IRC log of dwbp on 2016-04-08

Timestamps are in UTC.

12:59:01 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #dwbp
12:59:01 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/04/08-dwbp-irc
13:00:29 [phila]
RRSAgent, make logs public
13:00:31 [hadleybeeman]
zakim, who is here?
13:00:31 [Zakim]
Present: PWinstanley
13:00:33 [Zakim]
On IRC I see RRSAgent, BernadetteLoscio, PWinstanley, newton, yaso, phila, Zakim, hadleybeeman, trackbot
13:00:39 [hadleybeeman]
present+ hadleybeeman
13:00:41 [newton]
present+ newton
13:00:43 [annette_g]
annette_g has joined #dwbp
13:00:52 [BernadetteLoscio]
present+ BernadetteLoscio
13:01:21 [phila]
agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160408
13:01:29 [phila]
chair: Hadley
13:01:48 [phila]
regrets+ Ghislain
13:01:55 [Caroline]
Caroline has joined #DWBP
13:01:57 [phila]
regrets+ Dee
13:02:27 [Caroline]
Present+ Caroline
13:03:32 [yaso1]
yaso1 has joined #dwbp
13:04:01 [riccardoAlbertoni]
riccardoAlbertoni has joined #DWBP
13:04:02 [phila]
present+ phila
13:04:33 [yaso]
present+ yaso
13:05:03 [hadleybeeman]
agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160408
13:05:32 [ericstephan]
ericstephan has joined #dwbp
13:05:38 [riccardoAlbertoni]
present+ riccardoAlbertoni
13:05:43 [antoine]
antoine has joined #dwbp
13:05:43 [annette_g]
scribe: annette_g
13:05:49 [annette_g]
present+ annette_g
13:05:54 [hadleybeeman]
https://www.w3.org/2016/04/01-dwbp-minutes
13:05:55 [ericstephan]
sorry time got away from me, calling in shortly
13:06:00 [annette_g]
PROPOSED: accept last week's minutes.
13:06:03 [yaso]
+1
13:06:04 [hadleybeeman]
+1
13:06:09 [BernadetteLoscio]
+1
13:06:19 [riccardoAlbertoni]
+1
13:06:37 [annette_g]
+1, given that Phil fixes the date
13:06:39 [ericstephan]
+1
13:06:42 [antoine]
present+ antoine
13:06:55 [phila]
+1
13:07:11 [newton]
_1
13:07:13 [annette_g]
RESOLVED: accept last week's minutes.
13:07:14 [newton]
+1
13:07:20 [Caroline]
+1
13:07:57 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: 30 seconds of update on the BP doc
13:08:07 [annette_g]
BernadetteLoscio: it's almost ready!
13:08:08 [phila]
Topic: BP doc
13:08:15 [phila]
-> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html Ed Draft of BP
13:08:16 [PWinstanley]
q+
13:08:36 [annette_g]
BernadetteLoscio: we're finishing some more updates, can finish during the day today and freeze at the end of today
13:08:41 [ericstephan]
present+ ericstephan
13:08:49 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: please send a message out when it's time to start reviewing
13:08:56 [laufer]
laufer has joined #dwbp
13:09:02 [phila]
q+ to ask about native speaker bits
13:09:03 [annette_g]
BernadetteLoscio: we want comments during the week. We'll wait to update the doc.
13:09:20 [laufer]
present+ laufer
13:09:35 [annette_g]
BernadetteLoscio: also, we need some help
13:10:11 [annette_g]
BernadetteLoscio: with examples, the structural metadata example in particular. Can Phil help?
13:10:33 [annette_g]
phila: I'll ask people who are more connected with the csv work, but I will try.
13:10:47 [ericstephan]
yes Gregg would be great
13:10:48 [annette_g]
BernadetteLoscio: If it's not possible, we'll freeze like this.
13:10:54 [annette_g]
phila: I'll ask Greg Kellogg
13:11:06 [annette_g]
phila: or someone from the CSV group
13:11:17 [annette_g]
BernadetteLoscio: is it okay to freeze later today?
13:11:20 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: yes
13:11:45 [annette_g]
BernadetteLoscio: we made some editorial changes on intended outcomes of some best practices, so I want feedback about that.
