16:30:44 RRSAgent has joined #aria 16:30:44 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/04/09-aria-irc 16:30:45 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:30:46 RRSAgent, make logs member 16:30:46 Zakim has joined #aria 16:30:48 Zakim, this will be WAI_PF 16:30:48 ok, trackbot, I see WAI_PFWG()12:30PM already started 16:30:48 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 16:30:49 Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 16:30:49 Date: 09 April 2015 16:30:57 zakim, who's here? 16:30:57 On the phone I see +1.416.848.aaaa, Fred_Esch, [IPcaller], ??P12 16:30:58 On IRC I see richardschwerdtfeger, Zakim, RRSAgent, fesch, mattking, jamesn, asurkov, LJWatson, newtron, janina, MichaelC, joanie, ed, trackbot 16:31:00 chair: Rich 16:31:08 zakim, ??P12 is me 16:31:08 +janina; got it 16:31:09 meeting: W3C WAI-PF ARIA Caucus 16:31:15 +Matt_King 16:31:23 zakim, [IPcaller] is me 16:31:24 +??P15 16:31:24 +LJWatson; got it 16:31:28 +Rich_Schwerdtfeger 16:31:46 zakim, aaaa is Alexander_Surkov 16:31:46 +Alexander_Surkov; got it 16:31:58 zakim, aaaa is Alex 16:31:58 sorry, janina, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa' 16:32:04 +Joanmarie_Diggs 16:32:10 zakim, who's here? 16:32:10 On the phone I see Alexander_Surkov, Fred_Esch, LJWatson, janina, Matt_King, Michael_Cooper, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Joanmarie_Diggs 16:32:12 On IRC I see richardschwerdtfeger, Zakim, RRSAgent, fesch, mattking, jamesn, asurkov, LJWatson, newtron, janina, MichaelC, joanie, ed, trackbot 16:32:39 zakim, aaaa is Alexander_Surkov 16:32:39 sorry, janina, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa' 16:32:48 zakim, who's on the phone? 16:32:48 On the phone I see Alexander_Surkov, Fred_Esch, LJWatson, janina, Matt_King, Michael_Cooper, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Joanmarie_Diggs 16:33:07 Stefan has joined #aria 16:33:18 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Apr/0109.html 16:34:21 +James_Craig 16:34:34 scribe: matt_king 16:34:36 +Stefan_Schnabel 16:35:20 +James_Nurthen 16:35:21 TOPIC: describedat 16:35:37 RS: what is the current status of further discussion? 16:36:02 Janina: Suzanne will come on this call 16:36:07 clown has joined #aria 16:36:28 RS: I would like to see more than 1 company represented 16:36:49 JC: What is Suzanne's view? 16:37:08 Janina: She is strongly in support. 16:37:19 +[GVoice] 16:37:28 zakim, GVoice is Joseph_Scheuhammer 16:37:28 +Joseph_Scheuhammer; got it 16:37:35 zakim, I am Joseph_Scheuhammer 16:37:35 ok, clown, I now associate you with Joseph_Scheuhammer 16:37:38 http://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/dpub.html 16:37:55 TOPIC: DPUB DRAFT 16:38:07 http://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/dpub.html 16:38:31 RS: any objections to this going to 1st publicworking draft? 16:38:56 RS: Important to move this forward 16:39:15 +1 16:39:21 Janina: if no objections, I will put out CFC 16:39:21 +1 16:39:22 +1 16:39:30 +1 16:39:47 +1 16:39:49 JN: Still concerned about role multiplication 16:40:02 JN: And being confused for those not in publishing 16:40:18 RS: Separate module so not everyone has to consume 16:40:41 JN: Concerned about some of the names, e.g., title 16:41:03 JN: Might be generally useful but wouldn't want to casll it title 16:41:15 RS: Also have similar concern 16:41:29 JN: Abstract is another role that is not sensible 16:41:41 JC: I object to that one as well. 16:41:55 JC: should work these issues out before public working draft. 16:42:01 q+ 16:42:06 JC: Pull out the ones that are less solid 16:42:17 RS: Or just put issue under them 16:42:34 JC: Rather not put them out if they have issues 16:42:51 RS: Is there a list of those that are contentious? 16:43:19 JC: In a quick glance I found several that are problematic 16:44:03 JN: For abstract, we could either change name or remove all abstract roles 16:44:23 JC: We could change in 1.1, but could be major point of confusion 16:44:43 RS: Surprised at that level of confusion over that role. 16:45:04 JC: people publishing epubs understand that role without issue. 