IRC log of aria on 2016-02-25
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 17:21:43 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #aria
- 17:21:43 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/02/25-aria-irc
- 17:21:45 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 17:21:45 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #aria
- 17:21:47 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 17:21:47 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 17:21:47 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- chair: Rich
- 17:21:48 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference
- 17:21:48 [trackbot]
- Date: 25 February 2016
- 17:22:08 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- meeting: W3C ARIA Working Group Meeting
- 17:22:14 [jemma]
- jemma has joined #aria
- 17:22:17 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- RRSAgent, make log public
- 17:22:51 [dkaplan3]
- dkaplan3 has joined #aria
- 17:23:00 [jemma]
- present+ JaEunJemmaKu
- 17:27:18 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Feb/0398.html
- 17:27:26 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger
- 17:28:22 [janina]
- present+ Janina
- 17:28:44 [dkaplan3]
- present+ Deborah_Kaplan
- 17:29:39 [fesch]
- fesch has joined #aria
- 17:30:57 [joanie]
- present+ Joanmarie_Diggs
- 17:31:16 [fesch]
- present+ fesch
- 17:31:43 [Stefan]
- Stefan has joined #aria
- 17:32:58 [Stefan]
- Scribe: Stefan
- 17:33:14 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Feb/0398.html
- 17:33:32 [clown]
- clown has joined #aria
- 17:33:32 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-admin/2016Feb/0007.html
- 17:33:45 [cyns]
- cyns has joined #aria
- 17:34:04 [Stefan]
- Topic: issue 1009 CFC
- 17:34:06 [BogdanBrinza]
- BogdanBrinza has joined #aria
- 17:34:10 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-admin/2016Feb/0007.html
- 17:34:34 [clown]
- present+ Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 17:34:48 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger
- 17:34:49 [Stefan]
- Rich: any input?
- 17:35:18 [Stefan]
- Joanie: Joseph proposed change, was that made?
- 17:36:05 [Stefan]
- Joanie: should I wait?
- 17:36:11 [clown]
- is this the url: https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1009/aria/aria.html#aria-details
- 17:36:12 [Stefan]
- Rich: go pull it
- 17:36:13 [clown]
- ?
- 17:36:26 [Stefan]
- Joanie: I will merge
- 17:36:37 [clown]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1009/aria/aria.html#aria-details
- 17:36:41 [MichielBijl]
- present+ MichielBijl
- 17:36:52 [MichielBijl]
- present- MichielBijl
- 17:36:58 [MichielBijl]
- present+ Michiel_Bijl
- 17:37:03 [Stefan]
- Rich : OK I made the change
- 17:37:03 [jongund]
- jongund has joined #aria
- 17:37:21 [Stefan]
- Rich: next thing is heartbeat drafts
- 17:37:34 [clown]
- action-2031
- 17:37:34 [trackbot]
- action-2031 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to Update ARIA 1.1 Abstract and Introduction to accommodate SVG in addition to HTML -- due 2016-03-01 -- PENDINGREVIEW
- 17:37:34 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2031
- 17:37:42 [mck]
- mck has joined #aria
- 17:37:43 [Stefan]
- Rich: Michael 2031 and merge it?
- 17:37:55 [LJWatson]
- LJWatson has joined #aria
- 17:38:08 [Stefan]
- Michael: i'm not ready yet
- 17:38:08 [clown]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2031/aria/aria.html
- 17:38:21 [Stefan]
- Rich: when is the date?
- 17:38:21 [mck]
- present+ matt_king
- 17:38:23 [LJWatson]
- present+ LJWatson
- 17:38:39 [Stefan]
- Michael: have to look to editors minutes
- 17:38:45 [clown]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Feb/0383.html
- 17:39:14 [Stefan]
- Michael: not this week .. next week
- 17:39:26 [Stefan]
- Michael: by March 11th
- 17:39:29 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/2016/02/17-aria-editors-minutes.html#item01 Current publication timelines
- 17:40:05 [Stefan]
- Rich: Joanie ready next week?
