17:04:39 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #audio
17:04:39 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/02/25-audio-irc
17:04:41 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
17:04:43 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 28346
17:04:43 <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
17:04:44 <trackbot> Meeting: Audio Working Group Teleconference
17:04:44 <trackbot> Date: 25 February 2016
17:04:56 <ChrisL>  this works as the access code
17:05:07 <padenot> using the phone yea ?
17:05:11 <hongchan> present+ hongchan
17:05:12 <rtoyg_m> present+ rtoyg_m
17:05:15 <padenot> I had no luck on the android app
17:05:16 <ChrisL> using the client, too
17:05:19 <joe> present+ joe
17:05:33 <padenot> ah well, I must have mistyped, I tried twice though
17:05:44 <jdsmith> present+ jdsmith
17:06:05 <rtoyg_m> That was us.
17:07:06 <ChrisL> scribenick: mdjp
17:07:19 <mdjp> Agenda+ Audioworker discussion, aim to find the quickest route to competing the audio worker spec.
17:07:24 <mdjp> bah
17:07:41 <mdjp> Item 1 Audioworker discussion, aim to find the quickest route to competing the audio worker spec.
17:07:50 <ChrisL> zakim, take up agenda item 6
17:07:50 <Zakim> 'item\ 6' does not match any agenda item, ChrisL
17:08:04 <mdjp> I'll wing it
17:08:22 <mdjp> joe is the worklet spec in a state where we can define audio worker and proceed
17:08:32 <mdjp> joe if not what is blocking
17:08:58 <mdjp> iank belives we sould be able to spec if anything is needed which not aware of can make it a high priority
17:09:23 <mdjp> padenot: once changes merged in will try to write the text for aworker and report back if there are any problems
17:09:50 <mdjp> iank might be parts which are rendering specific but should have got rid of those
17:10:27 <mdjp> iank can we chat next week or week after padnot will look at text first but will be useful
17:10:34 <ChrisL> s/Item 1/Topic/
17:11:09 <mdjp> padenot based on early worklet text doesn't see any api changes on our side
17:11:12 <ChrisL> seems good to me
17:11:18 <mdjp> Item 2 Issues requiring WG review https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Needs+WG+review%22
17:11:36 <ChrisL> s/Item 2/Topic: /
17:13:15 <mdjp> joe issue 12 pozdnyakov proposed a workable example (see gh issue) joe in favour of going ahead with the prototype pr
17:13:30 <mdjp> joe different to previously discussed approach
17:13:39 <joe> x`https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/12#issuecomment-188858860
17:13:42 <joe> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/12#issuecomment-188858860
17:15:32 <rtoyg_m> He said he works on Crosswalk, a derivative of Chromium.
17:15:52 <mdjp> joe any objections.......no
17:16:45 <joe> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/348
17:17:00 <cwilso> present+ cwilso
17:17:38 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been padenot, ChrisL, joe, hongchan, rtoyg_m, jdsmith, cwilso
17:17:55 <ChrisL> present+ mdjp
17:18:47 <mdjp> scribe is struggling to hear - is it the same for everyone?
17:20:33 <mdjp> cwilso feedback that we want to specify number of frames rather than preset values,feedback in both directions - probably better to expose numbers rather than categories but either way is implementable
17:22:14 <mdjp> padenot the categories are very platform specific
17:22:59 <mdjp> cwilso balancing between users who are not concerned with precise latency and pro daw aps where users would expect to be tweeking values
17:23:39 <mdjp> rtoyg_m: interactive, media and custom (number)
17:24:47 <mdjp> joe this is an audio context creation option padenot it is possible to change it example deactivate a bluetooth device while playing when latency will reduce, that has to be handled
17:25:01 <mdjp> cwilso not sure if this would be graceful but has to be handled
17:25:49 <mdjp> joe either decide or defer entire feature cwilso defering would be a very bad outcome
17:26:19 <mdjp> cwilso nomnates rtoyg_m to comeup with a solution which we will stick to.....
17:26:35 <mdjp> rtoyg_m  nomnates cwilso  to comeup with a solution which we will stick to.....
17:27:02 <joe> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/566
17:28:42 <mdjp> cwilso no reson these would be harmful
17:28:46 <mdjp> joe lets allow them
17:29:09 <mdjp> cwilso you would expect to be able to create eg unit testing we shoudl enable them
17:29:28 <mdjp> joe agreed - no objections.
17:30:12 <mdjp> Item 3 New and Uncommitted issues https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+no%3Amilestone
17:31:02 <mdjp> rtoyg_m mostly simple changes on this list
17:31:21 <mdjp> rtoyg_m issue 719 need discussion
17:31:24 <hongchan> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/719
17:32:02 <mdjp> rtoyg_m its not clear that the down mixing is as agreed at the last f2f
17:32:45 <mdjp> cwilso thinks this is fine
17:32:47 <mdjp> rtoyg_m its not what is being done in chrome today
17:35:10 <mdjp> rtoyg_m happy with the way it is in the spec
17:35:37 <mdjp> padenot fine by me - its an edge case
17:35:50 <mdjp> cwilso leave as it is in the spec - agreed
17:36:08 <joe> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/723
17:36:45 <mdjp> joe suggest we close - agreed no objections
17:37:23 <ChrisL> sgtm
17:37:34 <mdjp> Next meeting 10th March
17:37:49 <mdjp> joe not likely to be able to go to atlanta
17:39:17 <joe> rrsagent, make minutes
17:39:17 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/25-audio-minutes.html joe
17:39:31 <mdjp> trackbot, end meeting
17:39:31 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
17:39:31 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been padenot, ChrisL, joe, hongchan, rtoyg_m, jdsmith, cwilso, mdjp
17:39:39 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
17:39:39 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/25-audio-minutes.html trackbot
17:39:40 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
17:39:40 <RRSAgent> I see no action items