14:38:26 RRSAgent has joined #coga 14:38:26 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-irc 14:38:34 zakim, this will be WAI_CogTF 14:38:34 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, Lisa_Seeman 14:47:24 regrets:Kinshuk, Deborah Dahl 14:57:30 slee has joined #coga 15:29:20 zakim, this will be WAI_CogTF 15:29:20 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, Lisa_Seeman 16:07:10 zakim, this will be WAI_CogTF 16:07:10 ok, Lisa_Seeman; I see WAI_CogTF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 53 minutes 16:35:37 regrets:Kinshuk, Deborah Dahl 16:43:04 agenda: this 16:43:05 agenda+ review of agenda, new items 16:43:07 agenda+ review of actions - including identifying user strategies and cognitive function table 16:43:08 agenda+ review resolutions from last week on schedules and resolutions process 16:43:10 agenda+ review/ approve new content for working draft 16:43:11 agenda+ assign todo actions for next steps 16:43:13 agenda+ John's EA and Kate's thread 16:43:14 agenda+ template for issue papers 16:43:16 agenda+ review of User Agent Accessibility Guidelines (UAAG) 2.0 Last Call Working Draft. The working group (UAWG) 16:43:17 agenda+ approval of other new content, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2014Aug/0045.html, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2014Aug/0044.html 16:43:19 agenda+ editing github 16:43:20 agenda+ Next FTF 16:43:22 agenda+ How will we receive comments? 16:43:23 agenda+ be done 16:43:25 scribe: ZakimName 16:53:59 WAI_CogTF()12:00PM has now started 16:54:06 +[IPcaller] 16:54:33 zakim, [IPcaller] is me 16:54:33 +Lisa_Seeman; got it 16:54:44 zakim, next item 16:54:44 agendum 1. "review of agenda, new items" taken up [from Lisa_Seeman] 16:56:49 JohnRochford has joined #coga 16:57:10 Chaohai_Ding has joined #coga 16:58:32 +Susann_Keohane 16:58:47 +??P2 16:58:59 +??P3 16:59:23 Susann_Keohane has joined #coga 16:59:41 Zakim, ??P3 is JohnRochford 16:59:41 +JohnRochford; got it 16:59:45 zakim, +??P2 is Chaohai_Ding 16:59:45 sorry, Lisa_Seeman, I do not recognize a party named '+??P2' 16:59:50 zakim, ??P2 is Chaohai_Ding 16:59:50 +Chaohai_Ding; got it 17:00:26 Tony_Doran has joined #coga 17:01:22 scribe Susann_Keohane 17:01:35 +Tony_Doran 17:01:39 scribe: Susann_Keohane 17:02:33 + +44.203.618.aaaa 17:03:19 + +1.804.749.aabb 17:03:38 zakim, who is here? 17:03:38 On the phone I see Lisa_Seeman, Susann_Keohane, Chaohai_Ding, JohnRochford, Tony_Doran, +44.203.618.aaaa, +1.804.749.aabb 17:03:40 On IRC I see Tony_Doran, Susann_Keohane, Chaohai_Ding, JohnRochford, slee, RRSAgent, Zakim, Lisa_Seeman, janina, trackbot 17:04:08 zakim, aabb is DebraRue 17:04:08 +DebraRue; got it 17:05:02 neilmilliken has joined #coga 17:05:45 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #coga 17:05:49 zakim, +442036182950 is me 17:05:49 sorry, neilmilliken, I do not recognize a party named '+442036182950' 17:06:30 janina_ has joined #coga 17:06:51 Chaohai: introduced himself 17:07:11 Zakim, aaaa is neilmilliken 17:07:11 +neilmilliken; got it 17:07:17 +Rich_Schwerdtfeger 17:07:25 LS: lead the round the table introductions 17:07:50 zakim, who is here? 17:07:50 On the phone I see Lisa_Seeman, Susann_Keohane, Chaohai_Ding, JohnRochford, Tony_Doran, neilmilliken, DebraRue, Rich_Schwerdtfeger 17:07:52 On IRC I see janina_, richardschwerdtfeger, neilmilliken, Tony_Doran, Susann_Keohane, Chaohai_Ding, JohnRochford, slee, RRSAgent, Zakim, Lisa_Seeman, janina, trackbot 17:08:35 KateDeibel has joined #coga 17:09:00 +??P13 17:09:07 zakim, ??P13 is me 17:09:07 +janina; got it 17:11:43 LS: Tony started to draft dyslexic techniques 17:12:48 SK: Need to ensure the content references are marked 17:13:14 SK: Request Neil review content he added to ensure it's referenced appropiately 17:14:39 action neil to check there are no todo items to add to the add section 17:14:39 Created ACTION-60 - Check there are no todo items to add to the add section [on Neil Milliken - due 2014-11-10]. 