13:59:22 RRSAgent has joined #tt 13:59:22 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/10/15-tt-irc 13:59:24 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:59:24 Zakim has joined #tt 13:59:26 Zakim, this will be TTML 13:59:26 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 13:59:27 Meeting: Timed Text Working Group Teleconference 13:59:28 Date: 15 October 2015 14:01:41 dakim has joined #tt 14:01:54 mike has joined #tt 14:01:59 present+ dakim 14:02:26 present+dakim 14:04:42 Present+ mike, nigel 14:04:46 s/present+dakim 14:04:50 s/present+dakim/ 14:05:51 Present+ tmichel 14:06:12 Regrets: andreas 14:06:50 nigel: Welcome to dakim, whose first meeting this is as a member. 14:06:55 dakim: Thank you 14:07:08 Topic: This meeting 14:07:10 chair: nigel 14:07:12 scribe: nigel 14:08:36 nigel: Goes through meeting - plans to discuss ATSC liaison, IMSC 1 issues, actions, TPAC agenda and timeslots. 14:08:43 pal has joined #tt 14:08:47 nigel: Is there any other business? 14:09:53 group: No AOB 14:10:25 my webex port was just terminated 14:10:34 same 14:10:42 yes I also lost webex ! 14:12:01 yes it does says meeting canceed ! 14:13:44 no I don't have the credentials to start it or a new one 14:14:02 i can try to book an audio bridge for everyone to call into 14:14:37 nigel: hold on for a moment, I also can do that but I think Thierry might be on the case... 14:15:48 plh has joined #tt 14:16:10 Yes I am currently discussing with PlH, maybe he has the credentials 14:16:22 ok, I can book webex 14:16:35 give me a minute 14:16:42 thanks, MIT does not accept my credential ... 14:18:10 dae has joined #tt 14:18:16 present+dae 14:18:24 312 343 368 14:18:37 password: caption 14:18:51 https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m231f833db1e0d4bde2ac19d0260c66f2 14:19:10 says you need to start it... 14:19:19 present +pal 14:20:18 done 14:20:31 thanks 14:22:00 okay that looks like it's up and running - just waiting for everyone to call back in... 14:22:28 pal: No other business from me either. 14:24:36 tmichel: Should we use this new webex next week or the usual one? 14:24:44 nigel: I don't know - can I bounce that back to you to investigate? 14:26:22 Topic: Action Items 14:26:25 action-430? 14:26:25 action-430 -- Thierry Michel to Look into merging the group home page and the wiki home page and propose something -- due 2015-10-15 -- OPEN 14:26:25 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/430 14:27:05 tmichel: I started to look at this and I think the proposal I will send is to keep the current home 14:27:20 ... page as a landing page because each working group has that kind of landing page. Then 14:27:34 ... I will highlight that most of the information is on the wiki and include a link. 14:28:04 nigel: Other people seem to have a better home page. Are we stuck with CVS? 14:28:18 tmichel: Yes the home page is under CVS. I propose to keep links to the charter, participants, 14:28:32 ... how to join etc that don't move much in time, and then all the more volatile information 14:28:36 ... should be kept in the wiki. 14:28:50 nigel: That's the status quo but with a clearer home page. 14:29:06 tmichel: Yes, I plan to simplify the page and make it clear that they need to go to the wiki 14:29:14 ... for more information - currently it's not easy to find that wiki link. 14:30:03 close action-430 14:30:04 Closed action-430. 14:30:31 Action: tmichel Update CVS hosted landing page to simplify and highlight link into wiki page 14:30:31 Created ACTION-433 - Update cvs hosted landing page to simplify and highlight link into wiki page [on Thierry Michel - due 2015-10-22]. 14:30:46 action-421? 14:30:46 action-421 -- Nigel Megitt to Check with ttml player manufacturers if they're happy to be listed on our site. -- due 2015-09-24 -- OPEN 14:30:46 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/421 14:30:52 nigel: I need to chase on this. 14:30:59 mike has joined #tt 14:31:06 Action-421: [meeting 2015-10-15] Nigel to chase up on this 14:31:06 Notes added to Action-421 Check with ttml player manufacturers if they're happy to be listed on our site.. 14:31:29 Topic: TPAC 2015 14:32:15 nigel: I've added to the wiki page the request to demo TTML2 on the Thursday. 14:32:23 https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/tpac2015 14:33:04 nigel: Are there any requests for specific days to cover specific topics? 