15:45:25 RRSAgent has joined #alreq 15:45:25 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/12/08-alreq-irc 15:45:31 present? 15:45:42 q? 15:45:50 present+ 15:45:55 who is here? 15:46:03 Zakim, who is here? 15:46:03 Present: Behnam 15:46:05 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, Behnam, trackbot 15:46:28 list attendees 15:46:31 zakim, list attendees 15:46:31 As of this point the attendees have been Behnam 15:46:40 zakim, list participants 15:46:40 As of this point the attendees have been Behnam 15:47:41 Meeting: Arabic Layout Task Force Teleconference 15:48:42 rrsagent, set logs public-visible 15:48:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:48:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/08-alreq-minutes.html Behnam 15:49:07 rrsagent, set logs public-visible 15:52:45 najib has joined #alreq 15:52:47 mostafa has joined #alreq 15:52:57 HI 15:54:11 Hi, Najib. 15:58:49 Shervin has joined #alreq 15:59:00 Hello everybody. 15:59:14 Zakim who is here? 15:59:26 present+ najib 15:59:45 zakim, who is here? 15:59:45 Present: Behnam, najib 15:59:47 On IRC I see Shervin, mostafa, najib, RRSAgent, Zakim, Behnam, trackbot 15:59:54 present+ Shervin 16:00:42 present+ 16:01:23 Hello, everyone. 16:01:44 Hey, Mostafa. 16:01:50 Chair: Behnam 16:01:57 ScribeNick: Shervin 16:02:27 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:02:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/08-alreq-minutes.html Behnam 16:02:46 r12a has joined #alreq 16:02:56 present+ 16:03:03 Shervin, waiting for you on the call 16:04:35 Just a second. 16:05:23 zakim, who is here? 16:05:23 Present: Behnam, najib, Shervin, mostafa, r12a 16:05:25 On IRC I see r12a, Shervin, mostafa, najib, RRSAgent, Zakim, Behnam, trackbot 16:05:26 Waseem has joined #Alreq 16:05:42 regrets+ Khaled 16:06:03 present+Waseem 16:06:23 present+ Waseem 16:06:29 zakim, who is here? 16:06:29 Present: Behnam, najib, Shervin, mostafa, r12a, Waseem 16:06:31 On IRC I see Waseem, r12a, Shervin, mostafa, najib, RRSAgent, Zakim, Behnam, trackbot 16:06:58 agenda+ Status review of action items from previous meeting 16:07:03 agenda+ Welcoming new participants 16:07:08 agenda+ Glossary status 16:07:14 agenda+ Review of Github issues 16:07:18 agenda+ Drafting status 16:08:06 Behnam: Opening the meeting with checking the action items. 16:08:10 http://www.w3.org/International/groups/arabic-layout/track/actions/open 16:08:27 najib, can you hear us? 16:08:37 Behnam: First action is action-7 for Najib. 16:09:31 Najib: For glossary it was to move the translations from Azzedine's list to our main glossary sheet 16:09:42 ... it's not always copy/paste. Adaptation is needed. 16:10:01 run-in heading vs running heads ? 16:10:25 ... there are some confusions about some of the terms; e.g. "running heading", "running head" 16:10:49 Topic: Status review of action items from previous meeting 16:11:02 Richard: "running head": header of the page, "running heading": beginning of the sentence. 16:11:32 s/of the sentence/of the paragraph/ 16:11:33 q+ 16:12:25 q- 16:13:14 Najib: For doing the pull request, there is some instructions needed. 16:13:59 If special instructions are needed... 16:14:17 Action for Shervin to write Github pull request instruction 16:14:17 Error finding 'for'. You can review and register nicknames at . 16:14:27 Action Shervin to write Github pull request instruction 16:14:27 Created ACTION-38 - Write github pull request instruction [on Shervin Afshar - due 2015-12-15]. 