15:53:06 RRSAgent has joined #html-wg 15:53:06 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-html-wg-irc 15:53:08 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:53:08 Zakim has joined #html-wg 15:53:10 Zakim, this will be html_wg 15:53:10 ok, trackbot; I see HTML_WG()11:30AM scheduled to start 23 minutes ago 15:53:11 Meeting: HTML Weekly Teleconference 15:53:11 Date: 30 October 2014 15:53:26 s/Weekly Teleconference/F2F - TPAC2014/ 15:53:34 scribe: timeless 15:53:39 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:53:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-html-wg-minutes.html timeless 15:53:45 agenda: https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2014-10-Agenda#F2F_Topics 15:53:54 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:55:25 F2F topics: https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2014-10-Agenda#F2F_Topics 15:55:53 yinagaki has joined #html-wg 15:57:28 chair: paulc, rubys 15:57:37 s/rubys1/rubys/G 15:58:27 forty4 has joined #html-wg 15:58:45 ohmata has joined #html-wg 16:00:06 adrianba has joined #html-wg 16:00:39 JonathanJ1 has joined #html-wg 16:00:51 edoyle has joined #html-wg 16:01:23 present+ Josh_Soref 16:01:24 edoyle has joined #html-wg 16:01:33 present+ Sam_Ruby 16:01:34 Present+ (plh) 16:01:35 ddorwin has joined #html-wg 16:01:37 adrianba_ has joined #html-wg 16:01:37 Present+ plh 16:01:40 present+ Cyril_Concolato 16:01:41 present+ AdamB 16:01:49 present+ 16:01:50 Present- (plh) 16:02:00 glazou_ has joined #html-wg 16:02:37 present+ David_Dorwin 16:02:41 present+ Erika_Navara 16:02:44 rubys1 has joined #html-wg 16:05:00 ShaneM has joined #html-wg 16:05:55 Noriya has joined #html-wg 16:06:02 SteveF has joined #html-wg 16:07:05 has the meeting started or is it unminuted at this time? 16:07:29 paulc: i'll be like the Baptist minister: "why are there no people in the front three pews?" 16:07:33 ... can people move in 16:07:45 ... we have a polycom, on this side 16:07:48 ... please move in 16:07:59 s/has the meeting started or is it unminuted at this time?// 16:08:04 tantek has joined #html-wg 16:08:26 paulc: we're waiting for darobin 16:09:04 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:09:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-html-wg-minutes.html timeless 16:09:33 good morning #html-wg - lurking here in IRC while in the AB meeting in person a few doors down. 16:09:42 paulc has joined #html-wg 16:09:57 Zakim, call santa-barbara 16:09:57 I am sorry, timeless; I do not know a number for santa-barbara 16:09:59 Zakim, call santabarbara 16:09:59 ok, timeless; the call is being made 16:10:00 HTML_WG()11:30AM has now started 16:10:01 +Santabarbara 16:10:14 Zakim, who is on the call? 16:10:14 On the phone I see Santabarbara 16:10:33 Zakim, Santabarbara has rubys, paulc, timeless, MikeSmith 16:10:33 +rubys, paulc, timeless, MikeSmith; got it 16:10:48 Jingwang_qi has joined #html-wg 16:10:56 Present+ Adrian_Bateman 16:11:22 edoyle has joined #html-wg 16:11:28 Ruinan has joined #html-wg 16:11:40 SteveF_ has joined #html-wg 16:12:25 tantek_ has joined #html-wg 16:12:27 hjlee has joined #html-wg 16:12:37 afz has joined #html-wg 16:12:40 zcorpan_ has joined #html-wg 16:13:11 Zakim, darobin has entered Santabarbara 16:13:12 +darobin; got it 16:13:42 topic: Introduction 16:13:44 paulc: good morning 16:13:49 ... i'm Paul Cotton, cochair WG 16:14:01 MikeSmith: Michael Smith, W3C 16:14:13 Josh_Soref: Josh Soref, BlackBerry, Scribe, Observer 16:14:23 AAA: aaa 16:14:25 BBB: bbb 16:14:27 CCC: ccc 16:14:31 DDD: ddd 16:14:34 JonathanJ1 has joined #html-wg 16:14:37 darobin: Robin Berjon, W3C 16:14:41 EEE: eee 16:14:45 plh: PLH 16:14:52 rubys: Sam