18:47:42 RRSAgent has joined #aapi 18:47:42 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-aapi-irc 18:47:44 RRSAgent, make logs member 18:47:44 Zakim has joined #aapi 18:47:46 Zakim, this will be WAI_PF 18:47:46 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(AAPI)3:00PM scheduled to start in 13 minutes 18:47:47 Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 18:47:47 Date: 31 March 2015 18:48:21 agenda: this 18:48:27 agenda+ ACTION-1590: (Joseph/James) Confirm that the AXAPI mapping of aria-owns is AXOwns array. 18:48:32 agenda+ ACTION-1279: (All) Talk to mobile manufacturers about how to include their apis. 18:48:37 agenda+ All: User Agent Implementation face-to-face in Augsut. 18:48:52 agenda+ ACTION-1373/ISSUE-441: (Cynthia) Test case for when aria-posinset and aria-setsize are provided explicitly on some but not all elements. 18:48:57 agenda+ ISSUE-700/ACTION-1544/ACTION-1546: (Rich, Cynthia, David, Alex) Mapping of role rowgroup. 18:49:03 agenda+ ISSUE-708: (All) Section 5.1.2: Condition on including elements in the accessibility tree is ambiguous. 18:49:07 agenda+ Triage: https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/23 18:49:12 agenda+ be done. 18:50:55 WAI_PFWG(AAPI)3:00PM has now started 18:51:02 +[GVoice] 18:51:13 zakim, GVoice is Joseph_Scheuhammer 18:51:13 +Joseph_Scheuhammer; got it 18:51:20 zakim, I am Joseph_Scheuhammer 18:51:20 ok, clown, I now associate you with Joseph_Scheuhammer 18:51:27 chair: Joseph_Scheuhammer 18:56:19 +Joanmarie_Diggs 19:02:08 + +1.650.738.aaaa 19:12:09 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aapi 19:13:18 +Rich_Schwerdtfeger 19:17:45 bgaraventa1979 has joined #aapi 19:18:07 zakim, I am Bryan_Garaventa 19:18:07 sorry, bgaraventa1979, I do not see a party named 'Bryan_Garaventa' 19:18:26 cyns has joined #aapi 19:18:33 zakim, aaaa is Bryan_Garaventa 19:18:33 +Bryan_Garaventa; got it 19:18:57 zakim, I am Bryan_Garaventa 19:18:57 ok, bgaraventa1979, I now associate you with Bryan_Garaventa 19:19:55 +[Microsoft] 19:19:58 MichaelC has left #aapi 19:20:05 scribe: joanie 19:20:17 zakim, microsoft has me 19:20:17 +cyns; got it 19:20:18 Zakim, take up item 1 19:20:19 agendum 1. "ACTION-1590: (Joseph/James) Confirm that the AXAPI mapping of aria-owns is AXOwns array." taken up [from clown] 19:20:23 action-1590? 19:20:23 action-1590 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Confirm that the AXAPI mapping of aria-owns is AXOwns array -- due 2015-02-27 -- CLOSED 19:20:23 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1590 19:20:34 JS: I noticed there was an error in the mappings for aria-owns. 19:21:17 JS: I asked James and he got back to me yesterday to confirm that it is AXOwns and not AXLinkedUIElements. 19:21:27 JS: Therefore, I have closed this action. 19:21:37 RS: Apple has an AXOwns? 19:21:52 JS: I came across it awhile back. I'm not sure how long it's been there. 19:22:11 JS: This prompted my question about the mapping for aria-owns on the Apple. 19:22:15 Zakim, next item 19:22:15 agendum 2. "ACTION-1279: (All) Talk to mobile manufacturers about how to include their apis." taken up [from clown] 19:22:21 action-1279? 19:22:21 action-1279 -- Shane McCarron to Talk to mobile manufacturers about how to include their apis -- due 2013-10-25 -- OPEN 19:22:21 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1279 19:22:28 JS: I brought this up on list yesterday. Rich has already replied. 19:22:49 JS: There's an old action about asking mobile manufacturers about incuding their mappings in our specs. 19:23:45 RS: We couldn't get it in time for ARIA 1.0. 19:24:22 RS: Interfaces in some cases add some further complication for mapping. 19:24:49 RS: For instance, how do you get the header information? 19:25:30 RS: I also sent a note to Dominic regarding what Google does. 19:28:30 JD: Apple now has an open means via which developers and testers can build and examine WebKit/Safari for iOS via simulator. 