ISSUE-70: special treatment of blank node types

blank node default type

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SHACL Spec

Raised by:

Peter Patel-Schneider

Opened on:

2015-06-19

Description:

http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-ref/ treats blank nodes specially in value type constraints.

This is different from http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#function-hasDatatype.

Special treatment of blank nodes is not needed.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-09-17)
Draft status (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-04)
Re: RDF Data Shapes WG [minutes] for 27 August 2015 (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2015-08-28)
Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-28)
Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-08-27)
Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-27)
Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-27)
Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-08-26)
my vote on ISSUE-70 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-08-26)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-24)
ISSUE-70: Proposed clean up of sh:defaultValueType (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-24)
Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2015-08-20)
Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-08-19)
Re: nomenclature in current document - ISSUE-65 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-08-14)
Re: shapes-ISSUE-70 (blank node default type): special treatment of blank node types [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-06-19)
shapes-ISSUE-70 (blank node default type): special treatment of blank node types [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-06-19)

RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-70, stating that rdf:type statements are optional but SHOULD be included whenever possible on IRI nodes. omitting rdf:type statements may have various negative effects
See http://www.w3.org/2015/09/03-shapes-minutes.html#resolution03

Arnaud Le Hors, 4 Sep 2015, 15:38:59