- 17:40:20 [MichaelC]
- present+ MichaelC
- 17:41:05 [AmeliaBR]
- AmeliaBR has joined #aria
- 17:42:01 [Stefan]
- Rich: we have dpub graphics etc. should we put all in there?
- 17:42:45 [Stefan]
- Michael: q for the group, personal opinion is better to point to intermediate resource, reccommended: aria intro
- 17:43:06 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/aria ARIA Intro
- 17:43:29 [Stefan]
- Rich: anybody issue with it?
- 17:43:52 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2031/aria/aria.html
- 17:44:01 [Stefan]
- Still action 2031
- 17:44:24 [Stefan]
- Joseph: theres a huge list of docs ...
- 17:45:19 [jamesn]
- jamesn has joined #aria
- 17:45:26 [Stefan]
- Here were no objections to Rich's question
- 17:46:03 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 17:46:10 [jamesn]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:46:10 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/25-aria-minutes.html jamesn
- 17:47:05 [bgaraventa1979]
- bgaraventa1979 has joined #aria
- 17:47:25 [bgaraventa1979]
- present+ Bryan_Garaventa
- 17:47:28 [Stefan]
- Matt: people needs to be aware of aria versions there are looking at
- 17:48:02 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/aria#wai-aria-1_1 1.1 specific part of the ARIA intro
- 17:48:07 [Stefan]
- Rich: some refs will be removed
- 17:48:47 [Stefan]
- Rich: we need cFC for non-normative text .. but action is closed .. objections? None
- 17:49:52 [clown]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2031/aria/aria.html#ua-support
- 17:49:59 [Stefan]
- Rich: section 1.3 has old link to imp guide
- 17:50:16 [clown]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2031/aria/aria.html#at_support
- 17:50:27 [Stefan]
- Rich: needs some polishing -> action to Michael
- 17:50:39 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- Action: Michael Search for old links and update them in the ARIA 1.1 spec.
- 17:50:40 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2033 - Search for old links and update them in the aria 1.1 spec. [on Michael Cooper - due 2016-03-03].
- 17:51:14 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- Action: Rich Remove reference to UAAG and reference EO ARIA 1.1 Suite of documents
- 17:51:15 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2034 - Remove reference to uaag and reference eo aria 1.1 suite of documents [on Richard Schwerdtfeger - due 2016-03-03].
- 17:51:33 [Stefan]
- RESOLUTION: close 707 and action 2031
- 17:51:54 [clown]
- issue-707
- 17:51:54 [trackbot]
- issue-707 -- Update ARIA 1.1 Abstract and Introduction -- open
- 17:51:54 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/707
- 17:52:13 [Stefan]
- topic: ARIA Test Coordination Call to
- 17:52:30 [Stefan]
- Topic: ARIA Test Coordination Call #
- 17:52:32 [clown]
- http://doodle.com/poll/g4kixuskyfvgmm24hakmvpig/admin#table
- 17:54:13 [Stefan]
- Michael: checking the invites ..
