15:58:22 RRSAgent has joined #pf 15:58:22 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/05/27-pf-irc 15:58:24 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:58:24 Zakim has joined #pf 15:58:26 Zakim, this will be WAI_PF 15:58:26 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 15:58:27 Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 15:58:27 Date: 27 May 2015 15:58:41 agenda? 15:58:52 Chair: Janina 15:58:52 agenda: this 15:58:52 agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes; Webex continued 15:58:52 agenda+ Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open 15:58:53 agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html 15:58:55 agenda+ Community Groups http://www.w3.org/community/groups/ 15:58:57 agenda+ Rechartering Continued 15:59:00 agenda+ ARIA.Next Items 15:59:02 agenda+ Other Task Force Updates; COGA; HTML-A11Y; SVG; D-Pub 15:59:05 agenda+ Other Business 15:59:07 agenda+ next and future meetings http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_273 15:59:10 agenda+ be done 15:59:46 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 16:02:16 fesch has joined #pf 16:03:55 present+ Janina 16:04:13 zakim, take up item 1 16:04:14 agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes; Webex continued" taken up [from janina] 16:06:31 JF has joined #PF 16:07:26 present+ Fred_Esch 16:07:53 present+ JF 16:12:57 JF_ has joined #PF 16:13:07 zakim, drop JF 16:13:07 sorry, JF_, I don't know what conference this is 16:13:12 scribenick: fred 16:13:27 scribenick: fresch 16:13:31 scribenick: fesch 16:13:39 agenda? 16:14:03 zakim, JF_ is JF 16:14:03 sorry, JF_, I do not recognize a party named 'JF_' 16:14:10 zakim, next item 16:14:10 agendum 2. "Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open" taken up [from janina] 16:14:49 js: my actions underway 16:15:05 jf: I don't have any action items here 16:15:11 action-1641? 16:15:11 action-1641 -- Janina Sajka to File comment on notes on using aria in html http://www.w3.org/tr/aria-in-html/ that it should not be on the rec track -- due 2015-05-27 -- OPEN 16:15:11 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1641 16:15:15 close action-1641 16:15:15 Closed action-1641. 16:16:24 action-1631 16:16:24 action-1631 -- Shane McCarron to Review credential management level 1 http://www.w3.org/tr/credential-management-1/ -- due 2015-05-27 -- OPEN 16:16:24 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1631 16:16:42 action-1628 16:16:42 action-1628 -- James Nurthen to Review dom level 3 keyboardevent code values http://www.w3.org/tr/dom-level-3-events-code/ and dom level 3 keyboardevent key values http://www.w3.org/tr/dom-level-3-events-key/ -- due 2015-05-29 -- OPEN 16:16:42 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1628 16:16:49 action-1629 16:16:49 action-1629 -- James Nurthen to Review manifest for a web application http://www.w3.org/tr/appmanifest/ -- due 2015-05-29 -- OPEN 16:16:49 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1629 16:17:00 jn: not june yet 16:17:10 action-1627 16:17:11 action-1627 -- Janina Sajka to Get group to look at ui events (formerly dom level 3 events) http://www.w3.org/tr/uievents/ -- due 2015-05-27 -- OPEN 16:17:11 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1627 16:18:47 action-1627: https://www.w3.org/2015/04/29-pf-minutes 16:18:47 Notes added to action-1627 Get group to look at ui events (formerly dom level 3 events) http://www.w3.org/tr/uievents/. 16:19:44 js: not sure how to do due diligence reviews with the reorg 16:19:56 js: how do we do this? 16:20:21 js: we comment and they respond, and at the end of the day, we agree on something 16:20:40 js: 6 months later they publish a new draft, how do we do that? 16:21:29 mc: can search a liaison list for comments, so someone would have to look through and see if the comments are fixed. 16:21:44 mc: we need to assign someone or hope we are OK 16:22:27 mc: my recollection is we were sad somethings were dropped and we hoped they would be brought back somewhere (else) 16:22:47 joanie: make an issue? 16:23:02 mc: this task did that 16:23:17 s/joanie/cyn/ 16:24:18 mc: we had a discussion on activate, wanted something better, indieUI was going to provide that 16:24:39 js: son of indieUI or WAPA was going to provide that 16:24:52 close action-1627 16:24:53 Closed action-1627. 16:25:34 cyns: what to do on work J Peters was doing, WAPA has a dependency on that 16:25:51 js: very interested in having that not be dropped 16:26:02 cyns: needs a driver... 16:26:38 mc: if we are going to have any success in driving integration we will need that 16:26:47 action-1615 16:26:47 action-1615 -- Janina Sajka to Review media capture and streams http://www.w3.org/tr/mediacapture-streams/ -- due 2015-05-06 -- OPEN 16:26:47 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1615 16:27:05 action-1597 16:27:05 action-1597 -- Janina Sajka to Review web midi api http://www.w3.org/tr/webmidi/ -- due 2015-05-27 -- OPEN 16:27:05 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1597 16:27:19 action-1597 due 2 months 16:27:19 Set action-1597 Review web midi api http://www.w3.org/tr/webmidi/ due date to 2015-07-27. 