17:28:56 RRSAgent has joined #aria 17:28:56 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/02/11-aria-irc 17:28:58 RRSAgent, make logs world 17:28:58 Zakim has joined #aria 17:29:00 Zakim, this will be 17:29:00 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 17:29:01 Meeting: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference 17:29:01 Date: 11 February 2016 17:29:04 chair: Rich 17:29:15 present+ CBAveritt 17:29:16 meeting: W3C ARIA Working Group 17:29:28 RRSAgent, make log public 17:30:14 fesch has joined #aria 17:33:18 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Feb/0194.html 17:34:00 Stefan has joined #aria 17:35:04 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 17:35:06 jamesn has joined #aria 17:35:44 scribe: fesch 17:36:33 Topic: ARIA working group decision policy 17:36:57 rs: done, drag and drop ends tonight 17:37:12 Topic: Action-2006 17:37:19 action-2006 17:37:19 action-2006 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Draft proposal for new aria-linktype attribute for group review -- due 2016-01-27 -- OPEN 17:37:19 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2006 17:37:24 Present+ Markus 17:38:32 jd: one question- do we want to allow a free text type, leaning toward no, want enumeration... reason - AT doesn't know what it is... DPUB can extend enumeration 17:38:41 q+ 17:38:49 jd: is there a use case for a free text type? 17:38:52 mck has joined #aria 17:39:29 rs: wouldn't AT users go crazy if they didn't know what the link type was? 17:39:51 jd: I think they wanted a role description - which would be free text 17:40:15 jd: then we will go with an enumerated type and DPub can extend it? 17:40:29 clown has joined #aria 17:40:42 cs; you could have a custom type 17:41:13 jamesn has joined #aria 17:41:26 markus: we need enumerations, no use case for free text... 17:42:08 markus: by extending the enumeration - you mean that we could extend it in the DPub module, that is a requirement... 17:42:11 present+ Joseph_Scheuhammer 17:42:21 rs: we thought we would give it some values to start... 17:42:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/11-aria-minutes.html clown 17:42:38 markus: would you start with the DPub answers? 17:43:38 jd: gives an example of why we might want to have some that are not DPub specific, thinking more of screen readers and web apps... for the core spec 17:44:02 jd: then stuff like glossary could be defined in DPub Module 17:44:33 markus: would aria-linktype have hyphenated values? 17:45:06 markus: my thought is we would need it here (avoid name collisions) 17:45:18 rs: we would have to come up with a prefix for values.... 17:45:43 markus: we could continue using doc- and the core ones naked (no prefix) 17:46:18 markus: if you need input/suggestions on types for the core type - we would be happy to suggest core types 17:46:35 jd: I would leave out glossary out of core... 17:46:53 JF has joined #aria 17:47:02 Present+ JF 17:47:18 jd: very relative to DPub... comments, footnotes... would be in core, may have a branch to look at tomorrow 17:47:51 cs: annotations -how does that sync with the annotations proposal we had a few years ago? 17:48:13 rs: that was for ARIA 2, would have to look at it... 17:49:03 jd: I have thought about types.... annotations I have thought about and they are parallel and not dependent on one another (link type) 17:49:09 there’s also https://www.w3.org/annotation/ 17:49:22 bgaraventa1979 has joined #aria 17:49:26 cs: I thought the proposal had link types in it as well... 17:49:40 present+ Bryan_Garaventa 17:50:10 Action: Cynthia look at annotation overlap with aria-linktype 17:50:11 Created ACTION-2017 - Look at annotation overlap with aria-linktype [on Cynthia Shelly - due 2016-02-18]. 17:51:24 clown: is this proposal for ARIA 1.1 - (yes) so we need mapping - 17:51:41 cs: I would probably use UIA annotations, 17:51:54 clown: AAXAPI.... 17:52:02 rs: will have to circle back... 17:52:09 s/AAXAPI/AXAPI/ 17:52:25 Topic: ARIA describedat 17:52:33 https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1009/aria/aria.html#aria-details 17:52:52 rs: what do you call this thing since there is a relationship 17:53:01 https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Publisher_requirements_for_extended_descriptions 17:53:14 rs: we have describedby and folks are used to using it... 17:53:49 rs: note aria-describedat is removed in this branch... reads ... 