16:45:44 JC: General web developers are instructed in the spec not to use abstract roles so having a role named abstract will be confusing to them. 16:45:57 +1 to JC. 16:46:03 http://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/dpub.html#role_definitions 16:46:09 +1 to JC 16:46:34 Janina: not sure I agree that we have to have only one definition per term 16:46:47 q? 16:47:02 Joanie: There will not be prefixes, right? 16:47:11 RS: yes 16:47:38 Joanie: These roles will show up in non-dpub content, right? 16:48:36 RS: publishing industry very clear they do not want name-spaced roles 16:49:18 Joanie: If I am making web app as non-publsiher, anything stopping me from using them? 16:49:28 RS: browser would have to support them 16:49:40 JC: rendering engine is same for browser and reader 16:50:07 RS: James are you wanting to lay in front of the publishing industry on the name space issue? 16:50:33 JC: I have objected every chance I have had; was not in room when decision was made. 16:50:50 JC: I wouldn't characterize as laying down in front of them, but I have big concerns 16:51:10 RS: They wanted hyphens but I didn't want that 16:51:41 JC: They were willing to have hyphens but not as a prefix separator? 16:51:49 JC: that doesn't make sense 16:53:07 http://www.idpf.org/epub/vocab/structure/ 16:53:56 JC: Enumerated what he thought Mozilla objections were to name space prefixes 16:54:10 dpub-footnote 16:54:22 RS: they do not want to do that either 16:55:21 s/Mozilla/DPUB/ 16:55:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/04/09-aria-minutes.html clown 16:56:29 MK: instead of prefixes, could we just make some of the role names longer? eg, docabstract instead of abstract? 16:56:38 RS: perhaps 16:57:37 JC: Recommend starting with names more like dpub-abstract, then later 16:58:31 JC: if we think the role is generally useful, we could integrate into main aria spec as the same role definition but diff name, e.g., dpub-abstract might map to summary. 16:59:10 RS: do we need to strip the contentious roles from the working draft 16:59:25 JC: Either that or very clear editorial notes 16:59:42 RS: Recommend we do not yet do working draft 16:59:54 RS: we need to define the issues first 17:00:27 JC: another way is no hyphen, e.g., dpubabstract, dpubchapter 17:00:53 Janina: James, can you join a call with them? 17:01:07 RS: not good time; 8 am thursday for James 17:01:31 JC: my scheudle is very challenging right now, even making these calls is difficult 17:02:10 joanie, I didn’t really think about naming 17:03:20 RS/JC: working out schedule 17:05:58 Settling on noon central on Wed, apr 22 17:06:18 for DPUB and James on same call. 17:07:01 Janina: holding 1st working draft up for that call? 17:07:04 RS: yes 17:08:54 RS: I am not sure we should take 1st wd that seriously, but definitely need to log issues. 17:09:17 JC: 1st public wd is like first call for implementation; very important. 17:09:43 MC: Will sned out code the day before. 17:11:18 +Cynthia_Shelly 17:11:54 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Apr/0109.html 17:12:08 TOPIC: PLACEHOLDER 17:12:28 Joanie: Last week conclusion thought we were close to text ready 17:12:46 Joanie: would update and just ask for review then we would merge 17:13:02 action-1349? 17:13:02 action-1349 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Patch issue-561: we need @aria-placeholder as backup for @placeholder in custom fields. -- due 2015-03-05 -- OPEN 17:13:02 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1349 17:13:42 jcraig has joined #aria 17:13:43 Use aria-labelledby 17:13:43 Otherwise use aria-label 17:13:45 Otherwise use the associated label element 17:13:46 Otherwise use the placeholder attribute 17:13:47 Otherwise use the title attribute 17:13:48 If none of the above yield a usable text string there is no accessible 17:13:49 name 17:14:12 RS: we will have to talk about placeholder in name calc 17:14:25 Joanie: yes, but that is independent of the spec text 17:14:34 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Apr/0060.html 17:14:47 Joanie: reading spec text 17:16:28 action-1349 17:16:28 action-1349 -- Joanmarie Diggs to Patch issue-561: we need @aria-placeholder as backup for @placeholder in custom fields. -- due 2015-03-05 -- OPEN 17:16:28 -LJWatson 17:16:28 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1349 17:17:50 q? 17:17:57 q- 17:18:21 RS: like the shorter, simpler text regarding empty strings. 