IRC log of apa on 2016-01-13
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:53:13 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #apa
- 16:53:13 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/01/13-apa-irc
- 16:53:15 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 16:53:17 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 16:53:18 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 16:53:18 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
- 16:53:19 [trackbot]
- Date: 13 January 2016
- 16:53:44 [janina]
- agenda?
- 16:53:54 [janina]
- zakim, clear agenda
- 16:53:54 [Zakim]
- agenda cleared
- 16:54:00 [janina]
- agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes
- 16:54:00 [janina]
- agenda+ APA Housekeeping http://www.w3.org/2015/10/apa-charter.html
- 16:54:00 [janina]
- agenda+ Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open
- 16:54:00 [janina]
- agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
- 16:54:01 [janina]
- agenda+ Pending CSS Flexbox CR http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/
- 16:54:03 [janina]
- agenda+ Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Jan/0007.html
- 16:54:06 [janina]
- agenda+ Draft APA Decision Policy http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy
- 16:54:08 [janina]
- agenda+ Other Business
- 16:54:11 [janina]
- agenda+ next and future meetings http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_273
- 16:54:14 [janina]
- agenda+ be done
- 16:54:46 [janina]
- zakim, next item
- 16:54:46 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes" taken up [from janina]
- 16:59:43 [fesch]
- fesch has joined #apa
- 17:00:07 [MichaelC]
- agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Jan/0023.html
- 17:01:48 [LJWatson]
- present+ LJWatson
- 17:02:43 [fesch]
- present+ fesch
- 17:02:49 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- richardschwerdtfeger has joined #apa
- 17:03:05 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- Present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger
- 17:03:19 [janina]
- present+ janina
- 17:04:21 [fesch]
- scribe: fesch
- 17:06:15 [fesch]
- what agendum is this?
- 17:06:20 [joanie]
- present+ Joanmarie_Diggs
- 17:07:59 [fesch]
- js: news items?
- 17:08:29 [fesch]
- rs: Samsung US is moving to dpub
- 17:09:11 [fesch]
- zakim, next item
- 17:09:11 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "APA Housekeeping http://www.w3.org/2015/10/apa-charter.html" taken up [from janina]
- 17:09:38 [fesch]
- js: we have tracker set up anything else?
- 17:09:53 [joanie]
- q+ to ask about making tracker readonly
- 17:10:00 [joanie]
- q-
- 17:10:19 [fesch]
- mc: all is set up, wiki, tracker... please abandon the the PF tracker
- 17:10:51 [fesch]
- mc: we are ready to request PF tracker be shut down
- 17:11:23 [fesch]
- js: wiki for logging specs... provides bread crumbs... that may be remaining infrastructure
- 17:11:39 [fesch]
- mc: I am putting specs in the wiki as we look at them
- 17:12:02 [fesch]
- mc: I haven't copied stuff from the PF wiki to APA wiki, spec reviews are new
- 17:13:57 [fesch]
- mc: need to change password...
- 17:14:41 [JF]
- JF has joined #apa
- 17:15:18 [fesch]
- js: membership - James N (Oracle) lost, he couldn't get approval for another group, Cynthia not yet in... we are thin on browser support (only Yandex)
- 17:15:48 [fesch]
- zakim, next item
- 17:15:48 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open" taken up [from janina]
- 17:16:07 [MichaelC]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
- 17:16:41 [MichaelC]
- close action-1763
- 17:16:41 [trackbot]
- Closed action-1763.
- 17:16:55 [JF]
- present+ JF
- 17:17:54 [fesch]
- js: digital publishing will meet with us next week
- 17:18:28 [LJWatson]
- Pointer Lock https://w3c.github.io/pointerlock/
- 17:18:34 [fesch]
- lw: have question on pointer lock
- 17:21:25 [MichaelC]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/uievents/
- 17:21:49 [MichaelC]
- action-1749: http://www.w3.org/TR/uievents/
- 17:21:50 [trackbot]
- Notes added to action-1749 Review ui events.
- 17:21:55 [MichaelC]
- action-1750: http://www.w3.org/TR/uievents/
- 17:21:55 [trackbot]
- Notes added to action-1750 Review ui events.
- 17:24:16 [jamesn]
- jamesn has joined #apa
- 17:24:22 [JF]
- Q+
- 17:24:24 [fesch]
- js: I don't see anyone setting up a UI without using ARIA, data changing on the fly, we may want them to make them say that in their spec. they have a section on security, so maybe we want an accessibility statement
- 17:25:21 [janina]
- q?