13:12:10 [annette_g]
BernadetteLoscio: we are trying to have a standard way of presenting the outcomes. So if something isn't correct, please tell us
13:12:17 [SumitPurohit]
SumitPurohit has joined #DWBP
13:12:35 [newton]
q+
13:12:41 [hadleybeeman]
ack p
13:12:41 [Zakim]
phila, you wanted to ask about native speaker bits
13:12:45 [phila]
ack pw
13:13:19 [annette_g]
PWinstanley: had a question about policy of content. Is it a good idea to link to live example? One example is the API stuff.
13:13:33 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: we should copy stuff into our doc if we can
13:14:01 [annette_g]
PWinstanley: would like to change the API documentation
13:14:02 [SumitPurohit]
present+ SumitPurohit
13:14:04 [annette_g]
q+
13:14:14 [ericstephan]
We could find a Citation to a paper written on the Flood project
13:14:30 [annette_g]
q-
13:14:43 [annette_g]
phila: I want to do a native speaker review on the doc
13:15:00 [annette_g]
phila: is it okay to do that while it's frozen?
13:15:21 [annette_g]
torking -1
13:15:49 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: my inclination is to do it in parallel but add them at the end
13:16:03 [hadleybeeman]
s/at the end/at the end with all other changes
13:16:09 [phila]
s/tork/fork/
13:16:10 [annette_g]
BernadetteLoscio: the editors think it's okay, Phil can choose
13:16:13 [annette_g]
q+
13:16:28 [ericstephan]
Is this editorial "fracking"? ;-)
13:16:42 [annette_g]
phila: I wouldn't do a merge
13:16:55 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: it sounds to me like that should go with the other changes
13:17:12 [hadleybeeman]
zakim, close the queue
13:17:12 [Zakim]
ok, hadleybeeman, the speaker queue is closed
13:17:17 [annette_g]
q-
13:17:28 [ericstephan]
sorry its something being done in the US where people search for oil underground and create havoc for those living above ground
13:17:30 [hadleybeeman]
ack newton
13:17:43 [annette_g]
annette_g: my experience as an editor screams "don't fork it"
13:17:59 [annette_g]
newton: would someone help with validating the RDF in the doc?
13:18:08 [annette_g]
phila: I'll do that as part of my review
13:18:33 [riccardoAlbertoni]
thanks!!
13:18:38 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: congrats to the editors for doing a fantastic job!
13:18:40 [hadleybeeman]
Zakim, open the queue
13:18:40 [Zakim]
ok, hadleybeeman, the speaker queue is open
13:18:41 [phila]
PROPOSED: Vote of thanks to the BP doc editors for doing so much work
13:18:42 [riccardoAlbertoni]
to the editor of bp
13:18:42 [phila]
+1
13:18:44 [annette_g]
+1
13:18:49 [yaso]
+1
13:18:49 [ericstephan]
++++1
13:19:00 [hadleybeeman]
topic: Data Quality vocab
13:19:01 [newton]
:-)
13:19:03 [riccardoAlbertoni]
http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html
13:19:05 [phila]
RESOLUTION: Vote of thanks to the BP doc editors for doing so much work
13:19:07 [BernadetteLoscio]
:)
13:20:57 [annette_g]
riccardoAlbertoni: we've had some great input, but still have to do some work. Given that the BP doc is where it is, we're thinking about how to schedule the DQV. we could consider another round of feedback or try to take advantage of the 3 weeks in which we're waiting for comments on the BP doc.
13:21:59 [annette_g]
riccardoAlbertoni: I'd like to hear the opinion of the group. From the point of view of transparency, adding a new working draft is a good option, but I'm worried that if we add new comments that will distract us from ongoing edits.
13:22:26 [annette_g]
@hadleybeeman help never hurts, but yes
13:23:02 [annette_g]
riccardoAlbertoni: I'd like to know the group's preference.
13:23:36 [annette_g]
antoine: I think I"m okay getting feedback. We're already aiming in that direction.
13:23:38 [hadleybeeman]
q+ to ask about implementations
13:23:50 [phila]
q+ to be the ex-advertising bloke
13:24:03 [annette_g]
riccardoAlbertoni: but should we do that with a new draft or not?
13:24:07 [hadleybeeman]
ack phila
13:24:07 [Zakim]
phila, you wanted to be the ex-advertising bloke
13:24:42 [annette_g]
phila: we're heading towards a date when we'll be saying the BP doc is done unless you think otherwise (last call).
