19:39:11 RRSAgent has joined #aapi 19:39:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/11/10-aapi-irc 19:39:13 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:39:13 Zakim has joined #aapi 19:39:15 Zakim, this will be WAI_PF 19:39:15 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 19:39:16 Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 19:39:16 Date: 10 November 2015 19:39:36 chair: Joseph_Scheuhammer 19:40:21 agenda: this 19:40:50 agenda+ Reminder: check that all new ARIA 1.1 spec have actions for the Core-AAM. 19:41:13 agenda+ ISSUE-723 - 734: Updated UIA role mappings (mostly landmarks). Close these issues? 19:41:20 agenda+ ACTION-1527: (Joseph) UIA mapping of aria-current. Review edits. 19:41:29 agenda+ ACTION-1737: (Joseph) Mappings for table and cell roles. Review edits. 19:41:36 agenda+ Cynthia: issues with text alternative calculation. 19:42:05 agenda+ Actions/issues/bugzillas triage for ARIA 1.1 19:42:19 agenda+ be done. 19:42:58 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aapi 19:44:43 topic WebEx Access Code 641 707 405 (Next meeting 17–Nov-2015) 19:44:50 clown has changed the topic to: WebEx Access Code 641 707 405 (Next meeting 17–Nov-2015) 19:52:29 I have to leave after 25 minutes - just a heads up 19:57:35 yes 19:57:51 s/yes// 20:00:49 scribe: Joanie 20:00:54 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 20:02:10 Zakim, next item 20:02:10 agendum 1. "Reminder: check that all new ARIA 1.1 spec have actions for the Core-AAM." taken up [from clown] 20:02:41 present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 20:02:51 present+ Bryan_Garaventa 20:02:55 present+ Joseph_Scheuhammer 20:02:56 Present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 20:03:43 bgaraventa1979 has joined #aapi 20:04:02 JS: I wanted to remind everyone that if you see something in the spec which needs to be dealt with in the core mapping, please let me know. 20:04:11 JS: So we can create actions. 20:04:17 Zakim, next item 20:04:17 agendum 2. "ISSUE-723 - 734: Updated UIA role mappings (mostly landmarks). Close these issues?" taken up [from clown] 20:04:26 JS: This requires Cynthia. 20:04:43 issue-723? 20:04:43 issue-723 -- UIA mapping for application incorrect -- raised 20:04:43 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/723 20:04:44 JS: Cynthia filed just over 10 issues about certain UIA mappings. 20:05:05 JS: For example issue-723 is the mapping for role application. 20:05:14 JS: (Reads corrected mapping) 20:05:42 JS: While you were at TPAC, I've updated these mappings as per Cynthia's issues. 20:05:47 JS: Many of these are landmarks. 20:05:54 JS: There is an issue with Banner. 20:06:17 http://w3c.github.io/aria/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-search 20:06:19 s/Banner/search/ 20:06:35 JS: I had to update the UIA mapping, and I noticed there is nothing for MSAA+IA2. 20:06:45 JS: Then I looked at the release and there's nothing there either. 20:06:55 JS: We've never had a mapping for this, going back to 2008. 20:07:00 JS: Does anyone know what it is? 20:07:05 BG: No. 20:07:21 JS: The cell is just blank and has been blank for a long time. 20:07:29 JS: Can I give someone an action to figure out what it is? 20:08:06 action: Joanie to determine what the MSAA+IA2 mapping for role="search" 20:08:06 Created ACTION-1738 - Determine what the msaa+ia2 mapping for role="search" [on Joanmarie Diggs - due 2015-11-17]. 20:08:10 JD: If you mean IA2, I have recently set up a Windows box and can look. 20:08:15 JS: Action crated. 20:08:45 JS: What were you planning to use? 20:08:49 JD: AccProbe 20:09:05 RS: Chrome and Firefox each use IA2. 20:09:21 JS: IE used to. IE 8 does IA2 mappings. 20:09:26 RS: I've not heard that. 20:10:38 s/IE used to. IE 8 does IA2 mappings./Did IE ever use IA2?/ 20:12:23 Topic: DPub Mappings 20:12:38 RS: I would like people to look at the DPub mappings if they have the time. 20:13:02 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/dpub-aam/dpub-aam.html 20:13:07 RS: This is going to be a FPWD. (link above) 20:13:17 JS: At this point, they just have roles, right? 20:13:19 RS: Correct. 20:13:26 RS: We've listed a number of issues in here. 20:13:43 RS: I'd like to see if anyone finds any significant issues/concerns. 20:14:09 RS: They have a number of links in here. I don't know if they'll stay. And there is an Editor's note about it. So I wouldn't be too concerned about those. 20:14:34 RS: I also have some TBDs in there, if anyone has any details to fill them in. 20:15:02 JS: How did navigation fare? 20:15:23 JS: I set up a couple of tables for Tzviya because she wanted to see how the tables were done. 20:15:42 JS: In one of them, I said it was done the same way navigation was done. 20:16:43 JS: I noticed that in many cases the mapping for IA2 and ATK are object attributes. 