13:58:09 RRSAgent has joined #shapes 13:58:09 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/10/22-shapes-irc 13:58:11 RRSAgent, make logs 252 13:58:11 Zakim has joined #shapes 13:58:13 Zakim, this will be 13:58:13 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 13:58:14 Meeting: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Teleconference 13:58:14 Date: 22 October 2014 13:58:24 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:58:44 zakim this is shapes 13:58:50 zakim, this is shapes 13:58:52 ok, Arnaud; that matches DATA_RDFWG()10:00AM 13:58:59 DavidM has joined #shapes 13:59:00 +[IPcaller] 13:59:11 +??P5 13:59:30 pfps has joined #shapes 13:59:41 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:59:41 On the phone I see ??P0, SumitPurohit, [IPcaller], ??P5 13:59:53 zakim, ??P0 is me 13:59:53 +simonstey; got it 14:00:11 + +1.408.243.aaaa 14:00:15 Zakim, ??p5 is me 14:00:15 +hknublau; got it 14:00:26 +Arnaud 14:00:31 ocorby has joined #shapes 14:00:52 + +1.919.977.aabb 14:01:17 Actually I may be the [IPcaller] 14:01:58 zakim, aaaa is DavidM 14:01:58 +DavidM; got it 14:02:01 I'm not sure which I am, either IPcaller or ??P5 14:02:06 + +33.4.92.96.aacc 14:02:20 +ericP 14:02:22 zakim, aabb is ralphtq 14:02:22 +ralphtq; got it 14:02:31 I'm trying the mute trick, but it doesn't appear to be working 14:02:39 zakim, aacc is ocoby 14:02:39 +ocoby; got it 14:02:54 zakim, aacc is ocorby 14:02:55 sorry, ocorby, I do not recognize a party named 'aacc' 14:03:14 Zakim, ocoby is really ocorby 14:03:14 +ocorby; got it 14:03:25 zakim, who's on the phone? 14:03:25 On the phone I see simonstey, SumitPurohit, [IPcaller], hknublau, DavidM, Arnaud, ralphtq, ocorby, ericP 14:03:28 -hknublau 14:03:53 +??P5 14:04:01 zakim, ??P5 is me 14:04:01 +pfps; got it 14:04:09 zakim, who's on the phone? 14:04:09 On the phone I see simonstey, SumitPurohit, [IPcaller], DavidM, Arnaud, ralphtq, ocorby, ericP, pfps 14:05:24 Holger, you can make your IRC name be different from your W3C name 14:05:29 zakim, IPCaller is hknublau 14:05:29 +hknublau; got it 14:05:41 zakim, who's on the phone? 14:05:41 On the phone I see simonstey, SumitPurohit, hknublau, DavidM, Arnaud, ralphtq, ocorby, ericP, pfps 14:05:47 Someone else made me be Holger :-( I dropped and came back to fix the problem 14:06:14 @pfps sorry my mistake 14:06:43 zakim, pick a victim 14:06:43 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose ralphtq 14:07:06 I have to drop in about 40min to get back to ISWC 14:07:29 zakim, pick a victim 14:07:29 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose hknublau 14:07:52 http://www.w3.org/2009/CommonScribe/manual 14:08:18 erikP: hello 14:08:31 ... blah blah blah 14:09:52 scribe: ralphtq 14:09:55 Arnauld: case sensitive? 14:09:58 @@1: if you don't know who's speaking, you can just make up some string and someone can fix it 14:10:00 ... no 14:10:05 chair: Arnaud 14:10:07 s/@@1/Arnaud/ 14:10:14 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2014.10.22 14:10:59 Arnauld: two late registrants 14:11:01 topic: TPAC F2F 14:11:04 https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/F2F1 14:11:46 .. who else is playing to come? 14:12:43 ... remote partipcants must login and enter info on that page 14:13:50 ... no meeting room number yet 14:13:58 ... look for it on this page 14:14:28 David Martin and I will be the hosts at Nuance 14:14:28 ... Marriott Santa Clara Thursday, different venue for Froday 14:15:49 ... break from 11am to 3pm to encourage networking and cross-fertilization - should we follow this schedule? 14:16:13 ... Thursday maybe, Friday? 14:16:45 ... AC Rep meetings also happening 14:17:30 ... question for all of us 14:17:48 ... option 1: attend, option 2: ignore 14:17:48 +q 14:17:59 ack SumitPurohit 14:18:04 I will be Nuance's AC rep at TPAC, but I don't see much of interest to Nuance on Thursday 14:18:54 i know that axel is in the AC but i dont know whether or not he will attend the ac meeting 14:18:59 i'm available remotly 14:20:17 arnuld: coffee break is 3:30 - this would mean we break at 11 and reconvene at 3:30 - not so good 14:20:27 +q 14:20:32 ack ralphtq 14:20:48 s/arnuld/arnaud/ 14:21:50 +1 14:21:51 arnaud: should we keep the breakouts? 