16:47:41 RRSAgent has joined #pf 16:47:41 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/11/11-pf-irc 16:47:43 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:47:43 Zakim has joined #pf 16:47:45 Zakim, this will be WAI_PF 16:47:45 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 16:47:46 Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 16:47:46 Date: 11 November 2015 16:47:46 agenda? 16:47:51 agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes 16:47:51 agenda+ APA Charter Impact http://www.w3.org/2015/10/apa-charter.html 16:47:51 agenda+ RQTF Organization -- Markku Hakkinen 16:47:51 agenda+ Long Text Mechanism Resolution [See Below] 16:47:52 agenda+ ARIA and the future of W3C Accessibility 16:47:53 agenda+ Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open 16:47:56 agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html 16:47:58 agenda+ Community Groups http://www.w3.org/community/groups/ 16:48:01 agenda+ MAUR Note Status Update 16:48:03 agenda+ HTML 5.1 Alt Edits -- https://w3c.github.io/alt-techniques/ 16:48:06 agenda+ Other Task Force Updates; COGA; HTML-A11Y; 16:48:08 agenda+ Other Business 16:48:11 agenda+ next and future meetings http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_273 16:48:14 agenda+ be done 16:49:03 zakim, remove item 3 16:49:03 agendum 3, RQTF Organization -- Markku Hakkinen, dropped 16:49:18 agenda? 16:57:26 tzviya has joined #PF 16:58:11 Hi, It's 647 857 439 passwd pfwg 16:59:03 LJWatson has joined #pf 16:59:15 it worked this time with a captcha 16:59:27 argh, captcha? 16:59:31 fesch has joined #pf 16:59:58 Janina what is the meeting paswword? 17:00:11 647 857 439 passwd pfwg 17:01:04 present+ TzviyaSiegman 17:01:11 present+ janina 17:01:32 present+ Jason_White 17:03:19 present+ fesch 17:03:51 Leonie, it's lower case pfwg for the password, but there may be a captcha problem that's newly shown up too 17:04:11 You might rather want to ask for a call out via your mobile 17:04:18 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 17:08:24 regrets: Gottfried, John_Foliot, Markku 17:08:58 scribe: fesch 17:09:07 zakim, next item 17:09:07 agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes" taken up [from janina] 17:09:13 present+ LJWatson 17:09:34 present+ MichaelC 17:10:02 js: anyone with news, items? 17:10:09 zakim, next item 17:10:09 agendum 2. "APA Charter Impact http://www.w3.org/2015/10/apa-charter.html" taken up [from janina] 17:10:10 regrets: James_Nurthen, Gottfried_Zimmerman, John_Foliot, Michiel_Bijl 17:10:16 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Nov/0061.html 17:11:16 js: #1 thing, everyone needs to sign up for the new working group (APA), PF will expire... 17:12:12 q+ To ask if we'll all be auto-subscribed to the new list when most of us have joined 17:12:15 js: newer things will move over, new mailing list..., not moving to new mailing list until most members are moved over would be counter productive, please get your transition underway 17:12:45 js: may be end of year before we cut over, ARIA will get similar message tomorrow 17:13:39 mc: we will have a change of infrastructure.... will get it worked out over the next few weeks (Rich, Janina, MC) 17:13:40 ack joa 17:13:40 joanie, you wanted to ask if we'll all be auto-subscribed to the new list when most of us have joined 17:14:31 js: yes (we will be auto-subscribed to new group, when we join new group) 17:14:54 zakim, nest item 17:14:54 I don't understand 'nest item', fesch 17:15:12 zakim, next item 17:15:12 agendum 4. "Long Text Mechanism Resolution" taken up [from See Below] 17:17:15 js: Rich are you here? I think Rich is wrong in initial post on details, we know Chrome and Safari have support, Mozilla has it underway, thinking MS Edge will 17:17:50 js: 2nd item, issue of making details visible, believe we can do that via CSS 17:19:11 js: 3rd issue - how we disambiguate use of details - no mechanism, so not quite there yet, think unfortunate aspect is if we do it with ARIA then restricting to users of AT 17:19:51 js: some of use cases we were given don't use AT (COGA, keyboard only user...) 17:20:10 q+ 17:20:17 ack t 17:20:30 js: without a non ARIA use we may be similar to... 17:20:32 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf 17:20:44 Ryladog has joined #pf 17:20:59 Rich, lower case pfwg 17:21:03 tz: aria may be broader use than AT 17:21:10 did that. will try again 17:21:14 I have the same question 17:21:22 jw: is it correct to say a details element can use CSS? 17:21:54 js: you can, but that doesn't discriminate between use - advertisement vs dscription 17:22:07 s/dsc/desc/ 17:22:27 jw: you could style differently using CSS 17:22:37 Present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 17:22:46 Present+ Katie Haritos-Shea 17:22:56 jw: web controls allow us to do that, Mark H showed a demo 17:23:25 js: talking about details 17:23:55 q+ to say that these are not new requirements 17:23:56 js: we haven't found a way to disambiguate between uses 17:24:10 present+ Rich, Cynthia, Katie 17:24:13 rs: requirements keep growing ... where does it end? 17:24:32 ack tz 17:24:32 tzviya, you wanted to say that these are not new requirements 17:24:40 tz: these are the same requirements, we talked about them in the past 17:25:00 rs: we didn't talk about them 17:25:19 tz: we gave broad examples, not every use case in the publishing world 17:25:36 rs: describedat won't do what you want, that is off the table 17:25:57 rs: when you have an iframe, why do you need pagination? 