17:00:13 RRSAgent has joined #social 17:00:13 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/04/12-social-irc 17:00:15 RRSAgent, make logs public 17:00:15 Zakim has joined #social 17:00:17 Zakim, this will be SOCL 17:00:17 ok, trackbot 17:00:18 Meeting: Social Web Working Group Teleconference 17:00:18 Date: 12 April 2016 17:00:22 present+ 17:00:23 present+ 17:00:26 present+ 17:00:30 present+ 17:00:56 present+ 17:01:22 present+ 17:02:29 scribenick:ben_thatmustbeme 17:02:29 congrats! 17:02:31 scribe: ben_thatmustbeme 17:02:32 jaywink has joined #social 17:02:36 scribe: Ben Roberts 17:02:37 zakim, who is here? 17:02:37 Present: cwebber, tantek, ben_thatmustbeme, eprodrom, shevski, wilkie 17:02:39 On IRC I see jaywink, Zakim, RRSAgent, annbass, cwebber2, tantek, eprodrom, jtilles, bblfish_, shevski, jasnell_, oshepherd, wilkie, raucao, rhiaro, ben_thatmustbeme, rrika, 17:02:39 ... Arnaud, aaronpk, tsyesika, bigbluehat, jet, KevinMarks, ElijahLynn, tessierashpool_, bret, dwhly, bitbear, Loqi, wseltzer, trackbot, sandro, shepazu 17:03:06 bengo has joined #social 17:03:11 tantek: first thing on the agenda is approval of minutes from last week 17:03:17 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-04-05-minutes 17:03:21 TOPIC: minutes of last week 17:03:28 looks fine 17:03:33 +1 17:03:38 tantek: could people who were there last week please +1 in IRC if they look file 17:03:39 present+ 17:03:41 s/file/fine 17:03:55 +1 17:04:00 present+ 17:04:04 +1 17:04:08 i was not here last week either 17:04:09 +1 17:04:26 tantek: i think thats a fine number, and lets go ahead and declare them approved 17:04:34 APPROVED: accept minutes of last week 17:04:41 TOPIC: document status 17:04:53 q? 17:05:04 tantek: anyone who is working on document actively, if anyone has anything to add please speak up 17:05:11 q+ 17:05:17 ack eprodrom 17:05:43 eprodrom: i have been talking with the chairs group and we are working to clear any ... for as2 17:05:59 ... I am working on a new editor's draft, this will be the first time doing so on my own 17:06:20 ... aiming for an editor's draft for the end of the week and hoping to publish a WD by the next meeting 17:06:34 hello! trying to dial in now 17:06:39 ... i think that all the important issues have been resolved so at this point its editorial and formatting 17:06:41 this is awesome 17:07:03 tantek: good luck, I believe as soon as you commit to github, it creates the editors draft automatically 17:07:13 q? 17:07:14 ... any other editors? 17:07:21 present+ 17:07:39 present+ 17:07:53 ... aaronpk since you just joined any updates on other documents before we move on to your specific item? 17:08:10 ... tsyesika if you have any updates, nows the time before we move on. 17:08:11 q+ 17:08:11 I should have an update next week but this week for me we can move on 17:08:24 ack aaronpk 17:08:40 aaronpk: ............................ 17:08:43 shoot why isn't my sound working 17:08:54 well, you see, computers 17:09:05 well this isn't going to work well if i can't talk 17:09:28 aaronpk: any one line status updates to provide us via IRC? 17:09:28 dialing in again 17:09:36 yeah - 17:09:40 present+ 17:09:47 minor webmention updates, changelog is here http://webmention.net/draft/#changes-from-29-march-2016-wd-to-this-version 17:09:50 tantek: well we can at least move on to other items while waiting 17:09:58 TOPIC: Propose opening PDX F2F day 2 lunch to local socialweb/indieweb design and development community members to drop in and informally mingle 17:10:00 TOPIC: f2f discussion 17:10:41 tantek: aaronpk proposed having our normally close to WG lunch to be open to the broader PDX design community on the second day 17:10:50 ... any concerns, feedback? 