IRC log of wai-wcag on 2016-04-19
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:48:19 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag
- 14:48:19 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/04/19-wai-wcag-irc
- 14:48:21 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 14:48:21 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #wai-wcag
- 14:48:23 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG
- 14:48:23 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot
- 14:48:24 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
- 14:48:24 [trackbot]
- Date: 19 April 2016
- 14:48:26 [Joshue108]
- zakim, agenda?
- 14:48:26 [Zakim]
- I see nothing on the agenda
- 14:48:59 [Joshue108]
- agenda+ Publishing new WCAG edited recommendation
- 14:49:25 [Joshue108]
- agenda+ New draft techniques from Low Vision TF
- 14:49:34 [Joshue108]
- agenda+ Some questions left from previous meeting
- 14:49:45 [Joshue108]
- agenda+ New Pull requests
- 14:49:52 [Joshue108]
- Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewWCAGEditRec/
- 14:51:42 [AWK]
- AWK has joined #wai-wcag
- 14:52:10 [AWK]
- zakim, agenda?
- 14:52:10 [Zakim]
- I see 4 items remaining on the agenda:
- 14:52:11 [Zakim]
- 1. Publishing new WCAG edited recommendation [from Joshue108]
- 14:52:11 [Zakim]
- 2. New draft techniques from Low Vision TF [from Joshue108]
- 14:52:11 [Zakim]
- 3. Some questions left from previous meeting [from Joshue108]
- 14:52:12 [Zakim]
- 4. New Pull requests [from Joshue108]
- 14:52:21 [AWK]
- +AWK
- 14:52:39 [AWK]
- Zakim, who is on the phone?
- 14:52:39 [Zakim]
- Present: AWK
- 14:56:48 [JF]
- JF has joined #wai-wcag
- 14:56:57 [kirkwood]
- kirkwood has joined #WAI-WCAG
- 14:57:07 [JF]
- Present+ JF
- 14:58:02 [Joshue108]
- present+ Josh
- 14:58:07 [kirkwood]
- present+kirkwood
- 14:58:30 [Makoto]
- Makoto has joined #wai-wcag
- 14:59:31 [Joshue108]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 14:59:31 [Zakim]
- Present: AWK, JF, Josh, kirkwood
- 15:00:09 [laura]
- laura has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:00:12 [Joshue108]
- Scribe list: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List
- 15:01:02 [alastairc]
- alastairc has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:02:52 [Wayne]
- Wayne has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:02:56 [Greg]
- Greg has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:03:12 [kirkwood]
- JF: waiting for feedback from others, hoping by next week to have something to report
- 15:03:36 [Sarah_Swierenga]
- Sarah_Swierenga has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:03:42 [MichaelC]
- MichaelC has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:03:42 [kirkwood]
- scribe:kirkwood
- 15:04:44 [Sarah_Swierenga]
- present+ Sarah Swierenga
- 15:04:51 [MichaelC]
- present+ MichaelC
- 15:05:03 [Makoto]
- present+ Makoto
- 15:05:11 [alastairc]
- present+ alastairc
- 15:05:14 [laura]
- present+ Laura
- 15:05:23 [KimD]
- present+ KimD
- 15:05:54 [allanj]
- present+
- 15:06:01 [marcjohlic]
- marcjohlic has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:06:13 [kirkwood]
- John Kirkwood scribing
- 15:06:50 [kirkwood]
- Sarah can do next week
- 15:07:07 [kirkwood]
- Wayne can do week after
- 15:07:21 [Joshue108]
- zakim, next item
- 15:07:21 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Publishing new WCAG edited recommendation" taken up [from Joshue108]
- 15:07:36 [Joshue108]
- Scribenick: John Kirkwood
- 15:08:44 [AWK]
- survey link?
- 15:08:59 [MoeKraft]
- MoeKraft has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:09:00 [AWK]
- https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewWCAGEditRec/
- 15:09:39 [marcjohlic]
- present+ marcjohlic
- 15:10:04 [kirkwood]
- Regarding: Current 1.4.3 to 1.4.3.6, any objections to Makoto edits?
- 15:10:35 [AWK]
- q+
- 15:10:45 [Joshue108]
- ack awk
- 15:12:07 [MoeKraft]
- present+ moekraft
- 15:12:29 [Wayne]
- present+ Wayne
- 15:12:58 [David]
- David has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:15:42 [kirkwood]
- MichaelC: Working group has approved to progress WCAG 2.0 proposed edited recomendations?
