12:59:24 RRSAgent has joined #dwbp 12:59:24 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/07/03-dwbp-irc 12:59:26 RRSAgent, make logs 351 12:59:26 Zakim has joined #dwbp 12:59:28 Zakim, this will be DWBP 12:59:28 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 12:59:29 Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 12:59:29 Date: 03 July 2015 12:59:40 chair: deirdrelee 12:59:44 present+ deirdrelee 12:59:51 zakim, who is here? 12:59:51 sorry, deirdrelee, I don't know what conference this is 12:59:53 On IRC I see RRSAgent, deirdrelee, cgueret, yaso, phila, trackbot, hadleybeeman, rhiaro 13:00:10 zakim, this will be dwbp 13:00:10 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, deirdrelee 13:00:28 Caroline has joined #DWBP 13:00:56 deirdrelee, nope 13:01:04 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150703 13:01:23 present+ phila 13:01:36 MTCarrasco has joined #dwbp 13:01:42 deirdrelee, webex says it does not have access to my sound card 13:02:47 ericstephan has joined #dwbp 13:02:58 jerdeb has joined #DWBP 13:03:00 present+ Yaso 13:03:00 Hi just dialing in... 13:03:56 present+ 13:03:59 present+ Caroline 13:04:06 present+ MTCarrasco 13:04:12 deirdrelee, just called in with Skype and it works 13:04:32 deirdrelee, of course I'm on Linux. What else ? ;-) 13:04:45 zakim, who is here? 13:04:45 sorry, ericstephan, I don't know what conference this is 13:04:47 On IRC I see jerdeb, ericstephan, MTCarrasco, Caroline, Zakim, RRSAgent, deirdrelee, cgueret, yaso, phila, trackbot, hadleybeeman, rhiaro 13:05:08 I'm on linux also :-/ 13:05:14 Present+ hadleybeeman 13:05:28 RRSAgent, draft minutes 13:05:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/07/03-dwbp-minutes.html phila 13:05:44 present+ cgueret 13:05:54 present+ ericstephan 13:06:22 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:06:29 RRSAgent, draft minutes 13:06:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/07/03-dwbp-minutes.html phila 13:06:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes 13:06:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/07/03-dwbp-minutes.html phila 13:07:00 Adrianoc-UFMG has joined #dwbp 13:07:09 present+ jerdeb 13:07:31 hadleybeeman has changed the topic to: agenda: agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150703 13:07:40 hadleybeeman has changed the topic to: agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150703 13:07:58 yup 13:08:06 scribe: cgueret 13:08:39 I self-muted did that help? 13:09:04 deirdrelee, two topics for today 13:09:11 ... will discuss open issues 13:09:21 topic: f2f meeting 13:09:46 deirdrelee, f2f should be in Brasil 13:09:52 laufer has joined #dwbp 13:10:14 ... to be fair with the people from the group leaving there and had travel to other locations in the past 13:10:26 24 and 25 13:10:35 of September 13:10:42 ... proposal is one f2f in SP 13:11:03 http://conferenciaweb.w3c.br/ 13:11:05 q+ 13:11:07 ... there would be a conference preceding the f2f 13:11:17 q? 13:11:20 ... comments ? 13:11:42 Caroline, we have the conference and a call for paper for it 13:11:44 http://conferenciaweb.w3c.br/call-for-submissions/ 13:11:45 ack Caroline 13:11:52 ... could help people to come if they get a paper in 13:12:07 ... everyone is invited to submit something 13:12:10 q+ 13:12:53 ... ping Caroline for questions about the conference 13:13:28 ack ericstephan 13:13:32 ericstephan, it does help to know there is a conference 13:13:34 present+ laufer 13:13:56 ... other hurdle for us is the window for travelling outside the country 13:14:14 q+ 13:14:18 +1 ericstephan! 13:14:43 phila, is it presentations or interactive discussions at the conference ? 13:14:45 ack phila 13:14:58 ... what kind of conference is it ? size ? 13:15:06 It's a conference for +- 400 people 13:15:13 mostly developers 13:15:21 but there's also business people 13:15:33 Caroline, we have different formats 13:15:41 ... tutorial, speech, round table 13:15:42 q+ 13:15:45 ... it's flexible 13:16:07 A lightning talk? 13:16:26 ... attenders are mostly devs 13:16:39 ... but we have a track "data on the web" 13:16:54 ... will be a round table 13:17:04 gatemezi has joined #dwbp 13:17:08 ... speak about semantic web and data on the web 13:17:27 http://conferenciaweb.w3c.br/call-for-submissions/ 13:17:46 yaso, just sent the link for the CFP 13:18:04 ack yaso 13:18:06 ... very flexible, just sent us an email 13:18:13 http://conferenciaweb.w3c.br/call-for-submissions/ 13:18:14 s/sent/send 13:18:43 topic: DUV 13:19:03 ericstephan, do we want to approve minutes first ? 