IRC log of aria-apg on 2015-11-30
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 17:44:55 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #aria-apg
- 17:44:56 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/11/30-aria-apg-irc
- 17:45:27 [jamesn]
- Agenda+ Update pattern work assignments and status https://github.com/w3c/aria/wiki/Aria-Authoring-Practices-Patterns-Status
- 17:45:27 [jamesn]
- Agenda+ Placement and format of design paterns for structural ARIA elements like landmarks and lists; draft example of landmarks pattern by John https://rawgit.com/jongund/aria/master/practices/aria-practices.html
- 17:45:27 [jamesn]
- Agenda+ Review bug fixes for menu and menubar pattern https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/apg_menuPattern/practices/aria-practices.html
- 17:45:38 [jamesn]
- Agenda+ Review bug fixes for menubutton design pattern https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/apg_menuPattern/practices/aria-practices.html
- 17:45:45 [jamesn]
- Agenda+ Review revised descriptive text for example of mixed checkbox https://rawgit.com/a11ydoer/practices/master/examples/checkbox/checkbox-3.html
- 17:52:31 [MichielBijl]
- MichielBijl has joined #aria-apg
- 17:53:21 [jemma_ku]
- jemma_ku has joined #aria-apg
- 17:53:25 [jemma_ku]
- hi
- 17:57:18 [jemma_ku]
- can I get meeting pw?
- 17:58:14 [jemma_ku]
- I understand and it is easy pw
- 18:00:29 [mck]
- mck has joined #aria-apg
- 18:00:54 [annabbott]
- annabbott has joined #aria-apg
- 18:01:00 [jamesn]
- present+ JamesNurthen
- 18:01:23 [annabbott]
- present+ AnnAbbott
- 18:01:36 [jemma_ku]
- present+ jemma_jaeun_Ku
- 18:01:36 [MichielBijl]
- present+ Michiel_Bijl
- 18:04:43 [jongund]
- jongund has joined #aria-apg
- 18:10:40 [jamesn]
- rrsagent, make log world
- 18:13:19 [mck]
- test
- 18:13:35 [jamesn]
- agenda?
- 18:15:17 [jamesn]
- zakim, pick a victim
- 18:15:17 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose JamesNurthen
- 18:15:19 [MichielBijl]
- scribe: MichielBijl
- 18:16:58 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next
- 18:16:58 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'next', MichielBijl
- 18:17:00 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next item
- 18:17:00 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Update pattern work assignments and status https://github.com/w3c/aria/wiki/Aria-Authoring-Practices-Patterns-Status" taken up [from jamesn]
- 18:17:25 [MichielBijl]
- MK: Have edited the first column of the status table
- 18:17:50 [MichielBijl]
- MK: dialog modal isn't quite ready
- 18:18:06 [MichielBijl]
- MK: put Jon's name in the edit column for landmarks
- 18:18:22 [MichielBijl]
- MK: those are the changes that have been made recently
- 18:19:04 [MichielBijl]
- MK: any takers for menu/menubutton?
- 18:19:13 [MichielBijl]
- JG: me and Jemma can take that
- 18:19:23 [MichielBijl]
- AA: I can help with landmarks.
- 18:20:59 [MichielBijl]
- JN: Jon and Jemma, you still have radio/checkbox group to do.
- 18:21:43 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next item
- 18:21:43 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Placement and format of design paterns for structural ARIA elements like landmarks and lists; draft example of landmarks pattern by John
- 18:21:45 [Zakim]
- ... https://rawgit.com/jongund/aria/master/practices/aria-practices.html" taken up [from jamesn]
- 18:22:08 [MichielBijl]
- MK: agenda item for larger topic
- 18:22:26 [MichielBijl]
- MK: where do we put stuff in the guide related to non interactive widgets
- 18:22:55 [MichielBijl]
- MK: there may be deswign patterns like landmarks, but not have them limited to interactive role
- 18:23:01 [MichielBijl]
- s/deswign/design
- 18:23:19 [MichielBijl]
- MK: or have a separate section for them
- 18:23:34 [MichielBijl]
- MK: do you want us to look at your example content first Jon?