14:33:13 dakim: The netflix request is for the Thursday 14:33:19 nigel: Thanks, that's already noted. 14:33:43 nigel: Any other preferences for particular dates, slots etc? 14:33:55 nigel: If not then I'll allocate them as is convenient. 14:34:50 ... The other thing to note is the charter discussion: if anyone has any scope changes they 14:35:10 ... would like to propose then this will be the time to do that. Otherwise we'll simply be 14:35:14 ... proposing an extension in time. 14:35:38 Topic: Incoming Liaison from ATSC 14:35:43 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2015Oct/0000.html 14:37:24 nigel: This is a request to make a derivative work based on part of TTML2 14:37:46 mike: This is a request to comply with the W3C copyright notice. We were planning to put 14:38:07 ... the new text under a different namespace. Plh advised that this is still a derived work and 14:38:23 ... needs internal approval. He wanted us to come here first and get the group's view. 14:38:55 nigel: The first point is that the current text does not match what we agreed as per 14:38:57 issue-224? 14:38:57 issue-224 -- Support text placement in 3D coordinate spaces (not zIndex compositing). -- open 14:38:57 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/224 14:39:10 mike: Yes, hence the request to keep tracking developments. 14:39:51 nigel: Right now I'd be unhappy for ATSC to adopt what we know is definitely not what we want. 14:40:13 pal: The first step is to make the changes. 14:40:28 nigel: Yes, the Editor hasn't done that yet. 14:40:35 pal: Maybe someone else could edit that section? 14:40:49 nigel: Yes, that would be okay. 14:41:17 mike: I wanted simply to address the legal compliance question, but we should follow this through. 14:41:23 ... I have asked Glenn about making the fixes. 14:41:47 pal: So ATSC would ideally like to copy and paste from a W3C Editor's Draft? 14:42:04 mike: Right - the previous liaison was that ATSC would like to reference the 3D part, and our 14:42:23 ... reaction was that we couldn't give a timescale, so ATSC has asked to derive from and track 14:42:28 ... the latest state. 14:42:45 pal: And the challenge is that to copy/paste from a rec track doc the WG needs to approve it? 14:43:05 mike: There's a boilerplate W3C policy on copying, and it's not permitted to make a derivative 14:43:19 ... work. Even though we're not changing the text but we are moving it to an ATSC namespace, 14:43:26 ... plh considered it to be a derivative work. 14:43:44 pal: Imagine someone were to come across a working draft of a W3C spec and love it. Nothing 14:44:03 ... prevents that person from referencing a paragraph in that spec, at their own risk. W3C rules 14:44:13 ... don't prevent that. 14:44:15 present+ plh 14:44:29 mike: No, that would be fine. Past experience is that those were ethereal. Unless the group 14:45:07 ... wants to make sure the Working draft URL is persistent. 14:45:22 nigel: The /TR Working Drafts already have a static link. 14:45:36 pal: Also the links to changesets in Mercurial can be used. 14:45:43 nigel: I wouldn't recommend that. 14:45:52 plh: We don't guarantee the stability of those links. 14:46:16 pal: Until the WD is updated. 14:46:22 plh: Why can't we update the WD? 14:46:32 pal: It would take work! I'm not sure what state it is in. 14:47:22 nigel: I think the actions are 1) make the edits to tts:disparity and 2) publish a new WD. 14:47:30 ... Would that work Mike? 14:47:54 mike: Yes as long as the WD link is permanent. The ATSC process is ongoing too by the way. 14:48:28 nigel: Can anyone volunteer to fix up tts:disparity? 14:48:34 pal: Yes I can do that. 14:48:38 nigel: Great, thank you. 14:49:09 mike: The expectation is that it matches CEA 708.1. 14:49:10 pal: Yes 14:49:26 nigel: As far as I know there are two ways of doing this, which differ only by a factor of 2. 14:49:28 pal: I can do that. 14:49:43 mike: Thank you. You should drop Glenn a note because he considers it to be his action right now. 14:50:08 issue-224: [Meeting 2015-10-15] pal volunteers to do the editing to implement this 14:50:08 Notes added to issue-224 Support text placement in 3D coordinate spaces (not zIndex compositing).. 14:50:30 pal: In terms of the liaison back, we need to indicate that this is a WD of TTML2, and it is a draft 14:50:49 ... so the group has spent some time on it but please don't depend on any of the document. 