Ruby, cochair 16:14:56 FFF: fff 16:14:59 GGG: ggg 16:15:02 HHH: hhh 16:15:11 III: iii 16:15:13 s/AAA: aaa/Cyril: Cyril Concolato, Institut Telecom, interested in the Media TF work/ 16:15:19 s/EEE: eee/zcorpan: Simon Pieters, Opera Software/ 16:15:23 JJJ: jjj 16:15:33 MMM: mmm 16:15:38 NNN: nnn 16:15:55 Evangelos has joined #html-wg 16:16:00 paulc: we're on #html-wg 16:16:13 ... Josh_Soref is scribing, thank you josh 16:16:20 Topic: Agenda Bashing 16:16:24 https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2014-10-Agenda#F2F_Topics 16:16:27 s/BBB: bbb/kurosawa: Takeshi Kurosawa, Mitsue-Links/ 16:16:46 paulc: first item, First Screen Paint in Advance 16:16:56 ... discussed in Web Perf WG on Tuesday 16:17:03 ... there's an email on public-html 16:17:05 16:17:06 stone has joined #html-wg 16:17:15 ... because proponents would like to have a remote participant from China 16:17:20 ... and we're 15 hours behind China 16:17:25 ... i'm proposing to do that at 5pm today 16:17:30 ... that's 8am tomorrow morning 16:17:38 ... we can't do it tomorrow, since that's Saturday in China 16:17:39 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2014Oct/0062.html 16:17:40 ... that's locked 16:17:49 darobin has joined #html-wg 16:17:55 ... fair amount of discussion in WebApps on Intentions (2 hours) 16:18:01 ... i don't know if anyone here wants to discuss that 16:18:08 ... Canvas TF, assume we'd want an update 16:18:14 ... Media TF requested Friday morning 16:18:20 ... i've stretched that through 1pm 16:18:29 ... i've talked about starting at 8:30am tomorrow 16:18:43 ... Charter schedule tells us we do HTML5.1 and Canvas 2D level 2 16:18:58 ... there was at least a breakout session on After HTML5 16:19:00 wei-james has joined #html-wg 16:19:08 ... darobin started a discussion on public-html@ probably over a month ago 16:19:13 ... chairs suggest doing it first 16:19:28 ... i expect we should do it first, and also think about how much time we need for it 16:19:28 +1 to paul on doing first 16:19:36 ... i included a link to outstanding HTML5 bugs 16:19:39 ... 288 of them 16:19:46 ... that's just searching bugzilla for the component 16:19:56 ... and it isn't obvious to me that that simple search is even right 16:20:02 ... in the press briefings on Monday 16:20:08 ... 40,000 emails 16:20:13 ... lots of formal objections 16:20:20 ... i didn't tell the press about outstanding bugs 16:20:22 ... -- 16:20:28 ... 3 topics on Accessibility 16:20:33 ... the first is locked to this morning 16:20:45 ... it isn't obvious to me that we'll know how many accessibility people will be here to discuss 16:20:53 ... i went to the SVG meeting @9am this morning 16:21:01 ... to discuss this first topic after the break 16:21:15 ... -- the item about PFWG 16:21:19 ... Digital Publishing 16:21:25 ... they asked for a slot 4-5pm today 16:21:35 ... and we have a DOM4 status update: test failures 16:21:40 ... not sure about how long/how much time 16:21:44 ... Agenda... 16:21:54 ... we're in "Unconference" 16:22:15 darobin_ has joined #html-wg 16:22:15 ... we have a 10:45-11:15 Coffee break -- technically, coffee is over at 11am 16:22:22 ... I put our start inside the window, 16:22:36 ... first item, Accessibility topics Part 1 (11:15-1am) 16:22:42 paulliu has joined #html-wg 16:22:53 ... slots 3 and 4 after lunch are open 16:22:57 igarashi has joined #html-wg 16:22:59 ... Tomorrow 16:23:09 ... i've made some modifications already 16:23:13 ... I sent Media TF a list of EME bugs 16:23:20 ... I've suggested 3 slots for EME 16:23:25 ... so many things outstanding 16:23:34 ... w/ TAG's input we went from 19 to 26/27 bugs 16:23:41 ... and in last two weeks, we've closed only 2 16:23:49 ... we need to do MSE CR status/test suite review 16:23:54 ... we need to decide 16:23:58 ... where to put items 16:24:06 ... anyone object to lockdown? 