16:15:27 So, we can go with this order: http://www.w3.org/International/groups/arabic-layout/track/actions/open?sort=owner 16:15:36 ScribeNick: Behnam 16:15:46 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nSxYKQm_mKroCmxU4fyJ-g70Eo1_mF89yHZg8YNOuzc/edit 16:15:46 Shervin: Still working on ACTION-16 16:16:12 Shervin: Re ACTION-29, I've been working on the Persian side. 16:16:35 ... can convert it to HTML sometime next time 16:16:52 ... Still working on the other actions 16:17:07 ScribeNick: Shervin 16:18:17 Waseem: I connected with a friend in the region. Going to receive hard copies in the mail. 16:18:44 zakim, who's here? 16:18:44 Present: Behnam, najib, Shervin, mostafa, r12a, Waseem 16:18:46 On IRC I see Waseem, r12a, Shervin, mostafa, najib, RRSAgent, Zakim, Behnam, trackbot 16:18:53 close action-22 16:18:53 Closed action-22. 16:19:38 Behnam: Going to send pull request for Action-23. 16:19:41 q+ 16:19:59 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TSA1Ju70FaMzUD2EXTgMnZtjszPKBeGj5O8FtXy9SqA/edit# 16:20:20 q+ 16:20:20 Mostafa: Action-24 drafting in progress. The only missing part is the ligatures. 16:20:48 close action-34 16:20:48 Closed action-34. 16:20:51 Mostafa: Action-34 can be closed as he put the comments on Github. 16:21:28 Behnam: General comment for everybody; agree on a font to use and have it for all the examples. 16:21:48 Behnam: Which font Mostafa is using in his examples? 16:21:58 Mostafa: It's Mitra for the images. 16:22:11 Mostafa: On Github issue there are comments in this regard. 16:22:25 Mostafa: We can change the typeface when we agree on the font. 16:22:52 Behnam: We can discuss the Github issues later. 16:22:53 q+ 16:23:31 q? 16:23:37 ack behnam 16:23:42 q- 16:25:00 Richard: To Mostafa regarding ligatures section. There are some controversy regarding what is a ligature or not; Lam-Alef being a ligature or not. 16:25:08 q+ 16:25:31 Mostafa: Heard things about it. Not sure how to address that. 16:25:55 Mostafa: All the technical documents call it "ligature". 16:25:57 q+ 16:26:07 q- 16:27:05 q- 16:27:23 Shervin: Mandatory vs. Optional ligature, but all ligatures. We can note that. 16:27:28 q+ 16:27:31 q+ 16:27:56 Richard: Ligated forms? 16:27:59 q+ 16:28:14 ack mostafa 16:28:15 Mostafa: Optional ligatures are not in my plan. 16:28:40 ack Shervin 16:29:55 Shervin: Thinks we should follow what other communities are calling them "ligature". 16:30:23 q+ 16:30:50 Shervin: For those experts who don't think these are ligatures we can have a note. 16:31:20 Behnam: Not sure we are all on the same page; we can call them all ligatures, but not sure that we are on the same page regarding optional vs. mandatory. 16:31:21 q+ 16:31:31 ack Behnam 16:32:11 Shervin: I agree. The intention is not to call any of the ligatures mandatory, and that's a different discussion. 16:32:21 q- 16:32:30 1+ 16:32:46 q+ 16:33:19 ack mostafa 16:33:25 Mostafa: We need to denote mandatory vs. optional in details. Depends on font, etc. 16:34:45 Behnam: We have a consensus on calling these ligatures and have a note in regards to issues of definition. 16:35:00 q? 16:35:02 q- 16:35:15 close action-20 16:35:15 Closed action-20. 16:35:36 agenda? 16:35:58 Topic: Glossary status 16:36:17 Behnam: Opening glossary status topics 16:37:35 q+ to talk about diacritics 16:38:02 q+ 16:38:48 Richard: Regarding diacritic in the glossary; for those audience who can read Arabic letters, but can not pronounce it. 16:39:26 Richard: It's extra work, but it would be useful for some experts. 16:39:36 q+ 16:39:41 q- 16:40:33 Najib: Not inclined to put the diacritic on all the letters. It overloads the words and writing. In Arabic text is marked with full diacritic when it's in Quran. 