- 18:23:43 [MichielBijl]
- MK: did you do some writing at that link?
- 18:24:03 [MichielBijl]
- JG: started to write some stuff. But looked at overall structure. Need to talk about.
- 18:24:20 [MichielBijl]
- JG: right now there is a landmark section
- 18:24:32 [MichielBijl]
- JG: I think we should have a section for non-interactive widgets.
- 18:24:59 [MichielBijl]
- JG: we have a lot of them: map, list, etc
- 18:25:43 [MichielBijl]
- JG: help developers find them easier
- 18:26:01 [MichielBijl]
- MK: do we want an index section of the document?
- 18:27:36 [MichielBijl]
- regrets+ Léonie_Watson
- 18:27:56 [MichielBijl]
- MK: if we have that in our guide, it would be easier for people who are using it to use it as a reference
- 18:28:37 [MichielBijl]
- MK: why would you separate interactive and non-interactive, what about cases where it's not clear?
- 18:28:52 [MichielBijl]
- JG: have a section for landmark roles
- 18:31:30 [MichielBijl]
- chair: Matt_King
- 18:34:51 [MichielBijl]
- JG: me and Ann will propose a solution/example and we'll take it from there
- 18:38:42 [annabbott]
- Jon & Ann: landmarks on Dec 14 agenda
- 18:39:03 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next item
- 18:39:03 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Review bug fixes for menu and menubar pattern https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/apg_menuPattern/practices/aria-practices.html" taken up [from jamesn]
- 18:39:43 [MichielBijl]
- MK: I'll merge after the call
- 18:40:17 [MichielBijl]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/apg_menuPattern/practices/aria-practices.html#menu
- 18:42:00 [jemma_ku]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/apg_menuPattern/practices/aria-practices.html#h-menu
- 18:42:24 [MichielBijl]
- MK: removed references to desktop applications
- 18:43:19 [MichielBijl]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria/compare/apg_menuPattern
- 18:45:24 [MichielBijl]
- MK: made keyboard section shorter and added notes to clarify
- 18:48:03 [MichielBijl]
- JN: don't want to add links to everything
- 18:49:31 [MichielBijl]
- AA: remove the link on menu button?
- 18:49:43 [MichielBijl]
- JN: no, links to separate section
- 18:51:17 [MichielBijl]
- MK: interested to know if the keyboard section is an improvement
- 18:51:32 [MichielBijl]
- MK: the other thing I tried to do is be consistent if we talk about keys
- 18:53:35 [MichielBijl]
- JN: would you tab to a container?
- 18:53:43 [MichielBijl]
- JN: why not?
- 18:53:48 [MichielBijl]
- JN: you would tab to it.
- 18:54:01 [MichielBijl]
- MK: you would tab to an element that contains a menu
- 18:54:13 [MichielBijl]
- s/contains/activates
- 18:54:30 [MichielBijl]
- MK: if you put on menubar you could tab to a container
- 18:55:44 [Birkir]
- Birkir has joined #aria-apg
- 18:56:34 [MichielBijl]
- JN: I have a question about up/down arrow
- 18:57:49 [MichielBijl]
- JN: you wouldn't use up/down for first/last if it is vertical
- 18:57:52 [MichielBijl]
- MK: you could
- 18:59:08 [MichielBijl]
- MK: on the wrapping behaviour
- 19:00:23 [MichielBijl]
- MK: do we want to enforce it or make it optional
- 19:01:45 [MichielBijl]
- MK: really like to encourage this
- 19:01:58 [Birkir]
- This is highly desirable for large menus (arbitrarily saying 8 menus or more), but for small menus with few items, it is less important.
- 19:02:03 [MichielBijl]
- JN: why do we want this
- 19:02:35 [Birkir]
- I'd vote for "optional but nice", to use my invented technical term.