17:55:03 rs: one of the requirements for DPub was it may need to pull in other resources, and you don't want to stringify it... joanie suggested the name (aria-details) 17:55:08 q? 17:55:20 ack me 17:55:29 q+ to ask a couple of questions. 17:55:41 rs: Marcus does this meet your needs? 17:56:28 markus: looks like a good start... provides a structured description ... reusable ... 17:56:38 Q+ 17:56:44 rs: could use an iframe, media source.... 17:57:02 clown: actually has an id so a name/anchor would link to it 17:57:15 markus: is an idref... 17:57:36 markus: can I use it with an anchor? 17:57:45 clown: yes,. explaination 17:58:00 clown: but you would load the entire page 17:58:33 markus: not restricted to what you point to, it has to be visible, you cant hide it - 17:59:11 clown: if you are using details, then the contents would be hidden only see the summary... the summary is what you click on to open and close 17:59:35 clown: actual contents can be hidden using a details element... 18:00:29 cyns has joined #aria 18:00:38 mk: it sounds like details refer to a visible element, not that the details are visible? 18:00:43 present+ ShaneM 18:00:51 q+ to ask about potential mapping conflicts 18:01:25 rs: it can be hidden, but in order to expose to AT, you must be able to make it visible 18:02:13 rs: you could have a media-query that hides something (layout small) however if you make it visible then it can be exposed to AT 18:02:40 rs: dpub wants to be able to hide stuff, but be able to make it visible if you wish... 18:02:54 clown: so a user could set what they want to see 18:03:02 present+ MichielBijl 18:03:04 jf: what about the sighted user? 18:03:41 rs: this would be something an ebook would turn on, not AT - keyed by user preference before the page is loaded 18:04:07 mk: what about this AT case? 18:04:36 rs: if it is hidden wont be mapped at all... so user agents need to check if the referred to content is visible 18:04:54 clown: that will slow down user agents 18:04:55 q? 18:05:21 mk: media query would have to remove the attribute.... 18:05:40 mk: how hard is it for a user agent to see if an id exists... 18:06:09 clown: mozzilla doesn't check ids... 18:06:29 cs: cant require a browser walks a tree... 18:07:17 fesch: what about ids off screen? 18:07:31 mk: unlikely case... 18:07:50 rs: can you talk about your team about this 18:07:51 q? 18:08:01 ack clown 18:08:01 clown, you wanted to ask a couple of questions. 18:08:21 clown: want to ask - aria details does not participate in the aria name computation... 18:08:41 "For the avoidance of doubt, aria-details does not participate in accessible name computation." 18:08:59 clown: make explicit it doesn't participate in name and description calc 18:09:21 Action: Rich modify issue1009 text to ensure that aria-details does not aria-details does not participate in accessible name computation 18:09:21 Created ACTION-2018 - Modify issue1009 text to ensure that aria-details does not aria-details does not participate in accessible name computation [on Richard Schwerdtfeger - due 2016-02-18]. 18:09:56 a? 18:09:57 rs: want people to review this... first look.... will revisit 18:09:59 q? 18:10:05 ack JF 18:10:21 http://static-api.visually.netdna-cdn.com/media/images/v3/portfolio/infographics/portfolio-1-infographic-cvs.jpg 18:10:30 jf: uses case you mentioned i get... but infographic case... 18:11:10 jf: would get push back if we have to have all that text visible on page 18:11:55 jf: at some point... it becomes kludgy... not everyone is on bleeding edge 18:11:56 Might be good to include an example of aria-details that links to an external file 18:12:07 s/an example/another example 18:12:24 jf: don't see how we can address that... 18:12:54 18:13:15 jf: infographic in a textbook... 18:13:21 rs: longdesc... 18:13:45 q+ to ask what the datatype of aria-details is? 18:13:46 ack JF 18:14:03 marcus: maybe have a second example with an external ref 18:14:03 ack cyns 18:14:03 cyns, you wanted to ask about potential mapping conflicts 18:14:09 janina has joined #aria 18:14:17 cs: does this need to be mapped... 18:14:23 rs: just a relationship 18:14:31 rs: new relationship 18:14:42 present+ janina 18:14:45 cs: don't want new relationship 18:15:27 mk: I don't think you would want to reuse an existing relationship - otherwise we would load confusion on existing relationship 18:15:36 detailsFor/detaileddby ? 