- 17:54:22 [Stefan]
- Rich: we can do this by email
- 17:54:28 [Stefan]
- Rich: after the call
- 17:54:46 [Stefan]
- Rich: there is a separate list
- 17:54:54 [MichaelC]
- Webex for next monday´s meeting: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m7e86f0230b1b7a09167aa46b4be2800a meeting number 647 399 010
- 17:55:23 [Stefan]
- Michael: forward to testing group
- 17:56:13 [Stefan]
- Topic: COMBO BOX
- 17:56:28 [Stefan]
- 1490: Combobox (20 minutes *max* discussion) Matt
- 17:56:31 [clown]
- action-1490
- 17:56:31 [trackbot]
- action-1490 -- Matthew King to Propose spec text edit for issue-610: comboboxes should allow complex children elements -- due 2016-02-03 -- OPEN
- 17:56:31 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1490
- 17:56:49 [mck]
- <div role=combobox aria-owns=list> <span role=textbox> </span> </div> <ul id=list role = listbox> </ul>
- 17:56:59 [Stefan]
- Matt: we have consesus around 1.1 structural for combo
- 17:57:23 [Stefan]
- Matt: composite widget, has a textbox, popoup element shown as listbox and siblings
- 17:57:44 [Stefan]
- Matt: clear to NVDA and FS on board from API perspective
- 17:58:44 [Stefan]
- Matt: advantages for 1.1 structure: 1. you can determine value of combo since there is textbox element 2. screen reader has ability to make both parts seprately percievable
- 17:59:25 [mck]
- <div role=combobox aria-owns=list> <span tabindex=0 role=textbox>value being edited </span> </div> <ul id=list role = listbox> focusable options with tabindex -1 </ul>
- 18:00:04 [Stefan]
- Matt: next part of discussion: focus managenment and ara-activedescendant: if focus is on textbox (DOM focus)
- 18:00:40 [mck]
- <div role=combobox aria-owns=list> <span tabindex=0 aria-activedescendant=opt1 role=textbox> </span> </div> <ul id=list role = listbox> <li id=opt1 tabindex=-1> </li> </ul>
- 18:00:54 [Stefan]
- Matt: when listbox expanded and activedescendant: hopeully will be agreement tthat this above will be ok
- 18:02:26 [Stefan]
- Matt:: diffwrence between 1.0 and 1.1 now descendat of parent within the tree .. this actually works in all browseers .. questuiion is formalizing this when textbox in combo has focus and uses aria-active descendant
- 18:02:51 [Stefan]
- Rich: you have owns on combo but activedescendant on textbox?
- 18:03:01 [clown]
- q+ to point out that tabindex=-1 on the list options is unneccessary in an activedescedant scenario.
- 18:03:02 [Stefan]
- Matt: right
- 18:03:30 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: what about aruia-controls to relate the parts
- 18:03:43 [Stefan]
- Matt: this does the composite container concept
- 18:04:04 [Stefan]
- Matt: activedescendant is on textbox because of DOM focus
- 18:04:14 [Stefan]
- Matt: is also therer
- 18:04:30 [Stefan]
- Matt: this way it works
- 18:04:38 [Stefan]
- Joseph: it works by ACIDENT
- 18:05:03 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- s/ACIDENT/accident/
- 18:05:14 [Stefan]
- JOseph: it creates isse for what's is focusabe
- 18:05:28 [Stefan]
- Joseph: descendendt of descendants doesnt happen here
- 18:05:29 [bgaraventa1979]
- +q
- 18:05:41 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: do we need this?
- 18:06:05 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: then we need to rewirte aria-activedescendant definitrion
- 18:06:31 [Stefan]
- Rich: aria-controls on combobox that controls textbox
- 18:06:46 [Stefan]
- Matt: messy from authoring perspective
- 18:06:54 [fesch]
- +1 to it being messy for authors
- 18:07:11 [Stefan]
- Matt: by this pattern we know what behaviour we want from combo box
- 18:07:33 [Stefan]
- Matt: author should NOT do work of user agent
- 18:07:50 [Stefan]
- Rich: descendant is descendant of item that has focus
- 18:08:20 [Stefan]
- Rich: textbox on behalf of combo has focus
- 18:08:51 [Stefan]
- Matt: one of two pssibilities: ativedescendant on textbox is proxy for combo
- 18:09:06 [clown]
- <div tabindex=0 role=combobox aria-owns=list aria-activedescendant> <span role=textbox>value being edited </span> </div> <ul id=list role = listbox> focusable options with IDs </ul>
- 18:09:06 [Stefan]
- Matt: other thing is with DOM focus
- 18:09:14 [fesch]
- q+ to say this is way to technical and tricky for authors
- 18:09:46 [Stefan]
- Matt: both are equally good .. from semantic perspective .. for implementation I prefer first way
- 18:09:57 [Stefan]
- Matt: activedescendant on textbox
- 18:10:41 [Stefan]
- Brian: seen many implementations .. you cannot guarantee parent-child relationships on combos .. style trums everything
- 18:10:54 [Stefan]
- Matt:: this structure fixes the problem
- 18:11:15 [Stefan]
- Brian: aria-controls will better fix that
- 18:11:30 [Stefan]
- Matt: bad idea frm API perspective saays AT developers
- 18:11:53 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: implementation just moves the focus
- 18:12:00 [clown]
- http://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/aria.html#aria-activedescendant
- 18:12:21 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- s/diffwrence/difference/
- 18:12:36 [Stefan]
- Matt: AT dwevelopers ignore activedescendant when not in context .. so no problem for them
- 18:13:29 [Stefan]
- Matt: in IE, when you mouseover menus, activedescendants is pointing to elements within menu and not related to elememt with dom focus .. all AT ignoring that
- 18:13:43 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: when are they using the DOM?