16:24:09 ... plh ? 16:24:26 plh: glazou wanted to be around for HTML5 discussion 16:24:31 ... but he's blocked until 1pm 16:24:32 wooglae has joined #html-wg 16:24:40 s/1pm/11am/ 16:25:15 plh: and he's leaving today 16:25:25 ... i'm guessing we won't be able to accommodate him 16:25:34 paulc: say we start After HTML5 discussion at 9:30m 16:25:40 s/30m/30am/ 16:25:45 ... would we need a second block? 16:25:48 plh: probably 16:25:57 paulc: people could discuss over break/lunch 16:26:09 ... and we could do a second slot after lunch, and glazou could come to that 16:27:07 paulc: adrianba, is ben still here? 16:27:10 adrianba: he's left 16:27:18 darobin_: without ben, it will be hard 16:27:23 paulc: it's going to be short 16:27:29 ... put that item at 2pm for 15 mins today 16:27:38 s/darobin_:/darobin:/G 16:27:45 AndroUser2 has joined #html-wg 16:27:48 paulc: and maybe darobin_ can find the webapps minutes? 16:27:48 r12a has joined #html-wg 16:28:00 s/ darobin_/ darobin/G 16:28:12 paulc: Canvas TF, maybe 15 mins after that? 16:28:24 rubys: make sense to slice Accessibility slot to cover Canvas ? 16:28:31 paulc: not the first slot 16:28:46 ... so add that to the 4-5pm slot today 16:29:04 MarkVickers has joined #html-wg 16:29:09 [ hober spills coffee ] 16:29:13 Present+ Shane_Stevens 16:29:28 hober: i'll remain anonymous for now 16:29:43 paulc: 2pm slot this afternoon, Editing TF 16:29:51 ... plh, can we do DOM4 status in <15 mins? 16:29:58 darobin_: if we want to discuss bugs, we need more 16:30:06 tomoyuki has joined #html-wg 16:30:07 paulc: what about the 45 mins 16:30:17 myakura has joined #html-wg 16:30:19 darobin_: we'd like to do DOM4 tomorrow to have time to run more tests 16:30:27 paulc: ok... look down for tomorrow 16:30:44 ... paulc ddorwin , MarkS , others, can we start 8:30 tomorrow morning? 16:30:58 ShaneM_ has joined #html-wg 16:31:03 ... everyone put up their hand if they'll be at tomorrow morning 16:31:13 ... noon, 1pm, 2pm, 3pm 16:31:18 ... 4pm 16:31:24 ... that seems to say we can go pretty deep 16:31:30 ... but since ddorwin is editor of EME 16:31:38 ... and w/ children who want to go out for Halloween 16:31:48 ... and people rant about Halloween -- TPAC 16:32:05 ... change 09:00 to 8:30 16:32:22 ... ddorwin leaves at 1pm 16:32:28 ... do lunch until 2pm 16:32:31 tomoyuki has joined #html-wg 16:32:39 ... Session 11 - 2pm-3pm 16:32:46 ... that can be DOM4 16:32:52 ddorwin1 has joined #html-wg 16:33:00 ... (test failures) 16:33:09 ... start EME bugs Part 1 at 8:30am tomorrow 16:33:41 hober: Ted O Connor, Apple 16:34:55 JonathanJ1 has joined #html-wg 16:35:27 paulc: ddorwin did you confirm that acolwell 16:35:41 ... move the MSE CR status to 12:30AM-1PM 16:35:58 ... and expand Part to 11:00-12:30PM 16:36:06 ... 4 hours of EME tomorrow morning 16:36:18 ... break for lunch 16:36:21 ... come back for DOM4 16:36:33 [ Agenda reloads ] 16:36:55 paulc: move back to Day 1 16:37:09 ... I think we can shrink Editing TF to 2pm-2:30pm 16:37:30 ... Session 4 should be After HTML5 part 2 2:30-3:30pm 16:37:48 ... if Editing TF ends early, we'll segway straight to After HTML5 16:37:59 s/ddorwin1/ddorwin/G 16:38:03 ... what have we missed? 16:38:31 ... Canvas2D level 2 -> after html5 16:38:40 .... accessibility part one partly covered 16:38:44 s/.../../ 16:38:52 ... accessibility part 2 isn't covered 16:38:59 ... did we know how we were going to cover this? 16:39:02 ... SteveF ? 16:39:13 ... name computation, access key, captcha ? 