16:03:20 RRSAgent has joined #socialig 16:03:20 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-socialig-irc 16:03:22 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:03:24 Zakim, this will be 76244 16:03:24 ok, trackbot; I see T&S_SOCIG()12:00PM scheduled to start 3 minutes ago 16:03:25 Meeting: Social Interest Group Teleconference 16:03:25 Date: 11 March 2015 16:03:46 scribe: AnnB 16:03:50 chair: elf-pavlik 16:04:04 scribenick: AnnB 16:04:06 agenda: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/2015-03-11 16:04:17 RRSAgent, generate minutes 16:04:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-socialig-minutes.html elf-pavlik 16:04:38 RRSAgent, make records public 16:04:55 present: Ann, Jules, Andy_Donovan, elf-pavlik, Lloyd_Fassett 16:05:08 action-3 16:05:09 action-3 -- Daniel Harris to Write carpooling use case (case of p2p marketplace) -- due 2015-02-11 -- CLOSED 16:05:09 http://www.w3.org/Social/InterestGroup/track/actions/3 16:05:33 topic: Mapping API User Stories to Vocabulary terms 16:05:47 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Vocabulary_TF/Mapping_API_User_Stories_to_Vocabulary_terms 16:06:19 elf: did people have a chance to review that wiki page? 16:30:35 RRSAgent has joined #socialig 16:30:35 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-socialig-irc 16:30:50 Ann: still in development, but a huge leap forward 16:31:10 Lloyd: could this tool be used with external people or entities? eg, the supply chain 16:31:36 AdamB: has been discussed quite a bit; but hard to do without security risks 16:32:29 ... we do have a Reverse Proxy system, where external people can login at the firewall .. 16:32:39 .. but we haven't applied it yet to our social tool 16:33:03 Lloyd: all sounds good; wondering how these standards will apply to your work 16:33:49 AdamB: we're such a huge company, we're like a microcosm of the public internet 16:33:58 ... problems we have are similar 16:34:08 Jules: we need to bridge silos, across the company 16:34:16 AdamB: yes, huge 16:36:07 Lloyd: we need to try to make this work for Boeing, as we're a big adopter 16:36:16 Lloyd_Fassett has joined #socialig 16:36:34 AdamB, do you have concepts like Event (temporal) or Place (spacial) used in inSite? 16:36:45 yeah, we have Events 16:36:54 we do have Locations 16:37:01 work locations, work regions 16:37:08 how about Venues, Facilities? 16:37:16 yeah, we have "buildings' 16:37:18 buildings 16:37:25 along with organizational data as well 16:37:28 Jules: if you look at people's profiles, we have regions .. organizations .. divisions ... accounting depts .. 16:38:03 Company specific information, contact, boss etc. all coming out of corporate information databases 16:38:29 AnnB: that info is coming out of corporate databases .. are those equivalent to vocabularies? 16:38:44 Jules: sort of, not exactly .. 2 levels 16:39:23 ... Library deals more with populating the values, 16:39:43 makes sense Jules 16:40:05 ... these roles are merging .. we now work as much with ontologies, schemas, models 16:40:10 Jules, do you see it related to http://schema.org/Enumeration 16:40:16 ... these are all vocabularies 16:40:21 ... controlled field-names 16:40:36 ... more of "model" for describing X type of info 16:40:47 ... then have to think about the values that populate the model 16:41:18 ... eg "Boeing Designated Expert" is a class that's in a model for insite 16:41:51 Jules, something similar to http://schema.org/Enumeration ? 16:41:59 ... underneath BDE, is the taxonomy of different types of expertise (all the engineering skills ... eg. , computational fluid dynamics) 16:42:25 ... you want people to select those terms from controlled vocabulary, so that profiles will be consistent 16:42:37 Lloyd: do you also use those terms for Processes? 16:42:41 Jules: we'd like to! 16:42:47 ... not yet, so much 16:42:59 ... still inconsistent across the company 16:43:15 .. working with our Enterprise Architecture group to be more standardized ... but it's slow 16:43:33 Lloyd: sounds like this all runs through the Boeing Library? 16:43:37 Jules: in our dreams! 16:44:01 Jules: very much a work in progress 16:44:14 ... trying to promote standards 16:44:30 ... trying to create and manage vocabularies so people won't reinvent the wheel 16:44:43 Lloyd: does W3C play a role in that, re: standards? 16:45:26 Jules: yes, definitely a role .. if I'm building an ontology, and can find one that exists, I'll try to map Boeing's stuff to that .. not easy 16:45:49 Lloyd: eg, map "computational fluid dynamics" to entry in DBpedia 16:46:02 http://www.wikidata.org/ & http://dbpedia.org 16:46:24 Andy: yes .. we might be influenced by that, but not actually making explicit URI refs 16:46:30 how about sameAs ? 16:46:43 ... we might use the term as it stands in DBpedia, but not make the external link 16:47:03 Andy_Donovan++ 16:47:04 ... we are moving toward using a lot of the OWL formats, and RDF 16:47:04 Andy_Donovan has 1 karma 16:47:15 Jules: moving that way, but not there yet 16:47:41 Lloyd: sounds important that you're moving toward RDF 16:48:07 Andy: we're using a tool right now that doesn't use RDF .. so we need to move to a tool that does 16:48:35 ... plus we're using a huge internal Thesaurus, created over 50 years, toward new techniques 16:48:37 SKOS 16:49:08 http://schema.org/Enumeration 16:49:45 Jules, but more than just a list, can have hierarchies 16:50:01 depends on need 16:50:05 and complexity of domain 16:50:10 thank you Jules :) 16:50:48 Andy_Donovan, Jules maybe useful for you http://www.productontology.org/ 16:51:06 Jules: what you're calling a vocabulary, is to me more like a 'schema' 16:51:26 AdamB: we have Activity Streams, but did not implement the spec 16:51:32 ... moving toward AS2.0 16:51:32 thanks elf! I haven't seen that before 16:52:09 ... we see activities as being potentially broad .. could be an alert generated by a Raspberry PI going off on something 16:52:41 Andy_Donovan, see FAQ: http://www.productontology.org/#faq 16:52:42 Lloyd: sounds important to combine internal and external standards 16:53:07 ... will help validate AS2.0 16:54:13 AdamB++ 16:54:15 AdamB has 4 karma 16:54:18 AnnB: we try to establish standards internally -- and to use public stds as possible 16:54:26 .. but really hard to get people to abide by them 16:55:15 AdamB: yes, we try to lead by example 16:55:28 ... embedding these standards into insite 16:55:53 Jules: yes, definitely trying to move the Library bodies of info toward more semantic standards 16:56:34 AnnB++ 16:56:36 AnnB has 8 karma 16:57:21 AnnB: Lloyd_Fassett you work in recruiting, would youl like to talk about your vocabulary requirements? 16:57:51 Lloyd: yes ... for crowdsourcing recruiting / looking for jobs 16:58:01 Lloyd_Fassett: we let users and multiple companies produce and consume - collaborating on vocabularies 16:58:03 ... other extensions, e.g., availability 16:58:27 ... eg. ,available next Wed at 3pm, or available to change jobs? 16:59:14 Lloyd: would like to create the questions, as well as the terms 17:00:08 ... once you interact with someone, you should be able to find them again 17:00:13 ... on open internet 17:00:32 Jules: I hope we'll evolve toward open "knowledge" / social graph 17:00:56 ... hoping our vocabulary management can provide foundation so that's well -structured 17:01:07 apologies, i need to drop off 17:01:07 AnnB, we shuld bring Boeing crew appreciation for RDF to WG face 2 face next week.... 17:01:07 Lloyd: yes, absolutely 17:01:13 -AdamB 17:01:14 bye Adam 17:01:38 yes, elf 17:02:49 Lloyd: also need to use vocabularies for controls of privacy / IP / etc 17:03:09 ... vocabularies will be fantastic enabler of collaboration 17:04:08 ... my main interest is how are Boeing uses vocabularies 17:04:16 ... regret that EdK couldn't be here 17:04:23 ... would like to know similar re: Ford 17:04:37 ... W3C seeks "real-world" direction 17:05:49 AnnB, still here 17:06:04 trackbot, end meeting 17:06:04 Zakim, list attendees 17:06:04 As of this point the attendees have been Ann, +1.206.261.aaaa, +1.425.965.aabb, Lloyd_Fassett, elf-pavlik, Jules, Andy_Donovan, AdamB 17:06:09 done! 17:06:12 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:06:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2015/03/11-socialig-minutes.html trackbot 17:06:13 RRSAgent, bye 17:06:38 thanks everyone! 17:06:40 ciao o/ 17:06:40 -Lloyd_Fassett 17:06:42 -Andy_Donovan 17:06:42 -Jules 17:06:43 -Ann 17:06:45 -elf-pavlik 17:06:45 T&S_SOCIG()12:00PM has ended 17:06:45 Attendees were Ann, +1.206.261.aaaa, +1.425.965.aabb, Lloyd_Fassett, elf-pavlik, Jules, Andy_Donovan, AdamB 17:07:01 dahacouk has joined #socialIG 17:08:14 dahacouk, missed daylight changes? 17:08:33 Obviously! ;-) 17:11:50 So, it'll be 5pm CET until we change over to summer time on Sunday, March 29 17:11:50 I added a countdown for 3/29 12:00am (#5650) 17:15:09 I will now peg the time of this call to 09:00 US/Pacific so that it updates the time correctly. :-) 17:30:21 Jules has left #socialig 19:06:44 AnnB has joined #socialig 19:19:37 Zakim has left #socialig 20:35:41 AnnB has joined #socialig 20:37:31 !tell dahacouk I'm so sorry you missed the call .. danged time change! 20:37:32 Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next