ISSUE-112: SHACL uses rdfs:label and rdfs:comment in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning

misuse of some RDFS properties

SHACL uses rdfs:label and rdfs:comment in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SHACL Spec

Raised by:

Peter Patel-Schneider

Opened on:

2015-11-05

Description:

From http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/:

Property constraints may have an rdfs:label to provide a human-readable label for the property in the scope where it appears.

From http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/

rdfs:label is an instance of rdf:Property that may be used to provide a human-readable version of a resource's name. A triple of the form: R rdfs:label L . states that L is a human readable label for R.

The SHACL use does not abide by the RDFS meaning. SHACL should not use RDFS properties in ways that violate their RDFS meaning.

Similarly for rdfs:comment.


PROPOSAL: Remove the non-conforming wording for and uses of rdfs:label and rdfs:commment.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. ISSUE-112: Proposal using sh:name and sh:description (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-14)
2. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-12)
3. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-11)
4. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-11)
5. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-11)
6. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-10)
7. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-10)
8. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-10)
9. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-09)
10. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-09)
11. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-09)
12. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-08)
13. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-07)
14. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-11-06)
15. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-06)
16. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-06)
17. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-11-06)
18. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-06)
19. Re: shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-06)
20. shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-11-05)

Related notes:

Display change log