IRC log of tt on 2015-08-27

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:01:41 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #tt
14:01:41 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/08/27-tt-irc
14:01:43 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
14:01:43 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #tt
14:01:45 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be TTML
14:01:45 [Zakim]
I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
14:01:46 [trackbot]
Meeting: Timed Text Working Group Teleconference
14:01:46 [trackbot]
Date: 27 August 2015
14:02:26 [pal]
pal has joined #tt
14:05:30 [nigel]
Present: pal, nigel, andreas, mike, Courtney
14:05:32 [atai]
atai has joined #tt
14:05:41 [nigel]
Regrets: thierry, frans
14:05:45 [nigel]
chair: nigel
14:05:48 [nigel]
scribe: nigel
14:06:18 [nigel]
Topic: This meeting
14:07:21 [nigel]
nigel: Checks agenda with group. AOB?
14:07:28 [nigel]
group: No other business
14:07:34 [nigel]
Topic: Action Items
14:08:02 [nigel]
nigel: All the actions in this section on the agenda have had no work done on them, so we'll move on.
14:08:13 [nigel]
Topic: TPAC 2015
14:08:39 [nigel]
nigel: Any issues, agenda requests, queries of any sort?
14:08:55 [nigel]
group: Nothing to discuss right now
14:09:03 [nigel]
Topic: HTMLCue proposal progress update
14:09:09 [nigel]
action-415?
14:09:09 [trackbot]
action-415 -- Thierry Michel to Send nigel email addresses of htmlcue proposal reviewers -- due 2015-08-27 -- OPEN
14:09:09 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/415
14:09:22 [nigel]
nigel: Thierry did this - I received the addresses from him
14:09:25 [nigel]
close action-415
14:09:25 [trackbot]
Closed action-415.
14:09:30 [nigel]
action-416?
14:09:30 [trackbot]
action-416 -- Nigel Megitt to Edit proposal and send to htmlcue proposal reviewers as listed by tmichel, following action-415 -- due 2015-08-27 -- OPEN
14:09:30 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/416
14:10:01 [nigel]
nigel: Apologies I haven't managed to do this one yet, hopefully by the middle of next week.
14:11:44 [nigel]
nigel: I don't think there's anything else on this one - but it's worth noting that the dash.js
14:11:57 [nigel]
... project has recently merged an EBU-TT-D implementation that takes this approach, and I
14:12:17 [nigel]
... think had to subvert the VTTCue to do it, but it demonstrates the HTMLCue principle nicely.
14:12:47 [nigel]
mike: The 1.5 release should be next week I believe - the change has been merged.
14:12:59 [nigel]
... It also supports VTT captions.
14:13:16 [nigel]
Topic: Unicode liaison
14:13:20 [nigel]
action-417?
14:13:20 [trackbot]
action-417 -- Nigel Megitt to Create ticket with unicode for cldr proposal, or add to existing one. -- due 2015-08-27 -- OPEN
14:13:20 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/417
14:13:40 [nigel]
nigel: Again, apologies from me - we decided last week to create a ticket for this and I took
14:13:46 [nigel]
... this action but haven't managed to do it yet.
14:14:51 [nigel]
pal: I'm happy to do this. It's just the act of filing the text of the message we sent before, right?
14:15:00 [nigel]
nigel: Yes, just the same message that we sent to Mark Davis.
14:15:05 [nigel]
pal: I'm happy to do that.
14:15:24 [nigel]
nigel: I wasn't clear if we should add it to the existing ticket or adding a new one.
14:15:32 [nigel]
pal: I may create a new ticket referencing the old one.
14:16:16 [nigel]
nigel: I've updated the action and re-assigned it to Pierre. Thank you Pierre!
14:16:21 [nigel]
pal: No problem!
14:16:47 [nigel]
Topic: ATSC liaison
14:17:20 [nigel]
nigel: There's an email here at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2015Aug/0041.html
14:18:08 [nigel]
mike: I don't have too much to add - I proposed a response and nigel proposed some edits.