13:19:16 :-) 13:19:24 PROPOSED: Accept last week's meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-06-26 13:19:28 its the summer heat 13:19:31 +1 13:19:32 :-) 13:19:36 +1 13:19:36 +1 13:19:38 +1 13:19:44 +1 13:19:45 +1 13:20:02 RESOLVED: Accept last week's meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-06-26 13:20:15 topic: DUV 13:20:34 -> http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-duv/ The Dataset Usage Vocabulary FPWD 13:20:56 ericstephan, editors not available at this meeting 13:21:06 ... propose to use the time of this meeting to gather feedback 13:21:13 ... wait for closing issues 13:21:24 deirdrelee, ok 13:21:26 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open 13:22:00 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/169 13:22:01 issue-169? 13:22:01 issue-169 -- Should usage be specified at the Dataset or Distribution level? -- open 13:22:01 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/169 13:22:33 Q? 13:22:34 ericstephan: carlos is not on the call 13:22:54 ... 3 constructs in the vocabulary 13:23:04 ... 1) how to someone may use a dataset 13:23:09 ... 2) citations 13:23:15 ... 3) describe feedback 13:23:42 q+ 13:23:48 ... probably looking at that from a pragmatic point of view. What is an application consuming ? 13:24:20 ... depending on circumstances both make sense 13:24:31 ... initially described at dataset level 13:24:34 ack phila 13:24:41 phila: answer is "it depends" 13:24:48 ... most cases at dataset level 13:25:27 ... distribution level is important when feedback is provided 13:25:44 ... for citation and feedback the dataset level is probably the most sensible one 13:26:07 ... we should be able to say the DUV can be applied to either and give example for it 13:26:19 q+ 13:26:21 ... be flexible and provide guidance 13:26:37 q+ 13:26:48 ericstephan: thanks! 13:27:39 ericstephan: the idea would be to include distributions in the model then 13:28:22 ... there were discussions on how to define data on the web and we settled on datasets 13:28:39 ... then saw there was also a lot of discussions about distributions 13:28:54 ack deirdrelee 13:28:58 ack laufer 13:29:09 laufer: really important issue 13:29:18 ... good to include distributions in the model 13:29:34 ... dataset is an abstract thing 13:29:50 ... a consumer never sees a dataset 13:29:55 ... just a distribution of it 13:30:19 ericstephan: slight disagreement here, it depends on the community you talk to 13:30:41 ... for some a "dataset" is a large combinaison of distributions 13:31:26 laufer: there is no such thing as direct access to a dataset 13:31:29 q+ 13:31:39 ... publishing gives access through a distribution 13:32:41 ericstephan: taking back on the example for climate scientists a dataset is a collection of distributions 13:33:11 ... we do not try to track causality here 13:33:27 q? 13:33:38 ack phila 13:33:45 phila: everyone is right 13:34:05 ... we have on purpose defined things vaguely so far 13:34:44 ... so we have to make it so that the vocabulary can be applied to both 13:35:15 ... and then specific usage is context dependant 13:35:47 deirdrelee: there could be cases where feedback on distributions could help publisher decided on which formats to keep 13:36:11 ericstephan: ok to be flexible and high level 13:36:15 +1 13:36:49 -> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/ Our comment tracker 13:36:49 q+ 13:36:58 ericstephan: have not got feedback on the vocabulary except from specific contacts established 13:37:21 ... we are re-using things people already use 13:38:09 phila: ivan was interested, he is in charge of open annotation group 13:38:32 s/dataset is an abstract thing/dataset is a thing that a consumer does not have a direct access/ 13:38:35 ... they want to express what motivates somebody to provide an annotation 13:38:40 q+ 13:38:44 ack phila 13:38:55 ... relates to us to knowing why would someone bother writing DUV data 13:39:31 deirdrelee: particularly relevant for APIs 13:40:09 ... motivation scenario could be a link with the consumers through the APIs 13:40:13 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/170 13:40:17 ack deirdrelee 13:40:30 issue-170? 