IRC log of dwbp on 2015-07-03
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:59:24 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #dwbp
- 12:59:24 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/07/03-dwbp-irc
- 12:59:26 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs 351
- 12:59:26 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #dwbp
- 12:59:28 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be DWBP
- 12:59:28 [Zakim]
- I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
- 12:59:29 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference
- 12:59:29 [trackbot]
- Date: 03 July 2015
- 12:59:40 [deirdrelee]
- chair: deirdrelee
- 12:59:44 [deirdrelee]
- present+ deirdrelee
- 12:59:51 [deirdrelee]
- zakim, who is here?
- 12:59:51 [Zakim]
- sorry, deirdrelee, I don't know what conference this is
- 12:59:53 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, deirdrelee, cgueret, yaso, phila, trackbot, hadleybeeman, rhiaro
- 13:00:10 [deirdrelee]
- zakim, this will be dwbp
- 13:00:10 [Zakim]
- I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, deirdrelee
- 13:00:28 [Caroline]
- Caroline has joined #DWBP
- 13:00:56 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee, nope
- 13:01:04 [deirdrelee]
- agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150703
- 13:01:23 [phila]
- present+ phila
- 13:01:36 [MTCarrasco]
- MTCarrasco has joined #dwbp
- 13:01:42 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee, webex says it does not have access to my sound card
- 13:02:47 [ericstephan]
- ericstephan has joined #dwbp
- 13:02:58 [jerdeb]
- jerdeb has joined #DWBP
- 13:03:00 [phila]
- present+ Yaso
- 13:03:00 [ericstephan]
- Hi just dialing in...
- 13:03:56 [MTCarrasco]
- present+
- 13:03:59 [Caroline]
- present+ Caroline
- 13:04:06 [phila]
- present+ MTCarrasco
- 13:04:12 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee, just called in with Skype and it works
- 13:04:32 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee, of course I'm on Linux. What else ? ;-)
- 13:04:45 [ericstephan]
- zakim, who is here?
- 13:04:45 [Zakim]
- sorry, ericstephan, I don't know what conference this is
- 13:04:47 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see jerdeb, ericstephan, MTCarrasco, Caroline, Zakim, RRSAgent, deirdrelee, cgueret, yaso, phila, trackbot, hadleybeeman, rhiaro
- 13:05:08 [yaso]
- I'm on linux also :-/
- 13:05:14 [hadleybeeman]
- Present+ hadleybeeman
- 13:05:28 [phila]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 13:05:28 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/07/03-dwbp-minutes.html phila
- 13:05:44 [cgueret]
- present+ cgueret
- 13:05:54 [ericstephan]
- present+ ericstephan
- 13:06:22 [phila]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 13:06:29 [phila]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 13:06:29 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/07/03-dwbp-minutes.html phila
- 13:06:53 [phila]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 13:06:53 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/07/03-dwbp-minutes.html phila
- 13:07:00 [Adrianoc-UFMG]
- Adrianoc-UFMG has joined #dwbp
- 13:07:09 [jerdeb]
- present+ jerdeb
- 13:07:31 [hadleybeeman]
- hadleybeeman has changed the topic to: agenda: agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150703
- 13:07:40 [hadleybeeman]
- hadleybeeman has changed the topic to: agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150703
- 13:07:58 [cgueret]
- yup
- 13:08:06 [deirdrelee]
- scribe: cgueret
- 13:08:39 [ericstephan]
- I self-muted did that help?
- 13:09:04 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee, two topics for today
- 13:09:11 [cgueret]
- ... will discuss open issues
- 13:09:21 [cgueret]
- topic: f2f meeting
- 13:09:46 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee, f2f should be in Brasil
- 13:09:52 [laufer]
- laufer has joined #dwbp
- 13:10:14 [cgueret]
- ... to be fair with the people from the group leaving there and had travel to other locations in the past
- 13:10:26 [Caroline]
- 24 and 25
- 13:10:35 [Caroline]
- of September
- 13:10:42 [cgueret]
- ... proposal is one f2f in SP
- 13:11:03 [Caroline]
- http://conferenciaweb.w3c.br/
- 13:11:05 [Caroline]
- q+
- 13:11:07 [cgueret]
- ... there would be a conference preceding the f2f
- 13:11:17 [yaso]
- q?
