ISSUE-34: 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint
OrConstraint
2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Simon Steyskal
- Opened on:
- 2015-04-02
- Description:
- I was wondering whether we want to "limit" ourselves to 2 disjuncts (i.e. sh:shape1 & sh:shape2) at a time, rather than having potentially n disjuncts as proposed by Eric's "sh:choice" construct.
Ofc, one could nest another sh:OrConstraint within sh:shape2 and if necessary another one in the nested one and so forth, but I guess this gets pretty ugly/verbose very quickly.
Any thoughts on this? Or am I missing something?
cheers,
simon - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-04-03)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (from simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at on 2015-04-02)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-04-02)
- shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-04-02)
Related notes:
fixed as stated in [1]..
[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2015Apr/0050.html
Display change log