- 19:04:26 [MichielBijl]
- MK: *long story* it's easier if you go through a menu and make up your mind if you're on the last item
- 19:04:48 [MichielBijl]
- MK: you can just wrap to the first item
- 19:07:37 [MichielBijl]
- AA: so make wrapping optional?
- 19:17:29 [MichielBijl]
- MK: main bug in menu button, don't duplicate anything that is in menu
- 19:22:30 [jemma_ku]
- Thanks, Micheil. I sent you an email.
- 19:22:52 [jemma_ku]
- s/Micheil/Michiel
- 19:23:33 [jemma_ku]
- I have another meeting in 7 min
- 19:25:21 [MichielBijl]
- MK: thank you all, great feedback
- 19:26:54 [MichielBijl]
- AA: I'm seeing a bunch of other variations on setting properties.
- 19:27:28 [MichielBijl]
- BG: are you removing quotes?
- 19:27:43 [MichielBijl]
- MK: removing quotes and add “to“
- 19:28:36 [MichielBijl]
- MB: I like having the quotes, makes it easier
- 19:28:57 [MichielBijl]
- MK: we don't have it consistently.
- 19:29:18 [MichielBijl]
- MB: maybe later
- 19:29:19 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next item
- 19:29:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Review bug fixes for menubutton design pattern https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/apg_menuPattern/practices/aria-practices.html" taken up [from jamesn]
- 19:29:34 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next item
- 19:29:34 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 was just opened, MichielBijl
- 19:29:38 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next item
- 19:29:38 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 was just opened, MichielBijl
- 19:29:48 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, close item
- 19:29:48 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'close item', MichielBijl
- 19:29:50 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next item
- 19:29:50 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 was just opened, MichielBijl
- 19:30:13 [MichielBijl]
- NOTE: covered in previous discussion
- 19:30:13 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next item
- 19:30:13 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 was just opened, MichielBijl
- 19:30:39 [mck]
- zakim, take agendum item 5
- 19:30:39 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'take agendum item 5', mck
- 19:30:53 [mck]
- zakim, take up agendum item 5
- 19:30:53 [Zakim]
- 'item\ 5' does not match any agenda item, mck
- 19:31:10 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, take up item 5
- 19:31:10 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Review revised descriptive text for example of mixed checkbox https://rawgit.com/a11ydoer/practices/master/examples/checkbox/checkbox-3.html" taken up [from jamesn]
- 19:31:13 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, take up item 5
- 19:31:13 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next item
- 19:31:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Review revised descriptive text for example of mixed checkbox https://rawgit.com/a11ydoer/practices/master/examples/checkbox/checkbox-3.html" taken up [from jamesn]
- 19:31:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 was just opened, MichielBijl
- 19:31:16 [MichielBijl]
- Zakim, next item
- 19:31:16 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 was just opened, MichielBijl
- 19:31:30 [jemma_ku]
- take up item agenda 5
- 19:32:06 [mck]
- TOPIC: Review revised descriptive text for example of mixed checkbox
- 19:32:23 [mck]
- https://rawgit.com/a11ydoer/practices/master/examples/checkbox/checkbox-3.html
- 19:33:22 [MichielBijl]
- MK: semantics typo in first sentence
- 19:33:29 [MichielBijl]
- JK: I'll fix it
- 19:34:00 [MichielBijl]
- MK: third bullet “This set of example” should be “This set of examples”
- 19:36:47 [MichielBijl]
- MK: how come there are square brackets around role=checkbox?
- 19:37:05 [MichielBijl]
- MB: only makes sense if you're talking about CSS selectors; which we are not
- 19:45:29 [jemma_ku]
- michiel, we don't hear you
- 19:45:45 [jemma_ku]
- you are on mute
- 19:45:54 [mck]
- One way to write it: The <code>div</code> element with role <code>checkbox</code>
- 19:48:18 [MichielBijl]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 19:48:18 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/30-aria-apg-minutes.html MichielBijl
- 19:49:19 [MichielBijl]
- present+ Bryan_Garaventa
- 19:49:37 [MichielBijl]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 19:49:37 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/30-aria-apg-minutes.html MichielBijl