19:29:05 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Mar/0247.html 19:29:11 JS: Dominic has already applied (link above) 19:29:23 JS: (Reads from above message from Dominic) 19:29:24 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aapi 19:30:08 JD: Here is the link I mentioned https://www.webkit.org/blog/3457/building-webkit-for-ios-simulator/ 19:30:43 RS and JS: We need to know if we can do this in the 1.1 timeframe 19:30:46 RS: I will ask. 19:31:17 JS: We can do the Microsoft mappings in time for 1.1: Just use UIA. 19:31:30 JS: What does Firefox do on the Android? 19:32:13 JD: They also have Firefox OS. I know they're actively working on that, but I don't know any details. 19:32:21 JS: Should this still belong to Shane? 19:32:35 RS: I don't know how it got assigned to Shane. 19:32:51 RS: Assign it to me for now. 19:34:08 JD: Someone perhaps should ping Mozilla about the Firefox OS mappings. 19:34:20 JS: I'll ping Yura. 19:35:40 Zakim, next item 19:35:40 agendum 3. "All: User Agent Implementation face-to-face in Augsut." taken up [from clown] 19:35:53 scribenick: clown 19:35:53 JS: This is something Joanie wanted me to add to the agenda. 19:36:24 JD: Thanks to all the work I'm doing on new table roles, I think it would be good to face-to-face. 19:36:37 JD: Specifically the user agent issues. 19:36:50 JD: We'd want gecko developers theres. 19:37:02 JD: We'd want Cynthis to rep. Microsoft. 19:37:07 JD: And, we'd want James. 19:37:16 JD: And Joseph, since he's the editor. 19:37:42 JD: A lot of the people would already be in Toronto around that time. 19:38:01 JD: It would be good if Chris, Cynthia, and James could come. 19:38:26 scribe: joanie 19:38:27 JD: We could do work on harmonziing the mappings across platforms. 19:38:47 CS: I might be able to come. But I'm not yet sure. 19:39:15 JS: My take on the meeting is to get consistency across platforms in mapping. 19:39:43 JS: I'm not yet sure if I'll be able to attend. 19:43:51 (Group discusses other possibilities for having a face-to-face. No current, potentiall-viable candidates.) 19:44:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-aapi-minutes.html clown 19:45:09 Zakim, next item 19:45:09 agendum 4. "ACTION-1373/ISSUE-441: (Cynthia) Test case for when aria-posinset and aria-setsize are provided explicitly on some but not all elements." taken up [from clown] 19:45:15 action-1373? 19:45:15 action-1373 -- Cynthia Shelly to Create a test case for when aria-posinset and aria-setsize are provided explicitly on some but not all elements. -- due 2015-03-24 -- OPEN 19:45:15 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1373 19:45:25 JS: This one was delayed last week until today. 19:45:42 CS: I haven't had a chance yet. Leave it overdue. 19:45:44 Zakim, next item 19:45:44 agendum 4 was just opened, joanie 19:45:49 Zakim, close item 4 19:45:49 agendum 4, ACTION-1373/ISSUE-441: (Cynthia) Test case for when aria-posinset and aria-setsize are provided explicitly on some but not all elements., closed 19:45:53 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 19:45:53 5. ISSUE-700/ACTION-1544/ACTION-1546: (Rich, Cynthia, David, Alex) Mapping of role rowgroup. [from clown] 19:45:53 Zakim, next item 19:45:54 agendum 5. "ISSUE-700/ACTION-1544/ACTION-1546: (Rich, Cynthia, David, Alex) Mapping of role rowgroup." taken up [from clown] 19:46:04 JS: This is progress on the how to map rowgroup. 19:46:07 issue-700? 19:46:07 issue-700 -- Discuss rowgroup, tbody, and thead in aapis -- open 19:46:07 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/700 19:46:16 JS: What happened was Rich sent email to Alex and the list last week. 19:46:28 JS: Alex and I engaged in a discussion about it. 19:47:04 JS: What we suggested that if rowgroup doesn't have a name and isn't focusable, it shouldn't be exposed. 