15:48:34 RRSAgent has joined #coga 15:48:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/03/07-coga-irc 15:50:13 Chair:Lisa_Seeman 15:50:14 agenda: this 15:50:16 agenda+ review actions, and timelines 15:50:17 agenda+ Tables for roadmap 15:50:19 agenda+ What have we missed for issues page,Emma, globish etc 15:50:20 agenda+ be done 15:50:45 next item 16:32:43 next item 16:49:12 JohnRochford has joined #coga 16:59:57 Rich has joined #coga 17:00:24 ddahl has joined #coga 17:02:43 https://www.w3.org/blog/2015/09/tpac-2016-dates-and-location-announced/ 17:04:33 kirkwood has joined #coga 17:05:48 KurtM has joined #COGA 17:06:40 scribe: JohnRochford 17:07:06 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/track/actions/open 17:08:11 michael are you there 17:08:13 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page#Current_schedules 17:08:59 Lisa: I will have a coordination call with Michael afterwards 17:09:30 Lisa: ddahl has open action items 17:10:09 https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html 17:10:14 Lisa: Next issue is to look at tables 17:11:11 Lisa: 1st table - anyone need more time to look at that? 17:12:22 https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/techniques/index.html 17:13:27 Lisa: To create Table 1, I looked at security in techniques document 17:13:38 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposal_for_WCAG 17:14:15 Rich: First link in Table 1 goes to Lisa's C: drive. 17:17:13 present+ Janina 17:17:52 Lisa is describing work put into Table 1 17:18:39 Q? 17:19:00 Lisa: Does Table 1 make sense? 17:19:24 Lisa: Who thinks that it does make sense? 17:19:55 Rich: For this example, the content ties into the information above it in a clean way. 17:20:55 Correction: KurtM said "For this example, the content ties into the information above it in a clean way." 17:21:42 Lisa: Let's look at Table 7, which was harder / more difficult. 17:22:11 Lisa: I have to go back and redo Table 7. 17:24:07 Lisa is describing work she performed on Table 7. 17:25:02 KurtM: Lisa, are you matching slow readers with comprehension? 17:26:12 Lisa resumes describing Table 7 work. 17:26:40 Lisa: Are people happy with Table 7? 17:26:53 Q? 17:27:28 Lisa: Do the tables (7 & 1) make sense to people? 17:28:22 scribe error 17:28:30 it was kurt 17:29:05 zakim, mute me 17:29:05 sorry, janina, I can't do that anymore 17:31:14 https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html 17:32:18 debie: the tables are realy long , so much in a cell 17:32:29 lisa: we could move out the discusion 17:32:53 scribe: Lisa_Seeman 17:32:58 debie: the tables are realy long , so much in a cell 17:33:02 lisa: we could move out the discusion 17:33:25 kurt: when would people look at the links - it dig deaper? 17:33:37 and should be be after 17:34:04 Lisa: I wouldnt, people need to see it 17:34:29 for one row 17:35:01 debie agrees with kurt 17:35:59 John R link to the bottem for the 17:36:21 Lisa: have a link to it from the user need 17:38:30 John R: likes the table anoying horisontal table. but why do we need it 17:38:59 for other userg groups who will complain whjy need things 17:44:03 john: to much information 17:44:27 maybe each table will be its own page 17:44:49 scribe: JohnRochford 17:45:23 Rich has joined #coga 17:46:35 ddahl: Is it redundant to have explanatory text and links to that text (external to the page)? 17:48:01 Lisa: A problem is that the link URLs will change. 17:48:04 https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html 17:48:48 Michael: Global copy and replace would not be too hard. 17:49:20 Michael: Editing tables is a pain in the arse. 17:50:11 Michael: You could move all the content to GitHub now. 17:50:47 Michael: It is easier to share editing in GitHub than it is in the Wiki. 17:52:03 Michael: I recommend not overwhelming the table with content; and instead using links. Also, you could have dynamic tables. 17:53:38 Michael: A common approach is to have a twistie that opens up more content. 17:53:59 q? 17:54:57 scribe: Lisa_Seeman 17:55:08 i like the idea of more content palled in real time 17:55:26 jquery will support it 17:55:58 michale: libarier or html summaries might do ti 17:56:36 1.4.3 Instructions, labels, navigation and important information are provided with a clear writing style that includes: 17:56:44 miss out the bullet pints 17:57:11
1.4.3 Instructions, labels, navigation and important information are provided with a clear writing style
17:57:18
17:57:21 1.4.3 Instructions, labels, navigation and important information are provided with a clear writing style 17:57:26
17:57:28 17:57:28 1.4.3 Instructions, labels, navigation and important information are provided with a clear writing style 17:57:31 17:57:33 bullets 17:57:35
17:58:33 kurt: that will make more digestible 17:59:29 ddahl has left #coga 17:59:40 It´s a HTML 5.1 feature: https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/semantics.html#the-details-element 17:59:58 Probably need a script ¨polyfill¨ for backwards compatibility, but can manage ti 18:00:01 lisa: doing it by script will keep it current 18:00:11 even if the wording on the souce changes 18:02:54 1.4.3 Instructions, labels, navigation and important information are provided with a clear writing style that includes: 18:02:56 more 18:09:32 rrsagent, make logs public 18:09:44 rrsagent, create minutes 18:09:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/03/07-coga-minutes.html Lisa_Seeman 18:09:53 kirkwood has left #coga 18:10:31 zakim, please part 18:10:31 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Janina, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Debbie_Dahl, JohnRochford 18:10:31 Zakim has left #coga 18:10:42 rrsagent, please part 18:10:42 I see no action items