15:02:50 RRSAgent has joined #interledger 15:02:50 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/01/13-interledger-irc 15:03:08 zakim, this is Interledger Protocol Community Group 15:03:08 got it, ShaneM 15:03:15 present+ ShaneM 15:03:22 zakim, who is here? 15:03:22 Present: ShaneM 15:03:24 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, padler, evanschwartz, ShaneM, AdrianHB, xavier, zmanian 15:03:26 present+ AdrianHB 15:04:23 rrsagent, make minutes 15:04:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/13-interledger-minutes.html ShaneM 15:04:56 Scribe: AdrianHB 15:05:04 Chair: AdrianHB 15:05:16 findthomas has joined #interledger 15:05:25 rrsagent, make minutes public 15:05:25 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', ShaneM. Try /msg RRSAgent help 15:05:35 rrsagent, make log public 15:05:43 Bart_Cant has joined #interledger 15:06:31 Heather has joined #interledger 15:06:41 present+ Heather 15:06:45 present+ Bart_Cant 15:06:49 dlehn has joined #interledger 15:07:35 Adam_Locklin has joined #interledger 15:08:59 evanschwartz: co-auth of the paper 15:09:09 ... working on some further use cases right now 15:09:33 ... keen to discuss with the group what needs to happen next and explore 15:09:46 karlos has joined #Interledger 15:10:25 shanem: digital bizaar - interested in ILP and how it fits into the bigger arch of exchange 15:10:50 Heather: indep researcher - worked ona scenario that predicted ILP a few years ago 15:11:07 ... done a lot of research on money, payments, txns 15:11:34 ... interested in making using money a better experience including the emotinal aspects of money 15:12:17 ari: IE at W3C, former banker 15:12:19 ... 15:12:48 ... ILP promises a very exciting opp for blockchain and fintech 15:13:04 s/digital bizaar/Digital Bazaar/ 15:13:08 ... feel the more we weave this tech together the better (id, payments etc) 15:13:11 rrsagent, make minutes 15:13:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/13-interledger-minutes.html ShaneM 15:14:20 tiffany: from BTC community. Follow Ripple closely. Following ILP because it looks like it will deliver on some of the ealry visons of Ripple 15:14:51 Topic: Introductions 15:15:17 padler: FedlIne, member of the W3C Payments groups, Federal Reserve of Chicago. Actively interested in ILP as it relates to the American payments ecosystem 15:15:39 heather: Padler, can you talk openly about your work at the Fed? 15:16:22 padler: yes and no. I have to walk a fine line. Need to ensure we are up to speed but can't say too much. 15:17:17 FYI that was Tiffany asking padler questions. :-) 15:17:18 pindar: Hong kong based. Liked the ILP whitepaper. Mostly observer. Strong fintech interest in HK. Experience in BTC stack. 15:18:17 Audrus: based in London. Followed Ripple for 2 years. Interested in m2m payments. Acting as an entrepreneur. 15:19:54 FYI, sound is breaking up. 15:21:19 Rangar/Zaky: Blockchain based trade finance. Interested in connecting payments based blockchains with trade finance ledger. 15:21:25 Zaki Manian 15:21:32 Skuchain 15:21:41 bway has joined #interledger 15:22:27 rangar: we expect there to be many ledgers and the need to connect these ledgers using something like ILP 15:24:31 bobway: also from Ripple. Also done some work on trade finance 15:25:40 michael from @@@. working on real-estate based use cases. interested in Tim S paper on crypto-currency 15:26:26 adam from PWC: focused on KYC etc and interested in how the future of payment protocols shape regs 15:26:55 thomas from MIT: here to learn 15:27:34 taylor fed reserve of Kansas. prod manager for the settlement service at the fed. interest is related to how ILP would be used for settlement 15:28:24 karlos: runs xrpchat forum; here to listen 15:28:26 Michael_Smolenski has joined #interledger 15:28:32 Hi I'm Michael Smolenski, as mentioned our company is "Midasium". Providing smart contract services for the Real Estate industry. 