21:00:16 RRSAgent has joined #sdwssn 21:00:16 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/06/28-sdwssn-irc 21:00:18 RRSAgent, make logs world 21:00:18 Zakim has joined #sdwssn 21:00:20 Zakim, this will be SDW 21:00:20 ok, trackbot 21:00:21 Meeting: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference 21:00:21 Date: 28 June 2016 21:00:24 chair: kerry 21:00:31 present+ Kerry 21:00:34 roba has joined #sdwssn 21:00:36 regrets: PhilA 21:01:01 present+ JoelRamsay 21:01:17 present+ SimonCox RaulGarciaCastro 21:04:28 rrsagent, make logs public 21:05:13 scribe: SimonCox 21:05:19 present+ roba 21:05:21 scribenick: SimonCox 21:05:46 proposed: approve minutes https://www.w3.org/2016/06/14-sdwssn-minutes 21:05:58 +1 21:06:00 +1 21:06:01 +1 21:06:24 +1 21:06:25 +1 21:06:38 ClausStadler has joined #sdwssn 21:06:46 approved: approve minutes https://www.w3.org/2016/06/14-sdwssn-minutes 21:06:57 resolved: approve minutes https://www.w3.org/2016/06/14-sdwssn-minutes 21:07:06 topic: patent call 21:07:25 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call 21:08:39 topic: Modularity: Diagram changes and email this week 21:08:48 present+ ClausStadler 21:09:38 topic: ISSUE-13 and this email from Frans 21:09:50 http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#DeferredRequirements 21:09:50 http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#DeferredRequirements 21:10:01 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Jun/0112.html 21:10:11 issue-13? 21:10:11 issue-13 -- SSN req. to discuss - Profiling, e.g. for checking compliance to standard model. -- closed 21:10:11 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/13 21:12:30 ChrisLittle__ has joined #Sdwssn 21:13:10 Present+ ChrisLittle_ 21:14:04 i'm losing sound regulary.. :-( 21:14:22 Proposal from kerry and frans that the requirement not be labelled 'deferred' 21:14:43 q+ 21:14:55 +1 21:15:07 Motion: move deferred requirement back into main document 21:15:30 +1 21:15:31 s/document/section/ 21:15:32 +1 21:15:37 +1 21:15:38 +1 21:15:39 +1 21:15:52 Resolved: 21:16:08 resolved: move deferred requirement back into main document 21:16:11 +1 21:17:01 ack roba 21:17:07 q? 21:17:28 roba: currently working through issues around profiling O&M for citizen science 21:17:51 roba: so, yes this is a real use case. But what is the mechanism for defining a profile within an ontology 21:18:13 roba: should not be solved by this group! much more general 21:18:20 q+ 21:18:50 kerry: we have been invited to propose mechanism/pattern 21:19:26 roba: if highly modular structure, then profiling is another mechanism within application domain 21:19:36 ack SimonCox 21:20:19 SimonCox: namespaces? named graphs? validation structures? 21:20:40 kerry: not clear yet - can't deal in this meeting 21:21:39 roba: test case for the modules as we proceed with that 21:21:39 q? 21:22:23 continue to use issue-13 to track this topic 21:22:52 q? 21:23:10 topic: SSN Requirements from UCR 21:23:38 kerry:UCR is heading to final revision 21:24:05 ... all members of ssn group should check requirements 21:24:54 http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#arSSN 21:25:32 ... add to agenda explicitly for next meeting 21:26:10 topic: Modularity: Diagram changes and email this week 21:26:22 http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/#Modularisation 21:26:29 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Jun/0134.html 21:27:04 DanhLePhuoc has joined #sdwssn 21:27:31 q+ 21:27:40 q+ 21:27:59 q? 21:28:05 ack roba 21:28:29 roba: diagram is high level, novel notation/idiom 21:28:56 ... Jano's proposal makes more sense, horizontal and vertical 21:29:23 ... the proposal here does not look very modular 21:29:53 ... e.g. can't see sensor details, or relation with sampling feature 21:30:17 kerry: core has minimum needed for IoT uc 21:30:44 ... this is Jano's proposal 21:31:06 roba: yes, this diagram is the vertical modularity, but not the horizontal modularity 21:31:31 kerry: vertical - increasing complexity as go out from core 21:31:51 ... diagram does not show enough vertical modularization 21:32:32 ... horizontal is the relationship between O&M and SSN facets 21:32:42 ... core needs to be smaller? 