IRC log of dpub-aria on 2015-09-24
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:57:22 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #dpub-aria
- 12:57:22 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/09/24-dpub-aria-irc
- 12:58:12 [janina]
- present+ janina
- 12:58:32 [tzviya]
- present+ tzviya
- 12:59:04 [tzviya]
- agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpub-aria/2015Sep/0010.html
- 12:59:14 [tzviya]
- this is DPUB-ARIA
- 12:59:47 [tzviya]
- chair: Tzviya
- 13:00:50 [janina]
- present+ Janina
- 13:00:55 [mgylling]
- mgylling has joined #dpub-aria
- 13:02:03 [ivan]
- Present+ ivan
- 13:02:33 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- richardschwerdtfeger has joined #dpub-aria
- 13:02:58 [mgylling]
- Present+ Markus
- 13:03:15 [mgylling]
- scribenick mgylling
- 13:03:50 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger
- 13:04:40 [mgylling]
- topic: open issues
- 13:04:47 [tzviya]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/87
- 13:04:53 [mgylling]
- tzviya: proposal to change prefix from dpub to doc
- 13:05:27 [mgylling]
- … the general thought is that using dpub limits audience, broaden exposure by more general prefix
- 13:05:39 [mgylling]
- rich: we might get pushback from other people
- 13:05:49 [mgylling]
- … is it floated to html5 wg, microsoft?
- 13:05:54 [mgylling]
- tzviya: not yet
- 13:07:20 [mgylling]
- tzivya: other than a possible microsoft objection, are we comfortable with the new prefix?
- 13:07:46 [mgylling]
- janina: why generalize it?
- 13:07:52 [ivan]
- q+
- 13:08:00 [mgylling]
- … seems to me there is value to associated with digital publishing as a brand
- 13:08:17 [tzviya]
- ack ivan
- 13:08:56 [mgylling]
- ivan: the other issue however is that it is not necessarily good to keep digital publishing in its own silo
- 13:09:14 [mgylling]
- … it has been that way, and it does not necessarily help
- 13:09:25 [mgylling]
- … not something no the side, but that is relevant for core web usage
- 13:09:43 [mgylling]
- … I would be pleased if somebody produced vanilla html5 doc with these terms
- 13:11:12 [mgylling]
- … we have to run the idea through others and see if we get pushbacks… its not the end of the world
- 13:11:26 [mgylling]
- janina: spending a lot of time on this is probably not worthwhile
- 13:11:41 [mgylling]
- rich: who from DPIG is going to raise this with microsoft
- 13:12:15 [mgylling]
- rich: suggest tzviya send an email to cynthia
- 13:12:26 [mgylling]
- tzviya: is ms the only organization we need comments from?
- 13:12:35 [mgylling]
- rich: you can post to public-pf
- 13:13:13 [mgylling]
- tzviya: and lets bring this up again on our next meeting
- 13:13:28 [mgylling]
- topic: additional terms
- 13:13:56 [mgylling]
- tzviya: we dont need to go through all additional terms now, we have some questions about them
- 13:14:08 [mgylling]
- … is the role term in ARIA?
- 13:14:21 [mgylling]
- rich: no it does not, we have definitions and things like that
- 13:14:50 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#term
- 13:15:08 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#definition
- 13:15:22 [mgylling]
- s/no it does not/yes it is
- 13:15:40 [mgylling]
- tzviya: this is going to affect how we do glossaries etc
- 13:16:41 [mgylling]
- tzviya: next questions: we put in a new role “errata” or “erratum”, if we put this on an li, how does that affect list based semantics
- 13:17:09 [mgylling]
- rich: why do you need erratum?
- 13:17:20 [mgylling]
- tzviya: think we only want the plural
- 13:17:41 [mgylling]
- tzviya: somebody in PF recommended using both container and individual item
- 13:18:23 [mgylling]
- tzviya: there are a few things that can be done individually or in group, like footnotes, not always standalone section
- 13:19:12 [mgylling]
- rich: can an erratum land elsewhere as well?
- 13:19:29 [mgylling]
- tzviya: probably no
- 13:20:16 [mgylling]
- … the first issue we wanted to clarify is whether listness is overriden, the answer to that is yes
- 13:20:42 [mgylling]
- rich: but then you will have an issue with each of the list items in an errata
- 13:21:28 [mgylling]
- tzviya: second issue is bloat caused by plural and singular, some of these are because they are sometimes in standalone sections, sometimes not.