- 17:25:25 [janina]
- ack jf
- 17:25:33 [MichaelC]
- http://www.w3.org/tr/webmidi/
- 17:25:35 [fesch]
- js: do we want to ask for sections on accessibility?
- 17:26:22 [fesch]
- jf: At TPAC we talked about this and we have this as a global need as well
- 17:26:37 [janina]
- q?
- 17:27:24 [fesch]
- js: I don't want to close this action without some comfort that accessibility is being addressed, maybe we want to point them to authoring guide
- 17:27:33 [fesch]
- js: think about a statement for it
- 17:28:03 [fesch]
- zakim, next item
- 17:28:03 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html" taken up [from janina]
- 17:28:45 [fesch]
- rs: those are the UI events from HTML is there anything new?
- 17:29:02 [fesch]
- js: that is a question, we may be able to close it?
- 17:29:07 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/TR/gamepad/ Gamepad
- 17:29:45 [MichaelC]
- action: Léonie to review Gamepad https://www.w3.org/TR/gamepad/
- 17:29:45 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2001 - Review gamepad https://www.w3.org/tr/gamepad/ [on Léonie Watson - due 2016-01-20].
- 17:31:16 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2-ext-req/ Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions
- 17:31:59 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/TR/webmention/ Webmention
- 17:32:59 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/TR/social-web-protocols/ Social Web Protocols
- 17:34:12 [MichaelC]
- action: fesch to review Social Web Protocols https://www.w3.org/TR/social-web-protocols/
- 17:34:12 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2002 - Review social web protocols https://www.w3.org/tr/social-web-protocols/ [on Fred Esch - due 2016-01-20].
- 17:34:44 [MichaelC]
- -> https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/ Data on the Web Best Practices
- 17:36:06 [fesch]
- lw: found email requesting us look at presentation API on Nov 6
- 17:36:22 [LJWatson]
- Presentation API http://w3c.github.io/presentation-api/
- 17:40:00 [fesch]
- jd: interested in topic, next couple of weeks is tough
- 17:40:28 [MichaelC]
- action: joanie to review Presentation API https://www.w3.org/TR/presentation-api/ - due 17 Feb
- 17:40:28 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-2003 - Review presentation api https://www.w3.org/tr/presentation-api/ [on Joanmarie Diggs - due 2016-02-17].
- 17:41:56 [fesch]
- zakim, next item
- 17:41:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Pending CSS Flexbox CR http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/" taken up [from janina]
- 17:42:41 [fesch]
- js: rich wrote up a email explaining the concern
- 17:43:11 [fesch]
- js: CSS has some good approaches, but haven't documented them
- 17:43:37 [fesch]
- js: we may need to ask them to document it... lets remember what was said at TPAC
- 17:44:12 [janina]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Jan/0025.html
- 17:44:18 [jnurthen]
- jnurthen has joined #apa
- 17:44:37 [fesch]
- rs: flexbox changes the DOM order which is different than visible order.... if the flexbox order is meaningful then tabindex should follow flexbox order
- 17:45:52 [fesch]
- rs: young designers want to use it and it causes accessibility problems, creates work, folks with disability get a worse experience and accessibility folks look like meanies,
- 17:46:23 [fesch]
- rs: totally preventable ... by having flexbox affect the tab and read order
- 17:46:30 [janina]
- TPAC Discussion: http://www.w3.org/2015/10/30-apa-minutes.html
- 17:46:54 [fesch]
- rs: we have the same issue in WCAG 1 .... we are repeating history...
- 17:47:06 [janina]
- q?
- 17:47:14 [fesch]
- rs: similar problem with content injection
- 17:47:21 [fesch]
- q+
- 17:47:48 [fesch]
- rs: representative of a bigger problem, CSS working group needs to work on interoperability
- 17:48:10 [fesch]
- js: agree with you rich
- 17:48:24 [LJWatson]
- Q+
- 17:48:32 [JF]
- Q+
- 17:48:57 [janina]
- ack fe
- 17:49:09 [fesch]
- fe: round display and grid layout have the same issue
- 17:49:29 [janina]
- ack jw
- 17:49:30 [JF]
- Jesse Beach
- 17:49:32 [JF]
- ack JF
- 17:49:38 [janina]
- ack lj
- 17:50:07 [fesch]
- lw: in Sapporo, Jesse (facebook) presented a demo, had discussion, doesn't change DOM and not API something in the middle
- 17:50:57 [fesch]
- jn: kind of works, affects keyboard sequence by not AT read order... two sequences are different in Firefox, other browsers may have wrong order but both orders the same
- 17:51:05 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q+
- 17:51:10 [fesch]
- lw: in the browser is where stuff needs to happen
- 17:51:44 [fesch]
- js: CSS need to document stuff they haven't yet documented, we may object to spec moving forward...