13:40:30 issue-170 -- Should we use Software or earl:Software instead of duv:Application? -- open 13:40:30 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/170 13:40:59 ericstephan: good comments about vocab reuse 13:41:48 ... the duv:Application relates to work from Bernadette on modeling 13:42:03 ... we used prov:Activity before 13:42:15 ... maybe prov:Agent would have been better 13:42:23 q? 13:42:23 q+ 13:42:28 ... curious to get comments on what to use 13:42:30 http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#Software 13:42:32 ack phila 13:42:56 phila: EARL has been around for a long time 13:43:04 ... not updated since May 2011 13:43:12 A Software is any piece of software such as an authoring tool, browser, or evaluation tool. It can be used to describe an Assertor, such as a validation or other quality assurance tool, and it can be used to describe a Test Subject (for example to test compliance of an authoring tool to Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines [ATAG] or of a browser to User Agent Accessibility Guidelines [UAAG]). 13:43:13 More on Software Classes http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/terms?q=Software&type=class on LOV 13:43:34 ... they have something specific in mind 13:43:44 ... and define it as a subclass of DOAP 13:43:58 ... this may not be what the DUV is after 13:44:26 ... earl:Sofware is a sub of doap:Project 13:44:33 ... so maybe use doap directly 13:44:45 ericstephan: a bit concerned about the lack of updates 13:46:30 phila: if a publisher wants to know the data has been used in some software it is probably not so important to know the exact nature of the software 13:46:34 ericstephan: agree 13:46:36 q+ 13:46:53 ack laufer 13:47:01 laufer: like the idea of prov:Activity 13:47:27 q+ to say prov:Agent would fit better than prov:Activity 13:48:14 ericstephan: everything can be mapped to prov 13:48:17 a Dataset as a kind of prov:hadPrimarySource 13:48:33 q? 13:48:56 yep, speaking right now 13:49:20 ack cgueret 13:49:20 cgueret, you wanted to say prov:Agent would fit better than prov:Activity 13:49:20 Agree with ericstephan. 13:49:22 I believe you are correct cgueret 13:50:31 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/171 13:50:33 issue-171? 13:50:33 issue-171 -- Should dct:creator or doap:developer be used instead of duv:developedBy? -- open 13:50:33 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/171 13:50:54 ericstephan: another re-use question 13:51:20 +1 to using DC unless there's a reason not to 13:51:26 ... preference to DC 13:51:30 +1 to DC 13:51:31 but an Agent consumes an Entity? 13:51:35 +1 for DC too 13:52:22 deirdrelee: maybe good to define publisher and creator with two matching dates 13:53:06 ericstephan: looking at DCAT they re-use a lot DC 13:53:33 ... we re-use DCAT as a base and should aim at being complementary 13:53:42 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/172 13:53:48 issue-172? 13:53:48 issue-172 -- Should duv:generates be removed? -- open 13:53:48 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/172 13:54:39 ericstephan: added this property because we thought data consumers write things 13:54:42 q+ 13:54:46 q+ to leave that to PROV 13:55:08 ericstephan: does it break something to have it ? 13:55:23 ... is a consumer creating something becoming a publisher ? 13:55:45 deirdrelee: the property is definitely valid but we may not need to include it in a vocab about usage 13:55:57 ack deirdrelee 13:56:16 I thought there is an axiom stating that duv:Consumer owl:differentFrom duv:Publisher 13:56:33 cgueret: I don't think we have to express it in DUV. If you want to say that some data was produced by an application, PROV has it covered so we can just point to that 13:56:42 ack cgueret 13:56:42 cgueret, you wanted to leave that to PROV 13:57:07 ericstephan: Maybe some guidance should be included without having something as part of the vocabulary. 13:57:19 ... you could leverage PROV if you wanted to 13:57:22 cgueret: Yep 13:57:29 + 1 to ericstephan point. And with samples 13:58:52 ericstephan: ok, so resolve not to put it in the model then but describe how prov can be used when needed 13:59:08 deirdrelee: we can continue discussing on mail 13:59:15 ericstephan: thx for the feedback! 13:59:53 phila: took two days to get the documents to be publishable 14:00:08 ... maybe some changes will be back-propagated to the editor drafts 14:00:18 Thanks phila for all the support 14:00:23 deirdrelee: next call on DQV 14:00:42 bp and duv and dq connectivity? 14:00:46 hadleybeeman: we need to talk about DCAT next week 14:01:07 bye! 14:01:08 bye all... nice weekend... be careful with sun... use your hats... 14:01:09 deirdrelee: ok and BP doc next week 14:01:09 bye 14:01:12 bye 14:01:19 ciao! 14:01:37 I used my pickup last weekend for a swimming pool laufer 14:01:49 :-) phila 14:01:53 lol, eric 14:01:55 ^_^ phila 14:03:39 regrets+ Makx 16:14:26 Zakim has left #dwbp 18:18:41 yaso has joined #dwbp 18:31:37 yaso has joined #dwbp 18:50:16 yaso has joined #dwbp