19:47:10 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Mar/0215.html 19:47:35 JS: Alex said that if it has a role, it should be exposed and he doesn't want to have to check if it's focusable or has a name, etc. 19:48:03 JS: In other words, Alex says if it has role="rowgroup" it should still be exposed via the accessibility API. 19:48:18 CS: We don't do that, though I can understand why. 19:48:36 JS: Alex says it's more efficient to just put it in. 19:48:48 JS: If you have a bare thead or tbody, they don't map it. 19:48:55 CS: It seems like they should be the same. 19:49:05 CS: And they don't map every single element. 19:50:07 JD: There are also implications for the new non-interactive table roles (e.g. thead) 19:50:25 CS: We already have conditional code for role mapping. 19:50:46 JS: To clarify, he did say they don't do that for role="presentation". 19:51:01 CS: I question whether the performance impact is that big a deal. 19:56:06 scribenick: clown 19:56:23 JD: If the rowgroup is focusable, then it is in the tree. We agreed on that. 19:56:37 CS: Anything that is focusable is in the tree. 19:56:58 JD: Right, but that means Orca already has to be ready to handle a focusable rowgroup. 19:57:25 JD: Given that, the code is there, and if Orca has to deal with a meaningless rowgroup, it can. 19:57:50 scribe: joanie 19:58:16 JS: Last week we agreed if rowgroup is present, but not focusable and doesn't have an attribute, it doesn't get mapped. 19:58:36 JS: And we emailed him our conclusions. 19:58:52 RS: The problem is nobody else is mapping it, right? 19:59:01 JS: Apple isn't and I don't think Microsoft isn't. 19:59:06 JS: And Joanie doesn't want to. 19:59:54 RS: I'd like to be consistent across the platforms. 20:00:38 JS: The impression I get is that Alex is not totally opposed to it, but he'd prefer not to have to special case this. 20:01:56 Zakim, next item 20:01:56 agendum 6. "ISSUE-708: (All) Section 5.1.2: Condition on including elements in the accessibility tree is ambiguous." taken up [from clown] 20:02:06 issue-708? 20:02:06 issue-708 -- The phrase "If not already excluded from the accessibility tree per the rules above" implies that the listed conditions do not override. Is that correct? -- open 20:02:06 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/708 20:02:10 JS: I started looking at the rules about when to include things in the tree. 20:02:23 JS: I found there's there's "if" clause that I don't like. 20:02:29 JS: (Reads from spec) 20:02:51 CS: There were some special cases where we excluded things. 20:02:59 CS: What are the listed exclusions? 20:03:13 JS: (Reads from the "excluded" part) 20:04:11 s/the "excluded" part/Section 5.1.1/ 20:04:33 CS: We probably can re-open this discussion. 20:05:03 CS: There was a lot of discussion in the past between PF and HTML about this. 20:08:07 -Rich_Schwerdtfeger 20:08:49 Exclusion rules: http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#exclude_elements2 20:09:02 Inclusion rules: http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#include_elements 20:09:39 CS: We should bring this up at the taskforce and get input from Steve and others. 20:10:43 action: Cynthia to bring up issue-708 with the html-a11y taskforce. 20:10:43 Created ACTION-1608 - Bring up issue-708 with the html-a11y taskforce. [on Cynthia Shelly - due 2015-04-07]. 20:10:48 action-1608? 20:10:49 action-1608 -- Cynthia Shelly to Bring up issue-708 with the html-a11y taskforce. -- due 2015-04-07 -- OPEN 20:10:49 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1608 20:11:19 -[Microsoft] 20:13:54 RRSAgent, stop 20:14:34 present+ Cynthia_Shelly 20:15:00 present- cyns 20:15:09 present- aaaa 20:15:15 RRSAgent, make minutes 20:15:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-aapi-minutes.html joanie 20:16:38 present: Cynthia_Shelly, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Joanmarie_Diggs, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Bryan_Garaventa 20:16:41 RRSAgent, make minutes 20:16:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/31-aapi-minutes.html joanie 20:17:02 RRSAgent, stop