14:51:03 mike: That goes without saying. Why don't I draft a liaison request, saying Request Denied, but 14:51:07 ... we have good news! 14:51:13 nigel: Sounds good to me! 14:51:35 Action: mdolan Draft outgoing liaison to ATSC proposing to reference an updated WD of TTML2 14:51:35 Created ACTION-434 - Draft outgoing liaison to atsc proposing to reference an updated wd of ttml2 [on Mike Dolan - due 2015-10-22]. 14:53:19 nigel: Can I propose that pal, you don't push the regenerated HTML but just the XML and ask 14:53:35 ... Glenn as Editor to pull it and generate the HTML before pushing so he has a chance to review. 14:53:43 Topic: TPAC 14:54:04 pal: I would like to revisit the topic of moving away from tracker towards github and other tools. 14:54:30 ... The lack of notifications on changes with tracker is becoming a blocker. Can we take 30 minutes 14:54:37 ... to revisit that topic and see if now is a good time. 14:54:44 plh: I'm interested in that conversation. 14:55:05 pal: I've found with tracker that it's tough to notice comments that people have added to issues. 14:55:20 nigel: Is there wider context? 14:55:34 plh: You're probably one of the last WGs using Mercurial and Tracker - most other groups 14:55:50 ... have moved to github, which has problems too but many advantages. I would favour moving 14:55:52 ... to github. 14:56:35 nigel: I have no problem with that, but I'm interested in the mechanics. Can issues be migrated? 14:56:50 plh: There's no way to migrate the issues from tracker. I think there's a way to migrate the 14:56:58 ... Mercurial repo while keeping its history. 14:57:04 pal: Yes there is. 14:57:16 plh: I'm happy to show how other groups are using github during the TPAC meeting. 14:57:24 nigel: Great, let's consider that added! 14:57:35 Action: nigel add tools to TPAC agenda 14:57:36 Created ACTION-435 - Add tools to tpac agenda [on Nigel Megitt - due 2015-10-22]. 14:58:24 Topic: Profiles registry 14:58:26 action-429? 14:58:26 action-429 -- Mike Dolan to Draft a wg note for the profile short name registry and ttml media type registration -- due 2015-10-08 -- OPEN 14:58:26 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/429 14:58:41 mike: The learning curve was higher than I expected. Pal is lending a hand but it's going to 14:59:02 ... take a bit of work. I can make Cyril's suggested changes on the wiki. I've got other things 14:59:44 ... to do so it won't happen before TPAC. The publishing process is interestingly complex. 15:00:16 mike: I was going to edit the recent other note but it's quite contorted to do by hand. The structure is quite complicated. 15:00:25 ... Then the Mercurial post needs to be sorted out. 15:01:12 nigel: You might want to start with a fresh Respec doc or there's also bikeshed. 15:02:16 ... Thierry, do you have an empty template you can send? 15:02:38 tmichel: Yes I'll send Mike an empty template. Do you want to make it a Note? 15:02:43 mike: I think we agreed to do that. 15:02:46 tmichel: Okay. 15:03:04 Action: tmichel Send mdolan an empty respec based Note as a starting point for action-429 15:03:04 Created ACTION-436 - Send mdolan an empty respec based note as a starting point for action-429 [on Thierry Michel - due 2015-10-22]. 15:03:56 nigel: Let's take a 3 minute break and come back to look at IMSC issues for the second half of the meeting... 15:09:14 Topic: Issues 15:10:17 issue-406? 15:10:17 issue-406 -- #lineBreak-uax14 is never 'used' by a document? -- pending review 15:10:17 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/406 15:10:52 pal: I modified this to mandate lineBreak-uax14 for text profile and leave silent for image profile. 15:12:08 pal: nigel raised a separate issue about profiles that we can deal with separately. 15:12:44 close issue-406 15:12:44 Closed issue-406. 15:12:52 issue-407? 15:12:52 issue-407 -- Excluding #bidi and #direction on image profile is inconsistent -- pending review 15:12:52 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/407 15:13:29 pal: To summarise, some features in TTML1 imply other features. This was a case where there 15:13:55 ... was an inconsistency so I tried to correct that inconsistency as proposed by the commenter, 15:14:10 ... by saying #bidi is not applicable in the image profile because not all included features are 15:14:12 ... supported. 