13:25:00 [ericstephan]
and in conclusion e=mc squared..
13:25:17 [annette_g]
phila: it's a nice PR message
13:25:22 [phila]
I'm saying we should get feedback on all docs together
13:25:25 [ericstephan]
:-)
13:25:45 [phila]
q?
13:25:47 [ericstephan]
q+
13:25:49 [phila]
ack h
13:25:49 [Zakim]
hadleybeeman, you wanted to ask about implementations
13:26:53 [ericstephan]
+1 hadleybeeman
13:26:55 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: the vocabs are not rec track, but we do get a lot of credibility by demonstrating that it's not stuff we just made up by ourselves. It would be good for the vocabs to go out to the general public and help us build up our documentation to justify the decisions we're making.
13:27:04 [hadleybeeman]
ack eric
13:27:58 [annette_g]
ericstephan: I understand the need to say we've completed these activities, but the data modeler in me says that vocabs will continue to change because they always do. How do we deal with that in the future?
13:28:02 [ericstephan]
oh no
13:29:01 [annette_g]
phila: one the WG is closed, the team is responsible for maintenance.
13:29:16 [ericstephan]
nice
13:29:43 [ericstephan]
regarding content negociation by profile
13:29:44 [annette_g]
phila: the next working group will be doing an update of DCAT, will look at content negotiation by profile, could potentially also come back to the DQV and DUV to put them on the rec track..
13:30:02 [BernadetteLoscio]
great :)
13:30:30 [ericstephan]
q+
13:30:33 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: there's a certain amount of stability that we need to emphasis by completing a version of this (or anything). Industry or developers need to be able to focus on something stable for a length of time.
13:30:43 [phila]
ack e
13:31:39 [annette_g]
ericstephan: one of the things we found in the DUV is that there are holes in DCAT, so I"m very excited about the revision of DCAT. The DUV could in some ways update based on what DCAT does.
13:32:08 [antoine]
q+
13:32:16 [hadleybeeman]
ack antoine
13:32:22 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: back to riccardoAlbertoni's question. Should they get feedback in parallel with the BP doc or use the time to write?
13:32:40 [annette_g]
riccardoAlbertoni: would the doc continue to be a public working draft?
13:32:49 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: yes, until it becomes a note
13:32:56 [riccardoAlbertoni]
q+
13:33:23 [annette_g]
antoine: I'm leaning toward making a public working draft
13:33:50 [annette_g]
riccardoAlbertoni: that means we have to finish up some things. Is that okay for you, antoine?
13:34:10 [annette_g]
antoine: we can put in some notes marking things as unfinished and asking for feedback
13:34:25 [phila]
ack r
13:34:41 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: in order to publish next week, we still need to get the working group to vote, which means we have to be okay that it's not finishted.
13:35:09 [PWinstanley]
PWinstanley has joined #dwbp
13:35:18 [PWinstanley]
present+ PWinstanley
13:35:21 [phila]
Yes, there is more time for changes for the vocabs than for the BP doc
13:35:22 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: I don't want people to be saying we should not publish because they still want to make changes. there will still be plenty of time for changes afterward.
13:35:38 [annette_g]
… are you guys okay with that
13:35:41 [annette_g]
antoine: yes
13:35:54 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: DUV update?
13:35:59 [phila]
Topic: DUV
13:35:59 [ericstephan]
http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-du.html
13:36:56 [ericstephan]
https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Data_usage_schedule
13:37:31 [annette_g]
ericstephan: the DUV right now has been making some slight changes in some of the examples (more elaborate, aligned with the bus timetable example), we tried to link in from the vocabulary overview section. We're trying to put things into some sort of a final state. There was a request for a schedule.
13:38:02 [ericstephan]
https://www.force11.org/meetings/force2016
13:38:37 [annette_g]
ericstephan: BernadetteLoscio provided some editorial changes, so we pushed things out to April 10. Also coming up this week is that I'm going to be going to a Force 11 conference where we'll present a poster on the DUV. We hope to get community feedback there.
13:38:41 [phila]
q+
13:38:47 [annette_g]
ericstephan: any questions?
13:38:50 [hadleybeeman]
ack ph
13:39:34 [annette_g]
phila: thank you eric for getting into the Force11 event. Have you created the poster, can we get some images of it and you in Portland?