- 15:16:29 [kirkwood]
- Joshue: looking for approval for edited recommendation
- 15:16:59 [kirkwood]
- No objection to edits published edited recommendation
- 15:18:07 [kirkwood]
- RESOLUTION: CFC to go to working group list regarding Mikota’s edit and working group approval
- 15:18:35 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 15:18:41 [kirkwood]
- zakim, next item
- 15:18:41 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "New draft techniques from Low Vision TF" taken up [from Joshue108]
- 15:20:06 [kirkwood]
- Laura: says good on 5
- 15:20:26 [Joshue108]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Using_a_Decorative_Icon_Font
- 15:21:10 [kirkwood]
- AWK: example using icon font?
- 15:21:23 [JF]
- Q+
- 15:21:49 [kirkwood]
- Laura: style in example /24 ‘black backward arrow head’
- 15:22:08 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 15:22:46 [kirkwood]
- AEK: Does unicode symbols count as an icon foNT?
- 15:23:34 [Joshue108]
- ack JF
- 15:23:47 [kirkwood]
- JF: are we back to square one?
- 15:24:13 [Greg]
- q+
- 15:24:35 [Joshue108]
- ack greg
- 15:24:40 [kirkwood]
- JF: when a symbol is produced from a font family, what do we do then? Its more about getting a clear definition of what we are talking about. It’s aterminology issue.
- 15:24:41 [Wayne]
- q+
- 15:25:28 [kirkwood]
- Greg: unicode glif app such as accomidtion aids like screen reader. Wher glif desn’t correspond to a unicode standard where problems occur
- 15:25:54 [AWK]
- q+
- 15:25:58 [kirkwood]
- Accessibility aid won’t have abilty to read when using glifs of other than standrd unicode
- 15:26:28 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 15:26:36 [Joshue108]
- ack way
- 15:27:24 [kirkwood]
- Wayne: thinks gathered together in fonts think one is called ‘awesome’
- 15:27:56 [kirkwood]
- Wayne: there are families, things dropped in in unicode, but there are formal fonts.
- 15:28:08 [Joshue108]
- http://www.sitepoint.com/introduction-icon-fonts-font-awesome-icomoon/
- 15:28:14 [kirkwood]
- JF: not always just visual decoration
- 15:28:37 [Joshue108]
- ack awk
- 15:29:02 [kirkwood]
- AWK: Addding on to greg saying. Are unicode symbols that assistive technologies do recognize.
- 15:30:28 [kirkwood]
- AWK: if using name in unicode they will probaly read a small set of characters s.a. right arrow and left arrow. Can use litigers in in font assign it to a code related to a font. Is a case we should capture
- 15:30:36 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 15:31:08 [jamesn]
- jamesn has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:31:08 [kirkwood]
- Poorly supported characters and icon font should be able to distinguish
- 15:31:25 [jamesn]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:31:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/04/19-wai-wcag-minutes.html jamesn
- 15:31:27 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 15:31:33 [kirkwood]
- Josh: don’t have to do in unicode if we know
- 15:32:27 [kirkwood]
- Laura: if expand to include real icon fonts not just unicode. We did this before
- 15:32:35 [alastairc]
- Q+
- 15:32:50 [kirkwood]
- Joshue: bundle all together or do sperate techniques?
- 15:32:54 [Joshue108]
- ack alist
- 15:32:59 [Joshue108]
- ack alas
- 15:33:08 [JF]
- +1 for separate techniques based on situation
- 15:33:09 [Kathy]
- Kathy has joined #wai-wcag
- 15:33:25 [Wayne]
- +1 multi technique
- 15:33:54 [Kathy]
- present+ Kathy
- 15:34:05 [kirkwood]
- Aliastirc: replacing default unicode characters might replace with a different symbol entirely. Could have one technique poss.
- 15:34:47 [kirkwood]
- joshue: if we’re confused it may still be confusing...
- 15:35:03 [Joshue108]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Using_a_Decorative_Icon_Font
- 15:35:40 [kirkwood]
- Technique 5 using a decorative icon font using unicode fonts have techniques reference other
- 15:37:03 [kirkwood]
- Alastair: when specifying icon font, ubut with private use area different issues with mobile and unicode and assitive tech’
- 15:37:25 [kirkwood]
- Alastair: important to use aria hidden and aira labels
- 15:37:50 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 15:37:51 [AWK]
- +! to James but that is still an accessibility support issue
- 15:38:01 [AWK]
- s/+!/+1
- 15:39:17 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 15:39:33 [kirkwood]
- zakim, next item
- 15:39:33 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Some questions left from previous meeting" taken up [from Joshue108]
- 15:39:54 [AWK]
- https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/5April2016_misc/results
- 15:40:30 [kirkwood]
- did we finish current survey?