16:40:55 ... scholarly books to be read by people who are not native Arabic speakers. 16:41:05 q+ 16:41:18 ... For ambiguity we put the specific diacritics on letters needed. 16:41:47 +1 16:42:20 Richard: Not talking about general text. Just about the keywords in the glossary. 16:42:37 ... Transliteration might be easier. 16:43:09 ... just key glossary terms and not the text. 16:43:20 Najib: Which are key words? 16:43:43 Richard: Only the terms in the glossary. 16:43:52 Behnam: For all the terms and not a subset? 16:44:00 Richard: Correct. 16:44:01 q+ 16:44:10 ack najib 16:44:10 q- 16:44:11 q 16:44:18 q- 16:44:37 Behnam: Kind of agreeing with Najib. Separate column for pronounciation. 16:44:46 ... Not much hard in having them. 16:45:01 ... for native speakers it's not usual. 16:45:15 q? 16:45:35 Richard: How dictionaries look like in Persian? 16:46:02 Behnam: The word comes first and the the diacritic separately. 16:46:14 http://parsi.wiki/dehkhodasearchresult-fa.html?searchtype=0&word=2LXZhtmF 16:46:24 http://www.vajehyab.com/?q=%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%B1 16:47:10 q? 16:47:16 ack behnam 16:47:34 Richard: It would be easier to have transliterations. 16:49:25 q+ 16:50:35 q- 16:51:15 q- 16:51:19 Shervin: Talking about the common trends for documenting pronounciation 16:51:52 q+ 16:51:53 Richard: In comparison to only letters with diacritics, transliteration is preferred. 16:52:00 q- 16:52:34 Richard: If the main use-case is to have it for people who don't speak Arabic, transliteration is better. 16:52:54 +1 to Richard 16:53:02 Waseem: Agrees regarding having transliterations. We can cover a larger audience. 16:53:17 ... It would be easier for them to use this glossary. 16:53:55 Behnam: Have a consensus regarding having transliteration. 16:53:58 q? 16:54:07 ack Waseem 16:54:09 q+ 16:54:13 q- 16:54:30 q+ 16:54:46 q+ 16:54:51 q- 16:55:07 Shervin: I need to look at semi-automatic solution. 16:55:40 http://r12a.github.io/pickers/arabic/ 16:55:42 q- 16:55:49 Mostafa: Agrees with the approach on scripting, having two entries in case of ambiguity. 16:56:07 Richard: Have a tool for producing transliterations. 16:56:47 ... Need to have diacritics. 16:57:14 ... we need to be consistent about the method of transliteration. 16:57:44 q? 16:57:49 q- 16:58:15 Behnam: Anyone wants to take an action for this? 16:58:36 q+ 16:58:47 q- 16:59:49 Behnam: The action we want to have is for add a column for transliteration. 17:00:54 Shervin: Can we agree on finishing the glossary work for now and then get to the transliteration step? 17:00:57 +1 17:01:01 +1 17:01:08 ... priority is first finish the glossary for priority one and two. 17:01:47 q- 17:02:00 action: Najib to lead the discussion on having transliteration/pronunciation columns in the glossary 17:02:00 Created ACTION-39 - Lead the discussion on having transliteration/pronunciation columns in the glossary [on Najib Tounsi - due 2015-12-15]. 17:02:10 agenda? 17:02:37 +1 17:02:37 q+ 17:02:57 q- 17:03:09 Topic: Review of Github issues 17:03:23 https://github.com/w3c/alreq/issues/ 17:05:12 Behnam: Going through GH issues. 17:05:38 ... Issue 21 and 16 are related. 17:06:56 Behnam: Discussing Issue 15. 17:08:02 Najib: Still working on the draft. Trying to add a section on the font and relation to typography. 17:08:51 Behnam: Discussing Issue 14. 17:08:58 Mostafa: Being drafted. 17:09:19 Behnam: Discussing Issue 13. 17:09:33 Mostafa: Ongoing discussion. To gather style issues. 17:10:19 Behnam: Discussing Issue 12. 17:10:26 q+ 17:10:36 q- 17:11:05 Behnam: Should we keep this open? 17:11:29 Richard: We can close Issue 12. 