- 13:11:20 [cgueret]
- ... comments ?
- 13:11:42 [cgueret]
- Caroline, we have the conference and a call for paper for it
- 13:11:44 [Caroline]
- http://conferenciaweb.w3c.br/call-for-submissions/
- 13:11:45 [deirdrelee]
- ack Caroline
- 13:11:52 [cgueret]
- ... could help people to come if they get a paper in
- 13:12:07 [cgueret]
- ... everyone is invited to submit something
- 13:12:10 [ericstephan]
- q+
- 13:12:53 [cgueret]
- ... ping Caroline for questions about the conference
- 13:13:28 [deirdrelee]
- ack ericstephan
- 13:13:32 [cgueret]
- ericstephan, it does help to know there is a conference
- 13:13:34 [laufer]
- present+ laufer
- 13:13:56 [cgueret]
- ... other hurdle for us is the window for travelling outside the country
- 13:14:14 [phila]
- q+
- 13:14:18 [Caroline]
- +1 ericstephan!
- 13:14:43 [cgueret]
- phila, is it presentations or interactive discussions at the conference ?
- 13:14:45 [deirdrelee]
- ack phila
- 13:14:58 [cgueret]
- ... what kind of conference is it ? size ?
- 13:15:06 [yaso]
- It's a conference for +- 400 people
- 13:15:13 [yaso]
- mostly developers
- 13:15:21 [yaso]
- but there's also business people
- 13:15:33 [cgueret]
- Caroline, we have different formats
- 13:15:41 [cgueret]
- ... tutorial, speech, round table
- 13:15:42 [yaso]
- q+
- 13:15:45 [cgueret]
- ... it's flexible
- 13:16:07 [phila]
- A lightning talk?
- 13:16:26 [cgueret]
- ... attenders are mostly devs
- 13:16:39 [cgueret]
- ... but we have a track "data on the web"
- 13:16:54 [cgueret]
- ... will be a round table
- 13:17:04 [gatemezi]
- gatemezi has joined #dwbp
- 13:17:08 [cgueret]
- ... speak about semantic web and data on the web
- 13:17:27 [yaso]
- http://conferenciaweb.w3c.br/call-for-submissions/
- 13:17:46 [cgueret]
- yaso, just sent the link for the CFP
- 13:18:04 [deirdrelee]
- ack yaso
- 13:18:06 [cgueret]
- ... very flexible, just sent us an email
- 13:18:13 [yaso]
- http://conferenciaweb.w3c.br/call-for-submissions/
- 13:18:14 [cgueret]
- s/sent/send
- 13:18:43 [cgueret]
- topic: DUV
- 13:19:03 [cgueret]
- ericstephan, do we want to approve minutes first ?
- 13:19:16 [ericstephan]
- :-)
- 13:19:24 [deirdrelee]
- PROPOSED: Accept last week's meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-06-26
- 13:19:28 [ericstephan]
- its the summer heat
- 13:19:31 [hadleybeeman]
- +1
- 13:19:32 [ericstephan]
- :-)
- 13:19:36 [Caroline]
- +1
- 13:19:36 [Adrianoc-UFMG]
- +1
- 13:19:38 [ericstephan]
- +1
- 13:19:44 [phila]
- +1
- 13:19:45 [laufer]
- +1
- 13:20:02 [deirdrelee]
- RESOLVED: Accept last week's meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2015-06-26
- 13:20:15 [cgueret]
- topic: DUV
- 13:20:34 [phila]
- -> http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-duv/ The Dataset Usage Vocabulary FPWD
- 13:20:56 [cgueret]
- ericstephan, editors not available at this meeting
- 13:21:06 [cgueret]
- ... propose to use the time of this meeting to gather feedback
- 13:21:13 [cgueret]
- ... wait for closing issues
- 13:21:24 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee, ok
- 13:21:26 [deirdrelee]
- https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open
- 13:22:00 [ericstephan]
- https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/169
- 13:22:01 [hadleybeeman]
- issue-169?
