14:08:14 RRSAgent has joined #dwbp 14:08:14 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/12/05-dwbp-irc 14:08:16 RRSAgent, make logs 351 14:08:16 Zakim has joined #dwbp 14:08:18 Zakim, this will be DWBP 14:08:18 ok, trackbot, I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM already started 14:08:19 Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 14:08:19 Date: 05 December 2014 14:08:27 \o/ 14:08:28 zakim, this will be dwbp 14:08:29 ok, yaso_, I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM already started 14:08:30 hi zakim! 14:08:33 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:08:38 \o/ 14:08:40 -??P6 14:08:44 All the robots in da haus :-) 14:08:46 newton has joined #dwbp 14:08:57 Zakim, yaso has nathalia 14:08:57 sorry, nathalia, I do not recognize a party named 'yaso' 14:09:03 Zakim, Caroline has Yaso_, nathalia and Newton 14:09:03 +Yaso_, nathalia, Newton; got it 14:09:05 +??P17 14:09:13 Zakim, ??P17 is me 14:09:13 +cgueret; got it 14:09:16 zakim, mute me 14:09:16 cgueret should now be muted 14:09:36 we don't hear anything 14:09:46 we’ll dial again. 14:09:50 -Caroline_ 14:09:53 Hello! 14:09:59 who called alerady? 14:10:10 +Caroline_ 14:10:16 Zakim, who is in the phone? 14:10:16 I don't understand your question, yaso_. 14:10:17 Zakim: who is here ? 14:10:27 can you hear us? 14:10:28 yep! 14:11:00 +[IPcaller] 14:11:03 yes; I can hear you! 14:11:13 zakim, IPcaller is me 14:11:13 +laufer; got it 14:11:15 Hadley, can you hear us? 14:11:20 zakim, mute me 14:11:20 laufer should now be muted 14:11:36 @hadleybeeman, are you on the phone? 14:12:08 Yes lets start 14:12:17 Hi, I am trying to connect by phone. My gtalk is not working... I will try again. 14:12:26 Scribe? 14:12:41 annette_g has joined #dwbp 14:12:44 Zakim, pick a victim 14:12:44 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose annette_g 14:13:14 scribe: SumitPurohit 14:13:20 chair: yaso 14:13:23 +??P18 14:13:36 Zakim, ??18 is AdrianoPereira 14:13:36 sorry, AdrianoPereira, I do not recognize a party named '??18' 14:13:44 http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-01 14:14:20 Zakim, ??P18 is AdrianoPereira 14:14:20 +AdrianoPereira; got it 14:14:21 propose, last call meeting minutes 14:14:46 PROPOSED: aprove last call minutes http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-12-01 14:14:51 PROPOSED, last call meeting minutes 14:14:54 +[IPcaller] 14:15:00 +1 14:15:04 0 (sorry, I was not present ) 14:15:07 +1 14:15:07 +1 14:15:09 zakim, ipcaller is BernadetteLoscio 14:15:09 +BernadetteLoscio; got it 14:15:09 +1 14:15:10 +1 14:15:11 +1 14:15:18 0( Not presentt) 14:15:30 zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio 14:15:30 BernadetteLoscio should now be muted 14:15:36 +1 14:15:44 +1 14:15:56 APPROVED, aprove last call minutes 14:15:56 +1 14:16:09 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20141205 14:16:33 yaso : start with action 104 14:16:36 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/114 14:16:37 Ok 14:17:02 s/action 104/action 114 14:17:06 cna i know who is speaking ? 14:17:15 s/cna/can 14:17:21 is AdrianoPereira 14:17:26 Ig_Bittencourt_ has joined #DWBP 14:18:12 AdrianoPereira: there are 6 data enrichment requirements which he is going to describe 14:19:34 AdrianoPereira: I will complete the it today and update the group then group will close the action 14:19:56 action 120 14:20:00 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/120 14:20:04 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/120 14:20:06 zakim, unmute me 14:20:06 laufer should no longer be muted 14:20:49 http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#metadata 14:20:50 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/123 14:20:55 yaso: I have 2 actions 120 and 123 14:21:12 s/yaso/laufer 14:21:51 q+ 14:22:35 -BernadetteLoscio 14:22:56 http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#licenses 14:23:10 q? 14:24:37 laufer, Now we need to not write just example but "final thing" 14:24:58 If I understood, Laufer is proposing to close the 120, because we don’t need examples 14:25:06 q+ 14:25:25 ack BernadetteLoscio 14:25:36 ack Car 14:25:40 ack Caroline 14:25:53 im without audio 14:26:02 Caroline, examples is not for best practice documents 14:26:04 but id like to explain one thing 14:26:24 yes... te example is not for the BP document 14:26:30 Please, BernadetteLoscio, write it here :-) 14:26:39 it was just to help the understanding of the metadata 14:26:42 q+ 14:27:18 ok 14:27:27 zakim, mute me 14:27:27 laufer should now be muted 14:27:31 q- 14:27:36 ok 14:27:40 laufer , I can propose to write example about metadata. Everyone else should write for their corresponding section 14:28:44 action: SumitPurohit to write example about metadata 14:28:45 Created ACTION-133 - to write example about metadata [on Sumit Purohit - due 2014-12-12]. 