Meetings:Telecon2015.10.08

Thursday at 2pm US Eastern time for 90 minutes
  Beware US and Europe Daylight Saving Time in effect check your timezone: -- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?msg=RDF+Data+Shapes+meeting&iso=20151008T11&p1=224&p2=43&p3=195&p4=26&p5=240 
 WebEx (for audio): https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=md9c1af126a726fed73c5d8fb2c6bb217
  To join by phone: +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number
  Access code/Meeting number: 646 464 360
IRC channel: #shapes on irc.w3.org on port 6665 (irc link, W3C web irc link)
To start meeting (ignore errors related to Zakim not knowing what teleconf this is): trackbot, start meeting
Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent

Admin

• Chair: Arnaud
• Scribe: Karen Coyle, first available on the scribe list.

Minutes of last meeting

PROPOSED: Approve minutes of the 1 October Telecon: http://www.w3.org/2015/10/01-shapes-minutes.html

Next meeting

• Telecon 2015.10.15

Disposal of Raised Issues

PROPOSED: Open ISSUE-98, ISSUE-99, ISSUE-100

• ISSUE-98: Proposal to generalize property constraints into node constraints
• ISSUE-99: Special treatment of rdfs:Resource and rdf:List in sh:valueClass (and possibly elsewhere)
• ISSUE-100: Proposal to allow (optional) sh:index for property constraints

ISSUE-95: Template Simplifications

PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-95, adopting Holger's proposed simplifications

• ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism

ISSUE-91: default cardinality

PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-91, keep defaults as 0 and unbound, in line with resolution of ISSUE-59

• ISSUE-91: Default Cardinality in property constraints

ISSUE-57: group cardinality

Discuss ISSUE-57: Cardinalities on expressions or groups of triple constraints

ISSUE-86: ontology association

Discuss ISSUE-86: Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies

ISSUE-92: additive repeated properties

Discuss ISSUE-92: Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive?

• Eric's proposal
• Holger's proposal
• Arthur's proposal

ISSUE-93: engine / language

Discuss ISSUE-93: SHACL engine vs. SHACL instance requirements

ISSUE-94: separate syntax and semantics

Discuss ISSUE-94: Should RDF syntax requirements be separated from SHACL semantics

ISSUE-96: Violation IDs

Discuss ISSUE-96: Should the validation results contain stable IDs to indicate the type of violation