14:19:25 [nigel]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2015Aug/0019.html
14:21:10 [nigel]
nigel: There was also a point from glenn saying that just using RGB colours and saying that they are in a different colour space might not be enough.
14:21:52 [nigel]
mike: I don't think that required any changes in the message back to ATSC.
14:21:56 [nigel]
nigel: I agree with that.
14:22:15 [nigel]
mike: Essentially we don't understand why they want to use a new colour model. We identified
14:22:29 [nigel]
... a possible problem of helping presentation processors do the compositing but that's not
14:22:32 [nigel]
... what ATSC asked for.
14:22:44 [nigel]
... I think we've captured the sense of the group.
14:23:12 [nigel]
Action: nigel Send response back to ATSC as per https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2015Aug/0019.html
14:23:12 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-418 - Send response back to atsc as per https://lists.w3.org/archives/member/member-tt/2015aug/0019.html [on Nigel Megitt - due 2015-09-03].
14:23:56 [nigel]
Topic: @codecs registry
14:24:08 [nigel]
nigel: Again this has been a subject of some discussion over the past week. I believe the main
14:24:22 [nigel]
... point is to see if we can progress this more quickly than TTML2?
14:25:28 [nigel]
nigel: Glenn had proposed putting the @codecs registry in a separate document a while back
14:25:44 [nigel]
... but I think we put it back into TTML2 because the IANA guidelines are to put it in the specification
14:26:36 [nigel]
... that it applies to. If we can separate it out then I don't see why we shouldn't publish separately.
14:26:43 [nigel]
pal: Is there any reason why it can't be a Note?
14:27:02 [nigel]
nigel: Only if it has to have normative status, i.e. it has to be a Recommendation. That would
14:27:05 [pal]
http://www.w3.org/TR/media-source/byte-stream-format-registry.html
14:27:19 [nigel]
nigel: incur some process delay whichever way we do it.
14:27:27 [pal]
See A.2 at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-source/#bib-MSE-REGISTRY
14:27:44 [nigel]
pal: The MSE registry posted above is an informative reference, which is a prior example we can reference.
14:27:56 [nigel]
nigel: That's helpful - well specified.
14:28:02 [nigel]
mike: What was the process for that?
14:28:25 [nigel]
pal: None! I think it was consensus of the group to publish it. I remember the exact same
14:28:47 [nigel]
... discussion in the HTML MSE Task Force - I think they ended up here. So one thought is we
14:29:02 [nigel]
... could go down that path. I may be able to do some archaeology and dig up the minutes, but
14:29:14 [nigel]
... maybe we should go down those lines since that's what they do in the HTML Media Task Force.
14:29:21 [nigel]
s/MSE Task/Media Task
14:31:06 [nigel]
nigel: It looks like this is a lookup table to be helpful rather than defining the MIME subtypes itself.
14:31:19 [nigel]
pal: It does more than simply replicate information present elsewhere.
14:31:37 [nigel]
... It also sets a Generate Timestamps Flag. It has a process for adding entries to the registry.
14:32:34 [nigel]
nigel: I think the draft proposal as it stands now is:
14:32:49 [nigel]
... 1) Create a WG Note describing the registry and the @codecs parameter usage.
14:33:01 [nigel]
... 2) Activate the registry page, either on the wiki or on /TR.
14:33:20 [nigel]
... 3) Also include the syntax for the @codecs parameter and its IANA registration and usage in TTML2.
14:34:05 [nigel]
pal: I think I found the email that closed the discussion...
14:34:47 [nigel]
mike: If there's a history of W3C doing this with WG consensus do we need a note?
14:34:54 [nigel]
nigel: The note would be the expression of the WG consensus.
14:35:27 [nigel]
mike: The registry that pierre linked to isn't even a Note - it's just a Document.
14:35:27 [pal]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Jun/0027.html
14:36:33 [nigel]
pal: The head of the thread is:
14:36:36 [pal]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Jun/0013.html
14:37:31 [nigel]
nigel: Seems like this last email suggests it will be okay.
14:37:44 [nigel]
pal: Reading the last email, it seems as though as long as the Registry only references other
14:37:56 [nigel]
... normative documents that seems to be fine. It doesn't have normative references of its own.
