02:58:24 dauwhe has joined #dpub 03:04:33 hober has joined #dpub 04:04:36 Florian has joined #dpub 05:38:56 Florian_ has joined #dpub 05:43:11 Guest has joined #dpub 07:30:30 Florian has joined #dpub 07:52:24 rego has joined #dpub 08:35:29 ivan has joined #dpub 09:04:04 hober has joined #dpub 10:50:10 Florian has joined #dpub 12:00:24 ivan has joined #dpub 12:59:47 Karen has joined #dpub 13:08:53 Florian has joined #dpub 14:00:27 tzviya has joined #dpub 14:12:21 ShaneM has joined #dpub 14:12:49 ivan has joined #dpub 14:23:24 Florian has joined #dpub 15:12:27 trackbot, start telcon 15:12:29 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:12:29 Zakim has joined #dpub 15:12:31 Zakim, this will be dpub 15:12:31 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 15:12:32 Meeting: Digital Publishing Interest Group Teleconference 15:12:32 Date: 23 November 2015 15:12:41 Chair: Tzviya 15:13:35 Regrets: Vlad_Levantovsky, Laura_Fowler, Luc_Audrain 15:14:16 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2015Nov/0145.html 15:14:32 shepazu has joined #dpub 15:14:43 Regrets+ Paul_Belfanti 15:52:08 pkra has joined #dpub 15:56:00 clapierre has joined #DPUB 15:56:43 brady_duga has joined #dpub 15:56:55 present+ Tzviya_Siegman 15:59:04 present+ Charles_LaPierre 15:59:13 present+ Karen 15:59:17 present+ Dave_Cramer 15:59:20 Present+ Ivan_Herman 15:59:35 Daniel-Weck has joined #dpub 15:59:48 mgarrish has joined #dpub 16:00:01 present+ duga 16:00:07 Bert has joined #dpub 16:00:38 mikeperlman has joined #dpub 16:00:42 Noel_Tanner has joined #dpub 16:01:08 TimCole has joined #dpub 16:01:34 dkaplan3 has joined #dpub 16:01:51 nickbarreto has joined #dpub 16:01:52 zakim, pick a victim 16:01:52 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Dave_Cramer 16:02:06 zakim, pick a victim 16:02:06 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Tzviya_Siegman 16:02:07 :) 16:02:16 zakim, pick a victim 16:02:18 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Karen 16:02:27 Present+ Tim_Cole 16:02:28 scribenick: dauwhe 16:02:36 ayla_stein has joined #dpub 16:02:38 present+ astearns 16:02:44 present+ nick_barreto 16:02:47 present+ ayla_stein 16:03:02 tzviya: let's get started 16:03:22 ... we need to approve the minutes from last week 16:03:33 ... any comments? 16:03:37 (silence, sortof) 16:03:42 ... minutes approved. 16:03:48 ivan: minutes are perfect. 16:03:56 Present+ Deborah_Kaplan 16:03:56 rdeltour has joined #dpub 16:03:59 tzviya: Topic: CSS examples 16:04:53 ... we still need volunteers; we've had some on the list 16:05:02 ... I had offered to provide some samples to Dave 16:05:09 Trying to get into WebEx...what the password? :) 16:05:24 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #dpub 16:05:26 ... there's been some back and forth 16:05:50 ... we need more samples for the csswg 16:06:03 present+ Peter Krautzberger 16:06:32 HeatherF has joined #dpub 16:06:33 present+ Liam_Quin 16:06:40 Present+ Daniel_Weck 16:06:42 present +Heather_Flanagan 16:06:59 dauwhe: examples from decimal alignment of tables 16:07:07 astearns: printed examples are better 16:07:23 q+ 16:07:28 tzviya: I can provide some PDFs, Paul offered 16:07:42 ack iv 16:07:46 ... a colleague sent me a list of issues 16:07:54 ivan: I might have another example 16:08:13 ... a guy from Germany at a small pub talked to me about a book they put together by cutting and pasting journal articles 16:08:18 ... kind of a collage 16:08:23 Present+ 16:08:30 ... he had something in PDF, 5k pages 16:08:40 ... he may send me a few pages 16:08:50 present+ Romain Deltour 16:08:51 ... might have usage of float 16:09:01 ... if I get it I'll send it to the list 16:09:10 ... and we can comment 16:09:24 tzviya: I feel bad for the person reading a five thousand page PDF 16:09:43 ivan: print is 5k pages, they want to reproduce digitally 16:10:11 ... anyone else with funky examples? 