20:16:58 JD: We have quite a few roles in ATK which will map, so I'll take a look. 20:18:33 20:19:12 Zakim, next item 20:19:12 agendum 3. "ACTION-1527: (Joseph) UIA mapping of aria-current. Review edits." taken up [from clown] 20:19:22 action-1527 20:19:22 action-1527 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Investigate the proper uia mappings for aria-current -- due 2015-10-01 -- OPEN 20:19:22 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1527 20:19:30 JS: I've put in the edits Cynthia suggested for UIA. 20:19:55 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaCurrent 20:20:23 JS: Whatever the value of aria-current is, is exposed. It's a name-value pair. 20:20:47 JS: I know that sometime in the future this may change, but she indicated in the action that for now this mapping is what should be done. 20:21:00 RS: It's a name-value pair where? 20:21:23 JS: In the AriaProperties. 20:21:46 JS: You can think of AriaProperties as ATK's object attributes. 20:21:56 Zakim, take up item 5 20:21:56 agendum 5. "Cynthia: issues with text alternative calculation." taken up [from clown] 20:22:06 Zakim, close this item 20:22:06 agendum 5 closed 20:22:07 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 20:22:07 3. ACTION-1527: (Joseph) UIA mapping of aria-current. Review edits. [from clown] 20:22:21 Zakim, close item 3 20:22:21 agendum 3, ACTION-1527: (Joseph) UIA mapping of aria-current. Review edits., closed 20:22:23 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 20:22:23 4. ACTION-1737: (Joseph) Mappings for table and cell roles. Review edits. [from clown] 20:22:30 agenda? 20:22:53 action-1737? 20:22:53 action-1737 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Determine mappings for ARIA 1.1 table and cell role for all AAPI platforms. -- due 2015-11-13 -- OPEN 20:22:53 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1737 20:22:56 Zakim, take up item 4 20:22:56 agendum 4. "ACTION-1737: (Joseph) Mappings for table and cell roles. Review edits." taken up [from clown] 20:23:07 JS: I did the mappings for table and cell roles for all platforms. 20:23:30 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-table 20:23:34 JS: The above is table. 20:24:44 JD: The role mapping is correct, but you missed the ATK/AT-SPI2 table interface. 20:24:48 cyns has joined #aapi 20:24:59 JS: The directive was to copy what's in grid, but change the xml-role. 20:25:17 JD: Grid should also implement the table interface on my platform. 20:25:25 present+ Cynthia_Shelly 20:25:26 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-table 20:25:38 JS: Is the UIA mapping correct, Cynthia? 20:27:56 https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ee671650(v=vs.85).aspx 20:28:01 JD: Oh wow, no interfaces at all in the Core mapping spec for my platform. 20:28:49 action Joanie to provide all the missing ATK/AT-SPI2 interfaces for Joseph 20:28:49 Created ACTION-1739 - Provide all the missing atk/at-spi2 interfaces for joseph [on Joanmarie Diggs - due 2015-11-17]. 20:29:04 CS: The control type is table; not data grid. 20:29:21 Control Type = Table 20:29:32 which implements the Grid and Table Patterns 20:29:55 CS: I also put a link to the documentation in (above) 20:30:11 JS: Both Grid and Table patterns? 20:30:20 CS: Yes. A Table is a Grid with headers. 20:30:44 JS: I believe that I got the AX API mappings from Joanie. 20:30:54 JD: I'm not remembering that, but perhaps.... :) 20:31:32 JD: I think it was an earlier meeting, and someone who was not scribing had a Mac handy. 20:32:16 JS: Moving on to cell 20:32:19 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-cell 20:32:27 JS: The role mappings are above. 20:32:56 CS: So this is a table cell; not a grid cell? 20:32:58 JS: Correct. 20:34:01 Control Type = TableItem 20:34:02 JD: I'm pretty sure that IA2 has a table-cell interface because we "stole" it for ATK/AT-SPI2. 20:34:40 Must support selection pattern and must not support invoke pattern 20:34:40 https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ee671649(v=vs.85).aspx 20:36:39 JS: Cynthia, should table also support selection? 20:36:55 CS: No. Table pattern and Grid pattern for ARIA role table. 20:37:10 CS: I don't think our table supports invoke, so I don't think that will be a problem. 20:37:24 CS: We just made a change that anything with an onclick handler supports invoke. 20:37:50 JS: Other questions or comments on cell? 20:38:03 Zakim, take up item 1 20:38:03 agendum 1. "Reminder: check that all new ARIA 1.1 spec have actions for the Core-AAM." taken up [from clown] 20:38:07 Zakim, take up item 2 20:38:07 agendum 2. "ISSUE-723 - 734: Updated UIA role mappings (mostly landmarks). Close these issues?" taken up [from clown] 20:38:29 JS: Cynthia, you filed a number of issues which were to change the UIA role mappings for a number of things. 