- 13:21:58 [mgylling]
- tzviya: moving on to the mappings, terms that are implicit
- 13:22:39 [ShaneM]
- ShaneM has joined #dpub-aria
- 13:23:08 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#listitem
- 13:23:34 [mgylling]
- rich: listitem says its on the context of a group or a list, the question is for erratum, is it a group, a landmark or what?
- 13:25:25 [mgylling]
- tzviya: the reason we had both, is that on some of the early calls, this was recommended because implication does not work in aria
- 13:26:28 [mgylling]
- rich: we need to come back to the taxonomy, its largely for modelling purposes, we have another spec that wants to override like a list with a different role, we need to figure out how to handle that in the aria spec
- 13:27:21 [mgylling]
- … if it subclasses list, do we know if it can have listitems
- 13:27:46 [mgylling]
- … normally dealing with inheritance of states and properties, we haven’t dealt with descendants
- 13:28:03 [mgylling]
- … because some things are multiple inheritance
- 13:28:11 [mgylling]
- s/are mult/have mult
- 13:29:13 [mgylling]
- rich: another way to do this: if someone iz extending the aria spec, we’ve talked about extending objects, but extending list etc needs to be worked out
- 13:29:45 [mgylling]
- rich: the other big thing I think is whether something is a landmark or just a group of items, its not clear which things you consider to be landmarks
- 13:30:11 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/dpub-aam/dpub-aam.html
- 13:30:33 [mgylling]
- … if you view the mapping spec, go down to role mappings view as table, you can see which things are landmarks, groups or panels
- 13:31:20 [mgylling]
- rich: is dpub-locator a link?
- 13:31:23 [mgylling]
- markus: yes
- 13:31:38 [mgylling]
- rich: why wouldnt we just have link?
- 13:35:08 [mgylling]
- markus: [explains locator]
- 13:35:21 [mgylling]
- rich: this reminds me about what we are looking at for cognitive
- 13:35:50 [mgylling]
- rich: this is a function rather than a role
- 13:36:41 [mgylling]
- … cognitive wants to say e.g. that a button accesses the help system or makes a purchase, used also for styling
- 13:37:27 [mgylling]
- rich: its almost like you want a new attribute
- 13:39:45 [mgylling]
- rich: look at the api mappings: on mac, role is link and subrole locator, but if you land on it and it says locator that is confusing, we are going to say one or the other to the user
- 13:41:24 [mgylling]
- … for UI automation they only give you one vehicle to tell you, if we have another attribute, its a way to convey information
- 13:41:48 [mgylling]
- tzviya: it doesnt duplicate the generic back function
- 13:42:08 [mgylling]
- … and it is activatable
- 13:43:35 [tzviya]
- markus: these are <a href role ="locator">
- 13:44:09 [tzviya]
- rich: you definitely want to say role ="link", because AT does not know what locators are
- 13:44:34 [tzviya]
- ...we almost need an ARIA function that we can use for Cognitive and DPUB
- 13:44:50 [tzviya]
- ...I will talk to Lisa Seaman
- 13:45:13 [mgylling]
- <a href=“” role=“link dpub-locator”>…</a>
- 13:45:14 [tzviya]
- tzviya: anything that ends with *ref is a link
- 13:46:17 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- <a href=“” role=“dpub-locator link:>. …
- 13:47:16 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- <a href=“” role=“link” aria-func=“dpub-locator”>. …
- 13:48:05 [tzviya]
- rich: recommends last of listed options. This would be a property
- 13:48:24 [tzviya]
- tzviya: are you recommending removing these roles from DPUB?
- 13:48:55 [tzviya]
- rich: don't change anything yet. Will get back to you shortly
- 13:49:12 [tzviya]
- rich: I also need to know which roles are landmarks and which are groups
- 13:49:58 [tzviya]
- ...I am asking Cynthia if the strings should have the prefix or not
- 13:50:44 [tzviya]
- rich: One would expect AT to expose landmarks in a hierachical view of page
- 13:51:41 [tzviya]
- tzviya: we'll take a look at the existing landmarks and assess
- 13:52:55 [tzviya]
- topic: TPAC
- 13:55:26 [tzviya]
- tzviya: DPUB meets on Thu/Fri. Afternoon so that Markus can call
- 14:01:40 [tzviya]
- tzviya: tentative meeting for Thursday afternoon 2pm
- 14:02:02 [tzviya]
- rrsagents, make minutes public
- 14:02:10 [tzviya]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 14:02:18 [tzviya]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:02:18 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/09/24-dpub-aria-minutes.html tzviya
- 14:51:03 [janina]
- janina has joined #dpub-aria
- 14:52:55 [richardschwerdtfeger]
- richardschwerdtfeger has joined #dpub-aria
- 15:32:08 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #dpub-aria