11:01:03 RRSAgent has joined #wot-comm 11:01:03 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-wot-comm-irc 11:01:15 present+ Coralie 11:01:18 present+ Yingying 11:01:33 yingying has changed the topic to: WoT IG communicaiton TF monthly meeting - Wed, Dec. 16, EST 6:00 / EU 12:00 / China 19:00 / Japan 20:00, WebEx meeting: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m5d694a43b4d11c56e6c4ce54d9d91461, meeting number: 640 219 672, meeting password: wotcomms 11:01:49 kaz_ has joined #wot-comm 11:02:22 Karen has joined #wot-comm 11:04:42 present+ Daniel_Peintner 11:04:45 present+ Kaz 11:05:14 joerg has joined #wot-comm 11:05:17 present+ Karen 11:05:36 present+ Joerg 11:07:09 present+ Dardo_Anicic 11:07:16 s/Dardo/Darko/ 11:07:47 rrsagent, make log public 11:07:51 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:07:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-wot-comm-minutes.html kaz 11:08:40 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wot-comms/2015Dec/0005.html 11:09:22 dsr has joined #wot-comm 11:09:32 sorry for the delay 11:10:22 Joerg: for landing page discussion, let's discuss which is best among IG page, IG wiki, CG page 11:10:30 +1 get started 11:10:42 s/among/among WOT W3C page,/ 11:11:04 agenda+ Landing page 11:11:12 agenda+ Upcoming events 11:11:22 agenda+ Outreach 11:11:26 agenda+ AOB 11:11:40 present+ Dave 11:12:14 agenda? 11:12:22 scribenick: koalie 11:12:41 Zakim, take up item 1 11:12:41 agendum 1. "Landing page" taken up [from koalie] 11:12:44 -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Communications_and_Collaboration_for_Web_of_Things_IG Landing Page 11:13:00 Joerg: We have three web pages and one wiki 11:13:12 DarkoAnicic has joined #wot-comm 11:13:53 ... if we think of a landing page, scope and activity, it seems w3.org/wot but IG page has probably more info, then wiki page has information to engage 11:14:11 ... any comment, preference? 11:14:23 q+ 11:14:32 Daniel: We need to keep content up to date and avoid mismatch that there is on first page 11:14:38 ... if feasible, reducing the number of pages 11:14:50 ... less likely that we forget to update everywhere 11:14:54 q+ 11:15:08 ack karen 11:15:31 Karen: I think from our recent experience, we like to see the landing page be at a higer level 11:15:54 ... so that busdev and comm team can use it as first entry page to let people know of the work taking place in the area of WoT 11:16:04 ... high-level and plain english type of page 11:16:28 ... then, IG and eventually WG pages will have more of the technical details of what you're doing, the scope and where you are, and those need to be maintained 11:16:34 could we take a look at http://www.w3.org/WoT/ 11:16:37 ... the high-level page doesn't need a lot of maintenance. 11:16:49 ... we typically update them every few months. 11:16:57 ... information stays pretty constant. 11:17:09 ack dsr 11:17:48 Dave: We have an IG page (essentially a list of links and news articles, a fairly common pattern across groups), that I hope people can help populate that page 11:17:54 ... let's ensure the info is appropriate 11:18:09 ... when linking to a wiki page, I'm not sure we're doing a good job 11:18:20 ... we need to ensure sections of the wiki are properly updated 11:18:27 ... I suggest people are in charge of some 11:18:39 Joerg: We can try to fix all those different aspects 11:18:44 q+ 11:18:55 ... I understand we have this WoT page as a kind of overview entry 11:19:17 ... and the IG page is the one with the news and links to get engaged into details 11:19:26 ... and wiki is the working area 11:19:31 http://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/ 11:19:40 https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_Page 11:19:56 Joerg: I wasn't quite clear and it's hard to understand the three purposes 11:20:07 ... then there's a community page 11:20:15 ... which is another overview document 11:20:27 http://www.w3.org/community/wot/ 11:20:30 q? 11:20:40 Dave: I think we need more work on the top-level one which doesn't serve its purpose yet 11:20:41 ack kaz 11:20:54 Auto and Web landing page: http://www.w3.org/auto/ 11:20:54 Auto WG main page: http://www.w3.org/auto/wg/ 11:20:54 Auto WG blog: http://www.w3.org/blog/auto/ 11:20:54 Auto wiki: https://www.w3.org/auto/wg/wiki/Main_Page 11:21:05 Kaz: These 4 pages ^^ 11:21:13 ... [Kaz goes over purpose of each] 11:21:46 q+ 11:21:57 ack dape 11:22:06 Darko: Will the main pages remain as we start a WG? 11:22:18 Dave: Yes. 11:22:23 ... see Kaz' examples 11:22:30 q+ 11:22:31 ... there is a role for top-level landing page 11:22:44 ... to serve the sort of purposes Karen talked about, and provide pointers to the rest of the pages. 11:22:54 Joerg: I'd propose to polish each 11:23:11 ... take existing materials and from this first page, to point further to the rest of the pages 11:23:26 i/Darko/kaz: landing page provides high-level description for industry stakeholders, main page provides links to resources, blog includes entries of the latest news, and the wiki includes the detail of the technical discussions/ 11:23:30 Dave: We are thinking of preparing a data sales sheet for CES early next year 11:23:46 .... through that work, we could introduce people to what W3C is doing 11:24:15 Daniel: Do people use tools to keep the pages up to date? 11:24:21 ... or is it done manually? 11:24:35 Kaz: landing page and main group page are rather fixed and static 11:24:45 ... the blog part is maintained via wordpress 11:24:55 ... the main content for the discussion is maintaing by hand in wiki 11:25:12 q? 11:25:24 ack dape 11:25:58 Dave: Right now, we have the admin control systems for Wordpress 11:26:01 q+ 11:26:11 ack kaz 11:26:12 ... for the wiki, members of the group have write access 11:26:23 Kaz: We assign each wiki page or sections to specific editors 11:26:47 Yingying: Could we agree on which one is the landing page? 11:26:58 ... should we point pointers on the landing page to other pages? 11:27:12 ... how could we maintain it? 11:27:19 ... how could we decide to @@ now? 11:27:35 ... for w3.org/wot/ can we agree it's the WoT landing page? 11:27:39 Joerg: +1 11:27:47 [some other oral agreement] 11:28:05 RESOLUTION: http://www.w3.org/WoT/ is the landing page 11:28:27 q+ 11:28:39 Yingying: In the WoT IG, there's a link to the wiki. Is it good enough? 11:28:56 +1 easier pointers on this page 11:29:02 Dave: Perhaps we could @@ wikis where we do most of our work 11:29:07 Also need to add CES as next event 11:29:10 ack j 11:29:33 Joerg: The landing page, which is more static, has outdated upcoming events 11:29:46 ... the automotive page uses the right-column differently 11:29:56 ... testimonials could be an option 11:30:19 ... left-hand side provides references to the sub-pages 11:30:34 ... we might say there's a wiki, where the work of the IG happens 11:31:06 ... I don't know if we should start testimonials like automotive landing page has 11:31:22 ... is that something you asked for? how were they gotten? 11:31:25 q? 11:32:11 Kaz: this was designed by Daniel Davis, formerly marcomm team member 11:32:19 Another example is web payments: http://www.w3.org/Payments/ 11:32:38 Kaz: we can ask IG members for testimonials 11:33:05 ... W3C MarComm team has been working with team contacts like me for Automotive 11:33:10 ... talk with stakeholders 11:33:18 ... and got the words for testimonials 11:33:27 trackbot has joined #wot-comm 11:33:28 ... we can ask WoT participants as well for testimonials 11:33:33 q+ 11:33:44 ... Paul Boyes is the chair of the automotive group 11:33:50 ... we can get your words, Joerg 11:33:57 ack dsr 11:34:13 Dave: I was going to ask MarComm team about worth of testimonials 11:34:20 ... we don't have them on the Web Payments page 11:34:25 ... could be a good page, what do you think? 