16:00:33 RRSAgent has joined #pointerevents 16:00:33 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/12/09-pointerevents-irc 16:00:38 +rbyers 16:00:39 RRSAgent, make log public 16:00:47 +[IPcaller] 16:00:49 jrossi2 has joined #pointerevents 16:00:50 ScribeNick: ArtB 16:00:50 Scribe: ArtB 16:00:50 Meeting: Pointer Events Working Group Voice Conference 16:00:50 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014OctDec/0099.html 16:00:56 Zakim, [IPcaller] is Olli_Pettay 16:00:56 +Olli_Pettay; got it 16:01:08 Zakim, nick smaug is Olli_Pettay 16:01:08 ok, smaug, I now associate you with Olli_Pettay 16:01:09 +Art_Barstow 16:01:27 zakim, who's here? 16:01:27 On the phone I see +1.571.426.aaaa, Matt_Brubeck, Scott_Gonzalez, rbyers, Olli_Pettay, Art_Barstow 16:01:29 On IRC I see jrossi, RRSAgent, Zakim, smaug, artb, AutomatedTester, scott_gonzalez, sangwhan_, slightlyoff, shepazu, rbyers, mbrubeck, trackbot 16:01:38 +[Microsoft] 16:01:58 Zakim, Microsoft is jrossi 16:01:58 +jrossi; got it 16:02:14 Present: Art_Barstow, Matt_Brubeck, Scott_Gonzalez, Rick_Byers, Jacob_Rossi, Olli_Pettay, Asir_Vedamuthu 16:02:20 Regrets: Sangwhan_Moon 16:02:44 -jrossi 16:03:26 -Art_Barstow 16:04:14 +Art_Barstow 16:04:22 jrossi2 has joined #pointerevents 16:04:24 zakim, who's here 16:04:25 artb, you need to end that query with '?' 16:04:40 +[Microsoft] 16:04:46 Topic: Tweak and agree on agenda 16:04:51 AB: I posted a draft agenda yesterday http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014OctDec/0099.html. Any change requests? 16:04:57 Zakim, Microsoft is jrossi2 16:04:57 +jrossi2; got it 16:05:01 [ None ] 16:05:08 Topic: Call for Consensus to publish Pointer Events Proposed Recommendation 16:05:23 AB: we now have an Implementation report that shows 100% pass for IE and FFMetro http://w3c.github.io/test-results/pointerevents/all.html. As such we have met Candidate Recommendation interoperability requirement. 16:05:42 AB: thanks to Jacob, Asir, Matt for running the tests! 16:05:58 … that's a lot of work! 16:06:12 MB: I'll pass that to my testers (I didn't run them personally) 16:06:28 AB: one commenter submitted a review for the Last Call and that comment is tracked in https://www.w3.org/wiki/PointerEvents/Comments-LCWD-2014-11-13. The comment resulted in several changes to the spec but none are considered substantive. 16:06:53 ... does anyone disagree the changes are non-substantive? 16:07:07 [ No disagreement ] 16:07:12 RESOLUTION: the group agrees the changes made as a result of the 13-Nov-2014 LCWD review are non-substantive. 16:07:34 AB: the draft Proposed Rec is https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/publish/tr.html. 16:07:46 AB: As discussed on December 2 with Philippe (http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#item05), there are two normative dependencies that are not yet at Proposed Recommendations (D3E and DOM4). 16:07:58 AB: we agreed the PE spec is using stable definitions in these references and the Draft PR reflects that via the statement "By publishing this Proposed Recommendation, W3C expects that the functionality specified in this Proposed Recommendation will not be affected by changes to DOM Level 3 Events or DOM4 as those  specifications proceed to Recommendation." 16:08:34 AB: I would like to determine if there is consensus on the above statement. Does anyone object to it or have concerns about it? 16:08:34 asir has joined #pointerevents 16:09:04 [ None ] 16:09:11 RESOLUTION: the group agrees the PR will not be affected by changes to D3E or DOM4. 16:09:28 AB: given this, it appears we have consensus to publish the Proposed Recommendation. Who supports publishing a Proposed Recommendation? 16:09:46 AV: support 16:09:48 JR: support 16:09:57 AB: support on behalf of Nokia 16:10:00 SG: support 16:10:07 MB: support 16:10:21 AB: are there any objections to publishing a Proposed Recommendation of Pointer Events? 16:10:34 RB: I do not object 16:10:52 AB: having heard no objections ... 16:10:53 RESOLUTION: the group agrees to publish a Proposed Recommendation of Pointer Events. 16:11:01 AB: thanks to Everyone for their contributions. It has been a real pleasure to work with all of you. I've been very impressed with the professionalism exhibited, and getting to PR when we said we would (two years ago)! 16:11:25 AV: congrats to the WG 16:11:35 AB: anything else on this topic 16:11:49 AB: my expectation is the Director's call will be tomorrow 16:12:06 Topic: AoB 16:12:11 AB: any other topics for today? 16:12:23 AB: Would people like to use the bridge reservation for Touch Events CG? 16:12:53 RB: the main Q is if there is sufficient interest to have a call 16:12:59 … it's ok with me 16:13:04 JR: I'm ok to have a call 16:13:28 RB: in particular, a discussion about events derived from other event types 16:13:47 AB: I think a working assumption then would be for Rick to propose an agenda 16:13:58 … and the CG can use this time slot 16:14:13 RB: ok; I'll send something to the CG list 16:14:19 AB: anything else 16:14:27 … meeting adjourned 16:14:30 … thanks all! 16:14:32 -Olli_Pettay 16:14:33 -jrossi2 16:14:34 -rbyers 16:14:36 -Scott_Gonzalez 16:14:37 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:14:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/09-pointerevents-minutes.html artb 16:14:42 -Art_Barstow 16:14:44 asir has joined #pointerevents 16:14:49 -Matt_Brubeck 16:15:50 - +1.571.426.aaaa 16:15:51 RWC_PEWG()11:00AM has ended 16:15:51 Attendees were +1.571.426.aaaa, Matt_Brubeck, Scott_Gonzalez, rbyers, Olli_Pettay, Art_Barstow, jrossi, jrossi2 16:29:05 hey, artb, sorry I missed the call 16:29:46 artb, let me know what I need to do to get this published 16:37:09 Chair: Art 16:37:14 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:37:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/09-pointerevents-minutes.html artb 16:45:30 zakim, bye 16:45:30 Zakim has left #pointerevents 16:45:49 rrsagent, bye 16:45:49 I see no action items