17:11:00 I generally like that. if we place demos around lunch can people come to that? 17:11:07 bengo: it seems like a good idea, but wouldn't dinner be better? 17:11:20 tantek: usually dinner on the second day is informal 17:11:22 fair 17:11:45 +1 to demos around lunch 17:11:53 +1 17:11:55 tantek: wilkie proposed demos around lunch, can people come to that, what to others thing of that 17:12:00 lunch is good for nearby folks 17:12:03 +1 17:12:17 extend lunch to include demo time +1 17:12:40 tantek: seems to be good feedback so i don't think we need to make that a formal proposal, i think its just general feedback 17:12:47 TOPIC: Intro/demo Webmention test suite 17:13:21 we hear ya 17:13:22 I hear you 17:13:26 .rocks 17:13:37 https://webmention.rocks/ 17:13:41 aaronpk: with ispiration from as2.rocks, i created webmention.rocks 17:14:03 present+ 17:14:06 ... the goal is to test various pieces of the spec. there are 8 now that test various parts of webmention discovery 17:14:18 https://webmention.rocks/test/3 17:14:47 ... each looks like a blog post, if you can discover endpoint on it, you can post comments to it 17:15:06 ... I plan to add more tests, i plan to, i'd love for people to hammer on it and test out their webmention clients 17:15:10 mention-tech.appspot.com now passes 17:15:19 q? 17:15:22 Known is being patched by kylewm 17:15:36 oh nice 17:15:43 tantek: i see a lot of comments on these links you just pasted, do you have any idea how many implementations we're seeing on here? 17:15:53 q+ 17:15:59 aaronpk: its hard to tell, i'm going to suggest people comment with information about their implementations 17:16:36 ... i see a couple of known sites, a wordpress one, one i don't recognize, one hand-rolled. looks like at least 3 or 4 sending 17:16:52 q+ 17:17:01 tantek: that looks great, people with implementations should check it out, where can we give feedback? 17:17:03 ack eprodrom 17:17:08 muted 17:17:10 aaronpk: issues link is on the page 17:17:54 eprodrom: aaronpk this is creating a lot of links to other peoples sites, this could be a spam magnet, what are you doing about that? 17:18:17 aaronpk: it only keeps them for 48 hours now, i may curate them to have some stick. 17:18:32 eprodrom: how about putting no-follow, i know its a bit paranoid. 17:18:49 ... i anticipate spamming might become an issue pretty quickly 17:18:53 that will give us a spam testcase 17:19:02 aaronpk: i would be flattered if this got spammed 17:19:05 :-) 17:19:17 +1 17:19:29 ... right now they auto disappear after 2 weeks but i'll drop that down after it gets real traffic 17:19:32 q? 17:19:33 ... i can add nofollow 17:19:41 TOPIC: tracking of issues 17:19:48 tantek: nothing pending review on tracker 17:19:53 TOPIC: other business 17:20:01 tantek: anything else anyone wants to bring up? 17:20:15 *crickets* 17:20:25 tantek: okay, sounds like we are done for the day 17:20:35 ... thank you everyone for participating 17:20:39 thanks all 17:20:40 byebye 17:20:42 ben_thatmustbeme++ 17:20:42 thanks tantek and ben_thatmustbeme! 17:20:44 ... see you next week, same bat-time, same bat-channel 17:20:45 ben_thatmustbeme has 138 karma 17:20:58 s/bat-// 17:21:13 trackbot, end meeting 17:21:13 Zakim, list attendees 17:21:13 As of this point the attendees have been cwebber, tantek, ben_thatmustbeme, eprodrom, shevski, wilkie, bengo, wseltzer, aaronpk, tsyesika, KevinMarks, annbass 17:21:21 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:21:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/04/12-social-minutes.html trackbot 17:21:22 RRSAgent, bye 17:21:22 I see no action items