16:39:21 ... was I overly zealous by adding this to the wiki? 16:39:22 igarashi has joined #html-wg 16:39:26 SteveF: I can see, but I have no idea 16:39:44 paulc: since we'll see PF at 11:15am today 16:39:54 ... we'll have to ask them what they want to do w/ A11Y-part2 16:40:02 ... I know footnotes, roles, validation have to be today 16:40:32 paulc: add A11y-part2 to 30min slot after DOM4 tomorrow 16:40:39 ... session 12 16:41:11 ... other comments on topics? 16:41:52 paulc: i suspect tantek is interested in After HTML5 on maintenance 16:41:58 hober: AC meeting starts at 11am? 16:42:04 [ yes ] 16:42:15 Travis: did we want to discuss extension specs? 16:42:17 paulc: good point 16:42:26 ... Longdesc from A11y 16:42:32 ... Canvas if you want to treat it 16:42:33 ... EME 16:42:36 Yves has joined #html-wg 16:42:43 ... MSE 16:42:55 ... i can give you an oral report on longdesc 16:42:58 ... right now 16:43:07 travis: any other submissions to glance over 16:43:11 ... we have a wiki of extensions 16:43:15 https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/wg/2014-10-Agenda#F2F_Topics 16:43:32 paulc: move A11y topic to after Coffee (Session 13) 16:43:46 ... and do status rundown of all extension specs tomorrow (session 12 before coffee) 16:43:54 ... if a11y people don't want to meet tomorrow 16:43:59 ... and we don't have overflow topics 16:44:05 ... we might adjourn at coffee tomorrow 16:44:20 [ Refreshes Agenda ] 16:44:25 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:44:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-html-wg-minutes.html timeless 16:44:37 paulc: we could do URL (webapps) in Extensions 16:44:41 ... other topics? 16:44:46 ... ok, i think we have an agenda 16:45:07 Topic: After HTML5 16:45:16 paulc: darobin, shall i give you the floor? 16:45:32 ... assume 1/2 the people know what you're talking about 16:45:38 darobin: hey, we finished HTML5, by the way 16:45:41 MikeSmith: Yay 16:45:42 http://darobin.github.io/after5/ 16:45:44 [ Applause ] 16:45:55 darobin: what's next, do we go home, and sip margaritas 16:45:59 ... or do we keep doing some work 16:46:04 ... not sure how much detail i should go 16:46:13 ... maybe highlights, and then deeper w/ Qs 16:46:32 ... rubys suggested "The best way to get the right answer on the Internet is not to ask a question, it's to post the wrong answer." 16:46:52 ... if you don't like it and don't speak up, it will become a decision 16:47:02 ... it would be wonderful to increase participation 16:47:09 ... the people who built the kittens... namely web developers 16:47:16 ... we built the technology 16:47:19 ... we should meet somewhere 16:47:33 ... editors would agree that the way we managed publication of HTML5 was painful 16:47:40 ... maybe learn from world of software development 16:47:45 wseltzer has joined #html-wg 16:47:46 ... Nightly version, stabilize 16:47:48 ... features 16:47:56 ... try to avoid 120,000 lines of code in a single file 16:48:12 ... orthoganalize features to make progress independently 16:48:12 xiaoqian has joined #html-wg 16:48:16 ... cut spec into smaller parts 16:48:18 ... ship them 16:48:22 ... focus on the bits 16:48:32 ... adopt classic open source process 16:48:35 ... pull request 16:48:40 ... so people can join in 16:48:45 ... not revolution 16:48:48 ... try to rationalize 16:48:55 ... no vibe of outrage at this point 16:48:58 paulc: some discussion here 16:49:04 ... WG would have to come to a decision about what it does 16:49:08 ... so, start w/ Qs 16:49:17 ... 