17:15:07 zakim, next item 17:15:07 agendum 2. "review of actions - including identifying user strategies and cognitive function table" taken up [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:15:48 LS: we made two important resolutions in last call 17:16:01 LS: sent new content for the working draft 17:16:03 LS 17:16:34 LS: may want to discuss the easy read techniques 17:16:47 Ls: we need to assign to-do actions for next steps which is techniques 17:16:52 Barry has joined #coga 17:17:00 zakim, who's here? 17:17:00 On the phone I see Lisa_Seeman, Susann_Keohane, Chaohai_Ding, JohnRochford, Tony_Doran, neilmilliken, DebraRue, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, janina 17:17:03 On IRC I see Barry, KateDeibel, janina_, richardschwerdtfeger, neilmilliken, Tony_Doran, Susann_Keohane, Chaohai_Ding, JohnRochford, slee, RRSAgent, Zakim, Lisa_Seeman, janina, 17:17:03 ... trackbot 17:17:04 LS: we also have UAG to respond to as we are late responding 17:17:10 zakim, next item 17:17:10 agendum 3. "review resolutions from last week on schedules and resolutions process" taken up [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:17:29 fine with me too 17:17:34 me too 17:17:50 LS: schedules and resolution was sent to the list 17:18:28 LS: important resolution has 48hr warning and gets sent to the list 17:18:52 LS: small resolutions can get handled on this call 17:19:38 LS: some folks may prefer 3 days because of country holidays 17:19:56 LS: 48hr may seem short for some 17:20:54 LS: If a resolution gets sent during a holiday and there is a request to re-open the issue then the request will be granted 17:21:08 +1 for 48-hour resolution 17:21:16 LS: open to any one who has an opinion on the 48hr resolution 17:21:27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2014Oct/0040.html 17:21:31 LS:this resolution has been passed 17:22:42 IIRC it was recorded when I was last scribe. 17:22:43 resolution : 48 hours for big issues to be passed on the liist. small issues can be passed on the calls 17:22:53 resolution: 48 hours for big issues to be passed on the liist. small issues can be passed on the calls 17:23:30 Schedule for the first working draft on the user groups research (what we already have done) . 17:23:32 Content finished: 27th October (This will include a new introduction and the cognitive-functions table ) 17:23:32 LS: schedule is the next item to discuss 17:23:33 Review changes: 10th November (object in 48 hours and record a resolution) 17:23:35 Send to the working groups: 17th November 17:23:36 Publish December: 4 or 11th. 17:23:38 Schedule for the first editors draft on the Gap Analysis 17:23:39 Putting together a first draft of techniques on the wiki: 24th November 17:23:41 Putting together a first draft of key issue papers about specific areas that need special consideration, such as, security and capture (draft by John), online payments, providing help, interruptions, interoperable symbols: 24th November 17:23:42 First editors draft of Gap Analysis on key use cases and introduction: 15th December 17:25:05 LS: 2 things we are working on (1) working draft of the user group work to be sent out for review 17:25:25 +q 17:25:29 LS: Nov 10th is the date targetted 17:26:09 LS: (2) rest of the task force to be looking at gap analysis 17:26:20 LS: need to be gathering information for techniques 17:26:35 LS: pulled together techniques and link to the known techniques we have already 17:26:45 LS: start drafting key issues paper 17:27:05 LS: Lisa and John have an initial draft of key issues 17:27:49 John: I have offered to edit the gap analysis 17:28:20 John: editor would ensure the spelling and sentence structure is correct and the content is logical 17:28:45 LS: editor in W3C are the people who are writing it into github and writing the introduction 17:29:16 LS: we are looking for pro-reader to review the documents 17:29:18 zakim, next item 17:29:18 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Lisa_Seeman 17:29:26 q? 17:29:43 ack j 17:29:44 Tim has joined #coga 17:30:48 action: John Rochford to proof read user group, new content sections 17:30:48 'John' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., jfoliot, JohnRochford). 