17:18:24 JC: +`1 17:19:05 Option 1 is: "Authors SHOULD present this hint to the user by displaying the hint text 17:19:08 at any time the control's Value is the empty string." 17:19:09 Joanie: pasting in 2 options for the text. 17:19:18 Option 2 is: "Authors SHOULD present this hint to the user by displaying the hint text 17:19:33 at any time the control's Value is the empty string., including when the control first receives focus, and when users remove a previously entered value." 17:19:47 #1 is my preference. and if the extra clarity is required, add it add a separate (non-normative) editorial note 17:20:26 Any objection to adopting Option 1? 17:20:41 CS: like option 1 better. 17:20:54 Joseph: how about an option 3? 17:21:23 Option 1 + an example that includes part of option 2. 17:21:45 Janina: Would it be a separate note? 17:22:12 Joseph: thinking it would just be a separate sentence. 17:22:28 "Authors SHOULD present this hint to the user by displaying the hint text at any time the control's Value is the empty string. This includes cases where the control first receives focus, and when users remove a previously entered value." 17:22:45 JC: keep the normative sentence shorter. 17:23:02 +1 17:23:04 +1 17:23:14 +1 17:23:29 CS: like any of them. 17:23:43 RESOLUTION: use option 3. 17:24:18 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Apr/0112.html 17:26:04 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Apr/0113.html 17:26:56 Joanie: Reading/describing 2 different example of placeholder use 17:27:33 q+ to mention we could add the script 17:27:37 Joanie: Proposal, use Joseph's example but have 2 version, one before and one after user input 17:27:52 ack me 17:27:52 jcraig, you wanted to mention we could add the script 17:27:54 q+ to agree with what joanie just said. 17:28:25 q? 17:28:51 CS: Should have note pointing people to html placeholder 17:29:22 ack Joseph 17:29:22 Joseph_Scheuhammer, you wanted to agree with what joanie just said. 17:29:52 JC: We see lots of use of custom placeholder because authors do not like dbrowser animations 17:30:19 rs: in interest of moving fwd, people OK with Joanie updating spec 17:31:16 Joanie: I like Joseph's example, and I wil wrap it up. 17:31:27 rrsagent, make minutes 17:31:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/04/09-aria-minutes.html mattking 17:31:39 rrsagent, make log public 17:32:02 TOPIC: MEETING NEXT WEEK? 17:32:16 RS: I will be at html working group f2f 17:32:27 RS: should we have meeting next week? 17:32:38 RS: next meeting in 2 weeks? 17:32:52 RS: no meeting next week then. 17:33:04 RESOLUTION: next meeting on Apr 23 17:33:10 -Rich_Schwerdtfeger 17:33:12 -James_Craig 17:33:14 -Joanmarie_Diggs 17:33:15 -Joseph_Scheuhammer 17:33:16 -Stefan_Schnabel 17:33:16 -Cynthia_Shelly 17:33:18 -janina 17:33:18 -Alexander_Surkov 17:33:19 rrsagent, make minutes 17:33:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/04/09-aria-minutes.html mattking 17:33:20 -Michael_Cooper 17:33:25 -Fred_Esch 17:33:27 -James_Nurthen 17:33:38 zakim, bye 17:33:38 leaving. As of this point the attendees were +1.416.848.aaaa, Fred_Esch, janina, Matt_King, LJWatson, Michael_Cooper, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Alexander_Surkov, Joanmarie_Diggs, 17:33:38 Zakim has left #aria 17:33:41 ... James_Craig, Stefan_Schnabel, James_Nurthen, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Cynthia_Shelly 17:33:58 rrsagent, make minutes 17:33:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/04/09-aria-minutes.html mattking 18:49:08 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 18:59:03 LJWatson has joined #aria 19:00:54 clown has joined #aria 19:25:33 LJWatson has joined #aria 19:26:42 LJWatson has left #aria 19:30:01 LJWatson has joined #aria 19:30:52 LJWatson has left #aria 20:58:11 clown has left #aria 21:24:58 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aria 21:29:07 jcraig has joined #aria 21:48:34 jcraig has joined #aria 22:13:15 janina has joined #aria 22:22:06 jcraig has joined #aria 22:44:49 jcraig has joined #aria 23:04:20 jcraig has joined #aria