1. what do we do w/ the 300 outstanding bugs? 16:49:22 darobin: good Q. triage them 16:49:35 ... i suspect quite a few have been fixed, but we haven't closed the bug yet 16:49:44 ... figure out which ones can be closed as Errata to HTML5 16:49:46 ... small bugs 16:49:54 ... maybe a shame to do Errata once we publish REC 16:49:59 ... but we have to, it's cycle of life 16:50:02 maheshkk has joined #html-wg 16:50:04 ... last batch, new work, new modules 16:50:11 ... for them, push to modules and focus on that 16:50:18 ... in some cases highlight what to work on 16:50:27 travis: under previous process 16:50:32 ... editors generated new content 16:50:35 ... fixed bugs in our component 16:50:41 ... we'd have bugs fixed by whatwg component 16:50:52 ... a large portion of our job was to synchronize 16:51:00 ... from shared source and push into our branch 16:51:04 ... under this after5 plan 16:51:14 ... what is the plan/philosophy to keep in sync/not-in-sync 16:51:21 darobin: you're an editor, what do you think? 16:51:29 travis: i'd love to see 16:51:33 ... probably not realistic 16:51:43 ... i'd love contributors from whatwg to participate in our process 16:51:46 ... pull requests 16:51:47 ... approved 16:51:52 ... short of that, i don't really know 16:51:58 paulc has joined #html-wg 16:52:08 ... i know we need to be sensisitive to their desires 16:52:11 q+ 16:52:19 ... if they're ok w/ pulling relevant content across or not 16:52:26 q+ 16:52:32 ack plh 16:52:35 plh: call a cat a cat 16:52:46 ... hixie has said he wanted w3c to stop copying his work 16:52:53 ... we agreed for the purpose of shipping html5 16:53:02 ... we looked at whatwg as submission to html5 spec 16:53:04 mjs has joined #html-wg 16:53:04 AndroUser2 has joined #html-wg 16:53:07 sunghan has joined #html-wg 16:53:07 ... html5 spec shipped 16:53:14 ... what do we do, he wants us to stop copying his work 16:53:15 ack MarkVickers 16:53:22 MarkVickers: i don't have an answer to that Q 16:53:29 Hitoshi_ has joined #html-wg 16:53:33 ... i think, the idea that this would be modular, able to react to submissions 16:53:39 ... is a much better way of going forward 16:53:53 ... i think a large document approach is difficult for people to track inside/outside 16:53:57 ... DataQ is hard 16:54:04 ... it doesn't mean anything, quite arbitrary 16:54:05 q+ 16:54:16 ... much better if you could look up where it is based on Tests/Implementation 16:54:17 q+ 16:54:24 ... i think better by 16:54:28 ... whatwg 16:54:35 ... I think the whatwg doesn't like the current structure 16:54:42 ... they did it to keep in sync 16:54:46 ... perhaps we should have a joint conversation 16:54:48 ack rubys 16:54:55 rubys: comment on the way i work 16:55:00 ... i don't work well on abstract things 16:55:03 ... you mentioned DataQ 16:55:14 ... what needs to be addressed in 3, 10, 12, 15 months 16:55:21 ... maybe it makes sense to work on small things 16:55:23 ... DataQ 16:55:30 ... and we look at a resync w/ whatwg in 2-5 years 16:55:31 ack paulc 16:55:43 paulc: darobin, your original proposal said break up this 1300 page document into modules 16:55:51 ... but as rubys implied, that's fairly abstract 16:55:56 ... can we talk about how we'd do that 16:56:03 ... rubys took MarkVickers 's suggestion 16:56:09 ... all the things we took out of for CR 16:56:12 ... "almost there" 16:56:25 ... but if we told Editorial staff to break it up into modules, what would you do? 16:56:28 darobin: 2 things 16:56:41 ... saner: focus on either things we cut out for CR / moved to 5.1 16:56:46 ... or things that need updates 16:56:50 ... SteveF's Area mapping 16:56:56 ... that would make sense to keep progressing 16:57:10 SteveF: Areas ... 