16:10:19 Topic: Romain 16:10:41 present+ Bill_Kasdorf 16:10:42 rdeltour: here on behalf of DAISY; also a member of EPUB WG 16:10:52 tzviya: we're happy to have you 16:11:09 Topic: New PWP Identifier Task Force 16:11:21 tzviya: who's in, who's leading, goals, etc. 16:11:29 ... Bill, are you on phone 16:11:40 ... markus mentioned you agreed to lead 16:11:47 Bill_Kasdorf: Yes, I was volunteered 16:12:05 tzviya: Romain, Matt, and Markus have agreed to be on the Task Force 16:12:09 ivan: and probably me 16:12:13 tzviya: and me 16:12:28 Bill_Kasdorf: the arm-twisting began with the statement y'all would be on the task force 16:12:41 (general hilarity ensues) 16:12:59 tzviya: any other volunteers? But first let's talk about goals 16:13:11 ... this group will be working with EPUB 3.1 WG 16:13:25 ... with goal of identifying proposals for identifiers for both EPUB 3.1 and PWP 16:13:35 ... submitting solutions to EPUB 3.1 by March 16:13:43 ... forward-compatible 16:13:52 ... talking about package identifier, not fragment identifiers 16:14:04 q+ 16:14:08 ack iv 16:14:13 Bill_Kasdorf: while component and frag identifiers are still in scope, the initial path is package identifiers 16:14:38 ivan: I think that talking about pub identifier without talking about ID of components won't work 16:14:45 ... but we don't need to worry about fragments 16:14:48 rdeltour_ has joined #dpub 16:15:01 tzviya: we can talk about identifying the package and ch1, but not words in ch1 16:15:02 ivan: correct 16:15:24 tzviya: another issue is the state of the package; IDs need to be state-agnostic 16:15:35 ... also relevant to EPUB 3.1 and the BFF format 16:15:52 ... the portable EPUB (traditional) and BFF (readable online) 16:15:58 Bill_Kasdorf: not to blend these discussions 16:16:10 q? 16:16:15 ... BFF discussion is currently being thought of as a tightening up of EPUB 3.1 16:16:40 I'd be interested in participating on this working group 16:16:44 ... Dave mentioned progressive enhancement last week 16:16:59 ... does there need to be a distinction between relaxed epub and tightened-up epub? 16:17:04 q+ 16:17:11 tzviya: let's not get into this now; let's focus on identifiers 16:17:18 Bill_Kasdorf: the reason I mentioned that 16:17:35 ... there is some recent work on ISTC 16:17:39 ... which was moribund 16:17:46 ... where that seems to be going 16:17:57 ... it identifies in a more abstract way what is a publication 16:18:11 ... it may allow various degrees of clustering 16:18:20 ... this ISTC covers all versions of pub in English 16:18:31 ... this other layer distinguishes between en-us and en-gb 16:18:40 ... this other layer deals with translations or abridgements 16:19:16 ... Ivan brought up we need URL and URN; 16:19:27 ... Our spec should be agnostic about those identifiers 16:19:36 ... we should provide syntax 16:19:40 ack ivan 16:19:49 ivan: two different things 16:20:03 ... first, I would say that this task force is not really about identifiers 16:20:11 ... we do not, must not define identifiers 16:20:13 +1 16:20:17 ... we are talking about locators 16:20:20 Bill_Kasdorf: thanks 16:20:37 ... if you call task force identifiers you get into the morass 16:20:42 ivan: we should talk about locators 16:20:47 ... what I wanted to say is 16:20:53 ... I see two goals 16:21:01 q+ 16:21:13 ... we have discussed a drafty thing in the PWP draft 16:21:21 ... we must clean up this draft 16:21:30 ... to see if it is proper, and what we need 16:21:36 ... so manifest is workable etc 16:21:44 q? 16:21:47 ... I'd like a proof of concept 16:21:51 ... showing it could work 16:22:05 ... and we have to identify if there's anything there that should become a long-term standard 16:22:15 ... maybe in a year we will set up a WG somewhere 16:22:33 ... to standardize 16:23:01 ... what of this can be used for EPUB 3.1 in spite of constraints 16:23:06 ack nick 16:23:07 ... but we need longer-term focus 16:23:23 nickbarreto: In relation to locaters 16:23:29 ... chapters within a publication 16:23:50 ... is there any need for implicit relationship between locators 16:23:56 ... in ch1 knowing ch2 is next 16:24:08 ivan: I'm not sure I understand 16:24:11 Karen_ has joined #dpub 16:24:30 tzviya: is what you're talking about the relative position in the file? 16:24:41 q+ 16:24:43 nickbarreto: should locators have relationshipo with each other 16:24:46 ack iv 16:24:54 ivan: what you just said... 16:25:26 ... the way we define PWP is a set of different resources that someone decided belonged together 16:25:37 q+ 16:25:42 ... locators can be very different... ch1 and foobar1 which could belong to the same doc 16:25:48 ... so we shouldn't make assumptions 16:25:56 ... maybe we need mapping in manifest 16:26:03 ... and this is all part of the discussion 16:26:19 ... the starting point is someone decides to conceptually put together resources from all over the place 16:26:35 tzviya: I think it's also important to recognize that IDPF is working on specific things 16:26:45 ... and the goal of this task force is strictly the locator 16:26:56 ... IDPF is worrying about linearity and spine and manfiest and such 16:27:02 ack tim 16:27:07 ... the goal of this task force is strictly the locator 16:27:16 TimCole: this might be out of scope in near term 16:27:21 ... with journals 16:27:32 ... article 1 in Journal A will be article 7 in Journal B 16:27:39 ... so locators can't have sequencing 16:27:52 ... we shouldn't make assumptions about these things 16:28:21 tzviya: we're not talking about how to assemple the package, just how to locate items in the package 16:28:33 Bill_Kasdorf: it's 2-layered 16:28:41 ... locate package, then you can locate components 16:28:49 tzviya: in practice, it might not be so two-stepped 16:28:56 q? 16:29:02 Bill_Kasdorf: you have to have that single high-level locator 16:29:14 ... it's not just a collection; the collection itself has to have a locator 16:29:30 tzviya: now that we've talked a bit about what this group will do 16:29:37 ... timeline for proposals is March 16:29:45 ... any other volunteers 16:29:52 Ivan: not identifier 16:29:57 Bill_Kasdorf: change name to locator? 16:29:59 tzviya: yes 16:30:26 (the usual silence when volunteers are requested) 16:30:42 I will sign up 16:30:55 *thumbs up* 16:31:18 Topic: Call for Consensus on next publication of PWPWP 16:31:23 http://w3c.github.io/dpub-pwp/ 16:31:46 tzviya: here's the current draft 16:31:55 ... of the portable web publications white paper 16:31:58 ... what's changed? 16:32:05 ivan: I did give an update last week 16:32:24 ... a few comments on grammar etc 16:32:38 tzviya: ralph has checked for grammar 16:32:46 Bill_Kasdorf: FPWD? 16:32:49 ivan: no, second 16:33:05 ... that's an ED, but I turn it into WD during formal publication process 16:33:14 tzviya: we can do call for consensus now 16:33:23 ivan: don't need to be formal 16:33:29 q? 16:33:33 ... does anyone formally object 16:33:38 (the good kind of silence) 16:33:47 +1 to publishing 16:33:54 ivan: will probably be published on Thursday 16:34:00 ... you americans will be eating Turkey 16:34:05 "turkey" for those of us who are vegetarian 16:34:21 Topic: what next with PWPWP? 16:34:58 tzviya: one next step is putting together proposals for EPUB 3.1 WG 16:35:09 ... did Ivan and Markus discuss? 