15:59:09 RRSAgent has joined #pf 15:59:09 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/05/06-pf-irc 15:59:11 RRSAgent, make logs member 15:59:13 Zakim, this will be WAI_PF 15:59:14 ok, trackbot, I see WAI_PF()12:00PM already started 15:59:14 Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 15:59:14 Date: 06 May 2015 15:59:45 trackbot, start meeting 15:59:47 RRSAgent, make logs member 15:59:49 Zakim, this will be WAI_PF 15:59:49 ok, trackbot, I see WAI_PF()12:00PM already started 15:59:50 Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 15:59:50 Date: 06 May 2015 15:59:53 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf 16:00:14 +??P15 16:00:24 +Rich_Schwerdtfeger 16:00:34 +??P18 16:00:40 +Joanmarie_Diggs 16:01:17 agenda? 16:01:23 zakim, clear agenda 16:01:24 agenda cleared 16:01:27 Chair: Janina 16:01:27 agenda: this 16:01:27 agenda+ preview agenda with items from two minutes 16:01:27 agenda+ Previous Meeting Minutes https://www.w3.org/2015/04/22-pf-minutes.html 16:01:28 agenda+ New Minuting Procedure 16:01:29 agenda+ Welcome to Webex 16:01:32 agenda+ Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open 16:01:34 agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html#tr_LCWD 16:01:37 agenda+ Community Groups http://www.w3.org/community/groups/ 16:01:39 agenda+ Rechartering Continued 16:01:42 agenda+ ARIA.Next Items--APG FPWD; Extension Mechanism 16:01:44 agenda+ Other Task Force Updates; COGA; HTML-A11Y; SVG 16:01:47 agenda+ Other Business 16:01:49 agenda+ next and future meetings http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_273 16:01:52 agenda+ be done 16:01:54 scribe: fesch 16:01:55 16:02:04 zakim, who's on the phone? 16:02:04 On the phone I see Fred_Esch, James_Nurthen, ??P15, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Michael_Cooper, Joanmarie_Diggs 16:02:17 zakim, ??P15 is me 16:02:17 +janina; got it 16:02:29 zakim, next item 16:02:29 agendum 1. "preview agenda with items from two minutes" taken up [from janina] 16:02:41 ShaneM has joined #pf 16:03:20 js: need to look at telecom and going public 16:03:26 zakim, next item 16:03:26 agendum 1 was just opened, janina 16:03:32 + +1.612.406.aaaa 16:03:32 zakim, close item 1 16:03:33 agendum 1, preview agenda with items from two minutes, closed 16:03:33 I see 11 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:03:33 2. Previous Meeting Minutes https://www.w3.org/2015/04/22-pf-minutes.html [from janina] 16:03:36 zakim, next item 16:03:36 agendum 2. "Previous Meeting Minutes https://www.w3.org/2015/04/22-pf-minutes.html" taken up [from janina] 16:03:39 zakim, I am aaaa 16:03:39 +ShaneM; got it 16:04:12 RESOLUTION: publish minutes as posted 16:04:19 zakim, next item 16:04:19 agendum 2 was just opened, janina 16:04:30 zakim, close item 2 16:04:30 agendum 2, Previous Meeting Minutes https://www.w3.org/2015/04/22-pf-minutes.html, closed 16:04:32 I see 10 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:04:32 3. New Minuting Procedure [from janina] 16:04:34 zakim, next item 16:04:34 agendum 3. "New Minuting Procedure" taken up [from janina] 16:04:43 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015May/0038.html 16:05:46 js: PF is OK with going fully public, Judy added to charter discussions 16:07:01 js: MC and JS checked into how to go public, talked to admin, 16:07:58 mc: has not heard back from admin on member PF list, being read only 16:08:05 q? 16:08:24 js: Any opinions on going public? 16:08:32 go publix 16:08:34 public 16:08:45 js: PROPOSES to go public immediately 16:09:20 jn: can we ask whether something should be minuted? 16:09:32 js: sure 16:10:21 q+ 16:10:24 JF has joined #PF 16:11:06 mc: please say in advance, please don't minute that --- helps the scribe :) 16:11:13 +JF 16:11:36 ack me 16:12:17 jn: scribe doesn't always accurately captured what you said, and potential liability 16:12:51 mc: we could ask minutes generator, putting a disclaimer - about the accuracy of scribing 16:14:00 js: might put in policy statement on the web page for the renamed group 16:14:21 PROPOSAL: make minutes public today, 16:14:41 rrsagent, make log world 16:14:53 RESOLUTION: PF will being posting all minutes into the public list and will seek to make the member list read only 16:15:01 +1 16:15:43 js: not many groups in members (only) space 16:16:11 q+ 16:16:30 js: how do we handle old member only space - keep it member only 16:16:53 rs: what are the chances we can make the issues and actions list public? 