17:31:02 action: JohnRochford to proof read user group, new content sections 17:31:02 Created ACTION-61 - Proof read user group, new content sections [on John Rochford - due 2014-11-10]. 17:31:46 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2014Nov/att-0010/user-research.htmlv 17:32:44 corrected link: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2014Nov/att-0010/user-research.html 17:33:22 LS: Please review the introduction in the link above 17:33:36 -DebraRue 17:33:44 LS: should the gap analysis be included? 17:34:34 LS: section on research of cognitive functions, methodology may be better at the end of the document 17:35:03 Rich: will there be a glossary at the end for the term that folks may not recognize? 17:35:30 Rich: this will be needed if it goes to a wide audience who may not know the different terms used 17:35:32 glossary 17:35:38 q? 17:36:09 Rich: may fall under a WAI glossary 17:36:32 Rich: there is one for ARIA but not sure if it is shared across groups 17:36:33 +Tim_Boland 17:36:50 Rich: defining these medical terms will be a good thing to do 17:37:22 LS: the terms are discussed in the section, where would be link to? to the glossary? 17:37:41 John: is there a link to a glossary that Rich can share? 17:38:27 not just definition but its source 17:38:38 LS: glossary would say dyslexia is then point to where it is discussed in more detail 17:39:16 action: Rich to find out how glossary is pulled in 17:39:16 Created ACTION-62 - Find out how glossary is pulled in [on Richard Schwerdtfeger - due 2014-11-10]. 17:39:56 LS: someone who is interested in building the glossary may be KC 17:40:35 LS: can we have a to-do box for the glossary to be added 17:40:46 LS: or does this need to go out with the draft? 17:41:01 Janina: it is not needed for the draft but it would be useful to have one 17:42:04 LS: is there a coordination call where this can be discussed? 17:42:13 Janina: we do have one next week 17:42:43 RESOLUTION: make a glossary to link where issues/terms are discussed and defined 17:42:59 zakim, next item 17:42:59 agendum 4. "review/ approve new content for working draft" taken up [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:43:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2014Nov/att-0010/user-research.html 17:44:35 https://w3c.github.io/wcag/coga/gap-analysis.html#research-on-user-groups 17:44:47 LS: the link above, we want to get to a first working draft 17:45:20 LS: research on user groups 17:45:43 LS: we need abstract, introduction 17:45:57 LS: scripts are causing a numbering issue that needs to be resolved 17:46:09 LS: we also need a summary 17:46:29 LS: potential for inclusion is also in for now 17:47:20 LS: at the end of document the discussion on the different cognitive function and methodology should be added 17:47:34 John: note that much of content would be out of scope for the task force 17:47:45 John: why would this be included? 17:48:09 LS: should we review this offline? 17:48:21 Rich: is there something we can do with formatting? 17:49:27 LS: review specifically if content should be included or not 17:49:39 -neilmilliken 17:49:40 LS: not so much the formatting issues 17:50:13 LS: Response to John's question about including out-of-scope content is that it is background information 17:50:20 +neilmilliken 17:50:28 Tim: what kind of document is this? Reccomendation? 