- 17:52:07 [LJWatson]
- ack me
- 17:52:13 [JF]
- +1 to Janina's point(s) - fantasai spoke directly to the gaps in documentation
- 17:52:18 [fesch]
- rs: happy to work with browser vendors, but CSS has to help and document, history is repeating
- 17:52:44 [fesch]
- rs: we don't know what CSS next steps are...
- 17:53:22 [fesch]
- js: I promised a response this week, fairly well recorded in minutes at TPAC...
- 17:53:55 [fesch]
- js: thought the FF approach could work.... CSS wants to move to PR sometime around May
- 17:54:19 [janina]
- q?
- 17:54:22 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack
- 17:54:25 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- q?
- 17:54:27 [fesch]
- js: need to have gap covered, documented or steps moving forward
- 17:54:29 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ack me
- 17:54:49 [LJWatson]
- s/in Sapporo, Jesse (facebook) presented a demo, had discussion, doesn't change DOM and not API something in the middle/in Sapporo, Jesse (facebook) presented a demo, had discussion about Firefox's attempt to resolve the problem, which doesn't change DOM or API but does something in the middle/
- 17:55:35 [fesch]
- js: don't mind stuff moving to CR as long as we can ask for changes in CR...
- 17:55:44 [fesch]
- zakim, next item
- 17:55:44 [Zakim]
- agendum 7. "Draft APA Decision Policy http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy" taken up [from janina]
- 17:56:38 [JF]
- agenda?
- 17:56:48 [fesch]
- zakim takeup item 6
- 17:56:57 [fesch]
- zakim, take up item 6
- 17:56:57 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Jan/0007.html" taken up [from janina]
- 17:57:39 [fesch]
- js: standard practice vs what WCAG requires
- 17:57:52 [fesch]
- js: for links
- 17:58:28 [fesch]
- js: WCAG on requires that it be recognized that a link be recognized as a link
- 17:59:07 [fesch]
- js: we didn't find anything where WCAG says the foreground and background color changes...
- 17:59:26 [JF]
- Q+
- 17:59:41 [fesch]
- js: will cast the net wider, this is a major enough issue, that I can write this up for the WAI list
- 17:59:48 [janina]
- q?
- 17:59:50 [fesch]
- js: comments?
- 17:59:53 [janina]
- ack jf
- 18:00:43 [fesch]
- jf: One issue - when you have an actionable item, need a color identifier, the underline is not
- 18:01:15 [fesch]
- jf: WCAG does not talk about identification of actionable items...
- 18:01:25 [jnurthen]
- q+
- 18:01:45 [fesch]
- jf: I think actionable items need a contrast ratio
- 18:02:34 [fesch]
- js: we need color contrast, do we want the text for a link need a different color?
- 18:02:37 [MichaelC]
- q+
- 18:03:11 [fesch]
- jf: low vision user needs to be able to see and recognize an actionable element
- 18:03:34 [janina]
- q?
- 18:03:54 [fesch]
- jn: she has modified the color contrast to 3:1
- 18:04:47 [fesch]
- jn: 4.5 allows you to read, 3:1 can be seen, a survey of 1 said he liked the underlined links
- 18:05:09 [MichaelC]
- q-
- 18:05:50 [fesch]
- jf: I don't think we have enough data to say 4.5 for text and 3:1 for underline is OK
- 18:06:34 [fesch]
- jn: there is an WCAG understanding document that says you can use color and other (underline) as a way to show it
- 18:06:51 [fesch]
- jf: I disagree
- 18:07:32 [fesch]
- jn: sometimes you need to, how else will you differentiate visited vs unvisited links?
- 18:07:59 [fesch]
- jn: need the low vision folks to say
- 18:08:20 [fesch]
- js: I should take this to a wider list
- 18:08:54 [fesch]
- js: the problem happens when you add the third visited (vs unvisited) link
- 18:09:05 [fesch]
- jn: folks can change their link color
- 18:09:31 [fesch]
- jf: since this is a W3C style guide, we should eat our own dog food...
- 18:10:00 [fesch]
- jn: I think this is a good template that helps people, want to see it adopted....
- 18:10:27 [fesch]
- jf: perhaps my objections are to big...
- 18:11:17 [fesch]
- js: next week we will have dpub and pointerlock
- 18:11:29 [fesch]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 18:11:29 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/01/13-apa-minutes.html fesch
- 19:42:06 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- richardschwerdtfeger has joined #apa
- 21:30:17 [chaals]
- chaals has joined #apa
- 21:38:53 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- richardschwerdtfeger has left #apa