16:35:15 ivan: yes, we agreed Markus would lead 16:35:31 (possible synchronicity) 16:35:42 ivan: we clarified some items for ourselves 16:35:56 ... what I said about locator task force is to work out some details 16:36:04 ... this is one way of moving ahead 16:36:08 ... there are some other areas 16:36:20 ... and I don't be the one writing all the details for all the areas 16:36:33 ... so I would like to have a clearer idea where we go with this work 16:36:39 ... in the coming half-year or year 16:36:47 ... and see if there are areas other people want to pick up 16:36:53 ... like security 16:36:58 ... the user-control issues 16:37:12 ... the packaging stuff we can put on hold for a while 16:37:24 ... I want to see if all these ideas make sense 16:37:31 ... Jake put together a skeleton 16:37:37 ... and Daniel in Readium 16:37:49 ... can we put togehter a proof-of-concept implementation 16:37:55 q? 16:37:57 ... and this might surface other issues 16:38:25 ... and I can't do it all by myself 16:38:34 tzviya: we haven't talked much about an archive format 16:39:00 YES 16:39:08 *waves* 16:39:09 ... which is nice for pubs but crucuial for the library community 16:39:19 ... it would involve talking with other communities 16:39:32 Yep 16:39:35 ... heather has some involvement, too 16:39:38 ... and Lars 16:39:47 ... who was sitting in at TPAC 16:39:58 ... so we do have some members involved with the library community 16:40:21 ... and dauwhe posted a link to a service worker experiment 16:40:35 ivan: we have to look at the document 16:40:44 ... the document can be used as a scratch pad 16:41:04 ... we put in sections on technical areas that must be addressed 16:41:19 ... we can use same approach for what library/archiving community needs 16:41:26 ... so we may need a new task force 16:41:35 ... and looking at what's there... is it OK or not 16:42:00 tzviya: before we move on to acme publishing 16:42:08 yes 16:42:09 yep 16:42:18 ... ayla, tim, heather... can you begin exploring library/archiving stuff? 16:42:21 Yes, though I need to some guidance on exactly what to ask. 16:42:31 tzviya: do we want a timeline? 16:42:53 HeatherF: I'm happy to reach out to library community; I need guidance on what we're asking for 16:43:01 TimCole: scope will determine timeline 16:43:11 ... but this is of great interest to library community 16:43:26 ... what are the obligations of an archive as formats evolve 16:43:39 ivan: I see a task force forming 16:43:46 TimCole: what kinds of things would be needed? 16:44:01 tzviya: the first step would be looking at the PWPWP section about archiving 16:44:13 ... and asking people involved in archiving if their use cases are addressed 16:44:23 .... that's a basic first step 16:44:28 TimCole: we can come up with more use cases 16:44:44 ivan: once those use cases are clear in our minds, how does it influence the rest of the document 16:45:02 Bill_Kasdorf: there's an intersection with the locator group, which is versioning 16:45:07 TimCole: definitely 16:45:28 ... should we go off now and come up with ideas? 16:45:36 ivan: go on 16:45:44 ... I don't think Markus has specific things in mind 16:45:49 tzviya has joined #dpub 16:46:09 TimCole: given the holiday, it's probably premature to plan on this as topic for next week, but maybe the week after 16:46:10 Email works fo rme. 16:46:17 q+ 16:46:18 ... we can discuss on email with interested parties 16:46:23 ack iv 16:46:25 tzviya: ivan, can you reach out to Lars? 16:46:31 ivan: yes 16:46:43 ... first, let's see what Tim et al come up with; then we can bring in Lars 16:46:51 ... we need something more tangible for him 16:46:59 tzviya: you were on the queue 16:47:08 ack ivan 16:47:09 ivan: Yes 16:47:19 tzviya: we were going to look at acme publishing 16:48:27 even MathJax works offline :) 16:48:34 so cool, dauwhe! 16:49:00 ivan: if I take heat radiation 16:49:13 (caveat emptor: which has some horrible MathML coding...) 