13:50:27 RRSAgent has joined #dacg 13:50:27 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/12/17-dacg-irc 13:50:37 zakim, this will be DACG 13:50:37 ok, phila; I see DATA_DACG()9:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes 13:50:46 RRSAgent, make logs member 13:50:53 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:51:01 zakim, clear agenda 13:51:01 agenda cleared 13:51:30 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/data/CG/wiki/Telecon:2014.12.17 13:51:36 phila has changed the topic to: Agenda for today is at https://www.w3.org/2013/data/CG/wiki/Telecon:2014.12.17 13:51:40 chair: Phil 13:51:45 scribe: phila 13:52:25 agenda+ Updates round the table 13:52:35 agenda+ Spatial Data WG 13:52:47 agenda+ This CG, useful or not? 13:52:57 agenda+ DNM 13:57:51 zakim, agenda? 13:57:51 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda: 13:57:52 1. Updates round the table [from phila] 13:57:52 2. Spatial Data WG [from phila] 13:57:52 3. This CG, useful or not? [from phila] 13:57:52 4. DNM [from phila] 14:00:36 zakim, code? 14:00:37 the conference code is 3224 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), phila 14:00:46 DATA_DACG()9:00AM has now started 14:00:53 +[IPcaller] 14:00:54 zakim, ipcaller is me 14:00:55 +phila; got it 14:02:52 zakim, dial ivan-voip 14:02:52 ok, ivan; the call is being made 14:02:54 +Ivan 14:03:36 Arnaud has joined #dacg 14:03:51 +Arnaud 14:04:18 +[IPcaller] 14:04:22 Soeren has joined #dacg 14:04:40 Sebastian has joined #dacg 14:05:28 +[IPcaller.a] 14:06:06 zakim, ipcaller is Soeren 14:06:06 +Soeren; got it 14:06:16 zakim, ipcaller.a is Sebastian 14:06:17 +Sebastian; got it 14:06:44 http://www.w3.org/2014/12/16-w3process-minutes.html#item03 14:07:23 +Kerstin_Forsberg 14:08:07 Kerstin has joined #dacg 14:08:27 zakim, take up agendam 4 14:08:27 'm\ 4' does not match any agenda item, phila 14:08:34 zakim, take up agendum 4 14:08:34 agendum 4. "DNM" taken up [from phila] 14:08:40 zakim, take up agendum 3 14:08:40 agendum 3. "This CG, useful or not?" taken up [from phila] 14:09:07 Arnaud: I get info I wouldn't get any other way, so I find it useful 14:09:25 ivan: When I was Activity lead it was useful for me 14:09:45 ivan: it was not always easy to find a specific topic to discuss 14:09:56 ... now in a different situation 14:10:16 ... not really part of this any more 14:10:20 phila: Why no call in the DPub Activity 14:10:30 ivan: We only have one group (plus annotations) 14:10:37 ... not a lot to coordinate 14:10:47 ... if we get more then yes, we may want to set uo a CG 14:11:09 ... what did come up in discussion, not with the chairs, but with AC Reps (publishers etc) 14:11:23 ... they'd like to have some sort of a group that looks at the strategic level 14:11:35 ... what should be happening in the Activity 14:11:56 ... maybe Arnaud is both 14:12:16 ... it's not a Coordination Group, it's a driving committee... 14:13:13 phila: Sounds like Soeren, Sebastian and Kerstin here 14:13:29 ivan: Hmm... in DPub it would be different kinds of people, more business focused 14:13:51 Soeren: I'm at Fraunhofer as well as at the Uni. So I think I have some impact from that area 14:14:16 ... but I think we could strengthen the stakeholder involvement. They'd be too far fron the IT dept. to come to this call 14:14:28 ... they're more users of tech than leaders 14:14:42 ivan: I agree, yes. Not easy to find those people 14:15:13 ... if I look at Cambridge Semantics - we know some people v well. But they have some more on business side of same group who we don't know 14:16:16 Sebastian: I think the call is quite good as it provides info at the right level. I'm also in this bridging people - what kind of standardisation is goinbg on wrt data 14:16:27 ... there is a group of