16:17:35 mc: we will need to do it with the new group, rather not make the current one public for a month, and protect old stuff 16:18:01 s/protect/need to protect/ 16:18:25 jn: what is the harm in having an aria and pf tracker? 16:18:43 mc: lists technical issues 16:19:24 js: was going to put on the agenda whether we want separate lists for aria and apa 16:20:11 js: scope of permitted work of (ARIA, APA) groups would be 16:20:53 sm: thought we were going to git anyway? 16:21:30 mc: bugzilla was a plan, still using tracker because of IRC integration 16:21:58 mc: need to decide on use of tracker or not and if so configuration 16:22:44 sm: lives and breathes perl... 16:23:00 sm: speaks bugzilla API, hasn't looked at github 16:23:36 js: would be interesting to know how big a job integrating with bugzilla, github would be 16:23:52 sm: another group, maybe web payments has already done it 16:24:20 action: shane to investigate possibilities of IRC bot integration with Bugzilla and GitHub 16:24:20 Created ACTION-1630 - Investigate possibilities of irc bot integration with bugzilla and github [on Shane McCarron - due 2015-05-13]. 16:24:26 jn: hates tracker 16:24:28 +Cynthia_Shelly 16:24:29 action-1630 due 2 weeks 16:24:29 Set action-1630 Investigate possibilities of irc bot integration with bugzilla and github due date to 2015-05-20. 16:24:46 zakim, next item 16:24:46 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, janina 16:24:53 q? 16:25:03 ack r 16:25:08 zakim, next item 16:25:08 agendum 4. "Welcome to Webex" taken up [from janina] 16:25:42 js: zakim is being decommissioned due to cost 16:26:14 js: moving to webex temporarily 16:26:27 js: this meeting will be on webex by June 16:27:03 js: android client is reasonably accessible, other clients less so 16:27:32 js: JW wasn't able to edit 16:28:07 js: need to play with it, before committing to it 16:28:39 js: do whatever you need to do audio over webex 16:28:40 -> https://mit.webex.com/ MIT WebEx 16:28:58 js: will continue to use IRC 16:29:15 js: need to record your attendence 16:29:33 js: webex can call you 16:29:36 q? 16:29:45 q+ jamesn 16:30:07 cs: can I call from a phone? 16:30:51 mc: don't know of a touch tone method to get on the queue 16:31:15 mc: can get the conference code and dial in 16:31:25 mc: code will be different for every meeting 16:31:52 mc: code not mnemonic 16:31:52 ack c 16:31:54 ack j 16:31:59 ack j 16:32:09 jn: code different each week? 16:32:13 mc: no 16:32:27 Q+ 16:33:02 ack j 16:33:04 js: each weekly call will have a code 16:33:29 jf: you can set up a recurring meeting and keep the same code 16:33:42 ack s 16:33:44 q? 16:33:51 jf: can use a link (URI) to access it 16:34:18 q+ 16:34:22 sm: on reason to use webex is for screen sharing are we using that? 16:34:33 JS: not using screen sharing 16:34:34 q+ to talk about screen sharing 16:34:41 q+ to talk about ¨interim solution¨ 16:35:17 js: can create a astrix solution 16:35:29 js: I think that cost is an issue 16:36:17 js: might be a misunderstanding on what it takes to support a 100 users over SIP with an astrix server 16:36:28 ack me 16:36:28 Michael_Cooper, you wanted to talk about screen sharing and to talk about ¨interim solution¨ 16:36:52 mc: cost of zakim will become $50K a month... 16:37:36 js: axtrix should also have built in web RTC support 16:39:16 mc: webex has screensharing, most likely not accessible ... discovered strange issues with presenter status being stolen... don't plan to use it, except in exceptional cases 16:39:16 ack c 16:39:20 ack c 16:39:57 js: thanks Shane for looking at astrix 16:41:08 js: most POTS, would expect more SIP, have more SKYPE users 16:42:12 js: a lot of companies use SIP calls internally 16:42:47 cs: are their accessible SIP clients? 