14:29:02 -! 14:29:02 Close action 120 14:29:06 -1 14:29:07 q? 14:29:12 q+ 14:29:29 Ack annette_g 14:30:01 about the action 123 I will send an email asking for comments of the group 14:30:29 I wrote a description for metadata section 14:31:07 laufer: Write an email about explaining this 14:31:20 ...to group 14:31:23 +[IPcaller] 14:31:31 zakim, ipcaller is BernadetteLoscio 14:31:31 +BernadetteLoscio; got it 14:31:41 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/121 14:31:57 Ig_Bittencourt_: can write about action 121? 14:32:27 Now http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/125 14:32:51 newton: I could not work on this action 14:33:12 newton: I will work on it by next tuesday 14:33:17 q+ to say I can help 14:33:27 zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio 14:33:27 BernadetteLoscio should now be muted 14:33:29 Ack annette_g 14:33:29 annette_g, you wanted to say I can help 14:33:39 newton: Can anyone help.. 14:33:50 annette_g: I can help 14:34:11 can help newton on action 125 too 14:34:43 I am very keen to work on/help on the data versioning issues 14:34:48 newton: I will email annette_g about what to do 14:34:48 q+ 14:34:48 Thanks annette_g and cgueret :-) 14:34:57 zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio 14:34:57 BernadetteLoscio should no longer be muted 14:35:00 Ack BernadetteLoscio 14:35:03 They are very relevant and important to our scientific missions 14:35:22 The issues: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Issues_vs_BP_Document 14:35:37 BernadetteLoscio: We have sent message asking for content on github 14:35:52 The content BernadetteLoscio is talking about is on http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html 14:35:58 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/56 14:36:05 q+ 14:36:15 ack Caroline 14:36:41 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/73 and > 14:36:42 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/56 14:36:50 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Main_Page 14:36:54 Thank you lewismc, I'll email you all to explain what we're going to do on the data versioning section, ok? 14:37:02 I can take care of producing something for issue 62 and 63, and then comment in https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Issues_vs_BP_Document 14:37:18 q+ 14:38:11 ack BernadetteLoscio 14:38:35 Caroline: We have deadline on Monday and need everyone's feedback on github page. 14:39:05 Also need that the contributors put more content on github or on the wiki 14:39:14 BernadetteLoscio: For each section we need to have best practice about concerning metadata 14:39:25 BernadetteLoscio suggests that we write an example of Bests Practices to each section 14:40:23 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Issues_vs_BP_Document 14:40:45 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/74 14:41:11 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/76 14:42:06 Caroline: Are we going to directly write on github ? 14:42:24 Caroline: If people can write directly on github, it is better for everyone 14:43:15 and people can use the BP templates in the wiki if they want to write things there ;-) 14:43:51 yep! 14:43:51 q? 14:43:59 Caroline: However if you prefer otherwise, they can do on wiki as everything which is on wiki is mirrored on github 14:44:09 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/68 14:44:42 can we have some context? 14:45:10 yaso_: on F2F we talked about data not connected with concept of ontology. 14:45:11 zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio 14:45:11 BernadetteLoscio should now be muted 14:45:56 q+ 14:46:00 ack Berna 14:46:01 zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio 14:46:02 BernadetteLoscio was not muted, BernadetteLoscio 14:46:03 ack BernadetteLoscio 14:46:08 yaso_: is "structure" is connected with 5 star data ? 14:46:30 BernadetteLoscio: "structure" is NOT connected with 5 star data 14:46:44 CSV , XML is structure data....we dont need onotlogies 14:46:53 +1 to BernadetteLoscio 14:47:00 +1 14:47:00 s/onotlogies/ontologies 14:47:06 +1 to BernadetteLoscio 14:47:08 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_model 14:47:15 q+ 14:47:23 zakim, unmute me 14:47:23 laufer should no longer be muted 14:47:24 Ig_Bittencourt has joined #DWBP 14:47:25 ack Laufer 14:48:00 laufer: agree with BernadetteLoscio 14:48:05 q+ 14:48:20 ack annette_g 14:48:25 zakim, mute me 14:48:25 laufer should now be muted 14:48:28 +1 to say that's different things 14:48:31 laufer: Do we mean "Machine Readable" structure ? 14:48:43 you can have (semi)structured data in a scanned document within a PDF 14:48:50 zakim, unmute me 14:48:50 laufer should no longer be muted 14:49:05 +1 to annette_g 14:50:05 zakim, unmute me 14:50:05 laufer was not muted, laufer 14:50:27 zakim, who is talking? 