14:38:08 [nigel]
mike: It's not intended to be normative - it's just a process and a table of values.
14:38:22 [nigel]
pal: If you read the entire thread they ran into the exact issue that we have, that the W3C doesn't
14:38:36 [nigel]
... have an explicit process for registries or things of that nature. Making it a consensus document
14:38:43 [nigel]
... seems to be a reasonable process.
14:39:45 [nigel]
nigel: Obviously a Note can refer to something non-normative as well as normative.
14:39:51 [nigel]
... Mike, what's the industry context?
14:40:15 [nigel]
mike: It's inadequate to signal TTML as simply the media type, just as it is inadequate to indicate
14:40:33 [nigel]
... video or audio without enough information to deduce if it can be decoded. So all of those
14:40:50 [nigel]
... media streams have a codec value that give more information e.g. profile, bitrate, resolution etc.
14:41:04 [nigel]
... TTML is just the same. I think it's just adequate to signal the profile to which it complies.
14:41:21 [nigel]
... MPEG asked W3C what to do about it and W3C offered to host a registry. MPEG was concerned
14:41:34 [nigel]
... about the long strings that were being used for the profile designators so asked for a more
14:41:45 [nigel]
... concise value to be used in place of the profile URL.
14:43:06 [nigel]
nigel: I'm aware that we don't have staff present, who may have a view, and I'd like people to
14:43:20 [nigel]
... have a chance to review the links that Pierre has posted. So I'd like to hold off this as a
14:43:34 [nigel]
... proposal until next week. Is there anything else to be done in the meantime? Can we draft
14:43:41 [nigel]
... the document? Is it just the existing wiki page?
14:43:59 [nigel]
https://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/CodecsRegistry
14:44:09 [nigel]
mike: That doesn't contain all the profiles that we know about - there are more to add.
14:44:29 [nigel]
nigel: Is there anything else that would need to be done?
14:44:51 [nigel]
mike: I think so, it's been static for a while. I think it's fair to put people on notice that we propose
14:44:57 [nigel]
... to make this 'live' in the near future.
14:45:34 [nigel]
nigel: Would anyone like to take the action to populate the table with the other values that we are aware of?
14:46:22 [nigel]
mike: I'm happy to do that. We should notify the organisations of what we plan too. I'll try to make them 4 or 5 letters.
14:46:29 [nigel]
nigel: It might be fair to make them all 4 if we can.
14:46:45 [nigel]
mike: If you want them to be meaningful then it will be easier if we allow ourselves to go to 5,
14:46:52 [nigel]
... such as EBUTT, CFFTT, IMSC1 etc.
14:47:14 [nigel]
Action: mike Add other TTML profiles to the CodecsRegistry wiki page
14:47:15 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-419 - Add other ttml profiles to the codecsregistry wiki page [on Mike Dolan - due 2015-09-03].
14:48:25 [nigel]
nigel: Looking at the agenda, I don't think there's anything else we have to discuss, so I'll adjourn the meeting.
14:48:55 [nigel]
nigel: Thanks everyone! [Adjourns meeting]
14:50:08 [nigel]
rrsagent, make logs public
14:50:12 [nigel]
rrsagent, draft minutes
14:50:12 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/08/27-tt-minutes.html nigel
14:57:45 [nigel]
s/well specified/well spotted
14:58:23 [nigel]
s/a note?/a Note?
14:58:31 [nigel]
s/The note would/The Note would
14:59:41 [nigel]
rrsagent, draft minutes
14:59:41 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/08/27-tt-minutes.html nigel
15:00:56 [nigel]
ScribeOptions: -final -noEmbedDiagnostics
15:00:57 [nigel]
rrsagent, draft minutes
15:00:57 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/08/27-tt-minutes.html nigel
15:15:17 [nigel_]
nigel_ has joined #tt
15:16:20 [nigel__]
nigel__ has joined #tt
16:28:43 [nigel]
nigel has joined #tt
16:31:52 [nigel_]
nigel_ has joined #tt
16:59:45 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #tt