15:47:41 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag
15:47:41 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/11/24-wai-wcag-irc
15:47:43 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
15:47:45 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG
15:47:46 <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
15:47:46 <trackbot> Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
15:47:47 <trackbot> Date: 24 November 2015
15:47:53 <Kenny> zakim, agenda?
15:47:53 <Zakim> I see 2 items remaining on the agenda:
15:47:54 <Zakim> 5. Extension Requirements – review and timeline [from yatil]
15:47:54 <Zakim> 6. New errata item - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/newerrata/ [from yatil]
15:48:14 <Kenny> zakim, clear agenda
15:48:14 <Zakim> agenda cleared
15:48:46 <yatil> present:
15:49:01 <Kenny> agenda+ Public review of 'Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions' (FPWD) https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/ExtensionsFPWD/
15:52:21 <Wayne> Wayne has joined #wai-wcag
15:53:37 <Joshue108> Joshue108 has joined #wai-wcag
15:53:48 <Joshue108> trackbot, start meeting
15:53:50 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
15:53:52 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG
15:53:52 <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
15:53:53 <trackbot> Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
15:53:53 <trackbot> Date: 24 November 2015
15:53:59 <Joshue108> zakim, agenda?
15:53:59 <Zakim> I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
15:54:00 <Zakim> 1. Public review of 'Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions' (FPWD) https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/ExtensionsFPWD/ [from Kenny]
15:58:55 <Wayne> wayne present+
16:01:30 <Joshue108> present+ Joshue108
16:03:10 <MichaelC> present+ MichaelC
16:03:33 <Joshue108> Scribenick: Wayne
16:03:40 <yatil> s/wayne present+/present+ Wayne/
16:03:53 <Kenny> present+ kenny
16:03:59 <MichaelC> regrets: Laura_Carlson, Kathy_Wahlbin, Andrew_Kirkpatrick
16:04:44 <MichaelC> agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2015OctDec/0228.html
16:04:57 <Sarah_Swierenga> Sarah_Swierenga has joined #wai-wcag
16:05:16 <Joshue108> zakim, who is on the phone?
16:05:16 <Zakim> Present: Joshue108, MichaelC, kenny
16:05:24 <yatil> present+ EricE
16:05:39 <david> david has joined #wai-wcag
16:05:55 <MichaelC> regrets- Andrew_Kirkpatrick
16:06:30 <marcjohlic> marcjohlic has joined #wai-wcag
16:06:52 <MichaelC> present+ Sarah_Swierenga
16:07:40 <marcjohlic> present+ marcjohlic
16:08:46 <rakesh> rakesh has joined #wai-wcag
16:09:01 <jon_avila> jon_avila has joined #wai-wcag
16:09:46 <Wayne> zakim: next item
16:09:57 <Wayne> zakim, next item
16:09:57 <Zakim> agendum 1. "Public review of 'Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions' (FPWD) https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/ExtensionsFPWD/" taken up [from Kenny]
16:13:50 <Ryladog> Ryladog has joined #wai-wcag
16:15:09 <Wayne> Josh: We sent out the survey there were some comments.
16:17:35 <Joshue108> q?
16:18:00 <Wayne> MichaelC: Changes mostly editorial, Abstract status may need to change during publication, many editorial, getting more substantial -- need reference WCAG 2.0 at least. Examples should be in an example class, acknowledgements section. They are all editorial but it changes the look.
16:19:23 <Wayne> Josh: Sent it out, get comments, and extension example, know of examples
16:19:34 <Ryladog> +1
16:19:52 <Wayne> Andrew: submit a new example extension pull request.
16:20:15 <Wayne> +1
16:20:39 <Joshue108> q?
16:21:15 <Wayne> Josh: We have gone through the responses. Do we put out the document. No objections.
16:21:19 <rakesh> +1
16:21:20 <david> +1 although I except I'm hoping we will end up with one extension at the end
16:21:28 <Sarah_Swierenga> +1
16:21:40 <yatil> \o/
16:21:47 <Joshue108> +1
16:21:48 <Wayne> RESOLUTION: Accepted for public review WCAG 2 Extensions.
16:23:08 <Joshue108> q?
16:23:22 <Wayne> Andrew: Make sure there is one item out on call for consensus.
16:24:17 <Joshue108> q
16:25:20 <Joshue108> wd: i've looked thru the sufficient conditions, and dont know if we need a fail case here
16:25:24 <david> I would like to see a fail for not being able to see a label on focus
16:25:44 <Joshue108> awk:what are you thinking about?
16:26:27 <Joshue108> wd: proximity, css...its easy to have a visual association that doesnt reflect semantics correctly.
16:26:44 <david> q+
16:27:11 <Joshue108> wd: how would you right a parser for some of  these cases..that bothers me.
16:30:18 <Joshue108> q?
16:30:25 <Joshue108> ack david
16:30:31 <david> ack David
16:30:31 <Wayne> David: The parsing issues are met because there always matches.
16:30:53 <Wayne> David: I would like to see a fail on focus with no display.
16:31:03 <Ryladog> Ryladog has joined #wai-wcag
16:31:18 <Ryladog> Present+ Katie Haritos-Shea
16:31:27 <david> wayne, pls mute, thanks
16:32:03 <Wayne> zakim, mute me
16:32:03 <Zakim> sorry, Wayne, I can't do that anymore
16:33:13 <Joshue108> rrsagent, make minutes
16:33:13 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/24-wai-wcag-minutes.html Joshue108