11:34:41 q+ 11:34:47 ack karen 11:35:04 Karen: Always great to have testimonials on landing pages 11:35:15 ... static page is a casualty of us having not a lot of staff 11:35:21 ... but some information needs to be evergreen 11:35:33 ... and it's good to have the calendars updated and a trickly of information 11:35:39 ... testimonials would be very nice 11:35:42 q+ 11:35:51 ack koalie 11:36:54 q+ 11:37:03 Coralie: -1 on rotation 11:37:12 ... that adds significant overhead 11:37:26 ... I'd suggest you take the same route as Automotive and maintain those by hand 11:37:45 ... and rotate them by hand if you have a bunch of them 11:37:52 Dave: it may be easy to do with javascript 11:38:31 Yingying: Who can take the action to call for testimonials among the IG members? 11:39:16 Dave: we can provide an example and invite the IG members to provide testimonials 11:39:33 Joerg: Logo might be difficult for companies given trademarks 11:40:01 Joerg: brief testimonials, short statements, yes 11:40:34 Yingying: I remember Ted sent a message previously, asking for testimonials. I can check that and with Ted and Kaz about experience 11:40:46 action: yingying to call for testimonials among the IG members 11:40:46 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 11:41:01 trackbot, associate this channel with wot 11:41:01 Sorry, koalie, I don't understand 'trackbot, associate this channel with wot'. Please refer to for help. 11:41:36 zakim, associate this channel with wot 11:41:36 I don't understand 'associate this channel with wot', kaz 11:42:02 +1 IIC quote 11:42:10 q+ 11:42:19 trackbot, associate this channel with #wot 11:42:19 Associated this channel with #wot. 11:42:27 action: yingying to call for testimonials among the IG members 11:42:27 Created ACTION-17 - Call for testimonials among the ig members [on Yingying Chen - due 2015-12-23]. 11:42:58 Kaz: We could consider a few organisation listed on the landscape page, such as echonet in Japan 11:42:59 q? 11:43:04 ack dsr 11:43:19 Dave: I think it's a good idea to ask most well known orgs 11:43:32 ... iic, open@@consortium, 1m2m etc. 11:43:48 ... I'd like to revisit the issue with logos, we should pursue that; makes impact 11:43:56 ... it's fine if companies do not want to provide their logos 11:44:04 Karen: Yes, some will, some won't. 11:44:12 ... if you can include it in the design that will be fine. 11:44:20 s/open@@consortium/Open Interconnect Consortium/ 11:44:23 s/open@@consortium/OIC/ 11:44:36 s/1m2m/oneM2M/ 11:44:39 Yingying: we have this alliance, any suggestion for others from whom to get a testimonial? 11:44:42 [none] 11:44:42 s/iic/IIC/ 11:44:49 Yingying: I'll start with the alliance 11:45:01 ... after this is done, who has access to modify this page? 11:45:03 Dave: I do 11:45:18 ... I'm sure we can add more poeple to the admin list 11:45:23 Yingying: I'll check with systeam. 11:45:28 ... this is about landing page 11:45:57 action: dsr to look at what wordpress support there is for testmonials 11:45:57 Created ACTION-18 - Look at what wordpress support there is for testmonials [on Dave Raggett - due 2015-12-23]. 11:46:16 Joerg: about landing page, testimonials would be on the right and left side would have other pages, right? 11:46:49 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:46:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-wot-comm-minutes.html kaz 11:47:16 ... a link to the wiki page would make sense in the left-hand side, as well as an overview description 11:47:23 Yingying: OK. 11:47:54 ... I'll get permission to modify and will write something for your review. 11:48:07 ... Any more comments? 