21:33:04 ... not yet agreed what goes in core, and what in other modules 21:33:15 q? 21:33:20 ack SimonCox 21:34:16 q+ 21:34:22 SimonCox: how should mechanics of commenting work? 21:34:58 kerry: WebProtege is shared editting tool, add comments directly 21:35:12 ... request editting permission from Armin 21:35:31 q? 21:35:37 ack JoelRamsay 21:36:02 JoelRamsay: extra arrow from DOLCE to core. Why? 21:36:15 ... it is already implied by SNM link 21:36:52 kerry: agree - probably an error 21:36:54 q? 21:37:18 q+ 21:37:47 ack DanhLePhuoc 21:37:57 ACTION: armin to remove arrow from dul alignment to core on diagram 21:37:57 Created ACTION-181 - Remove arrow from dul alignment to core on diagram [on Armin Haller - due 2016-07-05]. 21:38:16 DanhLePhuoc: other integrations with QB, OWL-Time? 21:39:15 kerry: alignment modules will be key 21:39:16 q+ 21:39:40 ack SimonCox 21:39:57 SimonCox: what is in alignment modules? 21:40:09 ... subclass + subproperty axioms? 21:40:25 kerry: look at DOLCE alignment module to see. 21:40:26 q+ 21:43:26 q+ 21:43:39 ... exact mechanism depends on modularity mechanism 21:43:53 ... currently you get the alignment from the same URI 21:44:20 SimonCox: maybe need to use graphs? 21:44:42 q? 21:44:46 ack JoelRamsay 21:44:49 kerry: existing DOLCE alignment is strawman 21:45:37 JoelRamsay: What goes in core? Is it the stuff that is always required, so must always be assumed to be present 21:45:50 q+ 21:46:08 ack roba 21:46:11 ack roba 21:46:25 roba: struggling with notion of a single core 21:46:56 ... logical grouping for maximum stability 21:47:14 kerry: invite roba to make proposal! 21:48:06 ... too many modules creates it own challenges. More documentation. Tradeoffs all over the place! 21:48:08 q? 21:48:49 q? 21:49:07 roba: lots of small components now common in programming. Tooling like Maven makes it manageable. 21:49:34 ... better than monolithic 21:50:01 q+ 21:51:04 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Proposals_for_rewriting_SSN 21:52:05 roba: namespaces/mechanisms/files - need profile for e.g. water quality monitoring - that would not match any of these namespaces 21:52:35 ... if all in one namespace, hard to know what each module is for 21:53:05 q? 21:53:18 kerry: backward compatibility with SSN is a consideration 21:53:56 q? 21:54:44 q? 21:54:51 ack SimonCox 21:56:26 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:56:26 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/06/28-sdwssn-minutes.html kerry 21:57:31 simon suggests at least 3 cores 21:57:47 ack DanhLePhuoc 21:58:04 SimonCox: 3 cores - sensors, sampling, observation-events 21:59:13 q? 21:59:48 DanhLePhuoc: need to integrate plan for best practice <--> design 21:59:55 ... iterate between these 22:00:31 kerry: not the SDWWG best practice 22:00:46 DanhLePhuoc: need a SSN best practice 22:01:47 ISSUE: Create corresponding Best practices to on-going design patterns 22:01:47 Created ISSUE-69 - Create corresponding best practices to on-going design patterns. Please complete additional details at . 22:02:06 Bye 22:02:10 rrsagent, draft minutes 22:02:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/06/28-sdwssn-minutes.html kerry