16:57:24 ... i can't remember the number, ARIA native semantic buttons 16:57:31 ... map Areas of abstract mapping tool 16:57:36 ... that section 16:57:41 ... but there's a number of other sections 16:57:46 ... another, the alt= guidance 16:57:48 Travis has joined #html-wg 16:57:55 ... in a more general sense, conformance requirements, + authoring advice 16:58:02 ... but that covers a lot of the spec in discrete parts 16:58:02 q+ 16:58:08 ... i don't see how that would be excised out 16:58:15 paulc: ARIA Roles 16:58:16 ... containable 16:58:22 s/Areas/ARIA Roles/ 16:58:24 s/Areas/ARIA Roles/ 16:58:33 ... 3rd Guidance, spread through document 16:58:39 ... alt= guidance 16:58:52 ... TextPP has work that's about to be published as a note 16:58:57 ... is that containable? 16:58:59 astearns has joined #html-wg 16:59:04 SteveF: yes, that's containable, in a single section 16:59:10 paulc: the first two are examples 16:59:14 ... modules 16:59:18 ... but the third one? 16:59:23 darobin: i don't know about it... 16:59:27 ... we'd have to discuss 16:59:32 q+ 16:59:39 ... MikeSmith mentioned interleaving authoring conformance might not be a good idea 16:59:44 ... perhaps have a separate document 16:59:56 SteveF: i agree 17:00:03 ... it's unclear what the best path forward for it is 17:00:09 ... but we need to work out that path 17:00:13 ack Travis 17:00:21 Travis: rubys got me thinking a bit about a more practical route 17:00:23 ... thanks rubys 17:00:27 q+ 17:00:27 ... as i look back over those bugs 17:00:31 ... i recall one that jumped out at me 17:00:40 ... implement a true tri-state checkbox 17:00:46 ... not dual indeterminate 17:00:53 ... that sounds like a great thing to be as a module 17:00:56 ... hook it up 17:01:01 ... then i thought, if you do that w/ bugs 17:01:05 ... why not review what's in 5.1 17:01:08 ... diff against 5.0 17:01:13 ... look at things that are unique 17:01:21 ... review, see if they could be moved out as modules 17:01:24 http://www.w3.org/html/landscape/#differences-between-w3c-html-5.1-and-w3c-html-5.0 17:01:30 ... not spend the effort to rip the document apart 17:01:36 ... but work on the parts we want to progress 17:01:41 darobin: i think that makes sense 17:01:46 ... we had a session yesterday as a breakout 17:01:55 ... rubys suggested a continuously maintained 17:01:59 ... 5.0.1 spec 17:02:04 ... that shrinks as things move into modules 17:02:10 ... we don't need to cut everything out 17:02:21 q+ 17:02:22 ... maybe we don't need a new spec for

17:02:22 ...

s are a mess 17:02:30 paulc: are they as bad as ? 17:02:41 ... scale of 1.., how bad are s? 17:02:46 darobin: s are bad 17:02:50 ... most new types are unusable 17:03:00 ... developers scream, like 18:28:57 ... similarly, if you make a barchart, you'd be able to identify tick-marks, ranges, in ARIA 18:29:04 ... a taxonomy of data visualizations 18:29:14 ... SVG can draw anything, but we're talking about a taxonomy 18:29:15 mhakkinen_ has joined #html-wg 18:29:17 q? 18:29:23 ack SteveF 18:29:28 shepazu_ has joined #html-wg 18:29:28 SteveF: comment to SVG/PF/... 18:29:34 ... when we're discussing this stuff 18:29:40 ... if this is brought to html wg 18:29:42 mjs has joined #html-wg 18:29:49 ... i'd ask this be discussed on public-html@w3.org 18:29:57 ... rather than the TF list 18:30:04 ... the TF is a subset 18:30:14 ... but we want to draw as many experts as possibl 18:30:18 s/ibl/ible/ 18:30:22 Connectors are here... http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/connector/SVGConnector.html and http://tavmjong.free.fr/SVG/CONNECTORS/index.xhtml 18:30:25 ... but we want to draw people to it 18:30:41 janina: HTML A11y TF is not a TF at play 18:30:47 ... this is a new TF between PF+SVG 18:30:52 ... if we take all discussion to HTML list 18:30:58 ... if that's what you're discussing 18:31:16 SteveF: just use public-html@ not a11y list when you bring things to HTML 18:31:17 q? 18:31:18 ack Travis 18:31:27 Travis: we had a great meeting now that HTML5 is a REC 18:31:34 ... 