19:56:01 RRSAgent has joined #sdw2 19:56:01 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-sdw2-irc 19:56:36 All Hangout URL for this call will be https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/ce2gg0fbtug4q7urls3u211gj1c 19:57:03 ebremer has left #sdw2 19:57:07 JoshLieberman has joined #sdw2 19:57:27 ClemensPortele has joined #sdw2 19:57:44 Linda has joined #sdw2 20:00:36 stlemme has joined #sdw2 20:01:41 AndreaPerego has joined #sdw2 20:01:44 MattPerry has joined #sdw2 20:04:17 phila has joined #sdw2 20:04:42 meeting: SDW Weekly, Best Practices 20:04:53 chair; Ed 20:04:57 chair: Ed 20:05:01 scribe: clemens 20:05:02 scribe: ClemensPortele 20:05:17 http://www.w3.org/2015/03/25-sdw2-minutes.html 20:05:18 TOPIC: approve minutes from last week 20:05:55 JoshLieberman: Mention on fine grained metadata - can you expand? 20:06:31 Ed: How much would we need to beyond what was happening on the web in general... 20:07:21 JoshLieberman: could be about resolution and other metadata related to spatial aspects 20:07:33 s/Ed/eparsons/ 20:08:15 eparsons: Need to revisit this when we get back to the requirements 20:08:33 Was just about to ask that! Spatial is often out ahead... 20:08:53 q+ 20:09:01 ack next 20:09:19 Can you hear me? 20:09:25 no we cant' 20:09:32 yep 20:10:11 Getting some ...breathing on the line. 20:10:58 AndreaPerego: regarding requirements not just related to spatial and which are more general - we may need to do something specific in spatial with general concepts; URIs may be an example 20:11:14 +1 20:11:18 +1 20:11:20 q+ 20:11:30 ack next 20:11:34 RESOLVED: Last week's minutes accepted http://www.w3.org/2015/03/25-sdw2-minutes.html 20:12:31 http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/open 20:12:38 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Minutes_from_Best_Practice_deliverable_group#Summary_of_Action_Items 20:13:11 AndreaPerego: Open actions in the Barcelona meetings, but not in the tracker (on Chaals and Clemens) 20:14:36 TOPIC: Discussion of use cases 20:15:01 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PSnpJYQDgsdgZgPJEfUU0EhVfgFFYGc1WL4xUX9Dunk/edit#gid=1542305387 20:15:44 TOPIC: UC 42 Crowd sourced earthquake observation information 20:15:48 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Working_Use_Cases#Crowd_sourced_earthquake_observation_information_.28Best_Practice.2CSSN.29 20:16:41 eparsons: requires spatial ontology and URIs 20:17:36 eparsons: metadata, too 20:17:41 eparsons: api not really discussing dissemination of the data 20:18:40 JoshLieberman: provenance is important, too 20:19:52 phila: not going to put into the docs that you should enable geo-location when tweeting about an earthquake 20:20:27 Let's move one 20:20:39 s/Let's move one// 20:20:51 JoshLieberman: do virtual observations apply to this? 20:22:37 eparsons: is that a requirement that is in the use case or are we extending it? 20:22:58 present+ Andrea, Clemens, Ed, Josh, Linda, Matt, Phil, stlemme 20:23:29 TOPIC: UC 43 Microscopy Imaging 20:24:48 eparsons: an issue of scale, more than anything else. Is that really different that we need to address or do we just to be clear not to be scale-specific? 20:25:37 JoshLieberman: Key is that this is not about a geo-centric reference system 20:27:20 Maybe it's just about describing the "shape" of an entity, and not to locate it. 20:28:03 eparsons: current requirement about ref system not sufficient to capture the "metaphysical" aspects 20:30:14 ACTION: Josh to come up with a sentence that captures the UC 43 discussion 20:30:14 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 20:30:55 phila: time aspect in this use case? 20:31:15 Requires not just a coordinate reference system but also an authoritative reference to the space or object that data is being positioned within / upon 20:31:32 phila: Probably the other group will deal with this (Eric is there, too) 20:31:49 s/Eric/Erich/ 20:33:18 Discussion about the term "authoritative reference". Maybe change to "global reference"? 20:34:03 +1 20:34:38 TOPIC: UC 44 Crop yield estimation 20:35:31 eparsons: from a best practice point of view, not new is apparent 20:36:07 TOPIC: UC 45 Geospatial extensions to domain-independent metadata schemas 20:37:18 ok thx phil 20:39:09 AndreaPerego: extension to general metadata standards in Europe (for geospatial and statistical data); touches several of the topics discussed before - CRS, geometries, ... 20:39:27 q+ to talk about data quality and URI design 20:39:53 AndreaPerego: Also data quality (not necessarily specific to spatial) 20:40:49 AndreaPerego: probably no new requirements, just supporting the need for a couple already identified 20:42:00 AndreaPerego: However, one question is how to model something in a non-domain-specific way (level of detail vs spatial resolution); what are the design patterns for this? 20:42:08 ack next 20:42:09 phila, you wanted to talk about data quality and URI design 20:42:37 -> http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/ DCAT 20:43:34 q- 20:43:55 phila: would be good if this group could provide input to work on extensions to DCAT for spatial 20:44:32 q+ 20:45:01 Recommendations on the use of HTTP URIs for geospatial data and metadata 20:45:22 q- 20:45:50 q+ 20:47:08 ack next 20:48:30 JoshLieberman: lots of work on metadata, many standard; also depends on the viewpoint what is called metadata 20:49:22 JoshLieberman: best practice should focus on simple things (e.g., how to find bounding box when following a link) 20:51:31 TOPIC: UC 46 Improving discovery of spatial data on the web 20:53:08 AndreaPerego: How to make spatial data more discoverable using general search engines? Use of HTML, RDFa, microdata, etc 20:53:54 Columns F & J are relevant here 20:54:04 eparsons: related to other use case, but less about recommendation when creating new resources, more about enabling existing resources 20:54:43 AndreaPerego: Not necessarily restricted to search engines, could also be other web applications 20:55:52 JoshLieberman: related to RESTful APIs? 20:56:48 JoshLieberman: in the sense of landing pages 20:58:08 in fact there are four UCs 20:58:19 in fact there are four UCs remaining 20:58:36 eparsons: send comments on the other use cases via email 20:58:43 eparsons: next week single meeting again 20:59:03 eparsons: face-to-face meeting will be at TPAC in Japan 20:59:20 phila: either Mon/Tue or Thu/Fri 20:59:40 Linda: When will this be decided? 21:00:19 phila: will work with chairs on this 21:00:27 -> http://www.sora-scc.jp/eng/index.html TPAC 2015 venue 21:01:44 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:01:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-sdw2-minutes.html phila 21:02:53 RRSAgent, generate minutes 21:02:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-sdw2-minutes.html phila