16:42:51 js: yes 16:43:33 zakim, next item 16:43:33 agendum 5. "Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open" taken up [from janina] 16:44:09 action-1615 16:44:09 action-1615 -- Janina Sajka to Review media capture and streams http://www.w3.org/tr/mediacapture-streams/ -- due 2015-05-06 -- OPEN 16:44:09 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1615 16:44:09 zakim, close this item 16:44:09 agendum 5 closed 16:44:11 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:44:11 6. new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html#tr_LCWD [from janina] 16:44:13 zakim, next item 16:44:13 agendum 6. "new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html#tr_LCWD" taken up [from janina] 16:44:31 -> http://www.w3.org/TR/credential-management-1/ Credential Management Level 1 16:44:33 mc: no new last calls or CR 16:46:09 sm: already reviewing... this is really password management 16:46:12 action: shane to review Credential Management Level 1 http://www.w3.org/TR/credential-management-1/ 16:46:12 Created ACTION-1631 - Review credential management level 1 http://www.w3.org/tr/credential-management-1/ [on Shane McCarron - due 2015-05-13]. 16:46:53 zakim, next item 16:46:53 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, janina 16:46:59 q? 16:47:02 ack sh 16:47:05 q? 16:47:10 zakim, next item 16:47:10 agendum 8. "Rechartering Continued" taken up [from janina] 16:47:36 zakim, take up item 7 16:47:36 agendum 7. "Community Groups http://www.w3.org/community/groups/" taken up [from janina] 16:47:50 mc: no community groups this week 16:48:09 zakim, next item 16:48:09 agendum 7 was just opened, fesch 16:48:20 zakim, close item 16:48:20 I don't understand 'close item', fesch 16:48:31 zakim, close this item 16:48:34 agendum 7 closed 16:48:34 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:48:35 8. Rechartering Continued [from janina] 16:48:41 zakim, take up item 8 16:48:41 agendum 8. "Rechartering Continued" taken up [from janina] 16:49:17 js: conversations have slowed down, drafts of charters... both together and split 16:49:34 -> http://www.w3.org/2015/04/draft-apa-charter Draft updates to the APA charter 16:50:32 mc: minor changes to existing group 16:50:32 -> http://www.w3.org/2015/04/draft-aria-charter Draft ARIA charter 16:51:08 mc: two other charters if we split, ARIA might not be a good name 16:51:10 -> http://www.w3.org/2015/04/draft-spec-charter Draft spec review charter 16:52:18 mc: take over non recommendation track doc work 16:52:23 ack c 16:52:51 Web Technology Accessibility Guidelines 16:53:12 cs: where would Web Technology Accessibility Guidelines go? 16:53:40 mc: spec review group - as a working group note - would be cool if it were rec track... 16:54:30 cs: don't know how seriously it would be taken as a note 16:54:44 mc: we should discuss that 16:55:02 ack s 16:55:03 mc: it is in the spec review charter 16:55:46 sm: CR only applies to normative requirements, if no normative requirements we don't have to worry about it 16:55:52 q+ to ask about ARIA deliverables on the milestones 16:56:02 ack j 16:56:02 joanie, you wanted to ask about ARIA deliverables on the milestones 16:57:23 -JF 16:57:57 jd: on draft ARIA charter, for ARIA 1.1, milestone table - do we plan to be ARIA 1.1 feature frozen by July 2015? 16:58:32 mc: milestones same in charters, but are out of date, should talk about that before sending charter forward 16:58:37 ack c 16:58:53 cs: ARIA 2.0 is not in the charter 16:59:04 +1 to 2.0 in the charter 16:59:10 cs: would like to see ARIA 2.0 in the charter 16:59:34 mc: wording says ARIA 1.1 and later... which allows us to work on it 16:59:54 rs: I don't think we can wait more than 3 years to work on ARIA 2.0 17:00:01 +Tzviya 17:00:10 ack s 17:00:13 mc: have 9 docs, need a reasonable time line 17:00:41 sm: need to give subgroups an action to come back with it next week 17:01:11 rs: want to discuss extension issues, what is happening with user context properties? 17:01:27 mc: in draft ARIA charter 17:01:45 rs: worried about having too much in the ARIA group 17:01:55 rs: where is the COGA work? 17:02:10 js: stays in APA 17:02:12 +Matt_King 17:02:44 zakim, list attendees 17:02:44 As of this point the attendees have been Fred_Esch, James_Nurthen, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Michael_Cooper, Joanmarie_Diggs, janina, +1.612.406.aaaa, ShaneM, JF, Cynthia_Shelly, Tzviya, 17:02:47 ... Matt_King 17:02:53 present- Tzviya 17:02:57 present- Matt_King 17:03:14 js: we have a call for consensus please respond 17:03:22 -Cynthia_Shelly 17:03:31 rrsagent, make log public 17:03:47 WAI_PF()12:00PM has been moved to #pf-editors by MichaelC 17:04:06 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:04:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/05/06-pf-minutes.html fesch 17:07:56 ShaneM has joined #pf 17:34:09 jcraig has joined #pf 17:59:57 ShaneM_ has joined #pf