12:57:27 RRSAgent has joined #dwbp 12:57:27 logging to http://www.w3.org/2015/01/09-dwbp-irc 12:57:29 RRSAgent, make logs 351 12:57:29 Zakim has joined #dwbp 12:57:31 Zakim, this will be DWBP 12:57:31 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 12:57:32 Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 12:57:32 Date: 09 January 2015 12:58:02 RSSAgent, make logs public 13:01:30 Hi, 13:01:50 i'm getting a 'conf is restricted at this time' msg when trying to dial in 13:01:56 are ye online? 13:02:47 oops, i'm an hour early... 13:25:10 laufer has joined #dwbp 13:54:09 yaso has joined #dwbp 13:58:16 Hello :) 13:58:25 hi 13:58:34 zakim, who's here? 13:58:34 sorry, deirdrelee, I don't know what conference this is 13:58:36 On IRC I see yaso, Zakim, RRSAgent, deirdrelee, phila, rhiaro_, hadleybeeman, sandro, trackbot 13:58:55 zakim, this will be dwbp 13:58:55 ok, deirdrelee, I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM already started 13:58:57 Hi Deirdre 13:59:03 zakim, who's here? 13:59:03 On the phone I see [IPcaller] 13:59:05 On IRC I see yaso, Zakim, RRSAgent, deirdrelee, phila, rhiaro_, hadleybeeman, sandro, trackbot 13:59:12 zakim, ipcaller is me 13:59:12 +deirdrelee; got it 13:59:32 Hi Yaso 14:00:17 antoine has joined #dwbp 14:00:45 + +1.510.384.aaaa 14:00:49 +yaso 14:00:51 ericstephan has joined #dwbp 14:00:55 +[IPcaller] 14:01:04 +[IPcaller.a] 14:01:07 zakim, IPCaller is me 14:01:07 +antoine; got it 14:01:12 zakim, ipcaller.a is me 14:01:12 +phila; got it 14:01:29 I’m dialing! 14:01:39 + +1.509.554.aabb 14:01:46 laufer has joined #dwbp 14:01:58 + +1.617.646.aacc 14:02:01 riccardoAlbertoni has joined #DWBP 14:02:01 zakim, I am +1.509 14:02:02 +ericstephan; got it 14:02:37 zakim, who's here? 14:02:37 On the phone I see deirdrelee, +1.510.384.aaaa, yaso, antoine, phila, ericstephan, +1.617.646.aacc 14:02:40 On IRC I see riccardoAlbertoni, laufer, ericstephan, antoine, yaso, Zakim, RRSAgent, deirdrelee, phila, rhiaro_, hadleybeeman, sandro, trackbot 14:03:06 SumitPurohit has joined #DWBP 14:03:17 +[IPcaller] 14:03:26 MTCarrasco has joined #dwbp 14:03:27 gatemezi has joined #dwbp 14:03:37 Zakim, IPcaller is me 14:03:37 +laufer; got it 14:03:41 3 people from the US Pacific Time woo hoo! 14:03:41 -deirdrelee 14:04:10 BernadetteLoscio has joined #dwbp 14:04:11 Happy New Year..... 14:04:16 +HadleyBeeman 14:04:22 + +39.349.096.aadd 14:04:47 +??P27 14:04:49 zakim, +39.349.096.aadd is me 14:04:49 +riccardoAlbertoni; got it 14:05:04 zakim, +??P27 is me 14:05:04 sorry, MTCarrasco, I do not recognize a party named '+??P27' 14:05:10 Hi to all, happy 2015 .. 14:05:11 ericstephan has joined #dwbp 14:05:33 zakim, mute me 14:05:33 laufer should now be muted 14:05:36 annette_g has joined #dwbp 14:05:37 zakim, ??P27 is me 14:05:37 +MTCarrasco; got it 14:06:47 + +1.609.557.aaee 14:06:58 "zakim" took out the chair from under us 14:07:01 zakim, mute me 14:07:01 MTCarrasco should now be muted 14:07:07 Eric_Kauz has joined #DWBP 14:07:22 +[IPcaller] 14:07:24 zakim, ipcaller is BernadetteLoscio 14:07:24 +BernadetteLoscio; got it 14:07:35 deirdrelee_ has joined #dwbp 14:07:42 newton has joined #dwbp 14:07:42 Zakim, who is here? 14:07:43 On the phone I see +1.510.384.aaaa, yaso, antoine, phila, ericstephan, +1.617.646.aacc, laufer (muted), HadleyBeeman, riccardoAlbertoni, MTCarrasco (muted), +1.609.557.aaee, 14:07:46 ... BernadetteLoscio 14:07:46 On IRC I see newton, deirdrelee_, Eric_Kauz, annette_g, ericstephan, BernadetteLoscio, gatemezi, MTCarrasco, SumitPurohit, riccardoAlbertoni, laufer, antoine, yaso, Zakim, 14:07:46 ... RRSAgent, deirdrelee, phila, rhiaro_, hadleybeeman, sandro, trackbot 14:07:55 +1.510 is me 14:08:01 sorry, wifi crashed... 14:08:04 back in a sec 14:08:06 zakim, aaee is me 14:08:06 +Eric_Kauz; got it 14:08:16 in the meantime,we need a scribe.. 14:08:19 no worries, deirdrelee_. Sorry you're having trouble! 14:08:24 Zakim, aaaa is me 14:08:24 +annette_g; got it 14:08:44 +[IPcaller] 14:09:04 zakim, ipcaller is deirdrelee 14:09:04 +deirdrelee; got it 14:09:52 zakim, pick a victim 14:09:52 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose BernadetteLoscio 14:10:12 zakim, pick a victim 14:10:12 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose ericstephan 14:10:24 newton has joined #dwbp 14:10:25 I am more of a scribble than a scribe but ok 14:10:37 scribe: ericstephan 14:10:43 yaso_ has joined #dwbp 14:10:44 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150108 14:11:29 deirdrelle_: Working on the bp document and the aim is to get the bp document out by the end of the month. 