- 18:14:08 [fesch]
- this is a brittle pattern
- 18:14:34 [clown]
- <div tabindex=0 role=combobox aria-owns=list aria-activedescendant="option5"> <span role=textbox>value being edited </span> </div> <ul id=list role = listbox> focusable options with IDs </ul>
- 18:14:35 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: as UA, I don't want resolve parent-chuild relationships
- 18:14:44 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 18:15:02 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack clown
- 18:15:02 [Zakim]
- clown, you wanted to point out that tabindex=-1 on the list options is unneccessary in an activedescedant scenario.
- 18:15:08 [clown]
- <div tabindex=0 role=combobox aria-owns=list aria-activedescendant> <span role=textbox>value being edited </span> </div> <ul id=list role = listbox> focusable options with IDs </ul>
- 18:15:29 [Stefan]
- Joseph: tabindex=0 on combo and aria-activedescendant on it
- 18:15:43 [Stefan]
- Matt: causes lotta issues in edit case
- 18:16:12 [Stefan]
- Joseph: not when textbox is a span and JS will put the chars in it
- 18:16:34 [Stefan]
- Matt: has huge impact on JS for non-editable content (??)
- 18:16:56 [Stefan]
- +q
- 18:17:27 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack bgaraventa
- 18:17:44 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack fesch
- 18:17:44 [Zakim]
- fesch, you wanted to say this is way to technical and tricky for authors
- 18:17:47 [Stefan]
- Fred: tis is a brittle (?) pattern
- 18:17:55 [Stefan]
- Fred: sorrta magic
- 18:18:12 [Stefan]
- Matt: we are not confused we need to make descision
- 18:18:37 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack Stefan
- 18:18:41 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q+
- 18:19:44 [cyns]
- q+ to say the UIA control pattern for combobox has a container with an edit and a list, like Matt's structure
- 18:20:51 [Stefan]
- Rich: for a container as a widget, can we say active child ?
- 18:21:19 [cyns]
- q?
- 18:21:36 [Stefan]
- Rich: as long as you have a place in a container widget
- 18:21:57 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack
- 18:22:01 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 18:22:08 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack me
- 18:22:40 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: UIA Comb box is a container with a edit and a list and expand/collaps pattern
- 18:22:53 [Stefan]
- Rich: time is over
- 18:23:08 [cyns]
- UIA combobox docs https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ee671622(v=vs.85).aspx
- 18:23:33 [Stefan]
- Rich: do people mind if Matt + Joseph change definition of activedescendant?