16:50:28 ivan: the question is how can we use this starting code and publications 16:50:34 ... as being a proof of concept for PWP 16:50:44 ... from your point of view, what are the missing bits 16:51:22 q? 16:52:35 tzviya: epub comes with a lot; somethings that's good and sometimes it's bad 16:52:53 ... maybe we can improve the a11y 16:53:00 tzviya: there's more to do with this 16:53:09 ... it exists in a rudimentary way, but we can add more 16:53:15 ivan: from our point of view 16:53:21 ... what I would like to separate 16:53:33 ... what should be done by a smart implementation 16:53:48 ... and what is necessary to add to the basic technology 16:54:02 ... in a way, the user interface is not our job 16:54:32 dauwhe: but we want the format to at least make this kind of thing possible 16:55:01 tzviya: it would be helpful to get more feedback, review from more people 16:55:12 q? 16:55:16 me astearns: LOL 16:55:16 yes. 16:55:22 ...not really 16:55:26 s/me//me/ 16:55:30 no 16:55:39 tzviya: we've been assuming people are familiar with service workers 16:55:47 ... but some might not be so familiar with this work 16:55:58 okay, thank you! 16:56:03 I'll try to do some reading too 16:56:04 ... we have just five minutes, but should give more background 16:56:24 ivan: and how does it relate to the pwp conversation 16:56:33 Service Workers: I posted comments in response to Ivan's issue on GitHub: 16:56:33 https://github.com/w3c/dpub-pwp/issues/6#issuecomment-158994118 16:56:38 tzviya: next time we talk about this, we'll give more background 16:56:48 Proposed motto for Acme Publishing: When you have an anvil, everything looks like a roadrunner. 16:56:52 ... please look and give Dave feedback 16:56:59 ... and tell us if it's creating trouble 16:57:12 q? 16:57:45 ivan: do we want to do a cleaned-up repo as PWP proof of concept eventually 16:58:23 ... it would be great to have non-books there 16:58:49 ... it would be great to have academic papers, to have magazines 16:58:58 +q 16:59:01 ... that may bring up new issues 16:59:15 tzviya: I'm working on 7 journals; I'll find out if I can publish anything 16:59:48 Bill_Kasdorf: I'm sure you can take a PLOS article 17:00:02 ack pk 17:00:04 tzviya: open access is tricky 17:00:11 pkra: I just wanted to volunteer 17:00:17 ... to help with this part 17:00:20 tzviya: excellent 17:00:31 +1 17:00:38 me +1 Dave is great 17:00:40 Dave is great! 17:00:41 for the record, dave is great 17:00:43 +1 17:00:53 +1 Dave! 17:01:37 q+ is there a link to dauwhe's repo? 17:01:38 (Is there documentation what rel/class/ID attributes you need to add to make a set of pages into a publication?) 17:01:47 https://dauwhe.github.io/epub-zero/acme-publishing/ 17:01:54 got it. 17:01:56 pkra: https://github.com/dauwhe/epub-zero 17:02:16 dauwhe is great. 17:02:17 tzviya: any closing remarks? 17:02:19 (silence) 17:02:44 thanks! 17:02:48 tzviya: happy thanksgiving etc 17:02:50 All Americans, enjoy your holiday. All Europeans, enjoy your holiday from Americans. 17:02:54 (more hilarity) 17:03:49 Regrets+ Markus_Gylling 17:03:56 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:03:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/23-dpub-minutes.html ivan 17:04:09 zakim, end telcon 17:04:09 I don't understand 'end telcon', ivan 17:04:17 trackbot, end telcon 17:04:17 Zakim, list attendees 17:04:17 As of this point the attendees have been Tzviya_Siegman, Charles_LaPierre, Karen, Dave_Cramer, Ivan_Herman, duga, Tim_Cole, astearns, nick_barreto, ayla_stein, Deborah_Kaplan, 17:04:20 ... Peter, Krautzberger, Liam_Quin, Daniel_Weck, Bert, Romain, Deltour, Bill_Kasdorf 17:04:21 clapierre has joined #DPUB 17:04:25 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:04:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/23-dpub-minutes.html trackbot 17:04:26 RRSAgent, bye 17:04:26 I see no action items