17:08:10 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #audio
17:08:10 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/01/14-audio-irc
17:08:21 <padenot> present+ padenot
17:09:37 <BillHofmann> I'll scribe
17:09:44 <BillHofmann> scribenick BillHofmann
17:10:01 <BillHofmann> scribenick: BillHofmann
17:10:45 <joe_> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/686
17:11:49 <BillHofmann> padenot: marked as ready for edit
17:11:56 <joe_> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/687
17:12:01 <BillHofmann> joe: ...687 seems to already be in progress
17:12:11 <BillHofmann> padenot: I have something for this
17:12:36 <joe_> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/688
17:13:34 <BillHofmann> rtoy_g: display issue with MathJax and Chrome - requires W3C to update
17:14:07 <BillHofmann> joe: important enough?
17:14:20 <BillHofmann> BillHofmann: can we just assign to someone in W3C?
17:14:28 <BillHofmann> cwilso: will follow up
17:14:32 <joe_> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/689
17:15:40 <BillHofmann> rtoy_g: lots of corner cases here... will create specific corner case issues and we can discuss each.
17:16:27 <BillHofmann> joe: 344 is merged - will close
17:16:32 <joe_> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/344
17:16:42 <joe_> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/pull/580
17:17:25 <BillHofmann> joe: agree with the disposition, will comment in-bug
17:18:10 <joe_> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/690
17:20:47 <joe_> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/pull/691
17:21:08 <BillHofmann> rtoy_g: have num channels, can't get length until end, but would be good to have earlier
17:21:19 <BillHofmann> rtoy_g: have a pull
17:21:41 <BillHofmann> joe_: there are a number of failures of introspection.  Paul: are you OK with adding this?
17:21:44 <padenot> it's kind of voiping here sorry
17:21:51 <BillHofmann> padenot: OK
17:22:18 <joe_> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/692
17:23:24 <BillHofmann> rtoy_g: note distinction between MediaCapture spec and our spec (float vs enum)
17:24:09 <BillHofmann> BillHofmann: goal was to not overconstrain UAs -
17:24:31 <BillHofmann> rtoy_g: so many devices - not really practical
17:25:00 <BillHofmann> padenot: a number doesn't really make sense, because what's good for some devices is bad for otheres
17:25:34 <BillHofmann> joe_: these are actually hinting *different* things - one is a buffering hit (webaudio) the other about device selection
17:25:41 <BillHofmann> padenot: well, it controls both, actually
17:26:16 <BillHofmann> joe_: device selection is an open item in WebAudio...
17:26:59 <BillHofmann> padenot: if you have a big buffer in the webaudio API, does it make sense to have a low latency device?
17:27:21 <BillHofmann> jdsmith: isn't latency in MediaCapture a negotiated constraint?
17:29:51 <BillHofmann> joe_: opening a MediaCapture spec issue is fine, and pointing at our choice.  Don't believe it's a requirement.  Reconciling the two specs is a post-V1 effort
17:30:29 <BillHofmann> BillHofmann: proposal is close this issue and open a MediaCapture issue.
17:32:50 <BillHofmann> jdsmith: their approach is consistent with how they deal with attributes.
17:33:22 <BillHofmann> ACTION: padenot to open issue against MediaCapture re 692
17:33:26 <trackbot> Created ACTION-123 - Open issue against mediacapture re 692 [on Paul Adenot - due 2016-01-21].
17:34:25 <BillHofmann> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/693
17:34:46 <BillHofmann> hongchan: this is a disparity between browsers - behavior is not clearly defined.
17:35:34 <BillHofmann> hongchan: e.g. Chrome updates on every rendering quantum
17:35:44 <joe_> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/318
17:35:45 <BillHofmann> joe_: there was an issue (318) that specified this value
17:36:37 <jdsmith> jdsmith has joined #audio
17:37:30 <BillHofmann> joe_: decision was that callers need to do their own calculation
17:38:24 <BillHofmann> joe_: no-one recalls the decision, alas
17:39:24 <BillHofmann> joe_: leave this open, will comment 318 that this still needs resolution
17:41:14 <BillHofmann> padenot: still need some features in Worklet so we can base AudioWorker off it, are really blocked
17:41:26 <BillHofmann> padenot: propose we contact author and ask him to resume his work on it.
17:41:38 <BillHofmann> padenot: OR we could write our own bits
17:42:37 <BillHofmann> joe_: is it possible that we/you could take this on, really?
17:44:38 <BillHofmann> padenot: definitely key infrastructure
17:44:58 <BillHofmann> ACTION: padenot to email author cc list and see what happens
17:44:58 <trackbot> Created ACTION-124 - Email author cc list and see what happens [on Paul Adenot - due 2016-01-21].
17:45:28 <BillHofmann> joe_: next item is progress on PRs
17:46:03 <BillHofmann> joe_: has been reasonable progress offline - does anyone have questions worth surfacing here?
17:46:25 <padenot> wfm
17:46:28 <BillHofmann> joe_: propose 2 weeks from now for call
17:46:34 <BillHofmann> works for me
17:46:42 <hongchan> wfm
17:46:56 <jdsmith> fine with me as well
17:47:20 <padenot> bye !
17:47:24 <rtoyg_m> Aloha!
17:47:42 <joe_> rrsagent, make minutes
17:47:42 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/14-audio-minutes.html joe_
17:47:44 <padenot> BillHofmann: thanks for the quick solution for the phone bill :-)
17:47:57 <joe_> Yes thank you Bill for saving the day!
17:48:32 <BillHofmann> rrsagent, make log public
19:34:12 <Zakim> Zakim has left #audio