20:38:37 JS: I have made the changes. Do you want to confirm them? 20:38:44 CS: Yes. 20:38:48 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-application 20:39:00 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#mapping_role_table 20:39:17 JS: You can go to this URL (above). You'll see a button that says "view as a single table". 20:39:38 JS: Then you can show/hide columns, so you can hide everything that's not UIA. 20:39:50 CS: Banner looks good. 20:39:57 CS: Complementary looks good. 20:40:22 CS: Contentinfo should be content information 20:40:36 CS: Main is correct. 20:40:42 CS: Search is correct. 20:40:50 CS: Navigation is correct. 20:41:30 CS: Article... I may have misunderstood the purpose of this role after having spoke with Matt King. So let's leave the article action open for now. 20:41:41 JS: I don't think Article is a landmark. 20:41:54 issue-730 20:41:54 issue-730 -- UIA mapping for article incorrect -- raised 20:41:54 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/730 20:41:58 s/article action/article issue/ 20:42:03 CS: Definition is correct. 20:42:12 CS: Log is correct. 20:42:16 CS: Math is correct. 20:42:26 CS: Note is correct. 20:42:52 JS: I will close all the issues but application and article. 20:43:03 JS: I'll also close content info after I have correct it. 20:43:06 CS: Sounds good. 20:43:25 Zakim, take up item 3 20:43:25 agendum 3. "ACTION-1527: (Joseph) UIA mapping of aria-current. Review edits." taken up [from clown] 20:43:43 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaCurrent 20:43:49 JS: You gave me the answer Cynthia. I just want to make sure I got it right. 20:43:57 JS: (reads it) 20:44:07 CS: That is correct for now. 20:44:33 CS: The link you gave me says "not mapped" 20:44:43 CS: Correction, wrong one. 20:45:31 RESOLUTION: Close action-1527. 20:45:40 +1 20:47:16 close action-1527 based on consensus from the 10-Nov-2015 AAPI meeting. 20:48:15 close action-1527 20:48:15 Closed action-1527. 20:48:29 note action-1527 Closing based on consensus from the 10-Nov-2015 AAPI meeting. 20:48:29 Notes added to action-1527 Investigate the proper uia mappings for aria-current. 20:49:15 Topic: Name Computation 20:49:25 s/Name/Text Alternative/ 20:49:36 CS: I think I'll put in issues for things I've found. 20:49:59 CS: We started trying to implement it and read into issues due to vagueness in the text. 20:50:09 JS: As far as I know, it's the same as 1.0. Just editorial. 20:50:24 CS: There was a high-level issue trying to piece together the ARIA and HTML computations. 20:50:42 CS: I know we intentionally separarted it. But when you go to implement it, it's really confusing. 20:50:51 CS: I spent multiple hours working with my dev. 20:51:09 CS: The other high-level piece of information is that that ARIA one is much more complete than the HTML one. 20:51:27 JS: I get the impression that the intended audience for the ARIA one is authors. 20:51:41 JS: And the intended audience for HTML, implementors. 20:52:21 JS: If you create the issues, Cynthia, we will then have open items we can discuss. 20:52:24 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/accname-aam/accname-aam.html 20:52:41 http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/accname-aam/accname-aam.html#mapping_additional_nd_te 20:53:08 CS: The first comment is on step 2a. 20:53:21 CS: (Reads step 2a) 20:53:57 CS: We only care if we reach the current node via computation; not if it's contained in any reference (gives example). 20:54:49 JD: You have an example you can share? 20:54:55 CS: I'll put it in the issue. 20:55:53 CS: (Points out other issues fairly rapidly, but tells scribe she will put them in the issues she creates.) 20:56:49 CS: There are several places where the ARIA one mentions the host-language one, but the HTML one doesn't address it. 20:57:00 http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-wai-aria-implementation-20140320/#mapping_additional_nd 20:57:48 JS: (Reads note from the 1.0 version for which the link is above) 20:58:16 CS: It was unclear what HTML elements and attributes applied. 20:58:29 CS: Do we own that? 20:58:38 JS: HTML AAM is part of the ARIA github tree. 20:59:10 JS: The editors are Steve, Alex, and Jason. 20:59:31 JS: I would like them to replicate the structure of the SVG AAM. 20:59:49 CS: I think I'll start with issues here and then figure out which need to be moved into bugs against them. 21:00:01 CS: And we can point to the SVG AAM if and as appropriate. 21:00:05 JS: We can do that. 21:00:25 CS: Are they using bugzilla or github or...? 21:00:28 JS: Bugzilla. 21:03:42 Zakim, part 21:03:42 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Joanmarie_Diggs, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Bryan_Garaventa, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Cynthia_Shelly 21:03:42 Zakim has left #aapi 21:03:57 RRSAgent, stop