17:26:04 tz: that is off topic... 17:26:17 rs: that was a reason we couldn't use it 17:26:55 tz: I will have to go back to Daniel about that... I think he is concerned about widgets in iframes.... 17:27:26 jamesn has joined #pf 17:27:51 tz: Daniel entered in the middle of the conversation... Janinia brought up, need a way to disambiguate usage 17:28:20 rrsagent, make minutes 17:28:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/11-pf-minutes.html jamesn 17:28:42 js: perhaps we could use a aria tag ... but want non AT users to benefit too 17:29:17 js: don't know if there will be a rush to implement ARIA for all users - in ereaders 17:30:00 js: are ebook reader's going to implement aria for use outside supporting AT? 17:30:28 tz: I can't speak for the platform developers, most are on top of a browser implementation 17:30:54 rs: all dpub readers support HTML 5 markup - all based on web browser technology 17:31:09 js: so data is available to them, if they want to take advantage of it 17:31:14 rs: yes 17:31:57 tz: may happen, but will depend on underlying technology 17:32:43 js: we haven't found how to disambiguate - other users may see the link but won't know if it is a description or advertisement 17:33:17 rs: for Diagram project, wanted to crowd source that is why they wanted a URL 17:33:39 q? 17:33:49 tz: that wasn't forwarded by dpub, we have a formal document... 17:34:12 ok 17:34:19 DPUB requirements for extended desc: http://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Publisher_requirements_for_extended_descriptions 17:34:20 rs:: we take requirements from more than dpub 17:34:57 q+ 17:35:09 js: how can we disambiguate? Looking for suggestions 17:35:42 rs: we could have a detailed view, sections - regular description, detailed description 17:36:06 rs: I heard that having a URL was a requirement - is that a requirement? 17:36:53 rs: I don't want to rule out iframes... 17:37:08 q? 17:37:21 tz: at TPAC MC said we would look at the table he put together, look at options and put to group 17:37:59 mc: I was going to harmonize the table from feedback from TPAC, Jason and private discussions, haven't done that yet 17:38:21 mc: only a couple options seem viable from use cases 17:38:38 lw: we have a definitive set of requirements? 17:38:57 mc: I have a table, don't know if it is definitive 17:39:18 lw: if we don't know the requirements.... makes it hard to work out solution... 17:39:51 lw: does it mean there is no consensus on requirements 17:40:26 rs: describedat won't do it - will have an item on ARIA call tomorrow 17:41:42 Michael's long analysis: http://www.w3.org/2015/08/extended-description-analysis.html 17:41:45 js: number one question about tables are they representational? If not, then the table won't help us make a decision 17:42:26 js: we know about unadded changes... details is best option, how to disambiguate use? 17:43:52 jw: mentioned on list - use CSS for visual, can't apply styles to underlying to shadow DOM element - if you can't do it then it would rule out using CSS ... 17:44:20 q+ 17:44:24 jw: web components don't have that problem... Mark H has demoed this 17:44:47 jw: can use web components to satisfy requirements 17:45:16 js: it is unclear what support web components will get? 17:45:54 jw: I think that is clear, but capabilities of web components are greater 17:46:03 q+ to mention http://caniuse.com/#search=custom 17:46:11 q? 17:46:25 js: web components are one, web annotations are another, need support now 17:46:44 jw: may not get everything immediately 17:47:15 jw: if can use CSS to handle visually different, that would handle the disambiguation issues 17:47:26 ack l 17:47:30 ack m 17:48:38 mc: what details doesn't do - is disambiguate, could use class='description" but that would be a convention, so support a role.. 17:48:50 mc: might have to add a role to ARIA 17:49:24 rs: I don't think I would use role='description' , we have a role... 17:49:45 mc: don't care what the role is - just as long as there is a role 17:49:45 ack t 17:49:45 tzviya, you wanted to mention http://caniuse.com/#search=custom 17:50:44 tz: dpub is neutral, web components have limited support, apple did not commit to supporting web components (unless it is well supported) 17:51:01 js: that is what I am trying to convey to Jason... 17:51:14 mc: are the implemented? are they easy to use? 17:51:23 q? 17:51:48 mc: if we fill in web components with no, no, no then it will fail the test, but have the capability to pass later 17:53:52 fe: I like something that disambiguated roles 17:54:11 mc: I think this is a question for ARIA 17:54:50 js: sounds like answer is yes, do we need to worry about styling? 17:55:11 mc: want styling on a universally predictable thing 17:56:07 js: is it reasonable to ask ARIA for a thing to disambiguate roles? 17:56:27 rs: you can ask.... trying to get ARIA 1.1 out... 17:56:27 q? 17:57:05 jw: Mark H will work on prototypes using details and migrate to web components 17:57:31 q? 17:57:32 rrsagent, make minutes 17:57:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/11-pf-minutes.html fesch 17:58:08 rs: where are we on the IRC? 17:58:45 js: talked about this earlier.... IRC may switch earlier, email later - 17:59:02 mc: no need for ARIA to switch IRC :) 17:59:32 rrsagent, make minutes 17:59:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/11-pf-minutes.html fesch