15:30:55 Ranga_ has joined #interledger 15:31:39 tiffany_ has joined #interledger 15:32:23 adrianhb: purpose of calls will change over time. can decide what we want to. 15:32:24 https://github.com/interledger/five-bells-demo/wiki 15:33:05 Support using slack. 15:33:32 slack +1 15:33:53 Some concern about openness of slack 15:33:55 +1 slack 15:34:06 not a fan of slack 15:34:38 @ShaneM slack can connect to irc 15:34:40 ari: Midasium should look at work of Bruce Cahan at Stanford 15:34:46 karlos has joined #interledger 15:35:27 I know Bruce. Good suggestion 15:35:49 +1 for specs and issue management on github. more easily merges with other W3C processes 15:36:15 Note: AdrianHB, there are some comments in the Bluejeans chat that should be archived as well. 15:38:05 pindarhk has joined #interledger 15:38:34 q+ to ask about goals of getting to a WG and a draft standard.. 15:40:22 TaylorD has joined #interledger 15:40:25 Fine ... thanks for the proto-roadmap 15:41:28 Note that "consensus" in a large group often means putting out an email "call for consensus" where no comment means "I agree" 15:43:23 Standard Desk might be helpful ;) 15:44:01 tiffany: is advocacy a goal? 15:44:18 adrianHB: yes, can help if required 15:44:53 I'll do some scribing. 15:45:11 Adrian - yes the goal is to get to multiple regchecked specs. 15:45:45 yes 15:45:56 Adrian: it's a goal, but we want to make sure we get the right specifications. also up for discussion who the right stakeholders are. going to do use cases first. 15:47:03 I think the "roadmap" can define the timeline. 15:47:14 ??: Is the goal to get the community to working group status by TPaC? Adrian: depends on the group. Would be good by mid year. 15:47:39 Adrian: the spec depends on who is kicking the tire in the wild (who is implementing what and how) 15:47:41 s/??/padler/ 15:47:52 Is that f2f meeting now confirmed at Google San Francisco? 15:48:00 If so, what was the date again? 15:48:10 Q: will we be able to connect remotely? Adrian: that would be ideal. Will find out facilities. 15:48:27 Great... remote participation would be great +1 15:48:29 The dates for the f2f are Feb 22-24 for the Web payments IG and WG 15:48:35 Thanks 15:48:50 Dare is Feb 22-24 15:48:55 So this group might need to meet right after that (25th) since there is quite a bit of overlap. 15:49:05 Adrian: Are there specific topics to see on the agenda for that meeting? 15:49:10 Novel use cases 15:49:22 I would like to see Roadmap development and Requirements development as high priroity agenda items. 15:49:28 Agenda suggestion: Scope definition 15:49:35 : Related to scope of group & what to achieve. What is in/out of scope. 15:49:37 Agreed 15:50:32 Adrian: lay groudwork & share ideas on the mailing list prior to f2f 15:50:54 Adrian: expect 1/2 day, 1 day max session. 15:50:55 I'll be UTC +8 if that could be accommodated 15:50:57 findthomas has joined #interledger 15:51:15 Adrian: meet in evening? Thursday> 15:51:25 Either time works for me. 15:51:30 :) 15:51:43 I am happy to meet in the evening. Thursday morning is okay too. I am in town all week. 15:52:07 24 hour standards marathon! No thank you 15:52:08 PROPOSAL: F2f meeting on 25 Feb in AM 15:52:13 +1 15:52:14 works for me 15:52:18 +1 15:52:29 +1 15:52:31 +1 15:52:33 +1 15:52:43 +1 15:53:28 + 15:53:31 +1 15:54:03 Thanks everyone! Great call, looking forward to work with you all. See you online! :) 15:54:14 Nice to meet everyone! 15:54:20 Thanks All! Looking forward to the work! 15:54:36 +1 to follow up call 15:54:37 yes to follow up call 15:54:40 +1 15:54:49 +1 as far as agendas 15:54:54 +1 but with an agenda and possibly a proposal (roadmap? skeletal requirements document) 15:55:02 Follow up call: Adrian will coordinate in a couple weeks. 15:55:08 Nite! 15:55:34 rrsagent, make minutes 15:55:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/13-interledger-minutes.html ShaneM 15:55:43 zakim, end meeting 15:55:43 I don't understand 'end meeting', ShaneM 15:56:19 bway has left #interledger 18:02:39 Zakim has left #interledger