people interested in these topics 14:16:42 ... industries, integrators etc. 14:16:50 ... MarkLogic, SWC etc. 14:17:07 ... so for me it's usefeul 14:17:32 Kerstin: For me it's an opportunity for updates on what's happening on Web of Data 14:17:41 ... trying to be connected in HCLS etc. 14:18:23 zakim, who is here? 14:18:23 On the phone I see phila, Ivan, Arnaud, Soeren, Sebastian, Kerstin_Forsberg 14:18:26 On IRC I see Kerstin, Sebastian, Soeren, Arnaud, RRSAgent, Zakim, phila, tbaker, ivan, sandro 14:19:30 topic: Infrastructure, SEMANTiCS 14:20:19 Sebastian: Idea is to have a workshop at SEMANTiCS on infrastructure and standards - infrastructure helped by standards 14:20:33 ... so maybe Shapes work -> validators as part of the stack 14:21:08 ... want to explore relationship between the two. topic will evolve as we develop the workshop ideas 14:22:30 Arnaud: I see the relationship between the two but it's not my thing. 14:22:45 ... Market pressure means that standards are seen as taking too long 14:23:05 ... we have a whole group working on LD, and yet it hasn't taken over IBM and there are sceptics 14:23:21 ... so always interested in discussions around insights into the market. 14:24:05 Soeren: What I feel in Germany now - there's a great push towards Industrie 4.0; linking machiens and shop floors 14:24:16 ... is there something at W3C on this? 14:24:59 http://www.gs1.org/docs/gtin_plus/GTINOTW-ImplementationGuide-i1-prd1.pdf 14:26:57 Soeren: I was thinking about sensors on the manufacturing floor 14:27:13 ... and I think LD and W3C can help there 14:27:38 ... I think they use a lot of proprietary methods. If you have hundreds of robots from diff manufacturers/open standards you need more 14:27:49 http://www.w3.org/2014/spatial/charter 14:30:16 Topic: VREs 14:30:18 Kerstin: I've not come across that 14:31:50 More concerned with IMI. OpenPhacts, SemWeb comes up more and more 14:32:56 topic: LDP extension 14:33:13 Arnaud: LDP initially chartered to June 2014 (3 years) 14:33:27 ... we weren't done, asked for extension until now. Managed to publish main spec at PR 14:33:40 ... LDP Paging spec split out from that main spec is now at CR 14:33:46 ... so what's next? 14:33:52 ... plenty more to do 14:34:16 ... developed the wish list... => new charter? But people weren't sure what the priorities were. 14:34:47 ... multiple discussions... wait another 6 months and see what happens... lead to request for a further 6 month experiment 14:35:03 ... also asking to host a workshop to ask the community about what the priorities are 14:35:27 ... Now have LD Patch format to incrementally update data 14:36:19 phila: Do you agree with Sandro that this is really about Web Apps 14:36:31 ... Social Web WG is looking at LDP for their protocol 14:36:39 ... we might see what they would need. 14:36:46 ... we could wait and see what their requirements are 14:38:20 -Ivan 14:38:21 -Kerstin_Forsberg 14:38:21 -Arnaud 14:38:22 -Sebastian 14:38:24 -phila 14:38:24 -Soeren 14:38:25 DATA_DACG()9:00AM has ended 14:38:25 Attendees were phila, Ivan, Arnaud, Soeren, Sebastian, Kerstin_Forsberg 14:38:42 Topic: Date Next Meeting 14:39:00 Next meeting will be 4 February 14:39:07 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:39:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/17-dacg-minutes.html phila 14:40:05 zakim, list attendees 14:40:05 sorry, phila, I don't know what conference this is 14:40:17 zakim, bye 14:40:17 Zakim has left #dacg 14:40:25 RRSAgent, generate minutes 14:40:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/17-dacg-minutes.html phila 14:40:57 Meeting: Data Activity Coordination Group Monthly 14:41:01 RRSAgent, generate minutes 14:41:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/17-dacg-minutes.html phila