ISSUE-226: Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context

JSON-LD @context

Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Holger Knublauch

Opened on:

2017-02-09

Description:

(This is entirely optional and not to hold off any W3C process)

See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2017Feb/0010.html there will likely be some value for the adoption of SHACL if there was a de-facto standard ("recommended") JSON-LD serialization context, possibly with framing.

This ticket is to organize the discussion around this topic.

Related Actions Items:

• ACTION-48 on Pano Maria to Produce a json-ld @context draft - due 2017-02-22, closed

Related emails:

1. Re: shapes-ISSUE-226 (JSON-LD @context): Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2017-02-09)
2. shapes-ISSUE-226 (JSON-LD @context): Should the WG produce a JSON-LD @context (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2017-02-09)

Related notes:

Display change log