13:39:44 [annette_g]
ericstephan: yes, I'll be happy to do that
13:40:18 [annette_g]
ericstephan: I was asked to participate in a debate about good open standards practices. I want to refer to our best practices doc.
13:41:04 [annette_g]
ericstephan: I've reached out to some communities about how you measure citations. If you reference a paper, what is the value of that? There should be some interesting nuances in data usage that I can come back with.
13:41:16 [phila]
Thank you Eric
13:41:20 [ericstephan]
http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-du.html#conclusion
13:41:48 [annette_g]
ericstephan: one last thing: this may be a bit controversial, I put a conclusion in. It brings up future work. I don't know if this is protocol.
13:42:27 [phila]
q+ to talk about [vocab-dcat] and normative/nn in vocabs
13:42:30 [annette_g]
ericstephan: I don't know what's normal for that, but these are our desires for where this work could go.
13:42:33 [hadleybeeman]
ack phila
13:42:33 [Zakim]
phila, you wanted to talk about [vocab-dcat] and normative/nn in vocabs
13:43:00 [ericstephan]
I am all ears
13:43:02 [annette_g]
phila: It's difficult.
13:44:14 [annette_g]
phila: I struggle with putting this in a document like this. I think this belongs more in a blog post or group page. I'll think about it some more. I recognize that that's how it's done when you publish scientific research.
13:44:28 [annette_g]
ericstephan: I love the idea of if it's on our web site.
13:44:51 [ericstephan]
understood :-)
13:44:51 [annette_g]
phila: we have to think about what the frozen group web page looks like when we finish up.
13:45:16 [ericstephan]
interesting, ok no normative
13:45:20 [annette_g]
phila: becaues it's a note, nothing is normative, so it's not appropriate to talk about normative /non-normative
13:45:37 [ericstephan]
thank you phila!
13:45:42 [phila]
I believe the reference for DCAT is vocab-dcat
13:46:11 [ericstephan]
thank you hadleybeeman!
13:46:16 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: it's really useful to be able to go back and see what we wanted to do next, so it will be good to capture that somewhere useful.
13:46:20 [hadleybeeman]
q?
13:46:26 [ericstephan]
q+
13:46:36 [hadleybeeman]
ack eric
13:46:37 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: let's look at actions
13:47:20 [phila]
We have a process for translations
13:47:51 [phila]
Labels etc in the RDF file can be added reaily enough
13:47:52 [annette_g]
ericstephan: there is one thing in the schedule I want to mention. Those of us a the national labs have a lot of connection to people who speak different languages. we'd like to get as many different languages into the DUV as possile. Japanese, mandarin, russian, spanish, portuguese, all would be good to cover.
13:49:15 [hadleybeeman]
https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/
13:49:29 [annette_g]
phila: docs in /tr space link to translations. we normally run things past a translator person. DCAT has labels in a bunch of languages all in one document, which is pure pornography if you're a UTF person.
13:49:39 [phila]
action-208?
13:49:39 [trackbot]
action-208 -- Antoine Isaac to Contact oa wg to see whether they would consider adding dqv motivation -- due 2016-04-01 -- OPEN
13:49:39 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/208
13:49:49 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: is that still open?
13:49:56 [annette_g]
antoine: yes, that continues
13:50:05 [annette_g]
action-210
13:50:05 [trackbot]
action-210 -- Eric Stephan to Investigate the relationship between dqv and duv wrt citations that can be considered as a quality annotation -- due 2016-04-04 -- OPEN
13:50:05 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/210
13:50:07 [phila]
action-210?
13:50:07 [trackbot]
action-210 -- Eric Stephan to Investigate the relationship between dqv and duv wrt citations that can be considered as a quality annotation -- due 2016-04-04 -- OPEN
13:50:07 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/210
13:50:21 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: is that still open, Eric?
13:50:24 [phila]
action-226
13:50:24 [trackbot]
action-226 -- Newton Calegari to To move the indexes and keep the BP Summary at the top of the doc -- due 2016-02-12 -- PENDINGREVIEW
13:50:24 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/226
13:50:27 [annette_g]
ericstephan: yes
13:50:46 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: newton, what's the status?
13:51:02 [annette_g]
newton: we can close this one
13:51:05 [phila]
close action-226
13:51:05 [trackbot]
Closed action-226.
