16:17:17 RRSAgent has joined #coga 16:17:17 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/02/01-coga-irc 16:18:35 agenda: this 16:18:36 agenda+ review actions, and timelines 16:18:38 agenda+ Gap Analysis Introduction 16:18:39 agenda+ what do we need to freeze version 16:18:41 agenda+ Gap Analysis Kurt's comments 16:18:42 agenda+ Gap Analysis Rich's comments on WCAG extension 16:18:44 agenda+ Other issue papers? 16:18:45 agenda+ Next ftf ideas (TPAC and Katie suggestion) 16:18:47 agenda+ be done 16:56:26 JohnRochford has joined #coga 17:00:13 Kurt has joined #coga 17:00:38 Mike_Pluke has joined #coga 17:03:01 scribe: Mike_Pluke 17:04:12 item 1 17:04:39 zakim, next item 17:04:39 agendum 1. "review actions, and timelines" taken up [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:05:00 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page#What_are_we_working_on_now.3F 17:05:00 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #coga 17:05:09 maryjom has joined #coga 17:05:20 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page#Current_schedules 17:05:58 Tony_Doran has joined #coga 17:06:25 Late on 28th January document freeze date. 17:06:34 intro 17:06:36 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis_Summary 17:06:42 https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html 17:07:22 Need to freeze Gap Analysis. Tables of user needs will not be complete. 17:07:42 present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 17:08:34 Mature pieces of documents have comments from EA and Renaldo. 17:09:20 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2016Jan/0038.html 17:09:30 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2016Jan/0042.html 17:09:37 Introduction from Lisa - comments from Renaldo and EA 17:09:46 zakim, next item 17:09:46 agendum 2. "Gap Analysis Introduction" taken up [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:10:23 ddahl has joined #coga 17:11:43 Lisa accepts EA's "suggested tool" change. 17:20:10 Some concern and confusion over the use of the terms preferences and personalization in the intro 17:23:22 EA has joined #coga 17:24:13 can we ignor coment The research you are referring to here is most likely exploratory. As such it is not intended to be conclusive, generalizable and prescriptive. It illuminates the situation and highlights areas that require further attention. 17:24:15 The issue here could be a lack of empirical work concerned with Web accessibility for persons with cognitive disabilities. 17:24:44 i think the issue is use clear writing is not well defined in a testable way 17:24:47 present+ janina 17:24:56 Q+ 17:25:16 present+ Debbie_Dahl 17:27:00 present+ MichaelC 17:30:22 https://blogs.office.com/2016/01/19/learning-tools-for-onenote-improves-learning-for-all/ proven according to Microsoft!! 17:31:54 rest of his coments we ask to be on the call to discuss if they are importend 17:33:21 action to give one more review of the intro and send the list for a 48 concensis 17:33:21 Error finding 'to'. You can review and register nicknames at . 17:34:31 EA's coments are excepted bu the one on porefrences might weight for next version 17:34:51 prefrences and persation should be clearly defined 17:35:08 EA comments on preferences will have to be addressed in a later version 17:36:42 Documents going out for review - Summary of Issue Papers and Techniques into Gap Analysis 17:36:57 for coneses to add to the gap analisis 17:37:00 https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html 17:37:01 The above for consensus 17:38:59 Consensus was to do summary and sample of user needs 17:40:00 q? 17:40:45 Rich would like to make the gap analysis like a roadmap. Current version getting better. 17:41:44 Rich comments: Editorial stuff needed on user needs - too hard to follow. Should be a proper TF Note. 17:43:46 Lisa: Don't have all the user needs correctly identified. Finalizing it would probably take 3 months. 17:44:22 q+ 17:44:29 ack lisa 17:45:05 q+ to way things don´t need to be complete (shouldn´t be at FPWD) but need to have enough to believe it will be completed, and draw comments 17:46:16 Rich: OK to have gaps. Need to get this in front of industry. If they see it as "Cognitive Accessibility Roadmap" and have the Gap Analysis in it. 17:47:54 Michael: Replace empty tables with what you have as, say, bullet points. 17:53:06 Michael: Include editorial notes explaining the bits that are to be done later. 18:01:04 Lisa will put together an integrated document with all the bits included. 18:02:01 ddahl has left #coga 18:02:26 action: lisa to put together an integrated document with all the bits included of gap analisis 18:02:26 Created ACTION-150 - Put together an integrated document with all the bits included of gap analisis [on Lisa Seeman - due 2016-02-08]. 18:04:05 rrsagent, make logs public 18:04:18 rrsagent, create minutes 18:04:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/01-coga-minutes.html Lisa_Seeman 18:05:31 zakim, please part 18:05:31 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been janina, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Debbie_Dahl, MichaelC 18:05:31 Zakim has left #coga 18:05:39 rrsagent, please part 18:05:39 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2016/02/01-coga-actions.rdf : 18:05:39 ACTION: lisa to put together an integrated document with all the bits included of gap analisis [1] 18:05:39 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/02/01-coga-irc#T18-02-26