1. taking a more modular approach 18:31:45 ... we welcome these contributions to the HTML family of language 18:31:56 ... but we probably wouldn't be in the core document 18:32:04 ... HTML's SVG is exclusively in the parser 18:32:06 q+ 18:32:15 ... the rest of it probably wouldn't have a relation to the document 18:32:19 ack shepazu_ 18:32:20 q+ 18:32:24 s/shepazu_/shepazu/G 18:32:33 shepazu_: there's another aspect of SVG/A11y 18:32:45 ... larger, how we integrate in 18:32:56 sunghan_ has joined #html-wg 18:32:58 kinjim has joined #html-wg 18:33:03 ... you can reference external an external .svg file w/ 18:33:10 ... is like but for graphics 18:33:37 marcjohlic has joined #html-wg 18:33:40 ... you might have , , 18:33:42 ... it's markup 18:33:46 ... just like 18:33:57 ... you can now include it inline in 18:34:06 ... right now, is treated as something very separate 18:34:17 ... and in has to be included in a wrapper called 18:34:27 sunghan__ has joined #html-wg 18:34:28 ... we'd like to see inside w/ a closer relation 18:34:37 ... many people who use HTML and SVG together would like to see that 18:34:44 ... SVG is often used w/ D3 18:34:49 s/foreignContent/foreignObject/ 18:35:02 paulc: where is that joining defined? 18:35:08 shepazu_: sort of defined 18:35:15 ... it doesn't cover sizings 18:35:26 ... but it needs more definition 18:35:31 paulc: where would that be done? 18:35:36 https://svgwg.org/specs/integration/ 18:35:38 shepazu_: we have a document called SVG Integration 18:36:04 i|where is that joining defined|-> http://d3js.org/ Data-Driven Documents| 18:36:28 shepazu_: , , css background:() 18:36:34 ... i used to have 18:36:41 ... it doesn't have 18:36:53 paulc: scroll up to top 18:36:58 ... FPWD from April 18:37:04 ... what impact does this have on HTML spec? 18:37:13 shepazu_: exclusively talking about SVG and its context 18:37:23 ... we're proposing that it would also cover inline svg 18:37:30 dirk: it doesn't right now 18:37:38 paulc: at that point, it would interact more w/ the current hook 18:37:46 marcjohlic_ has joined #html-wg 18:37:49 shepazu_: the current parser hook 18:37:56 ... we'd like to first class citizen 18:38:01 ... rather than have 18:38:07 s/ent/eign/ 18:38:12 ... we'd like to have 18:38:18 ... which would be an html root 18:38:20 jnurthen has joined #html-wg 18:38:25 ... inside that you could put html content 18:38:30 ... good idea? bad idea? 18:38:41 ... possibly having merging HTML/SVG 18:38:43 s/forentObject/foreignObject/ 18:38:59 paulc: if you're adding taxonomy to SVG 18:39:11 ... and create more increasing link 18:39:15 ... you'll inherit that 18:39:17 shepazu_: yes 18:39:22 q? 18:39:24 s|s/forentObject/foreignObject/|| 18:39:33 ack zcorpan_ 18:39:42 zcorpan_: Simon, KKW 18:39:45 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #html-wg 18:39:50 q+ 18:39:52 ... bring up a point Travis mentioned 18:40:01 ... new attribute/element affects parser 18:40:07 ... but it only applies if it has uppercase 18:40:16 ... if it's just lowercase, it doesn't affect the parser 18:40:20 Jingwang_qi has joined #html-wg 18:40:21 RRSAgent, draft minutes 18:40:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/30-html-wg-minutes.html timeless 18:40:41 shepazu_: and we will not use Uppercase 18:40:49 ... we'll lowercase everything from now on 18:40:52 ... we swear 18:40:58 [ he's lying ] 18:41:09 [ he's a werwolf ] 18:41:18 richardschwerdtfeger: we have declarative tabindex 18:41:20 ... sharing 18:41:23 s/we'd like to have /we'd like to have an element in SVG/ 18:41:23 ... more seemless 18:41:27 ... we have