14:52:14 RRSAgent has joined #annotation 14:52:14 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/10/07-annotation-irc 14:52:23 Zakim has joined #annotation 14:53:05 azaroth has changed the topic to: Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Oct/0007.html 14:54:44 trackbot, start telcon 14:54:46 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:54:48 Zakim, this will be 2666 14:54:48 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 14:54:49 Meeting: Web Annotation Working Group Teleconference 14:54:49 Date: 07 October 2015 14:54:52 fjh has joined #annotation 14:54:57 zakim, code? 14:54:57 I have been told this is 14:56:07 zakim, this is WebEx access code 645 413 954, passwd annotation, web link: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=me422bef2c6690852d7d9a2cf39f591b8 14:56:07 got it, ivan 14:56:31 trackbot, start telecon 14:56:33 zakim, save this conference description 14:56:33 this conference description has been saved, ivan 14:56:33 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:56:35 Zakim, this will be 2666 14:56:35 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 14:56:36 Meeting: Web Annotation Working Group Teleconference 14:56:36 Date: 07 October 2015 14:56:54 zakim, this is WebEx access code 645 413 954, passwd annotation, web link: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=me422bef2c6690852d7d9a2cf39f591b8 14:56:54 got it, fjh 14:56:56 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Oct/0007.html 14:57:26 zakim, code? 14:57:26 I have been told this is WebEx access code 645 413 954, passwd annotation, web link: https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=me422bef2c6690852d7d9a2cf39f591b8 14:58:44 tbdinesh has joined #annotation 14:58:47 Chair: Frederick_Hirsch, Rob_Sanderson 14:58:54 Present+ Frederick_Hirsch, Rob_Sanderson 14:59:03 present+ Ivan_Herman 14:59:15 Regrets+ Ray_Denenberg 14:59:35 Jacob has joined #annotation 15:00:04 Present+ Jacob_Jett 15:00:20 zakim, who is here? 15:00:20 Present: Frederick_Hirsch, Rob_Sanderson, Ivan_Herman, Jacob_Jett 15:00:22 On IRC I see Jacob, tbdinesh, fjh, Zakim, RRSAgent, azaroth, ivan, KevinMarks, nickstenn, tessierashpool_, bigbluehat, shepazu, rhiaro_, dwhly, stain, oshepherd, rhiaro, trackbot 15:00:23 present+ shepazu 15:01:18 TimCole has joined #annotation 15:03:30 https://www.w3.org/Member/Mail 15:03:43 Present+ Tim_Cole 15:03:58 bjdmeest has joined #annotation 15:05:01 Present+ Ben_De_Meester 15:05:04 scribenick: bjdmeest 15:05:18 Present+ Benjamin_Young 15:05:26 Topic: Agenda Review, Scribe Selection, Announcements 15:05:41 central script repository - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Oct/0001.html (Doug) 15:05:41 webex issues on chrome for mac https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Sep/0228.html 15:05:58 Topic: Minutes Approval 15:06:03 proposed RESOLUTION: Minutes from 30 September approved, http://www.w3.org/2015/09/30-annotation-minutes.html 15:06:09 RESOLUTION: Minutes from 30 September approved, http://www.w3.org/2015/09/30-annotation-minutes.html 15:06:17 Topic: Model - Range of Bodies and Target 15:06:19 Chair: fjh 15:06:28 http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd/RequireSpecificResource.html 15:06:29 discussed on last call, http://www.w3.org/2015/09/30-annotation-minutes.html#item05 15:06:31 Present+ TB_Dinesh 15:07:09 TimCole: There were 3 things 15:08:01 ... 1: consensus: allow embedded content in ???Resource 15:08:01 Regrets+ Davis_Salisbury 15:08:09 q+ 15:08:22 ... 3: multiplicity: where do roles come in multiplicity 15:08:29 s/???/Specific/ 15:08:35 ... defer 3 15:08:51 That's my recollection too. Multiplicity is going to be a complex topic so best to defer until after the next release. 15:08:54 Second was need for subclass for embedded content 15:09:00 q? 15:09:06 PaoloCiccarese has joined #annotation 15:09:15 Present+ Paolo_Ciccarese 15:09:58 azaroth: subclass of embedded content... 15:10:13 embedded content is for included resources that are not necessarily body or target 15:10:20 ... e.g. inline svg or css 15:10:27 ... those resources shouldn't have roles 15:10:39 q+ 15:11:02 ... subclass TextualBody could have 1. role associated with it but not embeddedContent 15:11:21 ... 