17:12:08 Behnam: Issue 10. Keeping open for when we get to special cases. 17:13:08 Behnam: Issue 9 is dupe. Should be marked. 17:13:45 Behnam: Issue 8, any updates on the data source, CLDR or something else? 17:15:00 q+ 17:15:29 q- 17:15:37 Shervin: Still ongoing. Going to do a pull request. 17:17:05 Richard: Issue with Kaf with dots. 17:17:21 Shervin: Please file an issue and Shervin will look into the details. 17:18:29 Mostafa: Issue 5, 4, 3 are to discuss topics. 17:18:38 ... Close after we added the content. 17:18:39 +1 17:18:44 agenda? 17:18:54 Behnam: Moving to next agenda item. 17:19:08 Topic: Drafting status 17:19:33 q+ 17:19:33 Behnam: Drafting topic. 17:19:59 Mostafa: Two chapters are close to pull request. 17:20:12 Mostafa: Not going to pay much attention to the style 17:20:12 q+ 17:20:35 Mostafa: We can adopt the style when we have a consenus. 17:20:53 q+ 17:21:16 q+ 17:21:22 Behnam: General direction of images. Better to keep the direction of images left to right. 17:21:39 Mostafa: There are cases that it can be a problem.' 17:21:42 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TSA1Ju70FaMzUD2EXTgMnZtjszPKBeGj5O8FtXy9SqA/edit# 17:22:07 ... In last image in joining section, having them from left to right doesn't make much sense. 17:22:53 Behnam: We might need to change equal sign to arrow or something. 17:23:00 q? 17:23:06 q- 17:23:11 ack mostafa 17:23:18 ack sh 17:25:04 q? 17:25:09 q+ 17:25:44 Waseem: Wanted to start a different topic. Not having much time to contribute. I would like to contribute to a topic. 17:26:01 ... Bidi text in UI and best practices and problems and issues. 17:26:18 q+ 17:26:24 ... It's common to see a mixture of Arabic and English in UIs. Wanted to cover a topic for that> 17:26:35 ack Waseem 17:27:14 Richard: The group can use me as a resource for the bidi issues. 17:27:40 ... Mostafa's example is confusing to understand if we're composing or decomposing. 17:28:05 ... My experience is it's better to go right to left for examples and images; even with arrows. 17:28:19 ... Consistency matters as usual. 17:28:33 Richard: Regarding what Waseem mentioned; 17:28:55 ... I'm totally interested to hearing those, but the document might not be a good place for these. 17:29:20 ... A little concerned the right thing for this document. 17:29:29 q? 17:29:35 q- 17:29:36 ack r12a 17:29:42 q+ 17:29:58 Najib: The example with equal sign might be confusing. 17:30:34 q+ 17:30:43 ack najib 17:30:57 Najib: Add arrow. 17:31:36 Waseem: Regarding Richard's observation. We can discuss the topic on next call. 17:31:45 q- 17:32:08 http://unicode.org/reports/tr9/ 17:32:18 Behnam: Step away from transferring information with arrow or equal sign. 17:32:48 ... Be explicit in draft and write things down. 17:32:58 ack Behnam 17:33:37 Mostafa: Regarding what Waseem mentioned. The UI is important but currently not in the list of topics. It's similar to issue of Quran (special pages). 17:33:50 +1 17:33:55 ... It might need it's own section or adding a topic to current list of topics. 17:34:05 ack mostafa 17:34:23 q? 17:34:35 Behnam: Closing the meeting. 17:34:48 zakim, please excuse us. 17:34:48 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Behnam, najib, Shervin, mostafa, r12a, Waseem 17:34:48 Zakim has left #alreq 17:37:32 RRSAgent, draft minute 17:37:32 I'm logging. I don't understand 'draft minute', Behnam. Try /msg RRSAgent help 17:37:40 RRSAgent, help 17:37:54 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:37:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/12/08-alreq-minutes.html Behnam