- 15:41:13 [kirkwood]
- RESOLUTION: Laura to rework techniques based on working group review
- 15:41:26 [Joshue108]
- Editorial changes to Understanding 1.4.3 #177
- 15:41:51 [Joshue108]
- https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/177
- 15:42:21 [kirkwood]
- RESOLUTION: accepted editorial changes
- 15:42:35 [Joshue108]
- Need to change "Understanding SC 3.3.2" as it does not accurately reflect what the SC says.(related to #164)
- 15:43:28 [kirkwood]
- Andrew suggested to remove 3rd paragraph, new example rqts. Greg, to speak to comments
- 15:44:03 [kirkwood]
- Greg: new text doesnat’ apply to hyperlinks, doesn’t take into account simple actions like clicks
- 15:44:39 [AWK]
- q+
- 15:45:10 [kirkwood]
- Greg: some abinguity form require type in a passord, asume original contraols specifically to take input vs controls to display information
- 15:45:13 [Joshue108]
- ack awk
- 15:45:56 [kirkwood]
- AWK: Is input suggesting that cliking on link is the other form you a re referring to?
- 15:46:32 [Joshue108]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/minimize-error-cues.html
- 15:47:02 [Joshue108]
- https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/164
- 15:47:25 [jamesn]
- it is not linked in the issue
- 15:47:39 [kirkwood]
- Greg: changing FC is not on table, not something to deal with right now. ‘When content requires user input.’ nothing in FC would mean?
- 15:47:58 [kirkwood]
- AWK: i wouldn t rquire user input as just clicking on a link
- 15:48:24 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 15:50:08 [kirkwood]
- Greg: typing and that distintion making a point about reality of selecting an itme in a list is just as much aentering data as typing into a tect bos. From my perspective user input is very borad. My reading and UAG working group doesn’t match intent of WCAG working group.
- 15:50:40 [AWK]
- s/borad/broad
- 15:50:54 [AWK]
- s/aentering/as entering
- 15:51:05 [AWK]
- s/tect bos/text box
- 15:51:23 [AWK]
- s/UAG working/UAAG working
- 15:52:49 [kirkwood]
- Greg: relunctant to hold up process due to my concerns. Having not worked on document for quite a few yeard. I am concerned that the document doesnt acutlly math FC in my reading. I fyou want to work on revise understanding based on an outsiders reading of the FC I’d do that as well
- 15:53:14 [David]
- q+
- 15:53:33 [AWK]
- q+
- 15:54:07 [Joshue108]
- ack david
- 15:54:08 [kirkwood]
- AWK: content is usually stuff that is just there, greg do you have objection with what Andrew is suggesting
- 15:54:31 [kirkwood]
- David: in wcag when think about content all lthings on page is considered contgent
- 15:54:31 [Joshue108]
- ack awk
- 15:54:54 [kirkwood]
- s/contgent/content
- 15:55:02 [jamesn]
- q+
- 15:56:20 [kirkwood]
- AWK: concerning that the whole point is to provide a lear label. It should be associated with content. There are situations where text alludes to 3.3.2 you’ve got differnet options. Interested in others reading on this.
- 15:56:24 [JF]
- Q+
- 15:56:42 [Joshue108]
- ack james
- 15:57:11 [kirkwood]
- Jamesn: I was reading it and lot of information 4.1.2 not strictly relevent. In oreder to meat 4.1.2 could do this part but doesn’t meet particular criteria
- 15:57:21 [Joshue108]
- ack jf
- 15:57:47 [kirkwood]
- JF: lot of private comments in que, what problem are we trying to solve
- 15:57:59 [AWK]
- q+
- 15:58:21 [AWK]
- ack me
- 15:58:22 [Joshue108]
- ack awk
- 15:58:28 [kirkwood]
- JF: my concern is that trying to maneuver authors to da a specif way
- 15:59:00 [Joshue108]
- q+
- 15:59:20 [Joshue108]
- ack me
- 15:59:39 [kirkwood]
- AWK: maybe we should go back to clearly criply identify problem. Feel like he’s I’m happy to get _ opinion
- 15:59:56 [MoeKraft]
- q+
- 15:59:58 [AWK]
- s/criply/and crisply
- 16:00:11 [Joshue108]
- ack moe
- 16:00:18 [AWK]
- s/get _/get Sailesh's
- 16:00:48 [kirkwood]
- Moe: tkaing look issue 164, wanted to recommend on Feburary 25th posted workd doc may hep us move forward
- 16:00:54 [MoeKraft]
- https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/164
- 16:01:17 [AWK]
- s/oreder to meat/order to meet
- 16:01:49 [MoeKraft]
- And Josh has included contents of Sailesh's explanation in the GitHub Thread on 2/29
- 16:02:42 [kirkwood]
- Josh: Trying to unserstan quest in succinct in a simple way
- 16:04:02 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 16:04:06 [kirkwood]
- Joshue: submit new issue and outline and we’ll come back
- 16:04:20 [kirkwood]
- RESOLUTION: leave open need more info
- 16:04:43 [kirkwood]
- Lack of understanding and need to go back to get
- 16:04:56 [kirkwood]
- zakim, next item
- 16:04:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "New Pull requests" taken up [from Joshue108]
- 16:05:27 [Joshue108]
- zakim, agenda?