13:51:31 [annette_g]
phila: done!
13:51:39 [phila]
action-227?
13:51:39 [trackbot]
action-227 -- Antoine Isaac to Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. -- due 2016-04-01 -- OPEN
13:51:39 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/227
13:52:07 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: is it open still?
13:52:11 [annette_g]
antoine: yes
13:52:15 [phila]
action-229
13:52:15 [trackbot]
action-229 -- Phil Archer to Send bp editors implementation-questionaire template -- due 2016-03-15 -- OPEN
13:52:15 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/229
13:52:33 [annette_g]
phila: that has come screaming up my todo list
13:52:35 [phila]
phila: Expect it next week
13:52:53 [hadleybeeman]
action-230?
13:52:53 [trackbot]
action-230 -- Caroline Burle to Create process for gathering evidence of implementations, e.g. wiki, google form -- due 2016-03-15 -- OPEN
13:52:53 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/230
13:53:14 [annette_g]
Caroline: this is something we discussed in zagreb, we can close it
13:53:31 [hadleybeeman]
action-231?
13:53:31 [trackbot]
action-231 -- Annette Greiner to Talk to eric wilde about open comments and reach resolution -- due 2016-02-19 -- OPEN
13:53:31 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/231
13:53:48 [hadleybeeman]
annette_g: I spoke to him. We weren't able to resolve it. He had concerns we hadn't addressed.
13:53:51 [phila]
phila has joined #dwbp
13:54:07 [hadleybeeman]
...We have addressed it since then. There have been several attempts to get his response, but he has hasn't replied.
13:54:59 [annette_g]
phila: he responded today
13:55:00 [Caroline]
q+ to askt the group to hepl with this https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n6tOphCLXLrzHrdyRUHVgrgx1YARdauBQBy9jSJXgDQ/edit#gid=0
13:55:09 [phila]
I just forwarded Erik's mail to the list in case it didn't make it
13:55:11 [hadleybeeman]
action-232?
13:55:11 [trackbot]
action-232 -- Antoine Isaac to Look into reference to ogc in http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#metadatastandardized (raised during joint call with sdw) -- due 2016-02-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW
13:55:11 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/232
13:55:13 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: sounds like that's still open
13:55:43 [annette_g]
antoine: I think that's been sent to SDW, and I haven't heard anything, so I think we can close it.
13:55:51 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: should we follow up with them?
13:56:06 [annette_g]
antoine: if someone else wants to do that, they can do that
13:56:20 [Caroline]
s/hepl/help
13:56:20 [annette_g]
antoine: if there's a new version, hopefully they will get in touch.
13:56:26 [phila]
+1 to hadleybeeman
13:56:31 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: we should ask them to make sure they do review it.
13:56:38 [annette_g]
action-233
13:56:38 [trackbot]
action-233 -- Newton Calegari to Check if the turtle and rdfa examples are validated -- due 2016-04-01 -- OPEN
13:56:39 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/233
13:56:42 [phila]
close action-237
13:56:42 [trackbot]
Closed action-237.
13:56:52 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: you were asking for help on that
13:57:10 [phila]
See previous about getting SDW review
13:57:11 [BernadetteLoscio]
q+
13:57:22 [phila]
I don't think it's needed as SDW is watching us anywat
13:57:24 [BernadetteLoscio]
I think so!
13:57:31 [BernadetteLoscio]
q-
13:57:42 [BernadetteLoscio]
We had a lot of discussions about this
13:57:51 [BernadetteLoscio]
yes, I agree!
13:58:18 [annette_g]
action-239
13:58:18 [trackbot]
action-239 -- Peter Winstanley to Check on using an example about real-time data for bp23 -- due 2016-03-25 -- OPEN
13:58:18 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/239
13:58:40 [phila]
close action-232
13:58:40 [trackbot]
Closed action-232.
13:58:41 [BernadetteLoscio]
Eric sent a first version and we included in the doc!
13:58:45 [annette_g]
PWinstanley: that's what eric and I were working on just recently, we're likely to have something very soon
13:58:45 [phila]
action-241
13:58:45 [trackbot]
action-241 -- Hadley Beeman to Review bp 22 -- due 2016-03-18 -- OPEN
13:58:45 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/241
13:58:53 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: Phil and I did that last week
13:58:54 [phila]
close action-241
13:58:54 [trackbot]
Closed action-241.