14:22:36 ... no AC meetings - full day - decision 14:23:27 ... let's talk about the meeting now - agenda - how we organize 14:24:15 ... Eric to do an intro - landscape - use cases and requirements 14:24:30 ... cover DC work 14:25:04 ... during this we would be in "listen-only" + clarification mode 14:25:16 ... maybe 40mins 14:25:27 ... then explore issues 14:25:59 ... identify issues and record 14:26:36 ... surface missing use cases 14:27:13 ... grouping has already started 14:27:41 ... goal to be (1) better sense of use cases and requirements 14:28:13 ... also (2) get to know each other and have a common language 14:28:20 +1 for the idea 14:28:34 q+ 14:29:28 ... Eric's presentation might mean that others can present on the second day 14:29:41 ack pfps 14:29:43 hold on 14:30:37 pfps: if people will present info on technical solutions, would like to have concise info ahead of meeting 14:30:46 ... ideally now 14:31:00 ... I have this ready now 14:31:02 -ocorby 14:31:52 arnaud: desirable but can we make it mandatable 14:32:10 who is speaking? 14:32:17 +karima 14:32:28 -ericP 14:32:55 sumitpurohit: spoke - [failed to capture his input] 14:33:10 +ericP 14:33:54 pfps: SPIN and SHex adaquate 14:34:04 ... documentation that is 14:34:17 SumitPurohit: agrees with Peter about getting some pointers about the technical presentations. 14:35:14 arnaud: 4 technologies we are considering: SPIN, SHex, Resource Shapes and ... 14:35:33 Suggested reading on SPIN: http://spinrdf.org/spinsquare.html 14:35:46 pfps: yes but we need some orientation on how to read 14:36:14 arnaud: happy to list resource section for meeting 14:36:49 it's the best of all possible worlds (that is, of course, not to say that it is good :-) 14:36:55 +1 agenda (so far) 14:37:02 +1 14:37:05 ... precise agenda is hard - we are early in the process 14:37:36 ... enough on ahenda 14:37:55 ... next 20 mins - use cases and requirements? 14:38:16 topic: Use cases & Requirements 14:38:31 topic: Use Cases and requirements 14:38:42 -> http://www.w3.org/2014/10/rdfvalreqs/#+small UC "small" 14:38:48 ericp: I have done the following 14:38:59 ... at the URL above 14:39:04 Hierarchical View of Dublin Core Requirements for RDF Validation 14:39:04 Hierarchical View of Dublin Core Requirements for RDF Validation 14:39:53 yes 14:40:05 ericp: Can everyone see document 14:40:10 ... yes 14:41:06 yes 14:41:06 ... DC reqs under DCAP heading 14:41:09 yes 14:41:47 ... tabs organize the groups 14:42:05 ... button for new ones 14:42:25 ... small is ~26 reqs 14:42:52 ... high level are common ones 14:43:16 ... yellow stuff points to DC database 14:43:35 ... maybe we can approve small 14:43:50 ... should I go through the categories? 14:44:03 arnaud: would like to confirm approach 14:44:30 ericp: for missing issues - click on DB - maybe some should be in small 14:44:51 ... missing issues -> missing use cases 14:46:04 ericp: i'll walk through the groupings 14:47:56 ... expressivity has code samples 14:51:16 ... finally implementabiliy - re: validation 14:51:49 arnuad: core might be better name than small 14:52:12 ... I'd like to ask if this organization makes sense 14:52:22 -pfps 14:53:21 sumitpurohit: question - when you say schemas are not ontologies, what do you mean? 14:54:17 ericp: we can have our own schema separate from the original ontology 14:54:56 pfps: schema is what works on other domains 14:55:18 +q 14:56:04 ralphtq: just like architecture schema will need a prefix - interface schema, validation schema, .... 14:56:20 ack ralphtq 14:57:07 :D 14:57:34 arnaud: seems we are all ok with the approach 14:57:56 ... encourage people to give input 14:58:21 ... what are we missing - have we characterized things the right way 14:59:15 Thank you all 14:59:19 ... we'll close now 14:59:28 ... thanks to all 15:00:09 -ericP 15:00:11 -hknublau 15:00:12 -simonstey 15:00:12 -DavidM 15:00:13 ... meeting closed 15:00:13 -Arnaud 15:00:14 -SumitPurohit 15:00:18 -karima 15:00:23 -ralphtq 15:00:25 trackbot, end meeting 15:00:25 Zakim, list attendees 15:00:25 As of this point the attendees have been SumitPurohit, simonstey, +1.408.243.aaaa, hknublau, Arnaud, +1.919.977.aabb, DavidM, +33.4.92.96.aacc, ericP, ralphtq, ocorby, pfps, karima 15:00:33 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:00:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/10/22-shapes-minutes.html trackbot 15:00:34 RRSAgent, bye 15:00:34 I see no action items