15:15:26 nigel: On image profile, are some of the implied features prohibited? 15:15:38 pal: Yes. So bidi cannot be used in its entirety. 15:17:18 nigel: Okay I see, #writingMode-horizontal is permitted (from the common features) but 15:17:47 ... since #direction and #unicodeBidi are prohibited then it does not apply. 15:18:46 nigel: I'd suggest removing the "Not applicable" since it's not the spec's job to decide that. 15:18:50 pal: ok 15:19:53 issue-407: [meeting 2015-10-15] Propose new text: "See implied features: some are prohibited, others are permitted" 15:19:53 Notes added to issue-407 Excluding #bidi and #direction on image profile is inconsistent. 15:20:03 reopen issue-407 15:20:04 Re-opened issue-407. 15:20:26 issue-410? 15:20:26 issue-410 -- Constraints on #linePadding and #multiRowAlign -- pending review 15:20:26 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/410 15:20:50 action-432? 15:20:50 action-432 -- Nigel Megitt to Nigel, pal, andreas and frans to hook up re changing imsc 1 ebu-tt feature references to point to tech3350 v1.1 -- due 2015-10-15 -- OPEN 15:20:50 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/432 15:21:47 nigel: I started a thread on this but haven't had the answer yet. My view is to go ahead with this 15:22:01 ... and if there's a problem then come back to it. 15:22:07 pal: Can you propose some specific text? 15:22:57 Action-432: [meeting 2015-10-15] nigel to check on details and propose specific wording 15:22:57 Notes added to Action-432 Nigel, pal, andreas and frans to hook up re changing imsc 1 ebu-tt feature references to point to tech3350 v1.1. 15:23:12 issue-410: [meeting 2015-10-15] see Action-432 update. 15:23:12 Notes added to issue-410 Constraints on #linePadding and #multiRowAlign. 15:23:47 issue-411? 15:23:47 issue-411 -- "shall be inherited" on #multiRowAlign -- pending review 15:23:47 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/411 15:24:14 nigel: The same edit for issue-410 should apply to issue-411 also. 15:24:21 reopen issue-411 15:24:24 Re-opened issue-411. 15:24:25 reopen issue-410 15:24:25 Re-opened issue-410. 15:24:36 issue-411: [meeting 2015-10-15] see Action-432 update. 15:24:36 Notes added to issue-411 "shall be inherited" on #multiRowAlign. 15:24:48 action-432: [meeting 2015-10-15] also applies to issue-411 15:24:48 Notes added to action-432 Nigel, pal, andreas and frans to hook up re changing imsc 1 ebu-tt feature references to point to tech3350 v1.1. 15:25:03 issue-412? 15:25:03 issue-412 -- The term 'SHALL' should not be used in the definition of Related Video Object -- pending review 15:25:03 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/412 15:25:28 pal: I think the document is better and implements what the commenter suggested. 15:25:45 close issue-412 15:25:46 Closed issue-412. 15:26:03 issue-413? 15:26:03 issue-413 -- What does "reproducible without error" mean? -- pending review 15:26:03 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/413 15:26:26 nigel: So you've applied the change that Glenn okayed? 15:26:30 pal: Yes I think so! 15:26:50 close issue-413 15:26:50 Closed issue-413. 15:27:12 issue-417? 15:27:12 issue-417 -- #writingMode constraint inconsistent in image profile -- pending review 15:27:12 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/417 15:27:48 pal: I've just posted an update that changes this one as well as the one nigel just suggested. 15:28:52 pal: #writingMode now says "See implied features: some are prohibited, others are permitted." 15:29:00 ... And I've added the change set to the issue. 15:29:28 nigel: Are there any other partial ones? 15:29:33 pal: I searched and couldn't find any other. 15:30:13 pal: Issue-407 and issue-417 are addressed with the same text nigel proposed on issue-407 15:30:59 dropping for another meeting 15:31:06 nigel: Since I know there are other bigger issues with profiles I don't want to spend any more time on these 15:31:19 pal: Also they don't have any conformance implications. 15:31:22 close issue-407 15:31:22 Closed issue-407. 15:31:25 close issue-417 15:31:25 Closed issue-417. 15:31:39 issue-418? 15:31:39 issue-418 -- semantics of ttp:aspectRatio is ambiguous -- pending review 15:31:39 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/418 15:32:12 nigel: After the last change I made a proposal. 