11:48:33 i|good idea to ask|-> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Mapping_of_tech_landscape_to_IoT_approaches tech landscape page| 11:48:34 action: Yingying to update left column of WoT landing page to include links to wiki etc 11:48:34 Created ACTION-19 - Update left column of wot landing page to include links to wiki etc [on Yingying Chen - due 2015-12-23]. 11:48:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:48:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-wot-comm-minutes.html kaz 11:49:19 Dave: That page also needs to be made useful for companies who might be interested in joining W3C for this work. 11:50:11 Joerg: we might find data when we take up the outreach topic 11:50:14 +1 slide presentation review 11:50:38 Zakim, close this item 11:50:38 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, koalie 11:50:41 q? 11:50:44 ack j 11:50:47 Zakim, close this item 11:50:47 agendum 1 closed 11:50:48 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 11:50:48 2. Upcoming events [from koalie] 11:50:52 Zakim, take up item 2 11:50:52 agendum 2. "Upcoming events" taken up [from koalie] 11:51:55 q+ 11:52:01 ack karen 11:52:08 [[ 11:52:09 - CES, Las Vegas(Jan 6-9) - Industry of Things World USA(Feb 25-26) 11:52:10 ]] 11:52:27 Karen: W3C suite at CES Jan 5-9 11:52:34 ... we need a presentation to show to people 11:52:47 ... We won't have a consumer oriented data sales sheet 11:53:13 ... but we're aiming to have it for the other event, Industry of Things World USA in San Diego in February 11:53:23 Here are the slides I presented at the ETSI M2M workshop last week - http://www.w3.org/2015/12/09-wot-m2m.pdf, I am updating them for a presentation to Industry 4.0 next Monday. I plan to update this further for use in CES. 11:53:45 Karen: Any other event people know about? 11:53:52 ... or that should be coming on the horizon soon? 11:54:21 Yingying: We need to prepare an industry-focused data sales sheet for the February event 11:54:29 The wiki page with a list of events: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Relevant_Conferences_for_the_Web_of_Things_IG 11:54:33 ... and write a white-paper as starting point for that sales sheet 11:54:38 ... I believe Dave is working on it 11:54:42 Dave: yes 11:54:47 Joerg: example to see? 11:54:50 Karen: sure... 11:55:50 -> http://www.w3.org/2012/12/auto_salesheet.pdf 2014 version of Automotive data sales sheet (in the process of being updated) 11:56:05 Karen: We have a designer to help on those; don't worry about the graphics 11:56:13 ... just worry about what's interested to present in terms of graphic 11:57:19 ... front: high-level data that speaks to the business audience 11:57:28 ... back: technical detail that speaks to the technical audience 11:57:41 Joerg: what are the top five messages we want for that page? 11:57:59 Karen: whitepaper is a starting point, unless we know right now what those top-five messages are 11:58:42 Joerg: we can also draw from slides 11:58:48 Karen: Yes, absolutely 11:59:23 Dave: see slides I presented last week http://www.w3.org/2015/12/09-wot-m2m.pdf that I'll update for next week to be more industrial 11:59:34 ... what's missing, what's wrong? 11:59:44 q+ 12:00:03 Yingying: Deadline for whitepaper, Karen? 12:00:13 Karen: It would be very good to have it by January 4. 12:00:19 Dave: That sounds tight. 12:00:25 ... we're all rushed 12:00:40 ... I have january deadlines for EU projects. 12:00:43 s/tight/right/ 12:00:48 q? 12:01:19 Joerg: Darko and Daniel might have short presentations that we can draw from to provide some focus 12:01:40 ... these have two parts: focus part of common presentation of activity and specific 12:01:53 ... for the common part, we need to come to a joint understanding 12:01:56 Dave: Yes 12:02:06 ... we have to make sure the content we're talking about is at the right marketing level 12:02:13 ... it needs to speak to the audience 12:02:47 ... we don't want to drill down into the detail of what the group is doing 12:03:29 Yingying: This white-paper can be ready for January 4. 