IRC log of pf on 2015-11-11
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:47:41 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #pf
- 16:47:41 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/11/11-pf-irc
- 16:47:43 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 16:47:43 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #pf
- 16:47:45 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be WAI_PF
- 16:47:45 [Zakim]
- I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
- 16:47:46 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
- 16:47:46 [trackbot]
- Date: 11 November 2015
- 16:47:46 [janina]
- agenda?
- 16:47:51 [janina]
- agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes
- 16:47:51 [janina]
- agenda+ APA Charter Impact http://www.w3.org/2015/10/apa-charter.html
- 16:47:51 [janina]
- agenda+ RQTF Organization -- Markku Hakkinen
- 16:47:51 [janina]
- agenda+ Long Text Mechanism Resolution [See Below]
- 16:47:52 [janina]
- agenda+ ARIA and the future of W3C Accessibility
- 16:47:53 [janina]
- agenda+ Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open
- 16:47:56 [janina]
- agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
- 16:47:58 [janina]
- agenda+ Community Groups http://www.w3.org/community/groups/
- 16:48:01 [janina]
- agenda+ MAUR Note Status Update
- 16:48:03 [janina]
- agenda+ HTML 5.1 Alt Edits -- https://w3c.github.io/alt-techniques/
- 16:48:06 [janina]
- agenda+ Other Task Force Updates; COGA; HTML-A11Y;
- 16:48:08 [janina]
- agenda+ Other Business
- 16:48:11 [janina]
- agenda+ next and future meetings http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_273
- 16:48:14 [janina]
- agenda+ be done
- 16:49:03 [janina]
- zakim, remove item 3
- 16:49:03 [Zakim]
- agendum 3, RQTF Organization -- Markku Hakkinen, dropped
- 16:49:18 [janina]
- agenda?
- 16:57:26 [tzviya]
- tzviya has joined #PF
- 16:58:11 [janina]
- Hi, It's 647 857 439 passwd pfwg
- 16:59:03 [LJWatson]
- LJWatson has joined #pf
- 16:59:15 [tzviya]
- it worked this time with a captcha
- 16:59:27 [janina]
- argh, captcha?
- 16:59:31 [fesch]
- fesch has joined #pf
- 16:59:58 [fesch]
- Janina what is the meeting paswword?
- 17:00:11 [janina]
- 647 857 439 passwd pfwg
- 17:01:04 [tzviya]
- present+ TzviyaSiegman
- 17:01:11 [janina]
- present+ janina
- 17:01:32 [janina]
- present+ Jason_White
- 17:03:19 [fesch]
- present+ fesch
- 17:03:51 [janina]
- Leonie, it's lower case pfwg for the password, but there may be a captcha problem that's newly shown up too
- 17:04:11 [janina]
- You might rather want to ask for a call out via your mobile
- 17:04:18 [joanie]
- present+ Joanmarie_Diggs
- 17:08:24 [janina]
- regrets: Gottfried, John_Foliot, Markku
- 17:08:58 [fesch]
- scribe: fesch
- 17:09:07 [fesch]
- zakim, next item
- 17:09:07 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes" taken up [from janina]
- 17:09:13 [LJWatson]
- present+ LJWatson
- 17:09:34 [MichaelC]
- present+ MichaelC
- 17:10:02 [fesch]
- js: anyone with news, items?
- 17:10:09 [fesch]
- zakim, next item
- 17:10:09 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "APA Charter Impact http://www.w3.org/2015/10/apa-charter.html" taken up [from janina]
- 17:10:10 [MichaelC]
- regrets: James_Nurthen, Gottfried_Zimmerman, John_Foliot, Michiel_Bijl
- 17:10:16 [MichaelC]
- agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Nov/0061.html
- 17:11:16 [fesch]
- js: #1 thing, everyone needs to sign up for the new working group (APA), PF will expire...
- 17:12:12 [joanie]
- q+ To ask if we'll all be auto-subscribed to the new list when most of us have joined
- 17:12:15 [fesch]
- js: newer things will move over, new mailing list..., not moving to new mailing list until most members are moved over would be counter productive, please get your transition underway
- 17:12:45 [fesch]
- js: may be end of year before we cut over, ARIA will get similar message tomorrow
- 17:13:39 [fesch]
- mc: we will have a change of infrastructure.... will get it worked out over the next few weeks (Rich, Janina, MC)
- 17:13:40 [janina]
- ack joa
- 17:13:40 [Zakim]
- joanie, you wanted to ask if we'll all be auto-subscribed to the new list when most of us have joined
- 17:14:31 [fesch]
- js: yes (we will be auto-subscribed to new group, when we join new group)
- 17:14:54 [fesch]
- zakim, nest item
- 17:14:54 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'nest item', fesch
- 17:15:12 [fesch]
- zakim, next item
- 17:15:12 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Long Text Mechanism Resolution" taken up [from See Below]
- 17:17:15 [fesch]
- js: Rich are you here? I think Rich is wrong in initial post on details, we know Chrome and Safari have support, Mozilla has it underway, thinking MS Edge will
- 17:17:50 [fesch]
- js: 2nd item, issue of making details visible, believe we can do that via CSS
- 17:19:11 [fesch]
- js: 3rd issue - how we disambiguate use of details - no mechanism, so not quite there yet, think unfortunate aspect is if we do it with ARIA then restricting to users of AT
- 17:19:51 [fesch]
- js: some of use cases we were given don't use AT (COGA, keyboard only user...)