18:15:39 cs: we already have generic relationships 18:15:59 cs: team is providing pushback - a bigt deal 18:16:09 s/bigt/big/ 18:16:26 cs: folks think it is more complicated 18:17:12 mk: is it hard to have a name, description and details - is it overload? 18:18:21 rs: other option - can have a describedby with multiple relationships with an indicator, if it can handle not being stringified... 18:18:40 mk: one gets stringified and the other doesn't ... 18:19:26 mk: what if they both mapped to the description relationship, can you put a property on the relationship to tell the user 18:19:43 cs: no, a description is a property - doesn't have properties 18:20:26 cs: in the current API we have the describedby not the string 18:21:06 cs: my concern is if had both describedby and details which would win 18:21:35 rs: Marcus were you envisioning having details and describedby? 18:21:58 marcus: sounds like an uncommon case... 18:22:53 rs: we have been calling this an extended description and don't want to stringify it... I never liked multiple descriptions... then you could have one or the other... 18:23:07 mk: then if you have both, we say details wins 18:23:12 cs: OK 18:23:30 rs: I will modify to be clear that we only have one mapping... 18:23:30 +1 18:23:57 clown: your example had both :( 18:24:11 Action: Rich modify aria-details to state that it wins over describedby and also to provide example with an anchor 18:24:12 Created ACTION-2019 - Modify aria-details to state that it wins over describedby and also to provide example with an anchor [on Richard Schwerdtfeger - due 2016-02-18]. 18:24:26 q? 18:24:49 sm: what is the datatype? it is a ifref 18:24:49 ack ShaneM 18:24:49 ShaneM, you wanted to ask what the datatype of aria-details is? 18:25:08 s/ifref/idref/ 18:25:43 mk: put it in the table below that it takes a single idref 18:26:35 action-2018 18:26:35 action-2018 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to Modify issue1009 text to ensure that aria-details does not aria-details does not participate in accessible name computation -- due 2016-02-18 -- OPEN 18:26:35 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2018 18:26:42 Topic: action items 18:30:21 stefan: part of the mission was to look at role descriptions, why don't we have attribute descriptions - should discuss one more time - 18:31:07 action-1560 18:31:07 action-1560 -- Stefan Schnabel to Email list with discussion of on/off value labels (maybe valuetext?) and extending value descriptions to other controls -- due 2016-02-10 -- OPEN 18:31:07 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1560 18:31:23 rs: would be a big job, too much for ARIA 1.1 18:32:41 action-1687 18:32:41 action-1687 -- James Nurthen to Get authoring practices guidance on use of aria-errormessage, including use cases for live region or not -- due 2015-07-23 -- OPEN 18:32:41 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1687 18:33:39 q? 18:33:56 action-1713 18:33:56 action-1713 -- Charles McCathie Nevile to Talk to gion kunz (chartist.js maintainer) and ask him about what roles/properties would make sense … -- due 2015-09-04 -- OPEN 18:33:56 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1713 18:35:34 action-1723 18:35:34 action-1723 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Editorial - create sections listing the roles that provide (1) nameFrom:author and (2) nameFrom:contents -- due 2015-11-05 -- OPEN 18:35:34 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1723 18:37:02 action-1731 18:37:02 action-1731 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Propose model for deprecation statements on individual features, with replacement and future plans guidance -- due 2015-10-14 -- OPEN 18:37:02 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1731 18:38:29 action-1730 18:38:29 action-1730 -- Michael Cooper to Draft ¨deprecated¨ section for conformance section of spec -- due 2015-10-14 -- OPEN 18:38:29 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1730 18:40:10 action-1742 18:40:10 Sorry, but action-1742 does not exist. 18:40:12 action-1743? 