- 16:05:27 [Zakim]
- I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
- 16:05:28 [Zakim]
- 4. New Pull requests [from Joshue108]
- 16:05:34 [Joshue108]
- zakim, drop item 4
- 16:05:34 [Zakim]
- agendum 4, New Pull requests, dropped
- 16:05:46 [Joshue108]
- TOPIC: Remaining survey items from last week
- 16:05:51 [kirkwood]
- Joshue; going to continue with remaing survey items from last week
- 16:05:53 [Joshue108]
- https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/5April2016_misc
- 16:06:04 [AWK]
- https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/5April2016_misc/results
- 16:06:25 [Joshue108]
- Issue 169
- 16:06:25 [Joshue108]
- Please review
- 16:06:40 [Joshue108]
- https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/169
- 16:06:46 [kirkwood]
- AWK: tried to talk about it las week
- 16:07:47 [kirkwood]
- Joshue: james important michael didn’t agree redunday, this could be clearer, James have you thought about this?
- 16:08:17 [Joshue108]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/G10.html
- 16:08:22 [Joshue108]
- G10: Creating components using a technology that supports the accessibility API features of the platforms on which the user agents will be run to expose the names and roles, allow user-settable properties to be directly set, and provide notification of changes
- 16:08:23 [kirkwood]
- James: similar but not redundant what michael says is yue they are bvery simialr but not the smae thing. Going to make it more complicated.
- 16:08:24 [Wayne]
- +1 James and Michael
- 16:08:35 [JF]
- +1 to James
- 16:08:39 [kirkwood]
- Jame; don’t need to spend time wondering aobout this
- 16:08:51 [Joshue108]
- G10: Creating components using a technology that supports the accessibility API features of the platforms on which the user agents will be run to expose the names and roles, allow user-settable properties to be directly set, and provide notification of changes
- 16:08:57 [Joshue108]
- Using the accessibility API features of a technology to expose names and roles, to allow user-settable properties to be directly set, and to provide notification of changes
- 16:09:16 [Joshue108]
- G135
- 16:09:29 [kirkwood]
- James: poorly written example
- 16:09:35 [Joshue108]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/G135.html
- 16:10:30 [kirkwood]
- awk: both using accessbility api, both names and roles, in 10 using both. Not sure why created differnetly
- 16:10:39 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 16:11:41 [kirkwood]
- Joshua: no point in bring all together, if we could work on it . James interested in working on it?
- 16:11:43 [kirkwood]
- James: no
- 16:12:27 [AWK]
- q+
- 16:12:36 [kirkwood]
- AWK: getting rid of techniques is a step backwrs , but removing would remove book makrs provide
- 16:12:57 [kirkwood]
- s/ makrs/marks
- 16:13:47 [kirkwood]
- g10 has mre fleshed out procedure than 135. Feel 153 is inaducate to meet what is idnetified in title
- 16:14:06 [kirkwood]
- AWK: maybe needs a bit of a regrash
- 16:14:28 [kirkwood]
- s/regrash /refresh
- 16:15:05 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 16:15:10 [kirkwood]
- Joshue: more of reason to keep may have value in time
- 16:15:22 [Joshue108]
- ack awk
- 16:16:03 [Wayne]
- +1 Close and defer
- 16:16:44 [kirkwood]
- awk: likely to get deferred and closed later. Working group feel like value in haveing two techniques using acccessibility feature. Looking for vlunteers to suggest changes to make that happen. We don’t have bandwitdth to work on it right now
- 16:17:20 [kirkwood]
- Joshue: why dont we make that a resolution
- 16:18:04 [kirkwood]
- MichaelC: looks like eric took on itself to file this, he himself hasn’t engagted in this.