- 17:20:10 [tzviya]
- q+
- 17:20:17 [janina]
- ack t
- 17:20:30 [fesch]
- js: without a non ARIA use we may be similar to...
- 17:20:32 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf
- 17:20:44 [Ryladog]
- Ryladog has joined #pf
- 17:20:59 [janina]
- Rich, lower case pfwg
- 17:21:03 [fesch]
- tz: aria may be broader use than AT
- 17:21:10 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- did that. will try again
- 17:21:14 [Ryladog]
- I have the same question
- 17:21:22 [fesch]
- jw: is it correct to say a details element can use CSS?
- 17:21:54 [fesch]
- js: you can, but that doesn't discriminate between use - advertisement vs dscription
- 17:22:07 [fesch]
- s/dsc/desc/
- 17:22:27 [fesch]
- jw: you could style differently using CSS
- 17:22:37 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- Present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger
- 17:22:46 [Ryladog]
- Present+ Katie Haritos-Shea
- 17:22:56 [fesch]
- jw: web controls allow us to do that, Mark H showed a demo
- 17:23:25 [fesch]
- js: talking about details
- 17:23:55 [tzviya]
- q+ to say that these are not new requirements
- 17:23:56 [fesch]
- js: we haven't found a way to disambiguate between uses
- 17:24:10 [MichaelC]
- present+ Rich, Cynthia, Katie
- 17:24:13 [fesch]
- rs: requirements keep growing ... where does it end?
- 17:24:32 [janina]
- ack tz
- 17:24:32 [Zakim]
- tzviya, you wanted to say that these are not new requirements
- 17:24:40 [fesch]
- tz: these are the same requirements, we talked about them in the past
- 17:25:00 [fesch]
- rs: we didn't talk about them
- 17:25:19 [fesch]
- tz: we gave broad examples, not every use case in the publishing world
- 17:25:36 [fesch]
- rs: describedat won't do what you want, that is off the table
- 17:25:57 [fesch]
- rs: when you have an iframe, why do you need pagination?
- 17:26:04 [fesch]
- tz: that is off topic...
- 17:26:17 [fesch]
- rs: that was a reason we couldn't use it
- 17:26:55 [fesch]
- tz: I will have to go back to Daniel about that... I think he is concerned about widgets in iframes....
- 17:27:26 [jamesn]
- jamesn has joined #pf
- 17:27:51 [fesch]
- tz: Daniel entered in the middle of the conversation... Janinia brought up, need a way to disambiguate usage
- 17:28:20 [jamesn]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:28:20 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/11-pf-minutes.html jamesn
- 17:28:42 [fesch]
- js: perhaps we could use a aria tag ... but want non AT users to benefit too
- 17:29:17 [fesch]
- js: don't know if there will be a rush to implement ARIA for all users - in ereaders
- 17:30:00 [fesch]
- js: are ebook reader's going to implement aria for use outside supporting AT?
- 17:30:28 [fesch]
- tz: I can't speak for the platform developers, most are on top of a browser implementation
- 17:30:54 [fesch]
- rs: all dpub readers support HTML 5 markup - all based on web browser technology
- 17:31:09 [fesch]
- js: so data is available to them, if they want to take advantage of it
- 17:31:14 [fesch]
- rs: yes
- 17:31:57 [fesch]
- tz: may happen, but will depend on underlying technology
- 17:32:43 [fesch]
- js: we haven't found how to disambiguate - other users may see the link but won't know if it is a description or advertisement
- 17:33:17 [fesch]
- rs: for Diagram project, wanted to crowd source that is why they wanted a URL
- 17:33:39 [janina]
- q?
- 17:33:49 [fesch]
- tz: that wasn't forwarded by dpub, we have a formal document...
- 17:34:12 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- ok
- 17:34:19 [tzviya]
- DPUB requirements for extended desc: http://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/Publisher_requirements_for_extended_descriptions
- 17:34:20 [fesch]
- rs:: we take requirements from more than dpub
- 17:34:57 [LJWatson]
- q+
- 17:35:09 [fesch]
- js: how can we disambiguate? Looking for suggestions
- 17:35:42 [fesch]
- rs: we could have a detailed view, sections - regular description, detailed description
- 17:36:06 [fesch]
- rs: I heard that having a URL was a requirement - is that a requirement?