- 13:22:01 [trackbot]
- issue-169 -- Should usage be specified at the Dataset or Distribution level? -- open
- 13:22:01 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/169
- 13:22:33 [deirdrelee]
- Q?
- 13:22:34 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: carlos is not on the call
- 13:22:54 [cgueret]
- ... 3 constructs in the vocabulary
- 13:23:04 [cgueret]
- ... 1) how to someone may use a dataset
- 13:23:09 [cgueret]
- ... 2) citations
- 13:23:15 [cgueret]
- ... 3) describe feedback
- 13:23:42 [phila]
- q+
- 13:23:48 [cgueret]
- ... probably looking at that from a pragmatic point of view. What is an application consuming ?
- 13:24:20 [cgueret]
- ... depending on circumstances both make sense
- 13:24:31 [cgueret]
- ... initially described at dataset level
- 13:24:34 [deirdrelee]
- ack phila
- 13:24:41 [cgueret]
- phila: answer is "it depends"
- 13:24:48 [cgueret]
- ... most cases at dataset level
- 13:25:27 [cgueret]
- ... distribution level is important when feedback is provided
- 13:25:44 [cgueret]
- ... for citation and feedback the dataset level is probably the most sensible one
- 13:26:07 [cgueret]
- ... we should be able to say the DUV can be applied to either and give example for it
- 13:26:19 [deirdrelee]
- q+
- 13:26:21 [cgueret]
- ... be flexible and provide guidance
- 13:26:37 [laufer]
- q+
- 13:26:48 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: thanks!
- 13:27:39 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: the idea would be to include distributions in the model then
- 13:28:22 [cgueret]
- ... there were discussions on how to define data on the web and we settled on datasets
- 13:28:39 [cgueret]
- ... then saw there was also a lot of discussions about distributions
- 13:28:54 [deirdrelee]
- ack deirdrelee
- 13:28:58 [deirdrelee]
- ack laufer
- 13:29:09 [cgueret]
- laufer: really important issue
- 13:29:18 [cgueret]
- ... good to include distributions in the model
- 13:29:34 [cgueret]
- ... dataset is an abstract thing
- 13:29:50 [cgueret]
- ... a consumer never sees a dataset
- 13:29:55 [cgueret]
- ... just a distribution of it
- 13:30:19 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: slight disagreement here, it depends on the community you talk to
- 13:30:41 [cgueret]
- ... for some a "dataset" is a large combinaison of distributions
- 13:31:26 [cgueret]
- laufer: there is no such thing as direct access to a dataset
- 13:31:29 [phila]
- q+
- 13:31:39 [cgueret]
- ... publishing gives access through a distribution
- 13:32:41 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: taking back on the example for climate scientists a dataset is a collection of distributions
- 13:33:11 [cgueret]
- ... we do not try to track causality here
- 13:33:27 [deirdrelee]
- q?