2. you have a nicer class when you don't want to embed svg or css 15:11:22 ack shepazu 15:11:24 q+ 15:12:31 shepazu: I don't think this or any issue should stop us from publishing a FPWD 15:12:36 ... they don't have to be perfect 15:12:42 s/FPWD/WD/ 15:12:53 +1 to Doug 15:13:01 ... as long as we have general consensus that the spec has improved 15:13:01 +1 to publishing early and often 15:13:01 Also +1 15:13:54 ... my opinion now: I think consistency, a single clear way, trumps simplicity for simple things 15:14:44 ... one level of hierarchy is not a big price to pay 15:15:04 ... that added complexity also adds options 15:15:22 ... consistency is better for understanding, writing parsers, etc. 15:15:23 +1 to a consistent model 15:15:45 q? 15:15:47 +1 for consistency 15:15:50 ack fjh 15:16:47 fjh: proposal 1 introduces complexities, last weeks poll there was consensus for proposal 2 15:16:57 q- 15:17:07 q+ for point of order 15:17:40 q+ 15:17:44 azaroth: we might not be able to break this apart, there are consequences 15:18:02 ... example: if SpecificResource is required 15:18:09 q? 15:18:14 ... then it should be introduced much earlier 15:18:48 ... so +1 to keeping current draft 15:19:05 ... trade-offs of consistency vs flexibility 15:19:41 fjh: we should get the draft published 15:19:42 ack shepazu 15:19:42 shepazu, you wanted to discuss point of order 15:19:44 +1 to publish using best guess now 15:21:06 davis_salisbury has joined #annotation 15:21:23 q? 15:21:23 present+ davis_salisbury 15:21:25 ack ivan 15:21:32 q+ 15:23:03 ivan: we have more or less an agreement, this is the direction we take now, let rob and paolo finish the document, discussions can happen once the document is more stable 15:23:26 +1 to what Ivan is suggesting 15:23:31 ... cfc is not necessary 15:23:52 +1 to not requiring CfC for publication ( was not suggesting that) also agree we need clarity on decisions 15:24:10 ... in practice, we can just go on and publish 15:24:12 q? 15:24:21 ack TimCole 15:24:47 TimCole: agree with Ivan, cfc should come after next publication, if needed 15:25:26 ... there is a trade-off: more classes to avoid hierarchy vs. patterns to be more rigid about hierarchy 15:25:42 ... we have to allow literaltext as bodies, and have roles on that 15:26:00 ... a next class for that seems, to me, too much 15:26:02 If we didn't have another class then I'd just want to shoehorn it in as a sub-class of specific resource so... 15:26:29 q+ to note multiplicity 15:26:31 ... so let's take best guess on multiplicity, and see what happens when implementations catch up 15:26:33 ack azaroth 15:26:33 azaroth, you wanted to note multiplicity 15:26:56 azaroth: cultural heritage community has implemented multiplicity 15:27:09 ... eg multiple images that depict one object (e.g in a museum) 15:27:12 ... they use choice 15:27:51 (I tend to think that some sort of choice mechanism is pretty important, though I fear the complexity of a general solution) 15:27:53 ... depending on location, quality of picture, etc, users can choose 15:28:01 q+ 15:28:25 ack shepazu 15:28:36 ... Composite and List, not really found (except maybe List in DPUB) 15:28:58 Ordering is verbose in RDF 15:29:13 and so fairly tedious. 15:29:15 Suzan_Uskudarli has joined #annotation 15:29:23 (well verbose and ugly, although conceptually simple) 15:29:41 shepazu: I think ordering is difficult in RDF, a sequence is very important for some (e.g. priority, selectors), not that important for others 15:30:20 ... construct specific for use case could be more simple 15:30:39 q? 15:30:41 +1 15:30:49 azaroth: more focussed, the better, so use-case driven is good 15:30:59 ... to complete the implementations (cfr charter) 15:31:31 azaroth: we'll continue with the WD as it stands, multiplicity could be handled at TPAC 15:31:47 Topic: RangeFinder 15:31:56 s/RangeFinder/FindText/ 15:32:24 shepazu: I put something together, fit for a FPWD 15:32:41 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Oct/0017.html 15:32:52 ... we got technical feedback from WebApps (great!) 