13:59:00 [annette_g]
action-242
13:59:00 [trackbot]
action-242 -- Newton Calegari to Follow up on issue 220 -- due 2016-03-18 -- OPEN
13:59:00 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/242
13:59:05 [annette_g]
newton: we can close that
13:59:09 [annette_g]
action-243
13:59:09 [trackbot]
action-243 -- Caroline Burle to Arrange redseign of the challenges diagram -- due 2016-03-21 -- OPEN
13:59:09 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/243
13:59:16 [phila]
close action-242
13:59:16 [trackbot]
Closed action-242.
13:59:22 [annette_g]
Caroline: it's still open because we need help with it
13:59:27 [phila]
phila: I think that's on my plate
13:59:31 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: what do you need?
13:59:34 [phila]
SVG
13:59:46 [BernadetteLoscio]
yes! SVG :)
13:59:53 [phila]
I like playing with SVG :-)
14:00:01 [yaso]
I can help, depending on the schedule
14:00:06 [yaso]
I like svg too
14:00:10 [annette_g]
Caroline: we discussed in zagreb, phila said he might help us, but he already has this huge job of the native speaker review.
14:00:25 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: phila, I can help with the native speaker review
14:00:32 [annette_g]
PWinstanley: I can help with it too
14:00:37 [annette_g]
Caroline: you guys rock
14:00:54 [Caroline]
thank you! :)
14:01:01 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: let's have PWinstanley look at both of our sections
14:01:05 [phila]
close action-243
14:01:05 [trackbot]
Closed action-243.
14:01:14 [phila]
action: phila to redo the challenges diagram
14:01:16 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-272 - Redo the challenges diagram [on Phil Archer - due 2016-04-15].
14:01:20 [annette_g]
action-244
14:01:20 [trackbot]
action-244 -- Newton Calegari to Remove the 2nd line of test section and rewrite the intended outcome of the bp2 provide descriptive metadata -- due 2016-03-21 -- OPEN
14:01:20 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/244
14:01:23 [phila]
action-244?
14:01:23 [trackbot]
action-244 -- Newton Calegari to Remove the 2nd line of test section and rewrite the intended outcome of the bp2 provide descriptive metadata -- due 2016-03-21 -- OPEN
14:01:23 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/244
14:01:35 [annette_g]
newton: we can close this
14:01:40 [phila]
close action-244
14:01:40 [trackbot]
Closed action-244.
14:01:57 [phila]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
14:01:57 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/04/08-dwbp-minutes.html phila
14:02:10 [riccardoAlbertoni]
thanks all ...
14:02:11 [laufer]
bye all... nice wkd...
14:02:12 [Caroline]
thank you!!
14:02:12 [ericstephan]
Will the phone line be open for a few minutes?
14:02:13 [riccardoAlbertoni]
bye
14:02:19 [yaso]
Bye!
14:02:23 [annette_g]
hadleybeeman: we should close the call at this point. Eveyrbody's homework is to review the BP doc.
14:02:35 [SumitPurohit]
Thanks...
14:02:55 [hadleybeeman]
Next week: Vote to publish new draft of BP doc and DQV.
14:20:22 [ericstephan]
https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-primer-20130430/#derivation-and-revision-1
14:36:25 [BernadetteLoscio]
https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/252
14:49:26 [phila]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HATEOAS
15:12:09 [phila]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
15:12:09 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/04/08-dwbp-minutes.html phila
15:12:38 [phila]
Meeting: DWBP Weekly
15:12:45 [phila]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
15:12:45 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/04/08-dwbp-minutes.html phila
15:21:10 [phila]
zakim, bye
15:21:10 [Zakim]
leaving. As of this point the attendees have been PWinstanley, hadleybeeman, newton, BernadetteLoscio, Caroline, phila, yaso, riccardoAlbertoni, annette_g, antoine, ericstephan,
15:21:10 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #dwbp
15:21:13 [Zakim]
... laufer, SumitPurohit, +++1
15:21:21 [phila]
RRSAgent, bye
15:21:21 [RRSAgent]
I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2016/04/08-dwbp-actions.rdf :
15:21:21 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: phila to redo the challenges diagram [1]
15:21:21 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/04/08-dwbp-irc#T14-01-14