14:11:35 q+ to talk about schedule 14:11:41 q? 14:11:57 ack me 14:11:57 phila, you wanted to talk about schedule 14:11:58 deirdrelee: just to follow the agenda we go back to the minutes..phil? 14:12:47 phila: From an outside perspective we have not been productive. We really need the document done ready for review next week. 14:13:01 phila: Without publication we could be closed down 14:13:26 http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-19 14:13:26 phila: We are under scrutiny because the publication processs takes a bit 14:13:44 propose: approve last meeting minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-19 14:14:06 proposed: approve last meeting minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-19 14:14:10 +??P34 14:14:16 +1 14:14:16 +1 14:14:17 +1 14:14:19 +1 14:14:20 +1 14:14:21 +1 14:14:24 +1 14:14:26 -??P34 14:14:27 +1 14:14:28 +1 14:14:38 0 (was not here) 14:14:39 +1 14:14:40 CarlosIglesias has joined #dwbp 14:14:43 resolved: approve last meeting minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-19 14:14:54 +??P34 14:15:04 zakim, P34 is me 14:15:04 sorry, CarlosIglesias, I do not recognize a party named 'P34' 14:15:11 zakim, ??P34 is me 14:15:11 +CarlosIglesias; got it 14:16:07 deirdrelee: UCR document is still being worked on and checked into gihub by today. 14:16:22 Topic: best practice document 14:16:31 -> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html BP Doc today 14:17:06 bernadette: This week we sent an updated version of the document and included some best practices, created from the use case document. The idea is that these requirements will be reflected in the bp 14:17:48 bernadette: Now we have in the best practice summary 25 best practices, however they are not complete. 14:18:35 bernadette: For example in data quality there are some grey areas where it isn't clear whether the requirement is for a bp or for the data quality vocabulary 14:19:13 bernadette: Also sent out a request for contributors, we the editors can't write it all. 14:19:28 q? 14:19:54 q+ 14:19:55 bernadette: We put up a wiki page in the email sent yesterday. I think we made some progress. We have a lot to do. 14:20:47 bernadette: We can choose not to work on all of the challenges identified in the use case document. In section 4 we have a list of the challenges and each challenge will have a list of bp. 14:21:29 bernadette: we need help in the challenges and we need contributors for each section. 14:22:11 bernadette: Thank you for creating the issues that I included in the document. Thanks @phila 14:22:47 bernadette: I'd like to hear your opinion about focusing on some challenges and what can we do for people to contribute. 14:23:17 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page#Best_Practices 14:23:34 deirdrelee_++ I am a contributor and I have no idea any more how all this is handled 14:23:37 deirdrelee: can we start with the contributors in the bp. How does this relate to the original people assigned to these sections? 14:23:51 q? 14:24:18 bernadette: It would be great for the people originally assigned to contribute, we just need people to write. 14:24:58 q- 14:25:26 deirdrelee: Should we run through the list of original contributors and see their commitment? 14:26:17 deirdrelee: We have 13 people on the call and 13 sections. 14:26:22 q+ 14:27:59 ericstephan: I'd be happy to contact some of the original contributors and try and encourage them to make good on their promise (paraphrase) 14:28:00 I apply to works on http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#dataIdentification 14:30:33 annette_g: data versioning and data formats 14:30:42 erica_kauz: data formats 14:30:56 I can try to write something rather general on data quality, anyone can join me? 14:30:57 I can also work on bp #11, #13 or #14. 14:31:31 ..of course not all, if some can join me 14:31:52 antoine: data quality activities have been postponed for the time being.... 14:32:00 I initially worked on Data Format with Eric K, i can continue that 14:32:27 deirdrelee: Is there some plan around data quality, can we make some efforts to report back next week? 14:32:41 q+ to make a suggestion about the vocabs 14:32:54 antoine: I want to make sure this is independent of the vocabulary for now. 14:33:01 ack eric 14:33:05 ack phil 14:33:05 phila, you wanted to make a suggestion about the vocabs 14:33:59 phila: We aren't getting the input that we need to make progress on the vocabularies. We perhaps need to get real world people to say I would use...we might need to rethink this... 14:34:13 q- 14:34:18 phila: This is after the bp working draft 14:34:21 +1 14:34:59 phila: A working draft can have open issues. My concern is that the document is not quite ready. We need more bp written. 14:35:29 phila: not ready +1 it needs a lot of work 14:35:35 +Steve 14:35:38 q+ 14:35:41 adler1 has joined #DWBP 14:35:51 sorry for being late 14:35:59 antoine: I could continue contributing toward vocabulary section I don't know who is working on this section 14:36:46 q? 14:36:59 deirdrelee: Would it make sense to put the other people you are aware of contributing and work with them to get more input? 14:37:16 https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/blob/gh-pages/bp.html 14:38:10 deirdrelee: eric_kauz do you still want to be on the data vocabulary? 14:38:26 eric_kauz: that would be fine 14:38:34 q+ 14:38:38 ack BernadetteLoscio 14:39:07 bernadette: What we need to do is complete the BP for the vocabulary. Igy made some progress, but the BP is not complete. Review the text that is that and complete the BP 14:39:33 antoine: Do you know if Iggy is still working on this section? 14:39:47 bernadette: I don't think Iggy is working on this. 14:39:58 q- 14:40:47 ping rhiaro_ 14:40:48 I can also work on Granularity 14:41:15 Carlos: I think I am already on a couple of sections so I will work on those. 14:41:21 -BernadetteLoscio 14:41:26 zakim, who is noisy? 14:41:37 hadleybeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: deirdrelee (5%), CarlosIglesias (79%) 14:41:40 I can try with Best Practice 14: Provide Data License .. 14:41:44 Deirdrelee: Can you add you name to list bernadette just created? 14:41:50 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Call_for_BP_Contributors 14:42:12 bad echo on the phone 14:42:14 Bad echo on the line 14:42:27 noise and echo, please repeate.. 14:42:40 zakim mute carlos 14:42:46 zakim, mute carlos 14:42:46 CarlosIglesias should now be muted 14:43:45 deirdrelee: moving back to the actual document and bernadette do you want to go through the document and close the issues as we go 14:43:51 http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html 14:44:26 phila: bernadette can you take us through the issues and close ones that we know are already resolved? 14:44:46 http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html 14:45:09 issue-100? 14:45:11 issue-100 -- organising BPs around Life Cycle -- open 14:45:11 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/100 14:45:20 +[IPcaller] 14:45:56 zakim, ipcaller is BernadetteLoscio 14:45:56 +BernadetteLoscio; got it 14:46:05 deirdrelee: newton lead us thru discussion issues on the BP document...? Or bernadette? 14:46:50 newton: bernadette will know more about the issues because I have been working thru another part of the document. 14:48:25 bernadette: organizing bp around the lifecycle....I am not sure if there is a bp for data creation, is it possible to identify if this makes sense for data publication. 14:48:45 q+ 14:48:51 q+ 14:49:13 ack deirdrelee_ 14:49:34 q+ to show a poss apporach 14:49:41 zakim, unmute me 14:49:41 laufer should no longer be muted 14:49:43 ack deirdrelee_ 14:49:48 deirdrelee: bp for lifecycle can be done after the bp have been followed. After the bp have been written, here is how the bp can be applied in the context of lifecycle. 14:50:40 ack laufer 14:50:46 ack me 14:50:46 phila, you wanted to show a poss apporach 14:50:50 http://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/bp/cas/ 14:50:52 zakim, mute me 14:50:52 laufer should now be muted 14:50:57 ack phila 14:51:09 laufer: In the example of metadata, we have one phase of the lifecycle. I agree with bernadette. 14:51:54 phila: maybe the document can be organized by challenge. It might relate to several one one life cycle stages. 14:52:26 Close Issue-100, resolve structure once more BPs have been written 14:52:32 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/101 14:52:49 phila: editors choice on the issue 14:52:56 issue-101, close 14:53:06 trackbot, close issue-100 14:53:06 Closed issue-100. 14:53:16 issue-102? 14:53:16 issue-102 -- Uuse Cases-BP links -- open 14:53:16 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/102 14:53:17 deirdrelee: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/102 14:53:20 trackbot close issue-101 Editor's discretion 14:53:20 Sorry, phila, I don't understand 'trackbot close issue-101 Editor's discretion'. Please refer to for help. 14:53:26 trackbot, close issue-101 Editor's discretion 14:53:26 Sorry, phila, I don't understand 'trackbot, close issue-101 Editor's discretion'. Please refer to for help. 14:53:35 trackbot, close issue-101 14:53:35 Closed issue-101. 14:53:53 trackbot, close issue-102 14:53:53 Closed issue-102. 14:53:56 deirdrelee: If no one else feels strongly about 102 we close that as well. 14:54:00 issue-103 14:54:00 issue-103 -- Should we talk about the diff types of user -- open 14:54:00 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/103 14:54:06 issue-103? 14:54:06 issue-103 -- Should we talk about the diff types of user -- open 14:54:06 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/103 14:54:06 102 also looks like an editors' decision 14:54:53 q+ 14:55:40 hadleybeeman: does it help us explain anything else? If it is just general then it might not be important to explain. 14:56:07 user is fine 14:56:18 deirdrelee: consistency in use of the terms is the most important thing to keep in mind. 14:56:38 bernadette: I agree, need to check this out. 14:56:44 q+ 14:56:45 consumer implies paying 14:56:48 ack me 14:56:48 q+ 14:57:04 zakim, unmute me 14:57:04 laufer should no longer be muted 14:57:16 phila: I thought I heard Deirdre prefered user as opposed to consumer. Something more commonly used. 14:57:23 PROPOSED: Data User is the term we will use unless there's a specific context that suggests otherwise 14:57:29 Agree that user is better 14:57:31 +1 14:57:42 bernadette: I'm not sure... 14:57:55 q? 14:57:58 ack annette_g 14:58:38 q+ to talk about consistency of terms and how people read specs 14:58:55 ack laufer 14:58:58 annette_g: The word user can be confused with a data user versus end user. Maybe the phrase data user would help. 14:59:30 -deirdrelee 14:59:39 laufer: I think that user can be confusing. I agree with Annette. Data user and not just user alone. 14:59:48 data user seems to be more generic, as it contains "end users", "developers", etc. 14:59:49 data user isn’t the same as the developer? 15:00:01 ack hadleybeeman 15:00:01 hadleybeeman, you wanted to talk about consistency of terms and how people read specs 15:00:28 zakim, mute me 15:00:28 laufer should now be muted 15:00:29 darnit, call dropped and zakim won't let me back in 15:00:32 hadleybeeman: I see plusses and minuses to both consumer and user. Whatever term we use we should be consistent, or ot could be more confusing 15:00:37 hadleybeeman, can you wrap up? 15:01:08 hadleybeeman: If we were writing a narrative then a variety of terms is good but most people will read specs by jumping around, just hte bots they want, so uniformity is important 15:01:21 hadley: I just wanted to say I see both + and - about either approach. Data user versus user. To annette's approach about how we write. If people just jump around reading parts of the bp document we want to ensure consistency 15:01:48 +1 to Hadley 15:02:01 -MTCarrasco 15:02:05 bye all, nice wkd... 15:02:07 -Steve 15:02:07 Bye all! 15:02:08 -antoine 15:02:11 -HadleyBeeman 15:02:12 byebye 15:02:12 -phila 15:02:12 ciao 15:02:12 Bye 15:02:13 - +1.617.646.aacc 15:02:13 -annette_g 15:02:14 -laufer 15:02:16 -BernadetteLoscio 15:02:16 -ericstephan 15:02:20 bye 15:02:21 -CarlosIglesias 15:02:28 zakim, bye 15:02:28 leaving. As of this point the attendees were deirdrelee, +1.510.384.aaaa, yaso, antoine, phila, +1.509.554.aabb, +1.617.646.aacc, ericstephan, laufer, HadleyBeeman, 15:02:28 Zakim has left #dwbp 15:02:32 ... riccardoAlbertoni, MTCarrasco, +1.609.557.aaee, BernadetteLoscio, Eric_Kauz, annette_g, CarlosIglesias, Steve 15:02:36 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:02:46 hadley: just to underscrore the schedule deirdre brought to our attention. We need to make lots of progress this next week. 15:03:08 sorry for being behind on the scribing. 15:42:51 newton has joined #dwbp 16:39:04 newton has joined #dwbp 17:20:05 newton has joined #dwbp 18:20:19 yaso has joined #dwbp 18:40:37 yaso has joined #dwbp 19:56:57 yaso has joined #dwbp 20:11:46 phila has joined #dwbp 20:23:43 BernadetteLoscio has joined #dwbp 20:35:17 yaso has joined #dwbp