Wednesday at 8:00am US Eastern time for 120 minutes
Please check your timezone: -- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?iso=2016-12-14T05:00:00&p1=224&p2=43&p3=48&p4=47 WebEx (for audio): https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2f433ba94951cf59f6da984c15500e5e To join by phone: +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number Access code/Meeting number: 646 464 360 IRC channel: #shapes on irc.w3.org on port 6665 (irc link, W3C web irc link) To start meeting (ignore errors related to Zakim not knowing what teleconf this is): trackbot, start meeting Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
- 1 Admin
- 2 WG Outlook
- 3 Moving advanced SPARQL features into separate document
- 4 ISSUE-211: Eliminate property constraints
- 5 ISSUE-216: Shall we switch to the (mathematical) style of definitions suggested by Peter?
- 6 ISSUE-179: label annotations
- 7 ISSUE-182: Clarifications needed to section 3.0
- 8 ISSUE-194: valueStem
- 9 ISSUE-202: Remove pre-binding from core
- 10 ISSUE-203: Constraint Components
- 11 ISSUE-204: Constraint node
- 12 ISSUE-208: $this
- 13 AOB
- Chair: ?
- Scribe: First available on the scribe list.
Minutes of last meeting
PROPOSED: Approve minutes of the 14 Dec 2016 Telecon: https://www.w3.org/2016/12/14-shapes-minutes.html
- Wednesday 2017.01.11
- Discuss timeline and plan forward
Moving advanced SPARQL features into separate document
Discuss https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Dec/0063.html and moving three of the less important SPARQL features into a separate document. This document would have its own life cycle.
ISSUE-211: Eliminate property constraints
Proposal to reopen ISSUE-211. Discuss https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Dec/0064.html and hopefully approve switching to the new, cleaner branch (if only as an intermediate step). Further discuss whether we may have enough time to do another round of metamodel refactoring (W3C has hinted at a possible 3-6 months extension which could make this possible).
ISSUE-216: Shall we switch to the (mathematical) style of definitions suggested by Peter?
Discuss ISSUE-216 and what to do with the restructuring of the spec suggested by Peter, see
ISSUE-179: label annotations
Discuss ISSUE-179: label annotations
PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-179 as out of scope (and out of time), e.g. leave it to Community Groups
ISSUE-182: Clarifications needed to section 3.0
PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-182 as addressed by the current spec (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Oct/0056.html)
Discuss ISSUE-194: valueStem
PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-194 deleting sh:stem as rather useless (it is a short cut for sh:pattern which supports the use of regular expressions)
ISSUE-202: Remove pre-binding from core
PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-202 as explained in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Nov/0080.html
ISSUE-203: Constraint Components
Discuss ISSUE-203: Constraint Components
PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-203 as addressed by https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Nov/0112.html
ISSUE-204: Constraint node
Discuss ISSUE-204: Constraint node
PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-204 as addressed by https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Nov/0113.html
Discuss ISSUE-208: $this
PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-208 as addressed by https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016Nov/0027.html