ACTION-273: Look into whether we can/should add licence statement to /ns docs and, if so, which one

Look into whether we can/should add licence statement to /ns docs and, if so, which one

State:

closed

Person:

François Daoust

Due on:

March 7, 2017

Created on:

February 28, 2017

Related emails:

1. [Minutes SSN] 2017-04-11 call (from fd@w3.org on 2017-04-12)
2. Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 11-04-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (from sefki.kolozali@kcl.ac.uk on 2017-04-11)
3. Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 11-04-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (from kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au on 2017-04-11)
4. SSN ontology licences, Was: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 11-04-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (from maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr on 2017-04-11)
5. RE: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 11-04-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2017-04-10)
6. Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 11-04-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (from rgarcia@fi.upm.es on 2017-04-10)
7. Agenda SSN meeting this week - 11-04-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC (from armin.haller@anu.edu.au on 2017-04-10)
8. Re: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) (from ssimmons@opengeospatial.org on 2017-03-06)
9. Re: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) (from jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com on 2017-03-06)
10. RE: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves) (from fd@w3.org on 2017-03-06)
11. [Minutes SSN] 2017 02 28 (from phila@w3.org on 2017-02-28)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log.