18:40:12 action-1743 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Put aria-activedescendant on application and request wg review -- due 2015-11-26 -- OPEN 18:40:12 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/1743 18:41:03 action-2004 18:41:03 action-2004 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Create proposal for password role -- due 2016-01-13 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:41:03 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2004 18:41:55 rs: James Craig wanted security to be talked to... rather have someone in the browsers... Cynthia? 18:42:53 cs: actually my suggestion... I can talk to them... only issue if characters aren't hidden... 18:43:33 Action: Cynthia check with Edge security people to see if there is a security issue with using role password 18:43:33 Created ACTION-2020 - Check with edge security people to see if there is a security issue with using role password [on Cynthia Shelly - due 2016-02-18]. 18:43:38 q+ to say I talked to security folks aabotu whether this was a real requirement 18:44:46 jn: I talked to our security folks, why the want to do this... dev want to stop password managers... 18:45:16 jn: they want people to not be able to use password managers 18:45:30 rs: a role will not stop password managers... 18:46:03 rs: we could add text in there that using a password fields offers greater security... 18:46:08 cs: not sure it does 18:46:40 mb: ARIA complement to HTML... 18:46:47 ack me 18:46:47 jamesn, you wanted to say I talked to security folks aabotu whether this was a real requirement 18:46:54 action-20056 18:46:54 Sorry, but action-20056 does not exist. 18:46:59 action-2005 18:46:59 action-2005 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Solicit input regarding making default spinbutton values more consistent with the defaults for HTML5's input type="number" -- due 2016-01-21 -- OPEN 18:46:59 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2005 18:47:18 jd: did that, skimming over it... 18:47:41 jd: this was blocking another action... 18:48:17 jd: somewhere there is another action somewhere about values... 18:48:30 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Jan/0058.html 18:48:32 js: slider requires max and min, spin button doesn't 18:48:49 issue-1002 18:48:49 issue-1002 -- Spin Button default values inconsistent with HTML5 -- open 18:48:49 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1002 18:51:24 q+ to ask where this is in the HTML5 spec to say that missing equates to negative& positive infinity? 18:51:28 cs: we use min and max for low high optimal... 18:52:07 cs: we have a meter, we implement the value and range pattern... 18:52:32 we map meters to a string... but do both the range pattern and value pattern 18:52:45 +q 18:53:02 ack jamesn 18:53:02 jamesn, you wanted to ask where this is in the HTML5 spec to say that missing equates to negative& positive infinity? 18:53:19 q+ to say that number doesn't have to be a spin button. That is implementation specific 18:53:58 mk: in none of the other aria specs do we express infinity? 18:54:17 jd: we were going to add text to say do what HTML does... 18:54:35 jn: so what does it map a spinbutton? 18:54:54 cs: can be a text field... 18:55:28 rs: we modified text on max and min... 18:55:29 action Joanmarie to draft text for default max and min spinbutton values 18:55:29 Created ACTION-2021 - Draft text for default max and min spinbutton values [on Joanmarie Diggs - due 2016-02-18]. 18:56:04 bg: what about a spinbutton that uses aria-valuetext? 18:56:09 associate aaction-2021 with issue-1002 18:56:16 associate action-2021 with issue-1002 18:56:16 action-2021 (Draft text for default max and min spinbutton values) associated with issue-1002. 18:57:33 q? 18:58:48 ack bgaraventa 18:59:07 ack cyns 18:59:07 cyns, you wanted to say that number doesn't have to be a spin button. That is implementation specific 18:59:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:59:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/11-aria-minutes.html fesch 19:29:30 chaals has joined #aria 19:33:09 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 20:37:08 clown has joined #aria 20:44:29 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 21:26:07 Zakim has left #aria 21:38:01 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 22:07:21 chaals has joined #aria 22:39:11 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria