14:15:31 RRSAgent has joined #socialig 14:15:31 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/10/22-socialig-irc 14:15:38 Zakim, this is SOCIG 14:15:38 sorry, harry, I do not see a conference named 'SOCIG' in progress or scheduled at this time 15:44:34 jasnell has joined #socialig 15:44:54 harry has joined #socialig 15:46:21 AdamB has joined #socialig 15:46:41 MarkCrawford has joined #socialig 15:53:32 Lloyd_Fassett has joined #socialig 15:53:40 Harry - I double checked and we do have the Zakim bridge every Wednesday from 12 to 1. However, at the moment I am getting an invalid passcode. 15:54:07 Weird. What passcode did you try? 15:54:58 76244# 15:55:31 I have been on hold for an operator for the last 5 minutes 15:56:12 trackbot, start meeting 15:56:12 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 15:58:40 It might not let you in until the telecon starts 15:58:44 Tracker, this is SOCIG 15:58:49 tracker, this will be SOCIG 15:58:57 Zakim, this will be SOCIG 15:58:57 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, harry 16:01:01 My email from Maria indicated that we had this every week.and I checked the calendar and it shows us as meeting 16:01:24 Lloyd_Fassett_ has joined #socialig 16:02:06 yes, my impression as well 16:02:14 am checking with admin/systems team now 16:02:21 Lloyd_Fassett_ has joined #socialig 16:02:34 shall we switch voice to my SAP number? 16:02:42 AnnBassetti has joined #socialig 16:03:29 Yes, this is really weird 16:03:35 We may have to - can you set it up 16:03:36 ? 16:03:46 OK. Sending an email to the list now with the call details. 16:04:10 Participant Passcode: 439 288 5451 16:04:37 is that the passcode or the phone num? 16:04:40 us 1-866 312-7353 16:05:24 +44 20 3364 5639 16:05:32 Lloyd_Fassett_ has joined #socialig 16:05:41 I'm hearing music Mark 16:05:49 means your in the right place :) 16:05:52 i am too 16:05:52 I'm in .. music too 16:05:58 ok, ping me when you are ready 16:06:07 bridge opened 16:06:38 Arnaud has joined #socialig 16:08:03 I'm in now too 16:08:52 zakim in limbo? 16:09:07 RRSAgent, generate minutes 16:09:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/22-socialig-minutes.html harry 16:09:08 chair: MarkC 16:09:19 scribe: AnnBassetti (in a minute) 16:09:48 Arnaud do you have the call in information? It was e-mailed. 16:09:48 Scribenick: harry 16:10:11 got it, thanks 16:10:59 rollcall: Anne, AdamB, MarkC, Arnaud, Lloyd, James 16:11:26 Minutes from last meeting: 16:11:33 [I'll track them down] 16:12:12 Link to Use Case list: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF/Social_Data_Syntax/Profile_Scenarios 16:13:48 does the wiki need to be updated to link to the latest minutes? 16:13:53 Minutes approved 16:14:03 [if you can do that real quick AdamB, that would be great] 16:14:08 topic: TPAC 16:14:36 s/Anne, Adam/Ann, Adam/ 16:14:37 AnnBassetti meant to say: I'm in .. music too 16:14:50 10-11 on Tuesday 16:14:51 I added a countdown for 10/28 12:00am (#5528) 16:16:39 Scribenick: AnnBassetti 16:16:49 I think 10-11 sounds good 16:17:07 Larry Hawes is not on the call 16:17:20 Mark: next Tuesday, at TPAC, we're slated to present 16:17:39 ... to present use cases to Social Web WG 16:17:47 ... 10:00-11:00 16:18:05 Arnaud: the WG is meeting on Mon / Tues 16:18:15 ... IG not formally scheduled to meet 16:18:22 .. at TPAC 16:18:29 ... mostly same people 16:18:56 MarkC: yes, mostly the same, but diffs in who's a W3C member 16:19:20 Harry: also, membership (in WG / IG) will likely change over time 16:19:58 MarkC: mostly an issue of Intellectual Property .. members must make IP commitments; non-members (who are limited to Interest Group) are not 16:20:13 believe i've added link to Oct 01 minutes to wiki 16:20:26 ... clarifying that participants who are IG-only participants, are invited to sit in on WG meeting at TPAC 16:20:51 ... IF there is interest and people can attend, MarkC volunteers to lead an informal IG meeting 16:21:35 best time seems to be Friday, for IG meeting 16:22:24 Harry: bigger rooms are all filled; but we can find informal space 16:22:41 scribenick: harry 16:22:42 MarkC: will send out mail to find out who's avail 16:22:58 Lloyd: I will be leaving Thursday 16:24:05 Harry: IG Members can attend and the WG meetings at TPAC. 16:24:28 Only issue would be concerns if substantial techncial points were made that effected implementations 16:24:52 but use-case and vocabulary discussions, being in remit of IG, would be welcome throughout both Monday and Tuesday 16:25:00 MarkC: Monday discussion summary? 16:25:02 MarkC: Status of the Use Cases. Who can update us from the Monday call? 16:26:08 AdamB: Ann, Adam and Elf wen through the use cases. They talked about other use cases and actions looking for inspiration to write a new use case. Adam discussed a Q&A use case. 16:27:21 MarkC: Adam, do we know where we have related use cases . Several weeks ago we had agreed to a template for Use Cases. Are they in the wiki? 16:27:44 Adam: many of the use cases needed to be broken out into that template separately 16:28:43 AdamB: Are we supposed to be looking at Profile? Most are around that? 16:28:58 MarkC: No, the use case can be anything. There are no limitations. 