- 13:33:38 [deirdrelee]
- ack phila
- 13:33:45 [cgueret]
- phila: everyone is right
- 13:34:05 [cgueret]
- ... we have on purpose defined things vaguely so far
- 13:34:44 [cgueret]
- ... so we have to make it so that the vocabulary can be applied to both
- 13:35:15 [cgueret]
- ... and then specific usage is context dependant
- 13:35:47 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee: there could be cases where feedback on distributions could help publisher decided on which formats to keep
- 13:36:11 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: ok to be flexible and high level
- 13:36:15 [cgueret]
- +1
- 13:36:49 [phila]
- -> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/ Our comment tracker
- 13:36:49 [phila]
- q+
- 13:36:58 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: have not got feedback on the vocabulary except from specific contacts established
- 13:37:21 [cgueret]
- ... we are re-using things people already use
- 13:38:09 [cgueret]
- phila: ivan was interested, he is in charge of open annotation group
- 13:38:32 [laufer]
- s/dataset is an abstract thing/dataset is a thing that a consumer does not have a direct access/
- 13:38:35 [cgueret]
- ... they want to express what motivates somebody to provide an annotation
- 13:38:40 [deirdrelee]
- q+
- 13:38:44 [deirdrelee]
- ack phila
- 13:38:55 [cgueret]
- ... relates to us to knowing why would someone bother writing DUV data
- 13:39:31 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee: particularly relevant for APIs
- 13:40:09 [cgueret]
- ... motivation scenario could be a link with the consumers through the APIs
- 13:40:13 [ericstephan]
- https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/170
- 13:40:17 [deirdrelee]
- ack deirdrelee
- 13:40:30 [cgueret]
- issue-170?
- 13:40:30 [trackbot]
- issue-170 -- Should we use Software or earl:Software instead of duv:Application? -- open
- 13:40:30 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/170
- 13:40:59 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: good comments about vocab reuse
- 13:41:48 [cgueret]
- ... the duv:Application relates to work from Bernadette on modeling
- 13:42:03 [cgueret]
- ... we used prov:Activity before
- 13:42:15 [cgueret]
- ... maybe prov:Agent would have been better
- 13:42:23 [deirdrelee]
- q?
- 13:42:23 [phila]
- q+
- 13:42:28 [cgueret]
- ... curious to get comments on what to use
- 13:42:30 [phila]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#Software
- 13:42:32 [deirdrelee]
- ack phila
- 13:42:56 [cgueret]
- phila: EARL has been around for a long time
- 13:43:04 [cgueret]
- ... not updated since May 2011
- 13:43:12 [phila]
- A Software is any piece of software such as an authoring tool, browser, or evaluation tool. It can be used to describe an Assertor, such as a validation or other quality assurance tool, and it can be used to describe a Test Subject (for example to test compliance of an authoring tool to Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines [ATAG] or of a browser to User Agent Accessibility Guidelines [UAAG]).
- 13:43:13 [gatemezi]
- More on Software Classes http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/terms?q=Software&type=class on LOV
- 13:43:34 [cgueret]
- ... they have something specific in mind
- 13:43:44 [cgueret]
- ... and define it as a subclass of DOAP
- 13:43:58 [cgueret]
- ... this may not be what the DUV is after
- 13:44:26 [cgueret]
- ... earl:Sofware is a sub of doap:Project
- 13:44:33 [cgueret]
- ... so maybe use doap directly
- 13:44:45 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: a bit concerned about the lack of updates
- 13:46:30 [cgueret]
- phila: if a publisher wants to know the data has been used in some software it is probably not so important to know the exact nature of the software
- 13:46:34 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: agree
- 13:46:36 [laufer]
- q+
- 13:46:53 [deirdrelee]
- ack laufer
- 13:47:01 [cgueret]
- laufer: like the idea of prov:Activity
- 13:47:27 [cgueret]
- q+ to say prov:Agent would fit better than prov:Activity
- 13:48:14 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: everything can be mapped to prov
- 13:48:17 [laufer]
- a Dataset as a kind of prov:hadPrimarySource
- 13:48:33 [hadleybeeman]
- q?
- 13:48:56 [cgueret]
- yep, speaking right now
- 13:49:20 [deirdrelee]
- ack cgueret
- 13:49:20 [Zakim]
- cgueret, you wanted to say prov:Agent would fit better than prov:Activity
- 13:49:20 [gatemezi]
- Agree with ericstephan.
- 13:49:22 [ericstephan]
- I believe you are correct cgueret
- 13:50:31 [ericstephan]
- https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/171
- 13:50:33 [cgueret]
- issue-171?
