16:11:12 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #aria-editors
16:11:12 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/06/15-aria-editors-irc
16:11:12 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #aria-editors
16:11:26 <MichaelC> rrsagent, make log world
16:11:26 <MichaelC> scribeOptions: -final
16:11:26 <MichaelC> scribe: MichaelC
16:11:26 <MichaelC> chair: MichaelC
16:11:26 <MichaelC> agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-editors/2016Jun/0004.html
16:11:26 <MichaelC> regrets: Rich, Tzviya
16:11:28 <MichaelC> meeting: ARIA editors
16:11:30 <MichaelC> agenda+ Timeline check
16:11:32 <MichaelC> agenda+ Commit history after branch merge
16:11:34 <MichaelC> agenda+ When to remove editorial notes
16:11:36 <MichaelC> agenda+ Changes to AXAPI names in mapping table https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/399#issuecomment-225467723
16:11:39 <MichaelC> agenda+ AOB
16:11:41 <MichaelC> agenda+ Next Meeting
17:01:32 <fesch> fesch has joined #aria-editors
17:03:28 <clown> present+ Joseph_Scheuhammer
17:03:33 <joanie> present+ Joanmarie_Diggs
17:03:59 <MichaelC> present: MichaelC, Michiel, JamesN
17:04:16 <MichaelC> present+ Fred
17:04:24 <ShaneM> present+ ShaneM
17:04:47 <MichaelC> agenda?
17:05:08 <MichaelC> zakim, next item
17:05:08 <Zakim> agendum 1. "Timeline check" taken up [from MichaelC]
17:05:23 <MichaelC> Practices and Primer pending
17:05:31 <MichaelC> ARIA spec: still need WG approval
17:06:03 <MichaelC> zakim, next item
17:06:03 <Zakim> agendum 1 was just opened, MichaelC
17:06:07 <MichaelC> zakim, close this item
17:06:07 <Zakim> agendum 1 closed
17:06:08 <MichaelC> zakim, next item
17:06:09 <Zakim> I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
17:06:09 <Zakim> 2. Commit history after branch merge [from MichaelC]
17:06:09 <Zakim> agendum 2. "Commit history after branch merge" taken up [from MichaelC]
17:06:49 <MichaelC> can merge in a way that preserves commits, or squashes them
17:06:53 <MichaelC> defaults is now to squash
17:06:54 <jamesn> jamesn has joined #aria-editors
17:07:10 <MichaelC> has caused loss of commit messages after branch deleted
17:07:29 <MichaelC> JD takes advantage of this to clean up whitespace and stuff before merge
17:08:21 <MichaelC> discussion also happens not directly relevant to why the branch is being merged
17:08:27 <MichaelC> but Matt wanted some history
17:09:30 <MichaelC> MC suggest squashing better, but need procedures to preserve commits locally if desired
17:09:46 <MichaelC> maybe keep branch deletes on server from killing it on your client
17:09:56 <MichaelC> zakim, next item
17:09:56 <Zakim> agendum 3. "When to remove editorial notes" taken up [from MichaelC]
17:09:59 <MichaelC> regrets+ Matt
17:10:32 <MichaelC> Is there a time editorial notes are removed?
17:11:44 <MichaelC> MC cleans them from CR and later, makes sure they´re appropriate to the stage
17:12:18 <MichaelC> doesn´t do for WD
17:12:22 <MichaelC> editors can do at their judgement
17:12:35 <MichaelC> also want dates in the ednotes?
17:13:04 <joanie> q+ to ask why
17:13:29 <MichaelC> ack j
17:13:29 <Zakim> joanie, you wanted to ask why
17:14:10 <MichaelC> JD: consumer of date?
17:14:30 <MichaelC> MB: I don´t dig through git history routinely
17:15:12 <MichaelC> JD: date in comment?
17:15:23 <MichaelC> MB: visible date might help a reviewer
17:17:19 <ShaneM> do people use class="ednote" for editorial ntoes?
17:17:34 <ShaneM> q+ to ask about a potential feature
17:17:34 <clown> ShaneM:  I do
17:17:49 <MichaelC> ack s
17:17:49 <Zakim> ShaneM, you wanted to ask about a potential feature
17:19:01 <MichaelC> SM: respec feature to suppress?
17:19:24 <MichaelC> MC: not a big editorial burden, and I do it context-sensitive at later maturities
17:20:18 <ShaneM> <div datetime="alskdaslkjd" class="ednote">
17:20:51 <MichielBijl> +1
17:20:55 <MichaelC> maybe a Respec feature request to output that if present, so would have consistent presentation
17:20:59 <joanie> +1
17:21:44 <MichaelC> RESOLUTION: editors should clear editorial notes when they see the need. Publishing contact will clear at PR and Rec.
17:22:01 <MichaelC> RESOLUTION: no requirement to date ednotes, but allowed. Ideal to have common format.
17:22:08 <MichaelC> zakim, next item
17:22:08 <Zakim> agendum 4. "Changes to AXAPI names in mapping table https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/399#issuecomment-225467723" taken up [from MichaelC]
17:23:25 <MichaelC> JK will update the docs
17:23:30 <MichaelC> want to make sure edits don´t collide
17:23:42 <MichaelC> Re-org not happening for 2 weeks at least, along with ARIA 1.1 publication
17:23:49 <MichaelC> so ok to do from that perspective before then
17:24:18 <MichaelC> (MC will coordinate specific timing and ¨hands off¨ period with editors when doing the re-org)
17:24:22 <ShaneM> https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/829
17:26:32 <MichaelC> <technical nittie gritties>
17:26:42 <clown> suggest for testable statements do:  AXRole/accessibilityRole
17:32:12 <MichaelC> zakim, next item
17:32:12 <Zakim> agendum 5. "AOB" taken up [from MichaelC]
17:32:35 <MichaelC> zakim, close this item
17:32:35 <Zakim> agendum 5 closed
17:32:36 <Zakim> I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
17:32:36 <Zakim> 6. Next Meeting [from MichaelC]
17:32:37 <MichaelC> zakim, next item
17:32:37 <Zakim> agendum 6. "Next Meeting" taken up [from MichaelC]
17:32:47 <MichaelC> Next meeting is 3 weeks, 6 July
17:33:02 <MichaelC> regrets from Shane
17:33:39 <MichaelC> ARIA 1.1 will hopefully be published by then
17:33:42 <MichaelC> and the repository split
17:34:06 <MichaelC> rrsagent, make minutes
17:34:06 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/06/15-aria-editors-minutes.html MichaelC
17:38:46 <clown> that latest one uses "AXRole", etc.
17:47:54 <joanie> RRSAgent, part
17:47:54 <RRSAgent> I see no action items