15:33:49 pal: So you wanted to add a note to Example 2 saying how it would look on a 4:3 display also? 15:33:51 nigel: Yes. 15:33:55 pal: Okay I can do that. 15:34:50 nigel: My aside was just because the numbers seemed like magic - which maths sometimes does! 15:35:02 pal: I'm going to implement that change right now... 15:35:17 s/that./that. I think that's an excellent suggestion. 15:37:10 issue-419? 15:37:10 issue-419 -- Overflow recommendations + #overflow feature -- pending review 15:37:10 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/419 15:38:18 nigel: In this case there seems to be no action to take. Glenn's point seems to miss that there 15:38:31 ... is no mandated behaviour for either hidden or visible value of tts:overflow. 15:38:39 s/w./w in TTML1. 15:38:52 close issue-419 15:38:52 Closed issue-419. 15:39:03 issue-420? 15:39:03 issue-420 -- The TTML timing vocabulary does not have elements -- pending review 15:39:03 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/420 15:40:34 nigel: The easy path here is to remove "or element" isn't it? That would strictly be correct. 15:41:01 pal: I don't think so. TTML1 ยง10 is "Timing Element Vocabulary" 15:42:07 pal: By the way this came out of me trying to match TTML1 as closely as possible. 15:42:12 close issue-420 15:42:12 Closed issue-420. 15:42:17 issue-421? 15:42:17 issue-421 -- Term "earlier" is ambiguous -- pending review 15:42:17 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/421 15:42:42 pal: I've satisfied Glenn and Nigel on this one, so it can be closed. 15:42:46 close issue-421 15:42:46 Closed issue-421. 15:43:04 issue-422? 15:43:04 issue-422 -- Presented region + itts:forcedDisplay -- pending review 15:43:04 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/422 15:46:13 nigel: I added a comment to this. 15:46:45 pal: Actually itts:forcedDisplay does not modify the computed value of tts:visibility. And more 15:47:08 ... importantly the document conformance should be independent of displayForcedOnlyMode. 15:47:42 nigel: I see - itts:forcedDisplay does not modify the computed value of tts:visibility. 15:47:55 pal: It used to be like that but based on Glenn's earlier feedback it was changed to be independent. 15:48:58 nigel: I don't think there's any change needed here. Maybe the phrasing "allows the processor to override the computed value" isn't helpful. 15:49:14 pal: To me that's a different issue, but I agree. If you want to propose new wording to the 15:49:20 ... introductory sentence then please go ahead. 15:49:43 Action: nigel [imsc1] propose new wording for intro sentence to itts:forcedDisplay 15:49:43 Created ACTION-437 - [imsc1] propose new wording for intro sentence to itts:forceddisplay [on Nigel Megitt - due 2015-10-22]. 15:49:53 close issue-422 15:49:53 Closed issue-422. 15:49:56 issue-425? 15:49:56 issue-425 -- Awkward prose re: smpte:backgroundImage and ittm:altText -- pending review 15:49:56 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/425 15:50:42 pal: I've done what was proposed. 15:50:46 close issue-425 15:50:46 Closed issue-425. 15:50:59 issue-426? 15:50:59 issue-426 -- MHP vs W3C reference for PNG -- pending review 15:50:59 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/426 15:51:42 pal: I couldn't find a meaningful difference and I take Glenn's point. Even if we did say MHP most 15:51:47 ... people would ignore it anyway! 15:51:49 close issue-426 15:51:49 Closed issue-426. 15:51:58 issue-427? 15:51:58 issue-427 -- Misc prose tweaks -- pending review 15:51:58 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/427 15:52:12 close issue-427 15:52:12 Closed issue-427. 15:52:20 issue-430? 15:52:20 issue-430 -- independent variables in the HRM -- pending review 15:52:20 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/430 15:52:44 pal: This was a question rather than a proposal. I think I've answered it and not heard back. 15:52:51 nigel: And you told Glenn about this comment on the issue? 15:53:07 pal: Yes, I reminded him of all the issues I'd addressed, on the day (Sep 21) 15:53:24 ... Regardless, this may be taken up by bigger things due to Glenn's other comments on the HRM. 15:53:27 close issue-430 15:53:27 Closed issue-430. 15:53:38 issue-432? 