15:32:52 http://w3c.github.io/findtext/ 15:33:31 ... feedback1: what about Shadow DOM (a way do develop custom components, to be reused, e.g., a slider) 15:33:59 ... behind the scenes of the slider, a tiny DOM is added underneath the -element --> shadow DOM 15:34:20 ... shadow DOM increases the complexity of the tree, so will have effect on FindText 15:34:35 ... no good way to represent ranges in shadow DOM yet 15:35:27 ... feedback2: positive feedback from google Japan, connected me with Yandex people 15:36:04 ... he pointed out serializing DOM is not only way, 2 other (non-standardized) methods exist 15:37:34 ... but it's out there :) 15:37:59 q? 15:38:09 q+ 15:38:14 ack fjh 15:41:28 q+ 15:41:32 ack TimCole 15:41:40 azaroth: cfc is out, +1 is encouraged 15:41:59 TimCole: what were the other serialization methods? 15:42:14 shepazu: textSerializeAPI, which is done under covers 15:42:29 ... of browsers 15:42:46 ... findText uses hidden - but similar - mechanisms under the hood 15:42:56 ... for at least Blink and Gecko browsers 15:43:20 TimCole: better strategy is making these hidden mechanisms normative? 15:43:29 q+ 15:43:47 shepazu: if we specifying currently existing mechanisms, it slows down the spec, but speeds up the uptake 15:43:54 +1 to paving cowpaths 15:43:58 ack ivan 15:45:51 q? 15:45:51 need 5 min for that 15:46:24 Topic: Publication schedule 15:46:34 fjh: last possible publication date is 20/10 15:46:48 ... we need to do an e-mail, also takes some days 15:47:11 ... maybe we need a (short) cfc 15:47:34 ack shepazu 15:47:35 ... if we want to publish before TPAC, there is tight timing 15:48:32 shepazu: FindText needs formalities (because FPWD), other publications do not 15:48:49 +1 to auto publishing 15:49:16 +1 to auto piublishing 15:50:02 shepazu: what about: cfc now, whether to publish or not 15:50:05 +1 to no CFC and +1 to publish 15:50:20 Draft: http://azaroth42.github.io/web-annotation/model/wd/index-renamed.html 15:50:46 Topic model draft 15:50:55 azaroth: up to 4.4 15:51:10 ... should be done by tomorrow 15:51:14 ... working on protocol next 15:51:28 ivan, can you please set up auto WD publishing for model and protocol so Rob can use it? 15:51:38 ... we should be easily good to go for a publication next week 15:52:05 ... protocol has less text, and significant change is about paging, so that should also go quickly 15:52:27 fjh: you can send cfc when you are done with the draft 15:52:43 ... cfc until tuesday, publication request for thursday 15:53:17 ... about protocol, maybe not that urgent 15:54:01 azaroth: maybe we can publish the protocol document by the 15th or 20th 15:54:06 q? 15:54:10 Topic: TPAC 15:54:30 fjh 15:55:22 fjh: joint meetings: social is possible, DPUB request has been sent, WebApps not necessary, TAG is constrained on monday, I18n also sent request 15:55:31 ... breakout is possible, if anyone can lead 15:55:43 azaroth: I will be there 15:55:55 fjh: breakout can be used to reach out to community 15:56:13 azaroth: I can lead the breakout, at least for model and protocol 15:56:38 ... can FindText also be put in the breakout session? 15:56:58 shepazu: I think it is appealing to a larger group of people 15:57:16 ACTION azaroth to set up wiki page for breakout on Annotation 15:57:16 Created ACTION-28 - Set up wiki page for breakout on annotation [on Robert Sanderson - due 2015-10-14]. 15:58:41 fjh: exact planning for TPAC is pending, depending on the answers of the other groups 15:59:22 Topic: Adjourn 15:59:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:59:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/10/07-annotation-minutes.html ivan 15:59:43 trackbot, end telcon 15:59:43 Zakim, list attendees 15:59:43 As of this point the attendees have been Frederick_Hirsch, Rob_Sanderson, Ivan_Herman, Jacob_Jett, shepazu, Tim_Cole, Ben_De_Meester, Benjamin_Young, TB_Dinesh, Paolo_Ciccarese, 15:59:46 ... davis_salisbury 15:59:51 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:59:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/10/07-annotation-minutes.html trackbot 15:59:52 RRSAgent, bye 15:59:52 I see no action items