- 16:18:09 [KimD]
- +1 to close/defer, accept response
- 16:18:15 [kirkwood]
- working group to defer issue no objections
- 16:18:16 [Sarah_Swierenga]
- no objections
- 16:18:32 [kirkwood]
- RESOLUTION: defer response
- 16:18:38 [alastairc]
- no objections, it's java, let us move along
- 16:18:50 [MoeKraft]
- +1
- 16:18:54 [Joshue108]
- Issue 167
- 16:19:09 [Joshue108]
- https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/167
- 16:20:03 [Joshue108]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H91.html
- 16:20:50 [kirkwood]
- awk: don’t have a current resoltion for this
- 16:21:06 [kirkwood]
- Joshue: up in the air
- 16:21:19 [AWK]
- q+
- 16:22:17 [Joshue108]
- ack awk
- 16:22:25 [kirkwood]
- awk: answer the question of ‘Why do we want to cover this’ an aproch is not change anything
- 16:22:51 [kirkwood]
- Joshue: keep it clean and don’t do it right now
- 16:23:29 [Wayne]
- q+
- 16:23:41 [kirkwood]
- awk: we could use recommendation aria for every technique, I am agreement with what Maichael is saying, I could go ther way
- 16:23:52 [Joshue108]
- ack wayne
- 16:24:02 [kirkwood]
- wayne: stand alone, aria is aria
- 16:24:19 [jamesn]
- now, it does need updating for new HTML input types
- 16:24:25 [AWK]
- OTOH ARIA is now allowed by the HTML5 spec
- 16:25:33 [AWK]
- ACTION: AWK to look back to see if we added new input types to H91
- 16:25:33 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-322 - Look back to see if we added new input types to h91 [on Andrew Kirkpatrick - due 2016-04-26].
- 16:25:56 [Joshue108]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/aria#ARIA14
- 16:26:02 [Joshue108]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/aria#ARIA16
- 16:26:07 [kirkwood]
- check input type and see if everything is there. Like using html whenever we can and aria when we cant
- 16:26:27 [kirkwood]
- wayne: check input type and see if everything is there. Like using html whenever we can and aria when we cant
- 16:26:50 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 16:27:09 [Joshue108]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/aria-in-html/
- 16:28:09 [JF]
- ++1 to James
- 16:28:48 [kirkwood]
- Joshue: don’t have a desire to do a lot with this. Yes lets arddd aria to page 91?
- 16:28:49 [JF]
- Q+
- 16:28:56 [Joshue108]
- ack jf
- 16:29:05 [kirkwood]
- James: Happy to add related technicques
- 16:29:40 [AWK]
- I'm ok with James's suggestion to add related resources and nothing else
- 16:29:58 [alastairc]
- +1
- 16:30:11 [kirkwood]
- Joshue: option do nothing or add link to aria techniques
- 16:30:17 [AWK]
- I'm happy to write a response and add the aria technique references for this and we can survey the change
- 16:30:24 [marcjohlic]
- +1 to adding links to ARIA14 and aria16 in Related Techniques
- 16:30:46 [kirkwood]
- JF: if we know teniques that esxist why not point to them
- 16:31:18 [kirkwood]
- RESOLUTION: link page 91 ith related aria techniques
- 16:31:26 [Wayne]
- +1
- 16:31:54 [laura]
- laura has left #wai-wcag
- 16:32:05 [kirkwood]
- Trackpot,end meeting
- 16:32:20 [Joshue108]
- trackbot, end meeting
- 16:32:20 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 16:32:20 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been AWK, JF, Josh, kirkwood, Sarah, Swierenga, MichaelC, Makoto, alastairc, Laura, KimD, allanj, marcjohlic, moekraft, Wayne, Kathy
- 16:32:28 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 16:32:28 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/04/19-wai-wcag-minutes.html trackbot
- 16:32:29 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 16:32:29 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2016/04/19-wai-wcag-actions.rdf :
- 16:32:29 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: AWK to look back to see if we added new input types to H91 [1]
- 16:32:29 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/04/19-wai-wcag-irc#T16-25-33
- 16:32:34 [kirkwood]
- trackbot, end meeting
- 16:32:34 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 16:32:34 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been AWK, JF, Josh, kirkwood, Sarah, Swierenga, MichaelC, Makoto, alastairc, Laura, KimD, allanj, marcjohlic, moekraft, Wayne, Kathy