- 17:36:53 [fesch]
- rs: I don't want to rule out iframes...
- 17:37:08 [janina]
- q?
- 17:37:21 [fesch]
- tz: at TPAC MC said we would look at the table he put together, look at options and put to group
- 17:37:59 [fesch]
- mc: I was going to harmonize the table from feedback from TPAC, Jason and private discussions, haven't done that yet
- 17:38:21 [fesch]
- mc: only a couple options seem viable from use cases
- 17:38:38 [fesch]
- lw: we have a definitive set of requirements?
- 17:38:57 [fesch]
- mc: I have a table, don't know if it is definitive
- 17:39:18 [fesch]
- lw: if we don't know the requirements.... makes it hard to work out solution...
- 17:39:51 [fesch]
- lw: does it mean there is no consensus on requirements
- 17:40:26 [fesch]
- rs: describedat won't do it - will have an item on ARIA call tomorrow
- 17:41:42 [tzviya]
- Michael's long analysis: http://www.w3.org/2015/08/extended-description-analysis.html
- 17:41:45 [fesch]
- js: number one question about tables are they representational? If not, then the table won't help us make a decision
- 17:42:26 [fesch]
- js: we know about unadded changes... details is best option, how to disambiguate use?
- 17:43:52 [fesch]
- jw: mentioned on list - use CSS for visual, can't apply styles to underlying to shadow DOM element - if you can't do it then it would rule out using CSS ...
- 17:44:20 [MichaelC]
- q+
- 17:44:24 [fesch]
- jw: web components don't have that problem... Mark H has demoed this
- 17:44:47 [fesch]
- jw: can use web components to satisfy requirements
- 17:45:16 [fesch]
- js: it is unclear what support web components will get?
- 17:45:54 [fesch]
- jw: I think that is clear, but capabilities of web components are greater
- 17:46:03 [tzviya]
- q+ to mention http://caniuse.com/#search=custom
- 17:46:11 [janina]
- q?
- 17:46:25 [fesch]
- js: web components are one, web annotations are another, need support now
- 17:46:44 [fesch]
- jw: may not get everything immediately
- 17:47:15 [fesch]
- jw: if can use CSS to handle visually different, that would handle the disambiguation issues
- 17:47:26 [janina]
- ack l
- 17:47:30 [janina]
- ack m
- 17:48:38 [fesch]
- mc: what details doesn't do - is disambiguate, could use class='description" but that would be a convention, so support a role..
- 17:48:50 [fesch]
- mc: might have to add a role to ARIA
- 17:49:24 [fesch]
- rs: I don't think I would use role='description' , we have a role...
- 17:49:45 [fesch]
- mc: don't care what the role is - just as long as there is a role
- 17:49:45 [janina]
- ack t
- 17:49:45 [Zakim]
- tzviya, you wanted to mention http://caniuse.com/#search=custom
- 17:50:44 [fesch]
- tz: dpub is neutral, web components have limited support, apple did not commit to supporting web components (unless it is well supported)
- 17:51:01 [fesch]
- js: that is what I am trying to convey to Jason...
- 17:51:14 [fesch]
- mc: are the implemented? are they easy to use?
- 17:51:23 [janina]
- q?
- 17:51:48 [fesch]
- mc: if we fill in web components with no, no, no then it will fail the test, but have the capability to pass later
- 17:53:52 [fesch]
- fe: I like something that disambiguated roles
- 17:54:11 [fesch]
- mc: I think this is a question for ARIA
- 17:54:50 [fesch]
- js: sounds like answer is yes, do we need to worry about styling?
- 17:55:11 [fesch]
- mc: want styling on a universally predictable thing
- 17:56:07 [fesch]
- js: is it reasonable to ask ARIA for a thing to disambiguate roles?
- 17:56:27 [fesch]
- rs: you can ask.... trying to get ARIA 1.1 out...
- 17:56:27 [janina]
- q?
- 17:57:05 [fesch]
- jw: Mark H will work on prototypes using details and migrate to web components
- 17:57:31 [janina]
- q?
- 17:57:32 [fesch]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:57:32 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/11-pf-minutes.html fesch
- 17:58:08 [fesch]
- rs: where are we on the IRC?
- 17:58:45 [fesch]
- js: talked about this earlier.... IRC may switch earlier, email later -
- 17:59:02 [fesch]
- mc: no need for ARIA to switch IRC :)
- 17:59:32 [fesch]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:59:32 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/11/11-pf-minutes.html fesch