12:03:43 ... presentations are needed as well, what is the deadline, Karen? 12:04:13 Karen: 1st presentation, high-level about what W3C is doing in WoT, is January 4 as well. 12:04:20 ... it's a hard deadline. 12:04:38 ... the 2nd presentation for San Diego event, we have more time, we can have it at the end of January 12:04:48 ... we can make it more interesting with a graphic 12:04:58 ... we'll have a booth 12:05:11 ... two companies already said they want to be part of the W3C booth and do demos 12:05:24 Yingying: Dave, is it OK? 12:05:34 Dave: we can provide a short slide deck in this time frame 12:05:44 Zakim, close this item 12:05:44 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, koalie 12:05:55 Zakim, queue = 0 12:05:55 I don't understand 'queue = 0', koalie 12:06:04 q- d 12:06:10 Zakim, close this item 12:06:10 agendum 2 closed 12:06:11 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 12:06:11 3. Outreach [from koalie] 12:06:14 Zakim, take up item 3 12:06:14 agendum 3. "Outreach" taken up [from koalie] 12:06:48 Daniel: I wanted to comment on what was said previously. We need to agree on slides content. 12:07:57 [review of WoT outreach materials by Daniel and Darko] 12:09:03 +1 explaining scope 12:10:41 +1 good start on slides 12:11:27 q+ 12:11:35 q? 12:11:49 i|explaining|-> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/images/5/53/WoT-Outreach-v4.pptx WoT outreach slides by Daniel and Darko| 12:12:14 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:12:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-wot-comm-minutes.html kaz 12:12:14 ack Karen 12:12:15 +1 use cases 12:12:35 karen: Thanks for starting this, Daniel. Good start, very helpful. 12:12:49 ... for CES, I think I heard Dave took the action to build a slideset 12:12:56 ... is it ok for Dave to re-use that material? 12:13:01 Daniel: Yes, feel free. 12:13:07 Karen: Great. Thank you very much. 12:13:13 kaz++ 12:13:40 Karen: Use-cases, in particular consumers examples, would be great for CES 12:13:49 ... something in the consumer electronics area 12:13:53 Joerg: Smart home? 12:13:59 Karen: Yes, probably a good thing 12:14:18 Joerg: also look at different classes of controllers, not just smartphones 12:14:18 +1 with Karen 12:14:36 devices, phones and hubs 12:14:42 ... that may be a message: smart homes, and controllers other than smartphones. 12:15:01 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:15:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-wot-comm-minutes.html kaz 12:16:06 Dave: the slideset we just looked at contains a lot of background information 12:16:32 ... content depends on audiences 12:16:42 ... for CES, we should focus on problems W3C is solving 12:17:00 Yingying: we'll use the mailing list for comments on the slides? 12:17:09 Dave: Yes, I've already sent to the group 12:17:26 ... where I'm struggling a bit: it's hard to compare W3C with the other groups 12:17:40 ... what is OneM2M doing 12:17:46 Yingying: Any more comments? 12:17:59 Daniel: What is the time-line for the presentation? 12:18:05 ... 10, 20 minutes? 12:18:13 s/time-line/length/ 12:18:41 Karen: for CES, I think somethign around 10 to 15 slides, for a 10-minute conversation 12:18:46 ... we want a short presentation 12:18:56 ... for the booth in San Diego, similar, could be longer 12:19:12 ... we might want to have 2 versions: high-level and more detailed for technical people who want to know more. 12:19:30 q+ to be excused from this call for conflicting thing 12:19:36 Dave: Industry? 12:19:39 Karen: Yes. 12:19:52 ack Coralie 12:20:01 Coralie: I have to offer regrets to leave meeting now 12:20:09 scribenick: Karen 12:20:19 …look forward to next call 12:20:44 YingYing: Any more comments on the presentation material? 