- 18:23:48 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: make the spec match
- 18:24:34 [Stefan]
- Matt: update action related to this and bring on an actual revised branch / update based on discussion .. but after next week
- 18:24:58 [Stefan]
- Rich: activedescendant for the widget .. you can do and say that
- 18:25:20 [Stefan]
- Brian: we should avoid examples where it won't work
- 18:25:51 [Stefan]
- Joseph: core AM docs .. looking at it
- 18:26:00 [Stefan]
- Rich : moving on
- 18:26:18 [Stefan]
- Topic: Action 2021: Draft text for default max and min spinbutton values
- 18:26:20 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action-2021/aria/aria.html#spinbutton
- 18:26:34 [clown]
- action-2021
- 18:26:34 [trackbot]
- action-2021 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Draft text for default max and min spinbutton values -- due 2016-02-18 -- PENDINGREVIEW
- 18:26:34 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2021
- 18:27:14 [Stefan]
- Joanie: I added a nrmative statement for UA's
- 18:27:25 [joanie]
- Authors must set the aria-valuemin, aria-valuemax, and aria-valuenow attributes. If missing, user agents must set the values of these attributes using the rules for the equivalent native host language element.
- 18:27:38 [fesch]
- s/nrmative/normative/
- 18:27:39 [joanie]
- Implicit Value for Role:Default for aria-valuemin is the same as the equivalent native host language element.
- 18:27:42 [joanie]
- Default for aria-valuemax is the same as the equivalent native host language element.
- 18:27:45 [joanie]
- Default for aria-valuenow is the same as the equivalent native host language element
- 18:29:21 [Stefan]
- Matt: HTML AAAM has mapping?!
- 18:29:38 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- s/HTML AAAM/HTML AAM
- 18:30:39 [Stefan]
- Matt: for an author is simple: spec the value
- 18:30:51 [jamesn]
- jamesn has joined #aria
- 18:31:07 [Stefan]
- Joseph: spin button in SVG ? Rich: no
- 18:31:14 [jamesn]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 18:31:14 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/25-aria-minutes.html jamesn
- 18:32:07 [Stefan]
- Matt: should spec value that exists in real wold
- 18:32:26 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: we should implicit role for value
- 18:32:58 [Stefan]
- joseph: HTML5 spin button does not require valuemin and max
- 18:33:10 [Stefan]
- Joseph: can be anything
- 18:33:29 [Stefan]
- Joseph: temperature max .. can be infinity
- 18:34:07 [Stefan]
- Joseph: HTML5 is saying ... ya don#t NEED to spec this
- 18:34:33 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 18:34:56 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: UA's say there must be maximum
- 18:35:10 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack cyncs
- 18:35:15 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 18:35:22 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack cyns
- 18:35:22 [Zakim]
- cyns, you wanted to say the UIA control pattern for combobox has a container with an edit and a list, like Matt's structure
- 18:35:22 [mck]
- q+
- 18:35:28 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 18:36:24 [Stefan]
- Matt: if the author doesn't spec min/max .. will we get inconsistent behaviour among browsers?
- 18:36:57 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: If platform API reqquires integer then we have an issue
- 18:37:14 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 18:37:23 [Stefan]
- JOanie: can we move on?
- 18:37:57 [Stefan]
- joseph: if platforms require values, the DOM isn't .. acc api is sayin zero .. mismatch
- 18:38:11 [joanie]
- s/on?/on because I have more to think about and research, and we have a guest to discuss aria-linktype?/
- 18:38:28 [Stefan]
- Matt: no SR does minmax yet for spinbutton, for sliders they do
- 18:38:48 [Stefan]
- Topic: Action 2006: Draft proposal for new aria-linktype role Joanie
- 18:39:18 [Stefan]
- Rich: we have discussion with linktypes witrh Jamwes Craig
- 18:39:35 [Stefan]
- Rich: then subrole discussions came
- 18:40:04 [Stefan]
- Rich: linktype go around is for epub .. do we want that? also in APG?
- 18:40:07 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 18:40:07 [dkaplan3]
- q+
- 18:40:19 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack mck
- 18:41:45 [Stefan]
- Deborah: funct. req. is: couple of key things, 1. why taxonomy ? we want to be able to say reading system for different stuff
- 18:42:19 [cyns]
- q+ to say what about aria-annotation proposal? There is some overlap, for example footnotes and comments https://www.w3.org/2014/04/annotation/submissions/Microsoft_Position_Paper_on_Annotations.pdf
- 18:42:22 [Stefan]
- Deborah: role we want make sure that vocab will cause AT make browsers to do the right thing
- 18:43:05 [Stefan]
- Rich: can call main role alink, then it is also a glossary reference (typed link)
- 18:43:16 [Stefan]
- Rich: subrole in UIA?