14:50:37 Caroline, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: +1.617.646.aabb (29%), laufer (5%) 14:50:39 another nice definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-structured_model 14:51:07 zakim, mute me 14:51:08 laufer should now be muted 14:51:14 Thanks cgueret 14:51:31 Zakim, who is talking? 14:51:38 BernadetteLoscio, newton 14:51:42 newton, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds 14:52:38 Yep but I think we need both the glossary AND the example 14:53:07 BernadetteLoscio: Instead of having term in definition, we should also have example of use of this term . I hope to finish it today and share with group 14:53:12 +1 to cgueret 14:53:33 I agree with cgueret, we need both definitions and examples. 14:54:23 I have published the new use case for "Web Observatory", which demands requirements for Data Enrichment. It is published in the Second Round Use Cases: http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases Any comments or suggestions can be send to me. ACTION-114 can be closed now. 14:54:36 +1 to Bernadette 14:55:18 +1 14:55:24 Maybe we can also have a more rich glossary where we can put examples... 14:55:34 we can re-use http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-glossary/ 14:55:50 BernadetteLoscio, if a definition is already provided I think we have to refer to it, I like the idea of wiki for contribute in definitions. 14:55:54 some months ago we already discussed either extending this document or have our own glossary 14:55:55 +1 14:56:06 don't remember what was decided though... 14:56:19 :) 14:56:26 q+ to ask a stupid question 14:56:37 ack annette_g 14:56:37 annette_g, you wanted to ask a stupid question 14:57:15 zakim, mute BernadetteLoscio 14:57:15 BernadetteLoscio should now be muted 14:57:21 sorry, I did't get the question .. 14:57:32 me neither 14:57:35 cgueret: are we repeating the efforts with glossary with what we have doe with vocabulary ? 14:58:04 s/cgueret/annette_g 14:58:13 Is not that two different things ? 14:58:20 since we are developing a vocab, it is not a double effort? The vocab should not be the glossary? 14:58:33 by "vocabulary" you refer to the vocabulary part of the group right ? 14:58:40 yes 14:58:49 they worked on ontologies, not a glossary 14:59:09 so that's fine it's not duplicate work 14:59:31 but +1 to open an action to sort this out 15:00:20 q+ 15:00:29 Ack lewismc 15:00:31 ACTION: cgueret send email to the group asking for clarification about glossary and vocabulary 15:00:31 Created ACTION-134 - send email to the group asking for clarification about glossary and vocabulary [on Christophe Gueret - due 2014-12-12]. 15:00:59 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Use-Cases_Requirements_RDF#Potential_requirements 15:01:01 s/[on Christophe Gueret/[on Annette Greiner 15:01:47 ACTION: annette_g send email to the group asking for clarification about glossary and vocabulary 15:01:47 Created ACTION-135 - Send email to the group asking for clarification about glossary and vocabulary [on Annette Greiner - due 2014-12-12]. 15:02:16 close action-134 15:02:16 Closed action-134. 15:02:22 zakim, who is speaking 15:02:22 I don't understand 'who is speaking', SumitPurohit 15:02:35 lewismc, SumitPurohit 15:02:46 q+ 15:03:10 zakim, unmute BernadetteLoscio 15:03:10 BernadetteLoscio should no longer be muted 15:04:29 hi Hadley! 15:04:37 -Eric_Kauz 15:04:38 thx, bye! 15:04:38 thank you! 15:04:39 - +1.626.487.aaaa 15:04:39 bye all, nice wkd 15:04:42 Hello! I was on holiday and mixed up the time zones. 15:04:42 -annette_g 15:04:43 bye, good weekend 15:04:43 zakim, generate minutes 15:04:44 thanks everyone 15:04:44 I don't understand 'generate minutes', yaso_ 15:04:44 bye 15:04:47 -BernadetteLoscio 15:04:48 -Caroline_ 15:04:57 -AdrianoPereira 15:05:00 -RiccardoAlbertoni 15:05:02 -laufer 15:05:08 Hi Hadley, and Bye everyone 15:05:15 annette_g has left #dwbp 15:05:19 RRSAgent, generate minutes 15:05:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/05-dwbp-minutes.html hadleybeeman 15:05:21 Bye! 15:05:28 RRSAgent, make minutes public 15:05:28 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', hadleybeeman. Try /msg RRSAgent help 15:05:58 rrsagent, please generate minutes 15:05:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/12/05-dwbp-minutes.html yaso_ 15:06:27 -cgueret 15:07:32 - +1.617.646.aabb 15:07:34 DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended 15:07:34 Attendees were +1.626.487.aaaa, RiccardoAlbertoni, Eric_Kauz, annette_g, +1.617.646.aabb, Yaso_, nathalia, Newton, cgueret, Caroline_, laufer, AdrianoPereira, BernadetteLoscio 15:08:23 annette_g has joined #dwbp 15:08:40 annette_g has left #dwbp 15:17:10 yaso has joined #dwbp 15:25:50 yaso has left #dwbp 17:27:57 Zakim has left #dwbp