12:21:03 …for the last last three bullets, I pulled them out of minutes from last meeting 12:21:08 …we want to have domain specific use cases 12:21:21 …shall we agree how to collect the domain specific use cases; what else do you propose? 12:21:38 Joerg: I think that should be be covered by this slide set 12:21:49 …those are common questions; differentiation of WoT and IoT we should have a slide 12:21:59 …and even that we can volunteer to have a first shot at that one 12:22:15 …Also what Dave commented on, how our activities relate to others like IIC 12:22:22 …those two are on the radar 12:22:36 …Having our slides for CES and then for industrial, we need to come up with easy to understand stuff 12:22:48 …We have use cases that we compiled at very beginning of IG; they are too complex 12:22:58 …here it's to have them be as easy to understand for the slides 12:23:04 …For CES would be good to use smart home 12:23:05 s/last last/last/ 12:23:08 …and the industrial for February 12:23:09 +1 12:23:14 …Also start one slide each 12:23:30 YingYing: use cases are already there but need to modify for the target audiences 12:23:39 Joerg: not elaborate, but make it easier to understand 12:23:56 YingYing: So these three points are being covered by this material 12:24:03 …we have all the agenda finished 12:24:09 …Are there any other topics to discuss here? 12:24:10 q+ 12:24:12 Dave: yes 12:24:19 …I put up a blog for the San Diego event 12:24:22 …on the IG page 12:24:28 …will also be available on the main W3C page 12:24:33 YingYing: pointer? 12:24:43 Dave: It refers to IoTW event in San Diego 12:24:55 …I also want to put up a short blog post promoting the upcoming F2F in January 12:25:03 …Sumir provided me with a logo and a quote 12:25:15 …I will draft text and quote later today; can send around to this list for comments 12:25:27 s/Sumir/Soumya/ 12:25:28 …We need to remind people to book travel asap 12:25:50 Dave: Meeting at Sophia-Antipolis 12:26:12 https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/ 12:26:30 Karen: Good to include that in the CES presentation especially for European companies who may want to observe 12:26:39 Dave: yes, we will have an open day again 12:26:45 …host is looking at who is being invited 12:26:57 …we will charge a fee as host does not have funds to cover meeting expenses 12:27:00 YingYing: ok 12:27:05 …any other comments here? 12:27:06 q? 12:27:12 ack ko 12:27:12 koalie, you wanted to be excused from this call for conflicting thing 12:27:14 ack kaz 12:27:14 ack k 12:27:24 Kaz: Probably we should talk in detail on next call 12:27:36 …we need to think about testimonials from other standards orgs 12:27:48 …and think about improving or adding liaison organizations to the W3C liaison page 12:27:56 …some are included in the present page, but may want to add some more 12:28:11 Dave: I think this is a topic for a further call; there is a long list of groups in which we are in various stages of discussion 12:28:17 Kaz: right 12:28:24 YingYing: Any more comments? 12:28:25 s/on next/during the next/ 12:28:36 …if not, I think we can close today's meeting 12:28:39 …thank you for joining 12:29:03 YingYing: Next call is 20th of January 12:29:08 …the third Wed of the month 12:29:34 Karen: Good to prepare 20 Jan for San Diego 12:29:39 …and rest for CES by email 12:29:54 YingYing: thanks all 12:29:57 [adjourned] 12:30:18 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:30:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-wot-comm-minutes.html Karen 12:32:05 Chair: Yingying 12:32:12 Meeting: WoT Comm 12:32:17 rrsagent, draft mintues 12:32:17 I'm logging. I don't understand 'draft mintues', kaz. Try /msg RRSAgent help 12:32:21 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:32:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-wot-comm-minutes.html kaz 13:02:02 dsr has joined #wot-comm 15:00:52 yingying has joined #wot-comm 16:18:34 yingying_ has joined #wot-comm 16:32:24 kaz has joined #wot-comm