 13:24:59 ... if one is check, if it's partial 13:25:02 q? 13:25:11 deirdrelee: it would be interesting for us 13:25:37 ... but otherwise if it's partial it doesn't count as an implementation 13:25:47 ... it's only pass/fail 13:26:12 q+ 13:26:23 ack deirdrelee 13:27:08 q+ 13:27:39 deirdrelee: does 'pass' mean 'pass everything'? 13:27:52 BernadetteLoscio: to be considered an implementation it should pass every test 13:28:05 deirdrelee: ok that's clear 13:28:16 ack antoine 13:28:19 ack BernadetteLoscio 13:28:40 BernadetteLoscio: if have one implementation form from an external implementers 13:28:48 ... do we need to check the implementation? 13:29:01 deirdrelee: we trust if somebody says it passes it 13:29:03 yes, we decided not to certificate the report... 13:29:47 BernadetteLoscio: if we have a portal with serveral datasets what the's URL? 13:29:59 q+ to ask about "extension of the DWBP life period" 13:30:02 deirdrelee: the approach is to take one specific dataset 13:30:29 BernadetteLoscio: in CKAN we have datasets and resources 13:30:42 ... I'm not sure if people will people will know how to address it 13:30:44 in ckan each resource could be a dataset in our definition 13:30:50 q+ 13:31:01 q+ 13:31:12 q+ 13:31:20 ack riccardoAlbertoni 13:31:20 riccardoAlbertoni, you wanted to ask about "extension of the DWBP life period" 13:31:56 ack antoine 13:32:34 antoine: I think we shouldn't try to anticipate everything for specific case 13:32:42 q- 13:32:44 ... let's see what implementers send, we can check later 13:32:54 deirdre: I agree we shouldn't be too prescriptive 13:32:58 ok 13:33:00 BernadetteLoscio: ok 13:33:11 q? 13:33:13 ack deirdrelee 13:33:26 riccardoAlbertoni: phil has suggested an extension recently 13:33:36 does it make sense to ask for an extension now? 13:33:48 q+ 13:33:55 riccardoAlbertoni: collecting evidence for many BP will require time 13:33:57 q+ 13:34:30 deirdrelee: I think it's feasible 13:34:46 ... we can put the implemention call out 13:34:50 q+ 13:34:52 ... and see where we are next week 13:35:14 ack deirdrelee 13:35:16 ack antoine 13:35:48 antoine: we are also entering period of summer holidays, people are slowly phasing out, extra time might be a good time 13:35:54 yaso has joined #dwbp 13:36:16 antoine: with the holidays submitting reports may not be high on piority lists of people 13:36:17 ack laufer 13:36:35 deirdrelee: on the other end in august not much will happen, we could use it as a deadline :-) 13:36:50 q+ 13:36:54 laufer: how much time before due date should we ask for extension? 13:37:00 deirdrelee: I think next week is still ok 13:37:08 ack BernadetteLoscio 13:37:10 yaso__ has joined #dwbp 13:37:29 BernadetteLoscio: if we have two evidence for a BP do we consider it's over? 13:37:35 deirdrelee: we have to have 2 13:37:48 BernadetteLoscio: even if they are provided by the group? 13:37:57 deirdrelee: yes we've already stated this. 13:38:09 q? 13:38:43 deirdrelee: BernadetteLoscio wehn do you plan to publish the call for imlementation 13:38:52 BernadetteLoscio: at latest next monday 13:40:09 ACTION: Newton to launch the implementation form on July 4th 13:40:09 Created ACTION-288 - Launch the implementation form on july 4th [on Newton Calegari - due 2016-07-08]. 13:40:16 ;) 13:40:41 Topic: DQV 13:41:18 riccardoAlbertoni: we have two issues still open 13:41:28 ... they are good good candidates for being postponed 13:41:59 ... We had a discussion this/last week on whether it is possible on postponing issues 13:42:10 ... for further work to tackle them 13:42:27 ... The answer was no during the call 13:42:43 ... Antoine: remembered some situation where postponing can be useful 13:43:05 ... otherwise we still have some editorial actions. 13:43:15 ... I don't see a problem closing DQV by July 13:44:21 antoine: I think it's alright 13:45:10 rrsagent, please draft minutes 13:45:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/07/01-dwbp-minutes.html antoine 13:45:17 in the next couple of weeks dqv will be finalised, issues postponed until next version of DQV 13:46:44 riccardoAlbertoni: we could do more to address the issue on parameters 13:46:53 ... but at this stage we don't think it should be done 13:47:21 ... we want to flag it for future work (also considering there might be a new WG next year) 13:47:46 ... The other issue is alignment between DQV and other domain-specific profiles 13:48:03 ... It could be also tackled in the next group 13:48:19 ... we we would have different reuirements from other domains 13:48:42 yaso1 has joined #dwbp 13:48:54 antoine: I think riccardoAlbertoni and deirdrelee agree 13:49:25 deirdrelee_ has joined #dwbp 13:50:00 antoine: for the other isseu I suggest we could try some tests if there are blockers 13:50:16 ... and if there are we can create issue that we postpone immediately 13:50:22 ... for another WG to takcl 13:50:30 ... at least they would start from sthg concrete 13:50:52 riccardoAlbertoni: I am not sure it's feasible 13:51:13 ... it's a completely new effort 13:51:16 ... also on their side 13:51:42 ... maybe you have already looked at their worked 13:51:48 q+ 13:53:34 [Antoine and Riccardo discuss the HCLS issue] 13:53:47 antoine: I'd like not to close the issue now 13:54:05 ... but would be ok closing it at the last moment if we have no time. 13:54:17 deirdrelee_: do you need input from the group? 13:54:44 riccardoAlbertoni: if the group has a look at the doc and can make suggestions, or knows implementations 13:54:49 ... please send them to us! 13:55:36 q+ 13:55:44 deirdrelee_: BernadetteLoscio, laufer, do you know of any implementation? 13:55:44 ack deirdrelee_ 13:55:46 ack BernadetteLoscio 13:55:50 BernadetteLoscio: I'm going to check! 13:56:00 ... I have a colleague who works on quality 13:56:19 deirdrelee_: it would be good. all the examples are from Europe 13:57:02 Topic: DUV 13:57:09 BernadetteLoscio: we had a meeting this week 13:57:15 ... working on the final version 13:57:26 ... we're going to handle final comments 13:57:33 ... and after this we need implementation 13:57:50 ... there's one open issue we need to discuss at the end of next week 13:58:04 s/implementation/implementations 13:58:06 i'm sorry :( 13:58:10 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/List_of_DQV_implementations 13:58:28 deirdrelee_: for DUV something similar to the list of DQV would be great 13:58:32 great ;) 13:58:35 ... including planned implementations 13:58:53 ... for a future WG 13:58:59 BernadetteLoscio: ok 13:59:13 ACTION: BernadetteLoscio to create a list of implementations for DUV 13:59:14 Created ACTION-289 - Create a list of implementations for duv [on Bernadette Farias Loscio - due 2016-07-08]. 13:59:22 q? 13:59:29 Topic: AOB 13:59:51 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:59:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/07/01-dwbp-minutes.html antoine 14:00:00 congrats again! 14:00:07 bye all 14:00:11 bye all.. 14:00:11 congrats everybody!!! 14:00:16 Thanks for chairing, Dee! 14:00:16 great wknd to you all 14:00:19 Bye all 14:00:50 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:29:02 Zakim has left #dwbp 17:38:40 yaso__ has joined #dwbp