16:29:59 We need to use the template to create a W3C report. 16:31:20 http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF/Social_Data_Syntax/Profile_Scenarios 16:31:47 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF 16:33:29 +q 16:34:41 Arnaud: The WG does not have use case requirements. The IG does not have limitations the scope of the Use Cases. We can suggest which ones are in scope. The WG is free to accept it, or filter it and select parts...that's up to the WG. 16:34:58 +q 16:35:08 ack 16:35:12 ack Arnaud 16:36:15 Lloyd: attended some WG meetings 16:37:30 ... a question about what Boeing is doing with Activity Streams 16:37:47 Adam: we're using SIOC and FOAF in our social tool, 16:38:05 ... have mocked up Activity Streams format, but not deployed 16:38:53 that is, if you guys can go public with everything. 16:39:02 EdKatFord has joined #socialig 16:39:43 there has been limited utilization of the SIOC and FOAF to date 16:40:26 Lloyd, Harry: would be valuable if Ann and Adam could document our real-life experience with social tool at Boeing 16:40:40 ... could we document our Q&A tool? 16:40:44 Adam: yes 16:41:24 Harry: please document what we need for profile federation between tools (e.g., our social tool, plus SharePoint or other commercial tools) 16:41:55 : how does Boeing handle declaration of skills? 16:42:16 Adam: various mechanisms .. self-declared and formal 16:42:32 makes sense MarkCrawford 16:42:56 MarkC: need to back off from drilling down on specific implementations; need to make sure we've captured what we need for TPAC meetings next week 16:43:03 ... need to figure out how to present 16:43:29 ... asking Arnaud how we should present? 16:43:56 Arnaud: first, give overview of what IG has done 16:44:09 q+ 16:44:42 Q- 16:45:32 AdamB: how should we optimize our time before TPAC? ... fill in gaps in Use Cases, or formalize the format? 16:45:57 MarkC: 16:46:50 ... will reach out to Larry Hawes to see if he's got time to put together what we'll present to WG 16:47:13 ... if he's not available, MarkC will make a straw horse 16:47:42 q+ 16:47:43 ... everyone should add focus areas and any other info to the wiki 16:47:49 ... the more the better! 16:47:53 +1 on that approach 16:47:59 +1 16:48:31 Lloyd: if we're adding more, both our use cases and links to the preceding work 16:48:36 q- 16:48:47 ... might be helpful to make a chart illustrating relationships 16:50:49 q- 16:50:53 I'm still confused about which wiki page is for the use cases 16:51:06 I find: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF 16:51:19 and I find: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF/Social_Data_Syntax/Profile_Scenarios 16:51:42 the second link is a child page to the first link 16:52:13 all the task forces are listed on the main IG page: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig 16:52:20 in the first link is an area called Use Case Collection by Facus Area 16:52:41 s/Facus/Focus 16:52:42 AnnBassetti meant to say: and I find: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF/Social_Data_Syntax/Profile_Scenarios 16:52:45 which is where you find the link to the social data syntax page 16:53:53 this page: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig has a link to: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF which has a link to: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF/Social_Data_Syntax 16:56:01 (still trying to figure out which Use Case wiki page is the main one> 16:56:25 ACTIONS: Mark will try to clean up wiki 16:56:50 ACTION: Mark will contact Larry Hawes to see if he's avail to present to WG at TPAC 16:56:50 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 16:57:07 ACTION: to all, add more use cases and flesh them out 16:57:07 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 16:58:18 Ann: how are we going to handle all the preceding UseCase work 16:58:41 ... from earlier 2 groups (incubator, etc) 16:59:42 16:59:52 ACTION: Lloyd to see if categorization for use cases could be useful guide to Types of Use Cases 16:59:52 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 17:00:04 Scribenick: harry 17:00:16 EdKatFord: I've moved some of the XG use-cases over, going through them now 17:00:39 Lloyd: Meeting again? 17:00:45 MarkC: We can try to gather Monday 17:00:50 ... probably not time for another telecon 17:01:00 ... need to finalize what we want to do on Tuesday 17:01:00 I added a countdown for 10/28 12:00am (#5529) 17:01:07 Lloyd: +1 17:01:15 Meeting adjourned. 17:01:24 RRSAgent, minutes 17:01:24 I'm logging. I don't understand 'minutes', harry. Try /msg RRSAgent help 17:01:30 RRSAgent, generate minutes 17:01:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/22-socialig-minutes.html harry 17:02:33 RRSAgent, make logs public 17:02:39 thanks Ann and Harry for scribing and all for participating 17:06:00 see everyone at TPAC!! 17:24:59 Arnaud has left #socialig 18:03:35 harry has joined #socialig 19:00:58 Zakim has left #socialig 19:46:26 harry has joined #socialig 21:00:24 harry has joined #socialig