- 13:50:33 [trackbot]
- issue-171 -- Should dct:creator or doap:developer be used instead of duv:developedBy? -- open
- 13:50:33 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/171
- 13:50:54 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: another re-use question
- 13:51:20 [phila]
- +1 to using DC unless there's a reason not to
- 13:51:26 [cgueret]
- ... preference to DC
- 13:51:30 [hadleybeeman]
- +1 to DC
- 13:51:31 [laufer]
- but an Agent consumes an Entity?
- 13:51:35 [cgueret]
- +1 for DC too
- 13:52:22 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee: maybe good to define publisher and creator with two matching dates
- 13:53:06 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: looking at DCAT they re-use a lot DC
- 13:53:33 [cgueret]
- ... we re-use DCAT as a base and should aim at being complementary
- 13:53:42 [ericstephan]
- https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/172
- 13:53:48 [cgueret]
- issue-172?
- 13:53:48 [trackbot]
- issue-172 -- Should duv:generates be removed? -- open
- 13:53:48 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/172
- 13:54:39 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: added this property because we thought data consumers write things
- 13:54:42 [deirdrelee]
- q+
- 13:54:46 [cgueret]
- q+ to leave that to PROV
- 13:55:08 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: does it break something to have it ?
- 13:55:23 [cgueret]
- ... is a consumer creating something becoming a publisher ?
- 13:55:45 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee: the property is definitely valid but we may not need to include it in a vocab about usage
- 13:55:57 [deirdrelee]
- ack deirdrelee
- 13:56:16 [gatemezi]
- I thought there is an axiom stating that duv:Consumer owl:differentFrom duv:Publisher
- 13:56:33 [phila]
- cgueret: I don't think we have to express it in DUV. If you want to say that some data was produced by an application, PROV has it covered so we can just point to that
- 13:56:42 [deirdrelee]
- ack cgueret
- 13:56:42 [Zakim]
- cgueret, you wanted to leave that to PROV
- 13:57:07 [phila]
- ericstephan: Maybe some guidance should be included without having something as part of the vocabulary.
- 13:57:19 [phila]
- ... you could leverage PROV if you wanted to
- 13:57:22 [phila]
- cgueret: Yep
- 13:57:29 [gatemezi]
- + 1 to ericstephan point. And with samples
- 13:58:52 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: ok, so resolve not to put it in the model then but describe how prov can be used when needed
- 13:59:08 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee: we can continue discussing on mail
- 13:59:15 [cgueret]
- ericstephan: thx for the feedback!
- 13:59:53 [cgueret]
- phila: took two days to get the documents to be publishable
- 14:00:08 [cgueret]
- ... maybe some changes will be back-propagated to the editor drafts
- 14:00:18 [gatemezi]
- Thanks phila for all the support
- 14:00:23 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee: next call on DQV
- 14:00:42 [ericstephan]
- bp and duv and dq connectivity?
- 14:00:46 [cgueret]
- hadleybeeman: we need to talk about DCAT next week
- 14:01:07 [Caroline]
- bye!
- 14:01:08 [laufer]
- bye all... nice weekend... be careful with sun... use your hats...
- 14:01:09 [cgueret]
- deirdrelee: ok and BP doc next week
- 14:01:09 [MTCarrasco]
- bye
- 14:01:12 [cgueret]
- bye
- 14:01:19 [gatemezi]
- ciao!
- 14:01:37 [ericstephan]
- I used my pickup last weekend for a swimming pool laufer
- 14:01:49 [ericstephan]
- :-) phila
- 14:01:53 [laufer]
- lol, eric
- 14:01:55 [cgueret]
- ^_^ phila
- 14:03:39 [phila]
- regrets+ Makx
- 16:14:26 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #dwbp
- 18:18:41 [yaso]
- yaso has joined #dwbp
- 18:31:37 [yaso]
- yaso has joined #dwbp
- 18:50:16 [yaso]
- yaso has joined #dwbp