Meetings:Telecon2015.11.05

Thursday at 2pm US Eastern time for 90 minutes
  The US and Europe should be back on the usual time offset, but please effect check your timezone: -- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?msg=RDF+Data+Shapes+meeting&iso=20151105T11&p1=224&p2=43&p3=195&p4=26&p5=240 
 WebEx (for audio): https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2f433ba94951cf59f6da984c15500e5e
  To join by phone: +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number
  Access code/Meeting number: 646 464 360
IRC channel: #shapes on irc.w3.org on port 6665 (irc link, W3C web irc link)
To start meeting (ignore errors related to Zakim not knowing what teleconf this is): trackbot, start meeting
Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent

Admin

• Chair: Arnaud
• Scribe: Jose Labra, first available on the scribe list.

Minutes of last meeting

PROPOSED: Approve minutes of the 29 October Telecon: http://www.w3.org/2015/10/29-shapes-minutes.html

Next meeting

• Telecon 2015.11.12

Disposal of Raised Issues

PROPOSED: Open ISSUE-105, ISSUE-106, ISSUE-107, ISSUE-108, ISSUE-109

• ISSUE-105: SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined
• ISSUE-106: Annotation properties are not defined well
• ISSUE-107: annotations and arguments use different mechanisms for specifying the SPARQL variable name
• ISSUE-108: Should operations be specified?
• ISSUE-109: SHACL requires that SPARQL implementations be able to call functions defined on the fly

ISSUE-84: Allowed IRIs

PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-84, node constraints are now addressed with sh:in

• ISSUE-84: Constraint to limit IRIs of focus nodes to a given enumeration (similar to owl:oneOf)
• ISSUE-84 Proposals

ISSUE-88: qualifiedValue

PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-88, no longer needed - sh:qualifiedValueShape can now be applied to literals too.

• ISSUE-88: Should we add sh:qualifiedValue ?
• ISSUE-88 Proposals

ISSUE-61: Direction of sh:nodeShape

PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-61, replacing sh:nodeShape with sh:scopeNode, which points from a shape to a node, and specifying that sh:scopeNode triples must live in the shapes graph.

• ISSUE-61: Direction of individual scoping: sh:nodeShape vs. sh:individualScope
• ISSUE-61 Proposals

ISSUE-100: sh:index

PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-100, adding sh:index as proposed.

• ISSUE-100: Specifying the order of property constraints (e.g. with sh:index)
• ISSUE-100 Proposals

ISSUE-22: recursion

Discuss ISSUE-22: Treatment of recursive shape definitions

• ACTION-29: Provide a proposal for recursion (from OSLC + shex static analysis)

ISSUE-93: engine / language

Continue discussion on ISSUE-93: SHACL engine vs. SHACL instance requirements along with validation vs other uses of SHACL