Meetings:Telecon2015.07.09
From RDF Data Shapes Working Group
Thursday at 2pm US Eastern time for 90 minutes Beware US and Europe Daylight Saving Time in effect check your timezone: -- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?msg=RDF+Data+Shapes+meeting&iso=20150709T11&p1=224&p2=43&p3=195&p4=26&p5=240 ** WebEx ** (for audio): https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m3f7be74bc0d7a0abf0405fe5661ee163 To join by phone: +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number Access code/Meeting number: 640 811 616 IRC channel: #shapes on irc.w3.org on port 6665 (irc link, W3C web irc link) To start meeting: trackbot, start meeting Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Contents
- 1 Admin
- 2 Reference Guide
- 3 ISSUE-22: Treatment of recursive shape definitions]
- 4 ISSUE-66: SHACL spec ill-founded due to non-convergence on data loops
- 5 ISSUE-62: Selection or filtering by arbitrary expressions and shapes
- 6 ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how?
- 7 More issues
- 8 AOB
Admin
- Chair: Arnaud
- Scribe: Michel Dumontier, or Dimitris Kontokostas, first available on the scribe list.
Minutes of last meeting
PROPOSED: Approve minutes of the 2 July Telecon: http://www.w3.org/2015/07/02-shapes-minutes.html
Next meeting
- Teleconf 2015.07.16
Reference Guide
ISSUE-22: Treatment of recursive shape definitions]
ISSUE-66: SHACL spec ill-founded due to non-convergence on data loops
ISSUE-62: Selection or filtering by arbitrary expressions and shapes
- Discuss ISSUE-62: Selection or filtering by arbitrary expressions and shapes
- Holger's proposed change
ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how?
- Two different proposals:
- PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? by allowing access to the shape graph, per Holger's current draft.
- PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? not requiring that the shape graph be accessible when evaluating constraints on the data graph, per Peter's email
More issues
- Discuss ISSUE-61: Direction of individual scoping: sh:nodeShape vs. sh:individualScope
- Discuss ISSUE-65: A consistent and cohesive definition of shapes, scopes, and constraints
- SHACL Editor's draft