16:27:58 js: keep pushing forward dependent on ... 16:28:07 zakim, next item 16:28:07 agendum 3. "new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html" taken up [from janina] 16:28:42 mc: nothing for use to review, maybe ..... something very low level 16:28:54 zakim, next item 16:28:54 agendum 3 was just opened, fesch 16:29:05 zakim, close item 16:29:05 I don't understand 'close item', fesch 16:29:11 zakim, next item 16:29:11 agendum 4. "Community Groups http://www.w3.org/community/groups/" taken up [from janina] 16:29:29 zakim, next item 16:29:29 agendum 4 was just opened, fesch 16:29:36 zakim, close item 16:29:36 I don't understand 'close item', fesch 16:29:42 zakim, next item 16:29:42 agendum 4 was just opened, fesch 16:29:52 zakim, close item this item 16:29:52 I don't understand 'close item this item', fesch 16:30:01 zakim, close this item 16:30:01 agendum 4 closed 16:30:02 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:30:02 5. Rechartering Continued [from janina] 16:30:08 zakim, next item 16:30:08 agendum 5. "Rechartering Continued" taken up [from janina] 16:30:28 -> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/32212/201505_charters/results Charter Survey 16:30:39 jf: there is scribe button.... 16:31:36 js: we have draft charters, taking in all kinds of comments, current working hope, please do survey 16:32:05 js: survey can you support the charters and do you plan to join each wg 16:32:18 js: deadline for survey is tonight 16:32:38 js: views are important so we can negotiate with management 16:32:59 jamesn has joined #pf 16:33:07 js: charter is formerly extended, we are officially under charter until July 15 16:33:24 jw: we can continue to publish 16:33:45 s?jw/js 16:33:54 s/jw/js/ 16:34:14 mc: Joseph made comments about timeline 16:34:43 mc: JN made comments on expected participation, LW and JC made comments as well 16:35:27 mc: Joseph's we can process... replied on email - on participation expectation (4 - 8 hours) 16:35:55 jn: between three groups, the total is no way 16:36:11 Lisa_Seeman has joined #pf 16:36:21 cyns: most week will be monitor list and show up for calls, on a review more hours on that 16:36:54 mc: if there is discussion on reviews, it could be more, but that is an exception 16:37:16 cyns: a lot more people would be willing to show up based on 2 hrs a week 16:37:43 js: time is average, if you get assigned a big spec.... could be more 16:38:20 mc: for the APA charter it may make sense 2- 4 and should we ARIA 4-8? 16:38:36 cyns: maybe a total between the two 4-8 hrs 16:38:47 mc: will put in 2-4 for both 16:39:25 mc:: Leone had lots of edit, she isn't here, I don't necessarily agree, she may have wanted to simplify 16:39:42 mc: hard to review without her here 16:40:01 js: negotiating the charter may cause delay 16:40:26 mc: summaries Leone's edits 16:40:49 cyns: doesn't seem to have impacts 16:41:06 js: need someone to do it, need a driver... 16:41:59 mc: charter needs to give us the ability to work with other groups, nice to encourage to join other groups, nice to to but... not needed in the charter 16:42:10 cyns: seems like a mission statement 16:43:06 mc: without Leone here, hard to negotiate with her 16:43:58 mc: besides Leone's comments, may take up Joseph's milestones 16:44:40 mc: 9 will join the spec review group, 17 would join ARIA, none that would join spec review and not ARIA 16:45:00 jn: once participation requirements change I might sign up for both 16:45:26 mc: will run past time commitment change this afternoon 16:46:16 jf: did quick survey at deque have 4 people interested in ARIA,, I can join up for spec review 16:47:07 can you post the link to the servay? 16:48:10 js: we believe we have got through the first road block on dpub, got through roles issue and provide doc to MC 16:48:31 js: expect dpub doc in June 16:49:15 zakim, next item 16:49:15 agendum 6. "ARIA.Next Items" taken up [from janina] 16:50:14 zakim, next item 16:50:14 agendum 6 was just opened, fesch 16:50:26 zakim, close item 6 16:50:26 agendum 6, ARIA.Next Items, closed 16:50:27 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:50:27 7. Other Task Force Updates; COGA; HTML-A11Y; SVG; D-Pub [from janina] 16:50:43 zakim, next item 16:50:43 agendum 7. "Other Task Force Updates; COGA; HTML-A11Y; SVG; D-Pub" taken up [from janina] 16:51:46 action: John Folio MAUR checklist 16:51:46 Created ACTION-1645 - Folio maur checklist [on John Foliot - due 2015-06-03]. 16:52:45 js: somewhat related to media stuff, we left Seattle with a plan.... not sure what is happening with Chaals 16:52:56 js: I think he said he would start a draft 16:53:20 jf: I think we were going to send an email to HTML wg with thoughts before creating a draft 16:53:30 js: lets talk about this tomorrow 16:53:46 js: we only care about use cases and requirements, not the mechanism 16:56:17 rssagent, generate minutes 16:56:50 rrsagent, generate minutes 16:56:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/05/27-pf-minutes.html fesch 18:30:44 janina has changed the topic to: PF Weekly Teleconference; Wednesday 3 June at 16:00Z; Webex 647 857 439