17:50:37 LS: it's a research document 17:51:46 LS: pulled together information from each user group into a table 17:51:52 q? 17:53:10 LS: Please send comments sent to the list 17:53:45 LS: To-do for this group is to review the working draft and send comments to the list unless is purely editorial then send to Lisa or Michael 17:54:45 zakim, next item 17:54:45 agendum 5. "assign todo actions for next steps" taken up [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:54:51 LS: review substantive issues as there are known issues with the scripts and formatting 17:55:14 LS: need help with gathering the techniques of different user groups 17:55:55 LS: look at the techniques that help for the techniques page 17:56:10 q+ 17:56:25 LS: the other is the issues paper 17:56:41 LS: John is doing one on security and Lisa on alt-text 17:57:05 Tim: is there a list of what issues paper that need to be written 17:58:24 LS: online payment, providing help, security/captcha, voice systems/xml voice menu system that are becoming Web technology 17:59:12 LS: another is voiceML 17:59:49 LS: request for volunteer for an issue paper 18:00:14 q? 18:00:26 ack susa 18:01:33 replace alt-txt above with help system 18:02:04 LS: Susann volunteer to pull techniques from Aging 18:02:39 Need to drop off - Bye 18:02:49 -Tony_Doran 18:02:56 Tim: will look at list and pick an issues paper 18:03:03 action: Susann_Keohane to add techniques from aging subgroup 18:03:03 Error finding 'Susann_Keohane'. You can review and register nicknames at . 18:03:09 action: SusannKeohane to add techniques from aging subgroup 18:03:09 Error finding 'SusannKeohane'. You can review and register nicknames at . 18:03:18 action: SusannKeoh to add techniques from aging subgroup 18:03:18 Error finding 'SusannKeoh'. You can review and register nicknames at . 18:03:32 ction: Susann_Keohane to add techniques from aging subgroup 18:03:43 action: Tim to write issue paper 18:03:44 Created ACTION-63 - Write issue paper [on Frederick Boland - due 2014-11-10]. 18:03:44 action: Susann_Keohane to add techniques from aging subgroup 18:03:44 Error finding 'Susann_Keohane'. You can review and register nicknames at . 18:04:28 action: Susann Keohane to add techniques from aging subgroup 18:04:29 Created ACTION-64 - Keohane to add techniques from aging subgroup [on Susann Keohane - due 2014-11-10]. 18:05:20 rrsagent, make logs public 18:05:31 -neilmilliken 18:05:31 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:05:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-minutes.html Susann_Keohane 18:05:40 zakim, please part 18:05:40 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Lisa_Seeman, Susann_Keohane, JohnRochford, Chaohai_Ding, Tony_Doran, +44.203.618.aaaa, +1.804.749.aabb, DebraRue, neilmilliken, 18:05:40 Zakim has left #coga 18:05:43 ... Rich_Schwerdtfeger, janina, Tim_Boland 18:05:46 rrsagent, please part 18:05:46 I see 9 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-actions.rdf : 18:05:46 ACTION: John Rochford to proof read user group, new content sections [1] 18:05:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-irc#T17-30-48 18:05:46 ACTION: JohnRochford to proof read user group, new content sections [2] 18:05:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-irc#T17-31-02 18:05:46 ACTION: Rich to find out how glossary is pulled in [3] 18:05:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-irc#T17-39-16 18:05:46 ACTION: Susann_Keohane to add techniques from aging subgroup [4] 18:05:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-irc#T18-03-03 18:05:46 ACTION: SusannKeohane to add techniques from aging subgroup [5] 18:05:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-irc#T18-03-09 18:05:46 ACTION: SusannKeoh to add techniques from aging subgroup [6] 18:05:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-irc#T18-03-18 18:05:46 ACTION: Tim to write issue paper [7] 18:05:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-irc#T18-03-43 18:05:46 ACTION: Susann_Keohane to add techniques from aging subgroup [8] 18:05:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-irc#T18-03-44-1 18:05:46 ACTION: Susann Keohane to add techniques from aging subgroup [9] 18:05:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/03-coga-irc#T18-04-28 18:06:14 janina has left #coga