- 18:43:25 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 18:43:34 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack dkaplan
- 18:43:36 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: annotation control pattern can be used but we don't have subroeles
- 18:43:57 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: we have a proposal for annotations - almost done
- 18:44:17 [Stefan]
- Rich: aria is an annotation as well
- 18:44:20 [cyns]
- UIA annotation pattern https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh448769(v=vs.85).aspx
- 18:45:04 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: can be mapped
- 18:45:31 [Stefan]
- ich: don't think so .. in middle of doc you cannot see eg glossary references
- 18:45:45 [Stefan]
- Rich: we have no vehicle witrh remote refs
- 18:46:19 [Stefan]
- Rich: you can do localized role description
- 18:46:36 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: gets pretty overloaded - may work
- 18:46:47 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: we do this for lotta other stuff
- 18:47:25 [Stefan]
- Rich: you can put role link yielding control type link but not properties, right? Cynthia: no
- 18:47:53 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: aria-banana will be shrubed to aria propertis in UIA API
- 18:48:03 [joanie]
- s/shrubed/shoved/
- 18:48:30 [Stefan]
- Cynthia: what is the proposal?
- 18:49:02 [dkaplan3]
- q+
- 18:49:05 [Stefan]
- Rich: role equals glossary refernd
- 18:49:53 [Stefan]
- Rich: role=link linktype=foo
- 18:50:12 [Stefan]
- Rich: keep separation in the mapping itsself
- 18:50:38 [Stefan]
- Matt: if yu make a link with, hoe many different roles? (??)
- 18:51:26 [Stefan]
- Matt: different types, biblio, footnote, glossary etc. .. list shold be expandable who does this?
- 18:52:36 [Stefan]
- Deborah: we have a comprehensive list and will maintain that (?)
- 18:53:00 [fesch]
- Lisa Seeman wanted COGA to coordinate with linktype and shortcuts
- 18:53:15 [clown]
- richardschwerdtfeger: ^
- 18:53:15 [dkaplan3]
- Curent list is at https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action-2006/aria/aria.html#aria-linktype
- 18:53:36 [Stefan]
- Rich: we will make sure that AT will be able to differentiate the link types
- 18:55:17 [Stefan]
- Matt: we will take these and make them part of core?
- 18:55:26 [Stefan]
- Rich: do people want this?
- 18:55:38 [MichielBijl]
- +1 to footnote
- 18:56:04 [Stefan]
- +q
- 18:56:33 [Stefan]
- -q
- 18:56:48 [mck]
- q?
- 18:57:08 [Stefan]
- Rich: there seem to be giid arguments for that
- 18:57:09 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 18:57:10 [AmeliaBR]
- Some of this functionality could be handled by role-description. The benefit of having standard link types is that the name can be localized by the user agent/AT.
- 18:57:48 [Stefan]
- Rich: proposals seem a bit to overlap
- 18:57:55 [joanie]
- AmeliaBR: Not just localized, but programmatically processed with specialized logic.
- 18:58:34 [Stefan]
- Matt: mainstream browsers need support these particular roles
- 18:58:58 [Stefan]
- RESOLUTION: DPUB link types preceed as standard roles
- 18:59:04 [clown]
- AmeliaBR, joanie, James Craig reject the approach using role description.
- 18:59:16 [Stefan]
- (in their name spaces)
- 19:00:26 [Stefan]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 19:00:26 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/25-aria-minutes.html Stefan
- 19:01:17 [dkaplan3]
- dkaplan3 has left #aria
- 19:36:25 [clown]
- clown has joined #aria
- 21:02:26 [jongund_]
- jongund_ has joined #aria
- 21:11:37 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #aria
- 21:53:31 [sam]
- sam has joined #aria