15:53:38 issue-432 -- Multiple layers of background color in HRM -- pending review 15:53:38 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/432 15:54:14 pal: I asked Glenn if he wanted clarification and he didn't respond, so I assume he's not unhappy. 15:54:19 close issue-432 15:54:19 Closed issue-432. 15:54:49 pal: There are a couple of open issues that are linked, that I'd like to cover. 15:55:11 issue-434? 15:55:11 issue-434 -- Behavior in case of multiple images in a region -- open 15:55:11 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/434 15:55:21 issue-433? 15:55:21 issue-433 -- Presented image definition -- open 15:55:21 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/433 15:55:23 issue-424? 15:55:23 issue-424 -- Awkward text re: smpte:backgroundImage dimensions -- open 15:55:23 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/424 15:55:42 pal: These issues are questions about document non-conformance. IMSC 1 specifically does 15:55:59 ... not specify behaviour in this case. Glenn suggested guidance would be helpful. I've tried 15:56:11 ... drafting generic advice on dealing with non-conformant documents. The problem is that 15:56:24 ... fundamentally this is dependent on the application and the user preference. Two extreme 15:56:27 ... examples: 15:56:42 ... 1. During authoring I would expect an authoring tool never to emit a non-conforming document. 15:56:59 ... 2. A player - I would hope that a player should do its best to do something with a non-conformant document. 15:57:12 ... Because the circumstances are so broad I don't think it's possible to come up with a generic 15:57:26 ... definition with conformance text for behaviour in case of a non-conformant document. We 15:57:51 ... could go down the path of exploring all the scenarios. I'm not sure if we could ever do that 15:58:06 ... in a useful way. I've not been able to find anything that makes sense and is helpful and 15:58:17 ... non-harmful. 15:58:37 dakim: With non-conformance, you just have to handle it. A spec document isn't the place for 15:58:52 ... that. Just don't address it. It's your problem! 15:59:04 nigel: I think that's fair. 15:59:23 pal: In that case I'm happy to close those issues, maybe with a note, until someone has a better idea. 15:59:32 tmichel: Did Glenn raise a specific request? 15:59:34 pal: No. 15:59:40 tmichel: Then it's an implementation issue. 15:59:45 pal: Yes, I think so too. 16:01:31 issue-424: [Meeting 2015-10-15] Agreed to close since no wording for non-conformance handling has been proposed, by anyone. 16:01:31 Notes added to issue-424 Awkward text re: smpte:backgroundImage dimensions. 16:01:42 issue-434: [Meeting 2015-10-15] Agreed to close since no wording for non-conformance handling has been proposed, by anyone. 16:01:42 Notes added to issue-434 Behavior in case of multiple images in a region. 16:01:47 issue-433: [Meeting 2015-10-15] Agreed to close since no wording for non-conformance handling has been proposed, by anyone. 16:01:47 Notes added to issue-433 Presented image definition. 16:01:51 close issue-424 16:01:51 Closed issue-424. 16:01:54 close issue-433 16:01:54 Closed issue-433. 16:01:59 close issue-434 16:01:59 Closed issue-434. 16:02:37 action-431? 16:02:37 action-431 -- Nigel Megitt to File issue re profile feature inclusion in imsc 1 documents -- due 2015-10-15 -- PENDINGREVIEW 16:02:37 http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/431 16:02:44 close action-431 16:02:44 Closed action-431. 16:03:24 nigel: We're out of time so I'll adjourn. Thanks everyone for your time - we got through loads! 16:03:27 nigel: [adjourns meeting] 16:03:59 rrsagent, make logs public 16:04:04 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:04:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/10/15-tt-minutes.html nigel 16:08:05 s|s/| 16:11:43 s/Topic: TPAC 2015/Topic: TPAC 16:11:57 s/Topic: TPAC/Topic: TPAC 2015/g 16:12:10 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:12:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/10/15-tt-minutes.html nigel 16:17:09 s|s/| 16:17:11 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:17:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/10/15-tt-minutes.html nigel 16:18:33 ScribeOptions: -final -noEmbedDiagnostics 16:18:34 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:18:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/10/15-tt-minutes.html nigel 17:01:15 Zakim has left #tt